1.Current Trends in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery.
Dennis J LEE ; Philip H KIM ; Chester J KOH
Korean Journal of Urology 2010;51(2):80-87
Over the past two decades, laparoscopic and robotic surgery in children has been described as a viable minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for many pediatric urologic conditions. With the goal of reducing the morbidity associated with open surgery, minimally invasive surgery in children is increasingly being performed as laparoscopic and robotic patients appear to be experiencing shorter hospital stays, decreased pain medication requirements, and the potential for improved cosmesis. This article provides an overview of the existing literature in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery in children. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery appears to be safe and effective in children for a wide range of ablative and reconstructive procedures. Conventional laparoscopic surgery is effective for ablative procedures, while robotic surgery may be ideally suited for reconstructive cases requiring advanced suturing and dissection. Overall, more prospective studies are needed to study the long-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery in pediatric patients, and the appropriate use of the available technology.
Child
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopy
;
Length of Stay
;
Pediatrics
;
Robotics
;
Urology
2.Is the Apprehension Test Sufficient for the Diagnosis of Anterior Shoulder Instability in Young Patients without Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)?
Krishna KUMAR ; Milindu MAKANDURA ; Nicholas J J LEONG ; Louise GARTNER ; Chin Hwee LEE ; Dennis Z W NG ; Chyn Hong TAN ; V Prem KUMAR
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2015;44(5):178-184
INTRODUCTIONThe purpose of this study is to compare the sensitivities and positive predictive values (PPV) of the anterior apprehension test and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of anterior labral tears in young patients with shoulder instability and to determine if surgery could be carried out without this investigation in selected patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODSWe undertook a retrospective study of 168 patients aged between 15 and 30 years with a history of shoulder dislocation and compared the sensitivities and the PPV of the apprehension test with both MRI and magnetic resonance arthrograms (MRA) in the diagnosis of a Bankart lesion. The radiological investigations were interpreted by general practice radiologists and specialised musculoskeletal radiologists. All patients had their diagnosis confirmed by shoulder arthroscopy.
RESULTSOur results showed that the apprehension test was highly reliable when it was positive with a PPV of 96%. It was more sensitive than MRI in the diagnosis of a Bankart lesion. The clinical test was significantly better when a musculoskeletal radiologist interpreted the MRI. The MRA interpreted by a musculoskeletal radiologist had the highest rates of sensitivity in detecting Bankart lesions. The figure was similar to that for the apprehension test. There was no difference in the PPVs among the clinical test, the MRI and the MRA read by the 2 categories of radiologists.
CONCLUSIONWe conclude that a routine MRI may be unnecessary in evaluating a young patient with clinically evident anterior shoulder instability if the apprehension test is positive. A MRA that can be interpreted by a musculoskeletal radiologist will be the next best investigation if the clinical test is negative or equivocal.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Arthroscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Joint Instability ; diagnosis ; etiology ; surgery ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Physical Examination ; methods ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Shoulder Dislocation ; complications ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Shoulder Joint ; surgery ; Young Adult