In our previous studies, DAZAP2 gene expression was down-regulated in untreated patients of multiple myeloma (MM). For better studying the structure and function of DAZAP2, a full-length cDNA was isolated from mononuclear cells of a normal human bone marrow, sequenced and deposited to Genbank (AY430097). This sequence has an identical ORF (open reading frame) as the NM_014764 from human testis and the D31767 from human cell line KG-1. Phylogenetic analysis and structure prediction reveal that DAZAP2 homologues are highly conserved throughout evolution and share a polyproline region and several potential SH2/SH3 binding sites. DAZAP2 occurs as a single-copy gene with a four-exon organization. We further noticed that the functional DAZAP2 gene is located on Chromosome 12 and its pseudogene gene is on Chromosome 2 with electronic location of human chromosome in Genbank, though no genetic abnormalities of MM have been reported on Chromosome 12. The ORF of human DAZAP2 encodes a 17-kDa protein, which is highly similar to mouse Prtb. The DAZAP2 protein is mainly localized in cytoplasm with a discrete pattern of punctuated distribution. DAZAP2 may associate with carcinogenesis of MM and participate in yet-to-be identified signaling pathways to regulate proliferation and differentiation of plasma cells.
Amino Acid Sequence ; Base Sequence ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 12 ; genetics ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2 ; genetics ; Cytoplasm ; metabolism ; DNA Primers ; DNA, Complementary ; genetics ; Down-Regulation ; Gene Components ; Humans ; Likelihood Functions ; Models, Genetic ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Multiple Myeloma ; genetics ; metabolism ; Phylogeny ; Pseudogenes ; genetics ; RNA-Binding Proteins ; genetics ; metabolism ; Sequence Alignment ; Sequence Analysis, DNA

BACKGROUNDPaclitaxel plus cisplatin is an effective regimen in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but it has severe adverse toxicities. The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect and safety of paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin compared with paclitaxel plus cisplatin in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

METHODSFrom January, 2002 to October, 2004, 83 initially treated patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized into two groups: the trial group was treated with paclitaxel 175mg/m², and oxaliplatin 130mg/m² on day 1;and the control group was treated with paclitaxel 175mg/m² and cisplatin 80mg/m² on day 1. Both of them were repeated every 21 days and 2-6 cycles were given to patients. The evaluation of efficacy and safety was performed after chemotherapy regularly.

RESULTSAll patients were evaluable and received 2 cycles chemotherapy at least. The response rate of the trial group and control group was 34.1% (14/41) and 33.3% (14/42) respectively, median time to progression of them was 6.0 months and 5.5 months, median survival time was 10.7 months and 10.5 months, 1-year survival was 39.0% (16/41) and 40.5% (17/42) respectively. The following adverse effects of the two groups were different: the incidence rate of III+IV leukopenia was 4.9% and 28.6% in the trial group and the control group respectively, III+IV thrombocytopemia was 0 and 14.3%, III+IV nausea and vomiting was 7.3% and 26.2%. The difference of the incidence rate of III+IV nerve abnormality (9.8% and 9.5%), imparied renal function (0 and 7.1%), myalgia and anthralgia (0 and 2.4%) was insignificant.

CONCLUSIONSThe regimen of paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin have the similar efficacy and less adverse toxicities as compared to Paclitaxel plus Cisplatin in treatment of advanced NSCLC.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect and safety between Velcade-Dexamethasone (VD)and revised Vinorebine+Pirarubicin+ Dexamethasone (VAD) regiment for multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: Thirty-six patients with MM were reviewed, 16 of whom were treated with VD (VD Group) and the others with VAD. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant (EBMT) criteria and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCICTCAE) were chosen to analyze the efficacy and side effects. RESULTS: In the VD group and the revised VAD group, the rates of complete response, partial response, minimal response, no change and progress disease were 50% vs. 5%, 25% vs. 25%, 18.8% vs. 15%, 6.2% vs. 35% and 0 vs. 20%, respectively. The total response rates were 93.8% vs 45%. There was significant difference in the overall response rate between the 2 groups (P<0.05). The side effects were less serious, and the endurance was better in the VD group than those in the revised VAD group. No serious effects of hematology and cardiology were seen, and good endurance was showed in the renal dysfunction in the VD group. CONCLUSION Velcade combined with dexamethasone is a safe and effective regiment for multiple myeloma with good safety and endurance.
Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Boronic Acids ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Bortezomib ; Dexamethasone ; administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Myeloma ; drug therapy ; Pyrazines ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies