1.Maximal cytoreductive effort in epithelial ovarian cancer surgery.
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2010;21(2):75-80
The surgical management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer involves cytoreduction, or removal of grossly-evident tumor. Residual disease after surgical cytoreduction of ovarian cancer has been shown to be strongly associated with survival. The goal of surgery is "optimal" surgical cytoreduction, which is generally defined as residual disease of 1 cm or less. However, the designation of "optimal" surgical cytoreduction has evolved to include maximal surgical effort and no gross residual disease. In order to achieve this, more aggressive surgical procedures such as rectosigmoidectomy, diaphragm peritonectomy, partial liver resection, and video-assisted thoracic surgery are reported and increasingly utilized in the surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer. The role of maximal surgical effort also extends to the recurrent setting where the goal of surgery should be complete cytoreduction. Patient selection is important in identifying appropriate candidates for surgical cytoreduction in the recurrent setting. The purpose of this article is to review the role of maximum surgical effort in primary and recurrent ovarian cancer.
Diaphragm
;
Liver
;
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
;
Ovarian Neoplasms
;
Patient Selection
;
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
4.An overview of the current debate between using minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for interval cytoreductive surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2023;34(5):e84-
The standard of care for treatment of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is primarily surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy, with the operative goal to achieve complete gross resection. Cytoreductive surgeries for epithelial ovarian cancer historically were performed via open laparotomy; however, as minimally invasive techniques became more widely accepted within gynecologic oncology, interest in employing this approach in the setting of cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer has grown. The purpose of this review was to examine the current debate between the use of minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy as an approach to interval cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. While numerous retrospective and feasibility studies have found comparable outcomes with respect to complete gross residual disease, progression-free survival, and overall survival between minimally invasive and laparotomy approaches to interval cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer, methodological challenges limit the utility of these data. Given potential risks of underestimating disease burden and failing to achieve complete resection using a minimally invasive approach, further rigorous studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in this setting and to better define the subset of patients who would receive the greatest benefit from a minimally invasive approach.
5.Role of aggressive surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer.
Suk Joon CHANG ; Robert E BRISTOW ; Dennis S CHI ; William A CLIBY
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2015;26(4):336-342
Ovarian cancer is the eighth most frequent cancer in women and is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy worldwide. The majority of ovarian cancer patients are newly diagnosed presenting with advanced-stage disease. Primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant taxane- and platinum-based combination chemotherapy are the standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. A number of studies have consistently shown that successful cytoreductive surgery and the resultant minimal residual disease are significantly associated with survival in patients with this disease. Much has been written and even more debated regarding the competing perspectives of biology of ovarian cancer versus the value of aggressive surgical resection. This review will focus on the current evidences and outcomes supporting the positive impact of aggressive surgical effort on survival in the primary management of ovarian cancer.
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/*methods
;
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Neoplasm, Residual/surgery
;
Observer Variation
;
Ovarian Neoplasms/*surgery
;
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
;
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
;
Retrospective Studies
6.Thoracic metastasis in advanced ovarian cancer: comparison between computed tomography and video-assisted thoracic surgery.
Oleg MIRONOV ; Evis SALA ; Svetlana MIRONOV ; Harpreet PANNU ; Dennis S CHI ; Hedvig HRICAK
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2011;22(4):260-268
OBJECTIVE: To determine which computed tomography (CT) imaging features predict pleural malignancy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) using video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), pathology, and cytology findings as the reference standard. METHODS: This retrospective study included 44 patients with International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage III or IV primary or recurrent EOC who had chest CT < or =30 days before VATS. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CT studies and recorded the presence and size of pleural effusions and of ascites; pleural nodules, thickening, enhancement, subdiaphragmatic tumour deposits and supradiaphragmatic, mediastinal, hilar, and retroperitoneal adenopathy; and peritoneal seeding. VATS, pathology, and cytology findings constituted the reference standard. RESULTS: In 26/44 (59%) patients, pleural biopsies were malignant. Only the size of left-sided pleural effusion (reader 1: rho=-0.39, p=0.01; reader 2: rho=-0.37, p=0.01) and presence of ascites (reader 1: rho=-0.33, p=0.03; reader 2: rho=-0.35, p=0.03) were significantly associated with solid pleural metastasis. Pleural fluid cytology was malignant in 26/35 (74%) patients. Only the presence (p=0.03 for both readers) and size (reader 1: rho=0.34, p=0.04; reader 2: rho=0.33, p=0.06) of right-sided pleural effusion were associated with malignant pleural effusion. Interobserver agreement was substantial (kappa=0.78) for effusion size and moderate (kappa=0.46) for presence of solid pleural disease. No other CT features were associated with malignancy at biopsy or cytology. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced EOC, ascites and left-sided pleural effusion size were associated with solid pleural metastasis, while the presence and size of right-sided effusion were associated with malignant pleural effusion. No other CT features evaluated were associated with pleural malignancy.
Ascites
;
Biopsy
;
Gynecology
;
Humans
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Obstetrics
;
Ovarian Neoplasms
;
Pleural Diseases
;
Pleural Effusion
;
Pleural Effusion, Malignant
;
Pleural Neoplasms
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Seeds
;
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
;
Thorax
8.Characteristics and survival of ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy but not undergoing interval debulking surgery
Ying L LIU ; Olga T FILIPPOVA ; Qin ZHOU ; Alexia IASONOS ; Dennis S CHI ; Oliver ZIVANOVIC ; Yukio SONODA ; Ginger J GARDNER ; Vance A BROACH ; Roisin E O'CEARBHAILL ; Jason A KONNER ; Carol AGHAJANIAN ; Kara LONG ROCHE ; William P TEW
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2020;31(1):17-
9.Characteristics and survival of ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy but not undergoing interval debulking surgery
Ying LIU ; Olga t FILIPPOVA ; Qin ZHOU ; Alexia IASONOS ; Dennis s CHI ; Oliver ZIVANOVIC ; Yukio SONODA ; Ginger j GARDNER ; Vance a BROACH ; Roisin e O'CEARBHAILL ; Jason a KONNER ; Carol AGHAJANIAN ; Kara LONG ROCHE ; William p TEW
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2020;31(1):e17-
OBJECTIVE:
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) confers similar outcomes as primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy. Little is known about patients who receive NACT but do not undergo debulking surgery. Our aim was to characterize these patients.
METHODS:
We prospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer treated with NACT from 7/1/15–12/1/17. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare clinical characteristics by surgical status. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival outcomes. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to assess the relationship of covariates to outcome, and time-dependent covariates were applied to variables collected after diagnosis.
RESULTS:
Of 224 women who received NACT, 162 (72%) underwent IDS and 62 (28%) did not undergo surgery. The non-surgical group was older (p<0.001), had higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI; p<0.001), lower albumin levels (p=0.007), lower Karnofsky performance scores (p<0.001), and were more likely to have dose reductions in NACT (p<0.001). Reasons for no surgery included poor response to NACT (39%), death (15%), comorbidities (24%), patient preference (16%), and loss to follow-up (6%). The no surgery group had significantly worse overall survival (OS) than the surgery group (hazard ratio=3.34; 95% confidence interval=1.66–6.72; p<0.001), after adjustment for age, CCI, and dose reductions.
CONCLUSIONS
A significant proportion of women treated with NACT do not undergo IDS, and these women are older, frailer, and have worse OS. More studies are needed to find optimal therapies to maximize outcomes in this high-risk, elderly population.
10.Characteristics and survival of ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy but not undergoing interval debulking surgery
Ying LIU ; Olga t FILIPPOVA ; Qin ZHOU ; Alexia IASONOS ; Dennis s CHI ; Oliver ZIVANOVIC ; Yukio SONODA ; Ginger j GARDNER ; Vance a BROACH ; Roisin e O'CEARBHAILL ; Jason a KONNER ; Carol AGHAJANIAN ; Kara LONG ROCHE ; William p TEW
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2020;31(1):e17-
OBJECTIVE:
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) confers similar outcomes as primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy. Little is known about patients who receive NACT but do not undergo debulking surgery. Our aim was to characterize these patients.
METHODS:
We prospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer treated with NACT from 7/1/15–12/1/17. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare clinical characteristics by surgical status. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival outcomes. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to assess the relationship of covariates to outcome, and time-dependent covariates were applied to variables collected after diagnosis.
RESULTS:
Of 224 women who received NACT, 162 (72%) underwent IDS and 62 (28%) did not undergo surgery. The non-surgical group was older (p<0.001), had higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI; p<0.001), lower albumin levels (p=0.007), lower Karnofsky performance scores (p<0.001), and were more likely to have dose reductions in NACT (p<0.001). Reasons for no surgery included poor response to NACT (39%), death (15%), comorbidities (24%), patient preference (16%), and loss to follow-up (6%). The no surgery group had significantly worse overall survival (OS) than the surgery group (hazard ratio=3.34; 95% confidence interval=1.66–6.72; p<0.001), after adjustment for age, CCI, and dose reductions.
CONCLUSIONS
A significant proportion of women treated with NACT do not undergo IDS, and these women are older, frailer, and have worse OS. More studies are needed to find optimal therapies to maximize outcomes in this high-risk, elderly population.