The fundamental treatment for acute cholecystitis is surgical cholecystectomy, especially laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Some high-risk surgical patients need gallbladder drainage. The traditional drainage method is percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage. However, in recent years, two endoscopic approaches, including endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage, have developed rapidly and have advantages in long-term outcomes. In this article, the authors discuss the historical development, technical characteristics, comparison between methods , adverse events and long-term outcomes of the two endoscopic drainage methods through literature review.

ObjectiveTo investigate the value of nasobiliary cholangiography in the diagnosis of residual common bile duct stones after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and the risk factors for residual stones. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of the patients who underwent ERCP and nasobiliary cholangiography after endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in Peking University First Hospital from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. The chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups, and a logistic regression analysis was used to investigate independent risk factors for residual stones. ResultsA total of 366 patients underwent ERCP and nasobiliary cholangiography and 27 patients were suspected to have residual stones, among whom 25 had residual stones confirmed by ERCP. The rate of residual stones after ERCP was 6.8% (25/366), and nasobiliary cholangiography had a positive predictive value of 92.6% (25/27) in predicting residual common bile duct stones. The univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between the two groups in multiple stones, common bile duct diameter ≥1.5 cm, and mechanical lithotripsy (χ2=5014, 7.651, and 9.670, all P＜0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that multiple stones (odds ratio ［OR］=2713, 95% confidence interval ［CI］: 1.002-7.345, P=0.049) and mechanical lithotripsy (OR=9.183, 95% CI: 2.347-35.925, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for residual stones. ConclusionPost-ERCP nasobiliary cholangiography is an effective method to detect residual common bile duct stones. Multiple stones and mechanical lithotripsy during ERCP are independent risk factors for residual stones.

Objective:To establish the biology reference interval (RI) of peripheral blood procalcitonin (PCT) for children between 3 days and 6 years old in China.Methods:Totally 3 353 reference individuals with apparent health or no specific diseases were recruited in 18 hospitals throughout the country during October 2020 to May 2021. Reference individuals were divided into four groups: 3-28 days, 29 days - 1 year, 1-3 years and 4-6 years. Vein blood or capillary blood were collected by percutaneous puncture from every reference individual. The PCT level in serum and the capillary whole blood were assayed by Roche Cobas e601 and Norman NRM411-S7 immunoanalyzer. Outliers were deleted and 95th percentiles of every group were provided as RIs. Man-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test were used performed to assess the difference among different gender, age or method groups. Results:The difference of PCT distribution between male and female is not statistically significant, but the difference between serum and capillary whole blood is statistically significant. The differences between age groups are significant too. For Roche e601, serum PCT RI of 3-28 days group is <0.23 μg/L, 29 days - 6 years are <0.11 μg/L. For NRM411, Serum PCT RI of 3-28 days group is <0.21 μg/L, 29 days - 1 year: <0.09 μg/L, 1 - 6 years: <0.10 μg/L. For whole blood PCT, RI of 3-28 days group is <0.26 μg/L, 29 days - 6 years is <0.15 μg/L.Conclusions:Serum and capillary whole blood PCT have different RIs, however, capillary whole blood PCT testing is valuable in pediatric application. Children in 3-28 days show higher PCT levels than other age group. To establish the RIs and understand the differences among different groups are essential for the interpretation and clinical application of peripheral blood PCT testing results.