Objective To observe the efficacy of modified Tianma?Sanqi Decoction on hypertension patients with anxiety. Methods Totally 64 hypertension patients with anxiety patients were randomly divid?ed into control group (32 cases) and treatment group (32 cases).The control group with standard medica?tions for hypertension and treatment group with addition of Tianma?Sanqi Decoction, and both groups were continuously treated for 8 weeks. The changes of 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure and SAS scores were compared.Results ( 1) After treatment in the control group and treatment group of 24 h mean systolic blood pressure (24 hSBP) ((130.13±3.81)mmHg,(123.56±4.37)mmHg) (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) were lower than before treatment((145.36±7.17) mmHg,(145.16±6.77) mmHg) and the difference was statisti?cally significant( P<0.01).(2) After treatment in the control group and treatment group 24 h systolic pres?sure standard deviation,diurnal systolic pressure standard deviation and nocturnal systolic pressure standard deviation((12.19±3.21) mmHg,(11.16±2.26) mmHg,(10.49±3.76) mmHg and (10.95±2.35) mmHg, (10.08±2.67) mmHg,(10.12±3.78)mmHg) were lower than before treatment ((14.53±3.65) mmHg, (13.81±4.04) mmHg,(12.47±4.23) mmHg and (16.73±7.90)mmHg,(16.06±4.14)mmHg,(13.65± 4.92)mmHg),and the difference was statistically significant( P<0.01 or P<0.05).After treatment in the treatment group, 24 h systolic pressure standard deviation, nocturnal systolic pressure standard deviation ((10.95±2.35) mmHg,(10.08±2.67) mmHg) were lower than control group((12.19±3.21) mmHg, (11.16±2.26) mmHg) and the difference was statistically significant.( P<0.01).(3) After treatment in the treatment group,SAS scores (36.68±3.88) points were lower than before treatment (58.66±3.13) points and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).After treatment the SAS score ((36.68±3.88) points) in the treatment group was lower than control group((51.86+2.62) points).Conclusion The hypertension patients with anxiety treated with Tianma?Sanqi Decoction and benazapril can improve blood pressure variability and the symp?toms of anxiety.

Objective:To explore the effect of early quantitative pulmonary rehabilitation assessment in adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with mechanical ventilation in high altitude area.Methods:From March 2019 to October 2021, convenience sampling was used to select 287 adult ICU patients with mechanical ventilation of Qinghai Red Cross Hospital as the research object. According to the time of admission, the patients were divided into the control group (142 cases) and the experimental group (145 cases) . The control group was given the routine pulmonary rehabilitation, and the experimental group received the early pulmonary rehabilitation based on quantitative assessment. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health EvaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ) score and the Intensive Care Units Mobility Scale (IMS) score were compared between the two groups before enrollment, on the eighth and sixteenth days of pulmonary rehabilitation. The oxygenation index of the two groups of patients before enrollment and on the first, fourth, sixth, eighth and sixteenth days of pulmonary rehabilitation, the time of ICU stay, the time of mechanical ventilation, the success rate of ventilator removal and the complications of the two groups of patients with mechanical ventilation were also compared.Results:On the eighth and sixteenth days of pulmonary rehabilitation, the APACHE Ⅱ score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group, and the IMS score was higher than that of the control group, with statistical differences ( P<0.05) . On the sixth, eighth and sixteenth days of pulmonary rehabilitation, the oxygenation index of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05) . The ICU stay time and mechanical ventilation time in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, and the success rate of ventilator removal in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group, with statistical differences ( P<0.05) . Conclusions:Implementing early pulmonary rehabilitation for adult ICU patients with mechanical ventilation in high altitude area is conducive to promoting pulmonary rehabilitation of patients, improving the success rate of ventilator removal, and reducing patients' ICU stay time, mechanical ventilation time and the occurrence of complications.

Objective:To explore the effect of early quantitative pulmonary rehabilitation assessment in adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with mechanical ventilation in high altitude area.Methods:From March 2019 to October 2021, convenience sampling was used to select 287 adult ICU patients with mechanical ventilation of Qinghai Red Cross Hospital as the research object. According to the time of admission, the patients were divided into the control group (142 cases) and the experimental group (145 cases) . The control group was given the routine pulmonary rehabilitation, and the experimental group received the early pulmonary rehabilitation based on quantitative assessment. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health EvaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ) score and the Intensive Care Units Mobility Scale (IMS) score were compared between the two groups before enrollment, on the eighth and sixteenth days of pulmonary rehabilitation. The oxygenation index of the two groups of patients before enrollment and on the first, fourth, sixth, eighth and sixteenth days of pulmonary rehabilitation, the time of ICU stay, the time of mechanical ventilation, the success rate of ventilator removal and the complications of the two groups of patients with mechanical ventilation were also compared.Results:On the eighth and sixteenth days of pulmonary rehabilitation, the APACHE Ⅱ score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group, and the IMS score was higher than that of the control group, with statistical differences ( P<0.05) . On the sixth, eighth and sixteenth days of pulmonary rehabilitation, the oxygenation index of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05) . The ICU stay time and mechanical ventilation time in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, and the success rate of ventilator removal in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group, with statistical differences ( P<0.05) . Conclusions:Implementing early pulmonary rehabilitation for adult ICU patients with mechanical ventilation in high altitude area is conducive to promoting pulmonary rehabilitation of patients, improving the success rate of ventilator removal, and reducing patients' ICU stay time, mechanical ventilation time and the occurrence of complications.