OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCAG (decitabine, cytarabine, anthracyclines, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) regimen in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: The clinical data of 64 R/R AML patients received treatment at Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary endpoints included efficacy measured by overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and duration of response (DOR). The patients were followed from enrollment until death, or the end of last follow-up (June 1st, 2023), whichever occurred first. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients who failed prior therapy were enrolled and completed 1 cycle, and 26 and 5 patients completed 2 and 3 cycles, respectively. Objective response rate was 67.2% ［39: complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 4: partial remission (PR)］. With a median follow-up of 62.0 months (1.0-120.9), the median overall survival (OS) was 23.3 and event-free survival was 10.6 months. The median OS was 51.7 months (3.4-100.0) in responders (CR/CRi/PR) while it was 8.4 months (6.1-10.7) in nonresponders ( P <0.001). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities were observed in all patients. Four patients died from rapid disease progression within 8 weeks after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION The DCAG regimen represents a feasible and effective treatment for R/R AML.
Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Cytarabine/administration & dosage* ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage* ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Female ; Decitabine ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Anthracyclines/administration & dosage* ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Treatment Outcome ; Aged ; Recurrence

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of venetoclax combined with demethylating drugs and intense chemotherapy in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: The clinical data of 76 patients with AML treated in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Dezhou Hospital from January 2019 to March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into observation group and control group. 38 patients in the observation group received venetoclax combined with demethylating drugs (decitabine or azacytidine) and 38 patients in the control group with the "3+7" intensive chemotherapy regimen. The primary endpoints of clinical observation were complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), partial remission (PR), non remission (NR), and overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and drug safety. RESULTS: After 2 courses of treatment, the CR+CRi rate in observation group and control group was 71.05% and 65.79%, respectively, and the ORR was 81.58% and 78.95%, respectively. After all courses of treatment, CR+CRi rate in the observation group and the control group was 73.68% and 78.95%, respectively, and the ORR was 81.58% and 84.21%, respectively, with no statistical significance between the two groups (P >0.05). After 1 course of treatment, there were statistically significant differences in the proportion and degree of myelosuppression, the duration of neutropenia and the duration of thrombocytopenia between the two groups (P < 0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of neutropenia with fever between the two groups (P >0.05). The incidence of non-hematological adverse reactions was highest in infection (mainly pulmonary infection) and gastrointestinal reaction. Among the many adverse reactions, there were statistically significant differences in the infection and hypokalemia between the two groups (P < 0.05), the incidence of hypokalemia in observation group and control group was 42.11% and 15.79%, respectively, and the infection rate in observation group and control group was 73.68% and 94.74%, respectively. The median OS was 13.13(1.67-53.63) months in the observation group and 16.60(0.57-59.67) months in the control group. CONCLUSION The combination of venetoclax and demethylating drugs has a low degree of myelosuppression, but a long recovery time, a response rate as good as that of intensive chemotherapy, and a lower infection rate. However, the incidence of hypokalemia is low in the intensive chemotherapy regimen, and the regimen significantly improves the long-term outcome of patients.
Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Sulfonamides/therapeutic use* ; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/administration & dosage* ; Retrospective Studies ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Female ; Male ; Decitabine/therapeutic use* ; Azacitidine/therapeutic use* ; Middle Aged ; Treatment Outcome ; Adult ; Aged ; Remission Induction

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of decitabine-based myeloablative preconditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: The clinical characteristics and efficacy of 115 AML patients who underwent allo-HSCT at the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from August 2018 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 37 patients treated with decitabine conditioning regimen (decitabine group) and 78 patients without decitabine conditioning regimen (non-decitabine group). The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and graft versus host disease (GVHD) were analyzed. RESULTS: For the patients in first complete remission (CR1) state before allo-HSCT, the 1-year relapse rates of decitabine group(22 cases) and non-decitabine group(69 cases) were 9.1% and 29.6%, respectively, the difference was statistically significant(P =0.042). The 1-year cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in decitabine group and non-decitabine group was 62.2% and 70.5%, respectively, and the 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic inhibitor-versus-host disease (cGVHD) was 18.9% and 14.1%, respectively, there were no significant differences in the incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD between the two groups (P >0.05). Of the 115 patients, there were no significantly differences in the 1-year CIR(21.7% vs 28.8%, P =0.866), NRM(10.9% vs 3.9%, P =0.203), OS(75.2% vs 83.8%, P =0.131) and LFS(74.6% vs 69.1%, P =0.912) between the decitabine group(37 cases) and the non-decitabine group(78 cases). CONCLUSION Decitabine-based conditioning regimen could reduce the relapse rate of AML CR1 patients with good safety.
Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy* ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods* ; Decitabine/therapeutic use* ; Transplantation Conditioning/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Graft vs Host Disease ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Adolescent ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA), and to analyze the factors that may affect their efficacy and prognosis, in order to provide a clinical basis for the choice of treatment options for patients with MDS/MPN. METHODS: 35 patients with newly diagnosed MDS/MPN who received hypomethylating therapy from January 2018 to April 2024 in the Department of Hematology of Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were included. The patients were divided into decitabine group (15 cases) and azacitidine group (20 cases) according to the treatment regimen. The efficacy, median overall survival (OS), and median progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients after HMA treatment were evaluated. The differences in efficacy and survival between the two groups were compared, and factors affecting efficacy and prognosis of MDS/MPN patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) of the 35 MDS/MPN patients treated with HMA was 51.4%. The ORR was 73.3% in decitabine group and 35.0% in azacitidine group, with a statistically significant difference (P =0.041). Survival analysis showed that the median OS was 12 months and the median PFS was 10 months in the entire cohort of the patients. There was no difference in median OS between decitabine group and azacitidine group. The median PFS in decitabine group was 12 months, higher than that in azacitidine group (7 months), but the difference was not statistically significant (P =0.505). Multivariate analysis showed that the treatment regimen and platelet count were independent influencing factors for the efficacy of HAM treatment; The course and therapeutic efficacy of HMA treatment were independent influencing factors for OS in MDS/MPN patients. The main adverse reactions of HMA treatment were myelosuppression and pulmonary infection. Gastrointestinal reactions were more likely to occur in the azacitidine group than in the decitabine group, and the difference was statistically significant (P =0.027). CONCLUSION HMA treatment is effective and well-tolerated in some MDS/MPN patients. Decitabine shows superior efficacy compared with azacitidine and is less likely to cause gastrointestinal reactions. Patients who received ≥4 courses of HMAs and responded to hypomethylating therapy had longer OS.
Humans ; Prognosis ; Decitabine/therapeutic use* ; Azacitidine/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Female ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes/drug therapy* ; Middle Aged ; Myelodysplastic-Myeloproliferative Diseases/drug therapy* ; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome ; Aged ; Myeloproliferative Disorders/drug therapy* ; Adult ; DNA Methylation

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, prognosis and safety of decitabine combined with modified EIAG regimen in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). METHODS: The clinical data of 44 patients with relapsed/refractory AML and high-risk MDS admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were equally divided into D-EIAG group (decitabine combined with EIAG regimen) and D-CAG group (decitabine combined with CAG regimen) according to clinical treatment regimen. The complete response (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recover (CRi), morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), partial response (PR), overall response rate (ORR), modified composite complete response (mCRc), overall survival (OS) time, 1-year OS rate, myelosuppression and adverse reactions between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: In D-EIAG group, 16 patients (72.7%) achieved mCRc (CR+CRi+MLFS), 3 patients (13.6%) achieved PR, and ORR (mCRc+PR) was 86.4%. In D-CAG group, 9 patients (40.9%) achieved mCRc, 6 patients (27.3%) achieved PR, and ORR was 68.2%. Difference was observed in mCRc rate between the two groups (P=0.035), but not in ORR (P>0.05). The median OS time of D-EIAG group and D-CAG group was 20 (2-38) months and 16 (3-32) months, and 1-year OS rate was 72.7% and 59.1%, respectively. There was no significant difference in 1-year OS rate between the two groups (P>0.05). After induction chemotherapy, the median time for absolute neutrophil count recovery to 0.5×10⁹/L in D-EIAG group and D-CAG group was 14 (10-27) d and 12 (10-26) d, for platelet count recovery to 20×10⁹/L was 15 (11-28) d and 14 (11-24)d, the median red blood cell suspension transfusion volume was 8 (6-12) U and 6 (6-12) U, and the median apheresis platelet transfusion volume was 4 (2-8) U and 3 (2-6) U, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in comparison of the above indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). The hematological adverse reactions of patients were mainly myelosuppression. Grade III-IV hematological adverse events occurred in both groups (100%), with no increase in the incidence of non-hematological toxicities such as gastrointestinal reactions or liver function damage. CONCLUSION Decitabine combined with EIAG regimen in the treatment of relapsed/refractory AML and high-risk MDS can improve remission rate, provide an opportunity for subsequent therapies, and have no increase in adverse reactions compared with D-CAG regimen.
Humans ; Decitabine/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome ; Retrospective Studies ; Cytarabine ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes/drug therapy* ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Bone Marrow Diseases/drug therapy* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen (D-CAG regimen) in patients aged ≥70 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: The clinical data of 59 AML patients (≥70 years old) who were newly diagnosed and treated in the Hematology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from November 2010 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 59 AML patients, 28 were males and 31 were females, with a median age of 74 (70-86) years. The complete remission (CR) rate was 69.4% (34/49), and the median duration of CR was 10.7 (0.6-125.4) months after 2 courses of D-CAG treatment. According to the British Medical Research Council (MRC) classification, there was only one patient in the favorable-risk group, and the CR rate was 71.8% (28/39) in the intermediate-risk group, and 55.6% (5/9) in the adverse-risk group, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the CR rate between the intermediate-risk and adverse-risk group. Referring to ELN 2017 genetic risk classification, CR rate was 88.2% (15/17) in the favorable-risk group, 45.5% (5/11) in the intermediate-risk group, and 66.7% (14/21) in the adverse-risk group. There was no significant difference in CR rate between the favorable-risk and adverse-risk categories, but both were significantly higher than that in the intermediate-risk group (P <0.05). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis showed that 11 gene mutations with a frequency of more than 10%, including TET2 mutation (35.6%), ASXL1 mutation (30.5%), NPM1 mutation (28.8%), FLT3-ITD mutation (27.1%), DNMT3A mutation (22.0%), IDH1 mutation (15.3%), CEBPA single mutation (13.6%), TP53 mutation (13.6%), IDH2 mutation (11.9%), RUNX1 mutation (11.9%), and NRAS mutation (10.2%). There were no statistical differences in mutation frequency of these 11 genes between CR group and non-CR group. Compared with normal karyotypes, patients with complex karyotypes were more likely to develop TP53 mutations (P <0.001), while FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A mutations were more likely to occur in patients with normal karyotypes (P =0.04, P =0.047). The median follow-up, overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS) of all the patients was 11.7 (1.5-128.2) months, 12.3 (1.5-128.2) months, and 8.5 (1.5-128.2) months, respectively. The median OS and EFS of CR patients were 19.8 and 13.3 months, respectively, which were significantly longer than 6.4 and 5.7 months in patients experiencing treatment failure (P < 0.001, P =0.009). In regard to genes with mutation frequency >10%, there were no statistical differences in CR rate, median OS, and median EFS between mutated and wild-type patients by Chi-square test and survival analysis. Univariate analysis showed that age, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetics and CR were factors affecting prognosis, while multivariate analysis showed that only CR failure was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS. The major adverse reactions to D-CAG regimen were grade 3-4 myelosuppression, pulmonary infection, and fever (infection focus was not identified). CONCLUSION D-CAG regimen is safe and effective in the treatment of AML patients ≥70 years old, and can partially improve the prognosis of elderly and high-risk patients.
