Objective:To investigate the expression of long non-coding RNA(lncRNA) ZFP36-AS1 in bladder cancer and the effect of ZFP36-AS1/miR-221 axis on the proliferation and immune escape of bladder cancer cells.Methods:The expression difference of ZFP36-AS1 in bladder cancer tissues was analyzed by cBioPortal database. Real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to analyze the expression difference of ZFP36-AS1 in bladder cancer cell lines (J82, RT-4, MGH-U3, 5637). MGH-U3 cells were randomly divided into negative control (NC) group and ZFP36-AS1 group, which were transfected with pcDNA3.1-NC plasmid and pcDNA3.1-ZFP36-AS1 plasmid, respectively. Colony formation assay and flow cytometry were used to analyze the proliferation activity and cell cycle of MGH-U3 cells, respectively. T lymphocytes were co-cultured with MGH-U3 cells in each group, and the levels of interleukin-10 (IL-10), γ-interferon (IFN-γ), and interleukin-4 (IL-4) in the supernatants of each group were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The dual-luciferase reporter gene assay verified the targeting relationship between ZFP36-AS1 and miR-221. The effect of ZFP36-AS1 on the expression of miR-221 in MGH-U3 cells was detected by RT-qPCR. Western blotting was used to detect the effect of ZFP36-AS1/miR-221 axis on the protein expression of CDK3, Cyclin C, CDK5, Cyclin D1 and Cyclin D3 in MGH-U3 cells.Results:Compared with normal bladder tissue, ZFP36-AS1 was abnormally low-expressed in bladder cancer tissue ( P<0.01). Compared with SV-HUC-1 cells, ZFP36-AS1 was abnormally low-expressed in bladder cancer cell lines (J82, RT-4, MGH-U3, 5637) ( P<0.01), and the expression was lowest in MGH-U3 cells ( P<0.01). The number of MGH-U3 cell colonies formed in the NC group and the ZFP36-AS1 group were (220.80±34.65) and (77.84±19.11), respectively, and the number of MGH-U3 cell colonies formed in the ZFP36-AS1 group was significantly down-regulated, the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.01). The proportions of G 0/G 1 phase cells in NC group and ZFP36-AS1 group were (48.04±2.89)% and (72.89±3.46)%, respectively, and the proportion of S phase cells were (35.38±2.98)% and (20.62±2.56)%, respectively. The proportion of G 2/M stage cells was (16.59±1.46)% and (6.48±1.50)%, respectively. The proportion of cells in G 0/G 1 phase were up-regulated in ZFP36-AS1 group ( P<0.01), and the proportion of cells in S phase and G 2/M phase were both down-regulated ( P<0.01). Compared with the NC group, the levels of IL-4 and IFN-γ in the ZFP36-AS1 group were significantly up-regulated ( P<0.01), and the level of IL-10 was significantly down-regulated ( P<0.01). ZFP36-AS1 can target miR-221 ( P<0.01). The relative expression of miR-221 in the NC group and the ZFP36-AS1 group was 6.84±1.35 and 1.00±0.21, respectively. Compared with the NC group, overexpression of ZFP36-AS1 could significantly inhibit the expression of miR-221 ( P<0.01). Compared with the NC group, the expressions of CDK3, Cyclin C, CDK5, Cyclin D1, and Cyclin D3 in the ZFP36-AS1 group were significantly decreased. Conclusion:ZFP36-AS1 is abnormally low-expressed in bladder cancer, and it reduces the proliferation activity of bladder cancer cells and inhibits their immune escape by inhibiting the expression of miR-221.

Objective:The transjugular or transfemoral approach is used as a common method for hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement in current practice. This study aims to confirm the safety and effectiveness of measuring HVPG via the forearm venous approach.Methods:Prospective recruitment was conducted for patients with cirrhosis who underwent HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach at six hospitals in China and Japan from September 2020 to December 2020. Patients' clinical baseline information and HVPG measurement data were collected. The right median cubital vein or basilic vein approach for all enrolled patients was selected. The HVPG standard process was used to measure pressure. Research data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical software. Quantitative data were used to represent medians (interquartile ranges), while qualitative data were used to represent frequency and rates. The correlation between two sets of data was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis.Results:A total of 43 cases were enrolled in this study. Of these, 41 (95.3%) successfully underwent HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach. None of the patients had any serious complications. The median operation time for HVPG detection via forearm vein was 18.0 minutes (12.3~38.8 minutes). This study confirmed that HVPG was positively closely related to Child-Pugh score ( r = 0.47, P = 0.002), albumin-bilirubin score ( r = 0.37, P = 0.001), Lok index ( r = 0.36, P = 0.02), liver stiffness ( r = 0.58, P = 0.01), and spleen stiffness ( r = 0.77, P = 0.01), while negatively correlated with albumin ( r = -0.42, P = 0.006). Conclusion:The results of this multi-centre retrospective study suggest that HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach is safe and feasible.