1.Experience of Gastric Cancer Survivors and their Spouses in Korea: Secondary Analysis.
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2004;34(4):625-635
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of gastric cancer couples in Korea and to generate a substantive theory integrating the experiences of gastric cancer survivors and their spouses as a whole. The specific aims of this study were to explore major problems gastric cancer couples faced and how they resolved these problems, focusing on inter-relational dynamics within the couples and on similarities and differences between the couples. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis study using grounded theory techniques. The study used the data of 11 married couples which was collected from in-depth interviews from two primary studies. The unit of analysis was dyads of gastric cancer survivors and their spouses. RESULT: The basic social psychological process that emerged from the analysis was "taking charge of their health." Major categories involved in this process were identified as 1) adjusting to new diets, 2) reinforcing physical strength, 3) seeking information, 4) strengthening Ki, 5) lowering life-expectations, and 6) going their separate ways. These six categories represent major strategies in overcoming critical problems that occurred in day-to-day experiences. In terms of the process, the first five categories characterize the earlier stage of the process of "taking charge of their health," while "going their separate ways" indicates the later stage and also the beginning of their separate ways: "pursuing spiritual life" for the survivors, and "preparing for the future" for the spouses. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study will help design family care for the people with gastric cancer by providing in-depth understanding and insight on the lives of gastric cancer couples.
*Adaptation, Psychological
;
Adult
;
Attitude to Death/ethnology
;
Attitude to Health/*ethnology
;
Female
;
Grief
;
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
;
Humans
;
Internal-External Control
;
Interpersonal Relations
;
Korea
;
Male
;
Marriage/psychology
;
Middle Aged
;
Models, Psychological
;
Nursing Methodology Research
;
Qualitative Research
;
Questionnaires
;
Self Care/psychology
;
Social Support
;
Spirituality
;
Spouses/education/*ethnology
;
Stomach Neoplasms/*ethnology
;
Survivors/*psychology
2.Translation: Roadmap for Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures.
W Greg MILLER ; Gary L MYERS ; Mary Lou GANTZER ; Stephen E KAHN ; E Ralf SCHONBRUNNER ; Linda M THIENPONT ; David M BUNK ; Robert H CHRISTENSON ; John H ECKFELDT ; Stanley F LO ; C Micha NUBLING ; Catharine M STURGEON
Laboratory Medicine Online 2012;2(1):1-9
Results between different clinical laboratory measurement procedures (CLMP) should be equivalent, within clinically meaningful limits, to enable optimal use of clinical guidelines for disease diagnosis and patient management. When laboratory test results are neither standardized nor harmonized, a different numeric result may be obtained for the same clinical sample. Unfortunately, some guidelines are based on test results from a specific laboratory measurement procedure without consideration of the possibility or likelihood of differences between various procedures. When this happens, aggregation of data from different clinical research investigations and development of appropriate clinical practice guidelines will be flawed. A lack of recognition that results are neither standardized nor harmonized may lead to erroneous clinical, financial, regulatory, or technical decisions. Standardization of CLMPs has been accomplished for several measurands for which primary (pure substance) reference materials exist and/or reference measurement procedures (RMPs) have been developed. However, the harmonization of clinical laboratory procedures for measurands that do not have RMPs has been problematic owing to inadequate definition of the measurand, inadequate analytical specificity for the measurand, inadequate attention to the commutability of reference materials, and lack of a systematic approach for harmonization. To address these problems, an infrastructure must be developed to enable a systematic approach for identification and prioritization of measurands to be harmonized on the basis of clinical importance and technical feasibility, and for management of the technical implementation of a harmonization process for a specific measurand.
