Hyperkalemia is the most common complication of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is more common in hemodialysis ( HD) patients.The reason of hyperkalemia in HD patients are related to excessive intake of K +,insufficient clearance of K +and K+transferring from intracellular to extracellualr .Clinically, most of the patients don't have any obvious symptoms ,a few of patients appear heart and neuromuscular symptoms .To prevent hyperkalemia ,the patients should control the daily potassium intake strictly ,and take adequate dialysis and drug therapy .

OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the safety and define the contraindication of regional citrate anticoagulation treatment on various critically ill patients being treated by continuous blood purification, who also had bleeding tendencies.

METHODSForty critically ill patients being treated by continuous blood purification (CBP) were involved in this study. Due to their bleeding tendencies, regional citrate anticoagulation treatment was given to all of them. Those with hepatic function impairment (n = 10) were classified as Group A, those with hypoxemia were classified as Group B (n = 10), and the others as Group C (n = 20). Blood samples were collected before treatment, and at 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hour intervals during CBP. These samples then were used arterial blood gas analysis, whole blood activated clotting time (WBACT) pre- and post-filter, and serum ionized calcium examination.

RESULTSWBACT pre-filter showed little fluctuant through the 48 hr period of CBP, and WBACT post-filter showed obvious prolongation than that of the pre-filter (P < 0.05) at all time points. Metabolic acidosis was found in Group A patients before CBP, and improved during CBP. Normal acid-base conditions of patients were disturbed and deteriorated in Group B during CBP, but not in Group C. Serum ionized calcium was maintained at a normal range during CBP in Group A and C patients, but declined significantly in Group B patients (vs. pre-treatment, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSRegional citrate anticoagulation can be safely used in conjunction with CBP treatment for patients with hepatic function impairment, but may induce acidosis and a decline in serum ionized calcium when used with hypoxemic patients.

Adult ; Aged ; Anticoagulants ; administration & dosage ; Calcium ; blood ; Citric Acid ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Critical Illness ; Female ; Hemofiltration ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged

Objective To investigate the efficacy of continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT)versus intermittent hemodialysis(IHD)in patients with severe acute renal failure(ARF).Methods One hundred and ninety -three severe ARF patients who received renal support between December 1978 and December 1998 were involved in this study.Of them,101(52.3%)were treated with CRRT(CRRT group),and 92(47.7%)with IHD(IHD group).Results Sixty(59.4%)patients in the CRRT group got through the acute phase of disease and 41 (40.6%)patients did not survive while in the IHD group 59(64.1%)patients survived and 33(35.9%)patients did not.No significant difference in survival rate was found between the two groups.24 of 64 patients(37.5%)in the CRRT group with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS)survived,while in the IHD group,8 out of 44(27.3%)survived,their survival rate was much lower than that in the CRRT group.Patients in CRRT group were more severely iii,as manifested by lower mean arterial pressure,higher APACHE Ⅱ score,more dysfunctioned organs and requiring mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support as compared with patients in the IHD group,CRRT was found to improve hemodynamic stability with a better fluid balance and control of biochemical status,increased nutritional intake and a shorter duration of acute renal failure(P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion CRRT perhaps may be the best choice in the treatment of severe ARF patients,for it can offer several distinct advantages compared to IHD.These may contribute to improving the survival rate of ARF patients,particularly those that are critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effectiveness of using continuous veno venous hemofiltration (CVVH) in the treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP).

METHODSThirteen ANP patients were involved in this study, including 4 females and 9 males, averaging 50.6 +/- 10.8 years old. CT scans upon admission revealed 33% necrosis involving the body of the pancreas in 2 patients, 67% necrosis in 3 patients and 100% necrosis in the other 8; the CT severity score was 8.9 +/- 2.1. CVVH was maintained for at least 72 hours and the AN69 hemofilter (1.2 m(2)) was changed every 24 hours. The ultrafiltration rate during CVVH was 2993.9 +/- 983.0 ml/h, the blood flow rate was 250 - 300 ml/min, and the substitute fluid was infused in a pre-diluted manner. Low molecular weight heparin was used as anticoagulant.

RESULTSCVVH was well tolerated in all the patients. Bloody abdominal cavity drainage fluid was observed in 2 patients, but no other side-effects related with CVVH were observed. Two patients died of systemic fungal infections and another died of intracranial fungi infection, resulting in an ICU mortality of 23.1%. Ten of the patients survived in the ICU, but one of them died for other reasons unrelated to the SAP before discharge. The APACHE II score before CVVH was 15.2 +/- 6.5, but decreased significantly to 8.1 +/- 5.3, 7.5 +/- 4.9 and 8.0 +/- 5.2 at the 24th, 48th and 72nd hour after CVVH, respectively (P < 0.01). Serum concentration of IL-1beta and TNFalpha decreased to the trough at the 6th hour after a new hemofilter was used and increased slowly to pre-CVVH levels 12 hours later. After CVVH had ceased, the serum levels of two cytokines increased to their peaks at the 120th hour and decreased eventually at the 144th hour. The sieving coefficient (SC) of IL-1beta and TNFalpha was 0.33 +/- 0.11 and 0.16 +/- 0.08.

CONCLUSIONCVVH offered therapeutic options for ANP and was well tolerated resulting in clearance of IL-1beta and TNFalpha; CVVH at early stages of SAP may contribute to the improvement of outcome.

Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Hemofiltration ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Interleukin-1 ; analysis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing ; therapy ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha ; analysis

Objective:To evaluate the volume status of hemodialysis patients with hypertension by bioelectrical impedance vector analysis, and investigate the effect of high volume status on the prognosis of patients with hypertension.Methods:The study subjects came from the patients with pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure>160 mmHg (mean systolic blood pressure of 6 times of treatment) in the Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. According to the volume status assessed by bioelectrical impedance vector analysis, patients were divided into two groups: fluid overload group and non-overload group (including normal fluid status and fluid decline). The clinical data, laboratory test results, ratio of intracellular and extracellular water (ICW and ECW), body cell mass, lean body mass and the percentage of total body weight, fat percentage of body weight, resistance/height, reactance/height, phase angle and illmarker were compared between two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to compare the difference of survival rate between the two groups.Results:A total of 51 hemodialysis patients with hypertension were enrolled in this study, including 19 patients in fluid overload group and 32 patients in non-overload group (27 patients with normal volume status and 5 patients with decreased volume). The levels of albumin, prealbumin, hemoglobin, hematocrit and serum phosphorus in patients with fluid overload decreased significantly compared with non-overload patients (all P<0.05), and the proportion of lymphocytes increased in fluid-overload patients ( P<0.05). The ratio of extracellular water and illmarker index in fluid overload group were significantly higher than those in the other group (both P<0.01). However, phase angle, resistance/height, reactance/height were lower than those in patients with non-overload (all P<0.01). After 20 months of clinical observation, the control rate of blood pressure (pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure<160 mmHg) in fluid overload group was lower than that in the non-overload group (26.3% vs 43.8%), but not statistically significant ( P=0.218). The all-cause mortality rate of patients in the fluid overload group was higher than non-overload group (26.3% vs 15.6%). Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis suggested that the difference in survival rate between the two groups was not statistically significant. Conclusions:The extracellular fluid of hemodialysis patients with hypertension and fluid overload increases significantly, and the nutritional status evaluation index decreases compared with that of patients without increased volume. Increased proportion of lymphocytes may be related to the micro-inflammatory status. Blood pressure is more difficult to control in hypertensive patients with fluid overload and the clinical prognosis can be worse in patients without increased volume.