Aged ; Male ; Female ; Humans ; Aged, 80 and over ; Decitabine/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Cytarabine/therapeutic use* ; Prognosis ; Mutation ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics*

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with decitabine, homoharringtonine, and interferon regimen as maintenance therapy for blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-BP). METHODS: The clinical data of CML-BP patients who received the first major hematological response after induction therapy at The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 2015 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The event-free survival, duration of remission, and overall survival of patients in TKI combined with decitabine, homoharringtonine, interferon group(n=18) and TKI combined with conventional chemotherapy group(n=10) were compared by log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were included, with a median age of 46 (24-58) years old. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients in TKI combined with decitabine, homoharringtonine, interferon group had longer event-free survival (7.4 vs 4.3 months, P=0.043, HR＝0.44, 95% CI: 0.17-1.14), duration of overall remission (16.1 vs 6.6 months, P=0.005, HR＝0.32, 95% CI: 0.11-0.89), overall survival (34.3 vs 13.5 months, P=0.006, HR＝0.29, 95% CI: 0.10-0.82) compared with patients in TKI combined with conventional chemotherapy group. CONCLUSION The TKI combined with decitabine, homoharringtonine and interferon regimen can significantly prolong the survival of CML-BP patients who obtained the major hematological response compared with TKI combined with conventional chemotherapy regimen.
Humans ; Middle Aged ; Blast Crisis/drug therapy* ; Homoharringtonine/therapeutic use* ; Decitabine/therapeutic use* ; Interferons/therapeutic use* ; Tyrosine Protein Kinase Inhibitors ; Retrospective Studies ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of decitabine (DEC) combined with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) on the number of immune cells, efficacy and adverse reactions in the treatment of myeloid neoplasms patients. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with myeloid tumors, including AML, MDS-EB-1 or MDS-EB-2 treated by the regimen containing decitabine in our hospital from January 2009 to October 2019 were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed, among the patients, 21 patients treated with DEC alone, 24 patients treated with DEC combined with ATRA (DEC/ATRA) and 39 patients treated with DEC combined with G-CSF priming regimen (DEC/priming). The changes of peripheral blood immune cell levels before and after treatment of the patients between the three groups were compared, and the differences in clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of the patients between the three groups were also compared. RESULTS: There was no statistical differences in the number of immune cells among the patients in the three groups before treatment (P>0.05). NK cell levels decreased significantly in the patients in DEC and DEC/ATRA group after treatment (P<0.05); After treatment, the levels of CD8+ and CD3+T cells in the patients treated by DEC /priming regimen significantly increased (P<0.05), while the levels of CD3-HLA-DR+ B cells significantly decreased (P<0.05). The overall response rate (ORR) of the patients in DEC/ATRA group (75%) and DEC/priming group (74.36%) was significantly higher than 42.86% in DEC monotherapy group, and the differences showed statistically significant (P<0.05), while the ORR between the patients in DEC/ATRA and DEC/priming group showed no statistic differences (P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in overall survival (OS) and incidence of bleeding between the patients in the three groups (P>0.05). The incidences of grade 3 to 4 bone marrow suppression and the infection rate of the patients in DEC monotherapy and DEC/ATRA group were significantly lower than that in DEC/priming regimen group after treatment (all P<0.05), however, there was no statistical difference between DEC monotherapy and the DEC/ATRA group. CONCLUSION The efficacy of DEC/ATRA on myeloid neoplasms is comparable to that of DEC/priming regimen, and the anti-myeloid tumor effect of DEC/ATRA regimen may be related to the regulation of NK cells and T cells.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Decitabine/therapeutic use* ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Tretinoin/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate regulatory T cells (Tregs) relative content in peripheral blood and bone marrow of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with or without decitabine (DAC), analyze the immunomodulatory of Tregs in pathogenesis and remission of MDS and AML, as well as effect of DAC on Tregs. METHODS: From October 2018 to February 2019, 15 patients with MDS and 49 patients with AML (newly diagnosed, treated with DAC or other chemotherapy regimens) were enrolled in this study, and 14 cases with iron deficiency or megaloblastic anemia while without malignant tumor and autoimmune disease as controls. The Tregs relative contents in bone marrow and peripheral blood were analyzed by flow cytometry, meanwhile clinical data of the objects were collected. RESULTS: In peripheral blood and bone marrow of the patients with MDS and AML, the Tregs relative contents at newly diagnosed were higher than those of the control group (P=0.05, P=0.043). The Tregs relative content of AML patients in DAC regimen treatment group was significantly lower than that in the newly diagnosed group and non-DAC chemotherapy group (P<0.05). In DAC regimen treatment group, the Tregs relative contents was significantly lower in remission group than in non-remission group (P<0.05). There was no difference between DAC regimen treatment group and control group in Tregs relative content. CONCLUSION DAC may increase the body's anti-tumor immunity by consuming Tregs content, enhance the body's immune function to identify and kill tumor cells, thereby promote the patients' reliefs.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Bone Marrow ; Decitabine/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes/drug therapy* ; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and survival factors of microtransplantation (MST) in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: For a retrospective analysis of 27 adult patients with AML receiving MST from July 2014 to October 2021, the median age was 59(29-77) years old, 13 cases were ≥60 years old, 14 case were <60 years old, 13 cases were male and 14 cases were female. Classification by FAB: AML-M2 6 cases, AML-M4 6 cases, AML-M5 2 cases, AML-M6 2 cases, AML（Undivided type） 9 cases, AML myeloid sarcoma 2 cases (primary AML 21 cases, AML secondary to MDS 6 cases). Cytogenetic analysis showed 25 patients with a normal karyotype, 2 patients with an abnormal karyotype, and 20 patients with an abnormal molecular biology. Induction chemotherapy regimens mainly include: IA, DA, MA or HA regimen, including CAG or CIG in combination with decitabine, and single-agent decitabine. 17 patients achieved complete remission (CR) after 1 course of induction chemotherapy and 4 patients achieved CR after 2 courses of induction chemotherapy. 3 patients received CR by four courses of decitabine, 2 patients received no remission, and 1 patient underwent no induction chemotherapy and were treated direct MST. There were 16 patients with pretransplant CR and 11 patients were not in remission before transplantation. Follow-up mainly used consult patient's medical records and telephone inquiry to observe the adverse effects and efficacy of MST treatment. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method, with the main observation indicators overall survival(OS) and leukemia-free survival(LFS), and performed with the Log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed by the Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 79 MST were performed in 27 AML patients with good overall safety and no special serious adverse effects. The median time of leukocyte recovery was 13(4-28) days, and the median time of platelet recovery was 13(4-30) days. There were 50 cases of infection, 5 cases of abnormal liver function and 3 cases of abnormal cardiac function. Except for abnormal cardiac function, all other complications did not affect the treatment and were cure. Acute or chronic GVHD, renal insufficiency, abnormal coagulation function, and severe bleeding were not observed during treatment or during follow-up. As of the follow-up date, the median follow-up time of the 27 patients was 79(14-171) months, the median OS time was 62(1-171) months, and the median LFS time was 15(0-171) months. The 2-year OS rate was 65.7%（17/27）, and the 2-year LFS rate was 47.4%（12/27） . The complete response rate of 27 patients treated with MST was 48.1% (13/27). 8 patients relapsed during MST treatment, including 7 patients after the completion of the first MST course and 1 patient after the completion of the second MST course. 2 patients relapsed after the end of the course of MST. 13 patients died, including 10 patients because of disease progression, two patients from severe infection, and one patient from cardiac damage. CONCLUSION MST has the advantages of small toxic side effects, complete compatibility of HLA matching is not required, effective avoidance of GVHD and rapid hematopoietic recovery, which can improve OS and LFS in elderly AML and young AML patients, and is one of the treatment options for patients without HLA matching.
Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Cytarabine ; Decitabine/therapeutic use* ; Female ; Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome