2.Clinical cases of implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis using modified lingual screw system (T-screw system).
Tae Young HONG ; Man Yong KIM ; Joon Ho YOON
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2016;54(4):423-430
The implant prosthesis can be divided into the screw retained prosthesis and cement retained prosthesis. Each type has advantages as well as disadvantages which is unfavorable to maintain the implants. To overcome these drawbacks, T-screw system was developed. T-screw system which utilizes a lingual direction of the screw to retain the implant prosthesis, has advantages of retrievability of the prosthesis, passive fit, and possibility to form esthetic and functional occlusal surface. The prior prosthesis which utilized horizontal screws had difficulty in fabrication especially in the case of multiple units, and also limited use with all-ceramic prosthesis. In this case, fabricating the implant prosthesis by using the T-screw system showed superior results in easy maintenance, esthetics, and also functions. In addition, we are to report the method of using the T-screw system in implant prosthesis, such as multiple units of implant prosthesis and all ceramic prosthesis.
Ceramics
;
Dental Implants
;
Dental Prosthesis*
;
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
;
Dental Restoration Failure
;
Dental Restoration Repair
;
Esthetics
;
Methods
;
Peri-Implantitis
;
Prostheses and Implants
3.Number of implants for mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review.
Jeong Yol LEE ; Ha Young KIM ; Sang Wan SHIN ; S Ross BRYANT
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2012;4(4):204-209
PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review is to address treatment outcomes of Mandibular implant overdentures relative to implant survival rate, maintenance and complications, and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted by a PubMed search strategy and hand-searching of relevant journals from included studies. Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) and comparative clinical trial studies on mandibular implant overdentures until August, 2010 were selected. Eleven studies from 1098 studies were finally selected and data were analyzed relative to number of implants. RESULTS: Six studies presented the data of the implant survival rate which ranged from 95% to 100% for 2 and 4 implant group and from 81.8% to 96.1% for 1 and 2 implant group. One study, which statistically compared implant survival rate showed no significant differences relative to the number of implants. The most common type of prosthetic maintenance and complications were replacement or reattaching of loose clips for 2 and 4 implant group, and denture repair due to the fracture around an implant for 1 and 2 implant groups. Most studies showed no significant differences in the rate of prosthetic maintenance and complication, and patient satisfaction regardless the number of implants. CONCLUSION: The implant survival rate of mandibular overdentures is high regardless of the number of implants. Denture maintenance is likely not inflenced substantially by the number of implants and patient satisfaction is typically high again regardless os the number of implants.
Dental Implants
;
Denture Repair
;
Denture, Overlay
;
Dentures
;
Humans
;
Mandibular Prosthesis
;
Patient Satisfaction
;
Survival Rate