Humans
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
3.Male Oxidative Stress Infertility (MOSI): Proposed Terminology and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Male Infertility
Ashok AGARWAL ; Neel PAREKH ; Manesh Kumar PANNER SELVAM ; Ralf HENKEL ; Rupin SHAH ; Sheryl T HOMA ; Ranjith RAMASAMY ; Edmund KO ; Kelton TREMELLEN ; Sandro ESTEVES ; Ahmad MAJZOUB ; Juan G ALVAREZ ; David K GARDNER ; Channa N JAYASENA ; Jonathan W RAMSAY ; Chak Lam CHO ; Ramadan SALEH ; Denny SAKKAS ; James M HOTALING ; Scott D LUNDY ; Sarah VIJ ; Joel MARMAR ; Jaime GOSALVEZ ; Edmund SABANEGH ; Hyun Jun PARK ; Armand ZINI ; Parviz KAVOUSSI ; Sava MICIC ; Ryan SMITH ; Gian Maria BUSETTO ; Mustafa Emre BAKIRCIOĞLU ; Gerhard HAIDL ; Giancarlo BALERCIA ; Nicolás Garrido PUCHALT ; Moncef BEN-KHALIFA ; Nicholas TADROS ; Jackson KIRKMAN-BROWNE ; Sergey MOSKOVTSEV ; Xuefeng HUANG ; Edson BORGES ; Daniel FRANKEN ; Natan BAR-CHAMA ; Yoshiharu MORIMOTO ; Kazuhisa TOMITA ; Vasan Satya SRINI ; Willem OMBELET ; Elisabetta BALDI ; Monica MURATORI ; Yasushi YUMURA ; Sandro LA VIGNERA ; Raghavender KOSGI ; Marlon P MARTINEZ ; Donald P EVENSON ; Daniel Suslik ZYLBERSZTEJN ; Matheus ROQUE ; Marcello COCUZZA ; Marcelo VIEIRA ; Assaf BEN-MEIR ; Raoul ORVIETO ; Eliahu LEVITAS ; Amir WISER ; Mohamed ARAFA ; Vineet MALHOTRA ; Sijo Joseph PAREKATTIL ; Haitham ELBARDISI ; Luiz CARVALHO ; Rima DADA ; Christophe SIFER ; Pankaj TALWAR ; Ahmet GUDELOGLU ; Ahmed M A MAHMOUD ; Khaled TERRAS ; Chadi YAZBECK ; Bojanic NEBOJSA ; Damayanthi DURAIRAJANAYAGAM ; Ajina MOUNIR ; Linda G KAHN ; Saradha BASKARAN ; Rishma Dhillon PAI ; Donatella PAOLI ; Kristian LEISEGANG ; Mohamed Reza MOEIN ; Sonia MALIK ; Onder YAMAN ; Luna SAMANTA ; Fouad BAYANE ; Sunil K JINDAL ; Muammer KENDIRCI ; Baris ALTAY ; Dragoljub PEROVIC ; Avi HARLEV
The World Journal of Men's Health 2019;37(3):296-312
Despite advances in the field of male reproductive health, idiopathic male infertility, in which a man has altered semen characteristics without an identifiable cause and there is no female factor infertility, remains a challenging condition to diagnose and manage. Increasing evidence suggests that oxidative stress (OS) plays an independent role in the etiology of male infertility, with 30% to 80% of infertile men having elevated seminal reactive oxygen species levels. OS can negatively affect fertility via a number of pathways, including interference with capacitation and possible damage to sperm membrane and DNA, which may impair the sperm's potential to fertilize an egg and develop into a healthy embryo. Adequate evaluation of male reproductive potential should therefore include an assessment of sperm OS. We propose the term Male Oxidative Stress Infertility, or MOSI, as a novel descriptor for infertile men with abnormal semen characteristics and OS, including many patients who were previously classified as having idiopathic male infertility. Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) can be a useful clinical biomarker for the classification of MOSI, as it takes into account the levels of both oxidants and reductants (antioxidants). Current treatment protocols for OS, including the use of antioxidants, are not evidence-based and have the potential for complications and increased healthcare-related expenditures. Utilizing an easy, reproducible, and cost-effective test to measure ORP may provide a more targeted, reliable approach for administering antioxidant therapy while minimizing the risk of antioxidant overdose. With the increasing awareness and understanding of MOSI as a distinct male infertility diagnosis, future research endeavors can facilitate the development of evidence-based treatments that target its underlying cause.
Antioxidants
;
Classification
;
Clinical Protocols
;
Diagnosis
;
DNA
;
Embryonic Structures
;
Female
;
Fertility
;
Health Expenditures
;
Humans
;
Infertility
;
Infertility, Male
;
Male
;
Membranes
;
Ovum
;
Oxidants
;
Oxidation-Reduction
;
Oxidative Stress
;
Reactive Oxygen Species
;
Reducing Agents
;
Reproductive Health
;
Semen
;
Spermatozoa
;
Subject Headings