OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of standard single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) and that of readout-segmented EPI (rs-EPI) in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with 74 breast cancers underwent both ss-EPI and rs-EPI. For qualitative comparison of image quality, three readers independently assessed the two sets of diffusion-weighted (DW) images. To evaluate geometric distortion, a comparison was made between lesion lengths derived from contrast enhanced MR (CE-MR) images and those obtained from the corresponding DW images. For assessment of image parameters, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lesion contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. RESULTS: The rs-EPI was superior to ss-EPI in most criteria regarding the qualitative image quality. Anatomical structure distinction, delineation of the lesion, ghosting artifact, and overall image quality were significantly better in rs-EPI. Regarding the geometric distortion, lesion length on ss-EPI was significantly different from that of CE-MR, whereas there were no significant differences between CE-MR and rs-EPI. The rs-EPI was superior to ss-EPI in SNR and CNR. CONCLUSION: Readout-segmented EPI is superior to ss-EPI in the aspect of image quality in DW MR imaging of the breast.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Artifacts ; Breast/pathology ; Breast Neoplasms/pathology ; Contrast Media/diagnostic use ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods/*standards ; Echo-Planar Imaging/methods/*standards ; Female ; Humans ; Image Enhancement/methods/*standards ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio