1.Classical natural ovine scrapie prions detected in practical volumes of blood by lamb and transgenic mouse bioassays.
Rohana P DASSANAYAKE ; Thomas C TRUSCOTT ; Dongyue ZHUANG ; David A SCHNEIDER ; Sally A MADSEN-BOUTERSE ; Alan J YOUNG ; James B STANTON ; William C DAVIS ; Katherine I O'ROURKE
Journal of Veterinary Science 2015;16(2):179-186
Scrapie is diagnosed antemortem in sheep by detecting misfolded isoforms of prion protein (PrP(Sc)) in lymphoid follicles of the rectal mucosa and nictitating membranes. Assay sensitivity is limited if (a) the biopsy is collected early during disease development, (b) an insufficient number of follicles is collected, or (c) peripheral accumulation of PrP(Sc) is reduced or delayed. A blood test would be convenient for mass live animal scrapie testing. Currently approved techniques, however, have their own detection limits. Novel detection methods may soon offer a non-animal-based, rapid platform with detection sensitivities that rival the prion bioassay. In anticipation, we sought to determine if diseased animals could be routinely identified with a bioassay using B lymphocytes isolated from blood sample volumes commonly collected for diagnostic purposes in small ruminants. Scrapie transmission was detected in five of six recipient lambs intravenously transfused with B lymphocytes isolated from 5~10 mL of blood from a naturally scrapie-infected sheep. Additionally, scrapie transmission was observed in 18 ovinized transgenic Tg338 mice intracerebrally inoculated with B lymphocytes isolated from 5~10 mL of blood from two naturally scrapie-infected sheep. Based on our findings, we anticipate that these blood sample volumes should be of diagnostic value.
Animals
;
B-Lymphocytes/*pathology
;
Biological Assay/*veterinary
;
Mice
;
Mice, Transgenic
;
Prions/*blood
;
Scrapie/blood/*diagnosis/transmission
;
Sheep
2.A Comparison of Radiographic Alignment between Bilateral and Unilateral Interbody Cages in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Mark James LAMBRECHTS ; Jeremy HEARD ; Nicholas D’ANTONIO ; John BODNAR ; Gregory SCHNEIDER ; Evan BLOOM ; Jose CANSECO ; Barrett WOODS ; Ian David KAYE ; Mark KURD ; Jeffrey RIHN ; Alan HILIBRAND ; Gregory SCHROEDER ; Alexander VACCARO ; Christopher KEPLER
Asian Spine Journal 2023;17(4):666-675
Methods:
Patients >18 years old who underwent primary one- or two-level TLIFs at our institution were identified and propensitymatched in a 3:1 fashion (unilateral:bilateral). Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and radiographic outcomes, including vertebral endplate obliquity, segmental lordosis, subsidence, and fusion status, were compared between groups.
Results:
Of the 184 patients included, 46 received bilateral cages. Bilateral cage placement was associated with greater subsidence (1.06±1.25 mm vs. 0.59±1.16 mm, p=0.028) and enhanced restoration of segmental lordosis (5.74°±14.1° vs. −1.57°±10.9°, p=0.002) at the 1-year postoperative point, while unilateral cage placement was associated with an increased correction of endplate obliquity (−2.02°±4.42° vs. 0.24°±2.81°, p<0.001). Bilateral cage placement was significantly associated with radiographic fusion on bivariate analysis (89.1% vs. 70.3%, p=0.018) and significantly predicted radiographic fusion on multivariable regression analysis (estimate, 1.35; odds ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.51–12.05; p=0.010).
Conclusions
Bilateral interbody cage placement in TLIF procedures was associated with restoration of lumbar lordosis and increased fusion rates. However, endplate obliquity correction was significantly greater for patients who received a unilateral cage.
3.Comparative outcomes of subcutaneous and transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators.
Jin-Jun LIANG ; Hideo OKAMURA ; Roshini ASIRVATHAM ; Andrew SCHNEIDER ; David O HODGE ; Mei YANG ; Xu-Ping LI ; Ming-Yan DAI ; Ying TIAN ; Pei ZHANG ; Bryan C CANNON ; Cong-Xin HUANG ; Paul A FRIEDMAN ; Yong-Mei CHA
Chinese Medical Journal 2019;132(6):631-637
BACKGROUND:
The comparative outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) and transvenous ICD (T-ICD) have not been well studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of currently available S-ICD and T-ICD.
METHODS:
The study included 86 patients who received an S-ICD and 1:1 matched to those who received single-chamber T-ICD by gender, age, diagnosis, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and implant year. The clinical outcomes and implant complications were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS:
The mean age of the 172 patients was 45 years, and 129 (75%) were male. The most common cardiac condition was hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM, 37.8%). The mean LVEF was 50%. At a mean follow-up of 23 months, the appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy rate were 1.2% vs. 4.7% (χ = 1.854, P = 0.368) and 9.3% vs. 3.5% (χ = 2.428, P = 0.211) in S-ICD and T-ICD groups respectively. There were no significant differences in device-related major and minor complications between the two groups (7.0% vs. 3.5%, χ = 1.055, P = 0.496). The S-ICD group had higher T-wave oversensing than T-ICD group (9.3% vs. 0%, χ = 8.390, P = 0.007). Sixty-five patients had HCM (32 in S-ICD and 33 in T-ICD). The incidence of major complications was not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The efficacy of an S-ICD is comparable to that of T-ICD, especially in a dominantly HCM patient population. The S-ICD is associated with fewer major complications demanding reoperation.
Adult
;
Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic
;
physiopathology
;
therapy
;
Death, Sudden, Cardiac
;
prevention & control
;
Defibrillators, Implantable
;
Electrocardiography
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Tachycardia, Ventricular
;
physiopathology
;
therapy