Objective To investigate the serum levels of PGⅠ,PGⅡ,TK1,TSGF and CEA,CA724 in gastric cancer and eval-uate the application value of combined detection the above tumor markers in diagnosis of gastric cancer.Methods The serum levels of TSGF were measured in 94 patients with gastric cancer and 85 healthy control by rate method.PGⅠ,PGⅡ,TK1 and CEA,CA724 were detected by electrochemiluminescence method.Results PGⅠand PGⅠ/PGⅡwere lower than healthy control in serum of patients with gastric cancer (both P<0.05).There was no difference in PGⅡ (P>0.05),and other tumor markers were all higher than healthy control (all P<0.05).The sensitivity of PGⅠ,PGⅠ/PGⅡ were better than TK1,CEA and CA724 (all P<0.05),the specificity of PGⅠ/PGⅡ,CEA were better than TSGF (both P<0.05),the accuracy of PGⅠ,PGⅠ/PGⅡ were better than CA724 and TSGF alone (all P<0.05).When combined TSGF,TK1 and PGⅠ/PGⅡ,PGⅠ,the sensitivity was better than combined PGⅠ/PGⅡand PGⅠ alone (P<0.05).Then when added CEA, CA724,this sensitivity improved up to 82.98%.Although the combined detection would show a lower specificity,it still keep high to 84.71%.Combined detection improved the accuracy in diagnosis of gastric cancer,up to 83.80%.In this re-search,There was no difference in sensitivity,specificity and accuracy between the group of PGⅠ+PGⅠ/PGⅡ+TSGF+TK1+CEA and the group of PGⅠ+PGⅠ/PGⅡ+TSGF+TK1+CEA+CA724.Conclusion Compared with CEA and CA724 popular used in clinic,PGⅠ/PGⅡand PGⅠshowed a better application value.The group of PGⅠ+PGⅠ/PGⅡ+TSGF+TK1+CEA showed the best sensitivity.Combined detection of serum levels of PGⅠ,PGⅠ/PGⅡ,TSGF,TK1 ,CEA can significantly raise the sensitivity and accuracy in diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of morinidazole combined with appendectomy in treating purulent or gangrenous appendicitis.Methods Double-blind randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial was designed and conducted.Totally 437 patients were included,219 in the control group and 218 in the experimental group.Cases of purulent or gangrenous appendicitis were enrolled and assigned to each of the two groups.The control group received ornidazole injection for 5 to 7 days while the experimental group received morinidazole injection.Both groups underwent appendectomy.Clinical response,micrombiological outcomes,overall response were evaluated.Adverse events and side effects were recorded.Results No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the clinical healing rate at 5-10 days after medicine withdrawal,anaerobia clearance and overall healing rates.Adverse events occurred in 140 patients (32.1％).Incidence of adverse events in the control group and the experimental group was 34.7％ and 29.4％,respectively (P ＞ 0.05).The overall incidence of side effects was 15.1％ (66 cases).Side effects were less seen in the experimental group compared with that in the control group (11.5％ vs.18.7％,P ＜ 0.05).The most frequent side effects were aminotransferase rising,thrombocytosis,nausea,vomiting and electrocardiographic abnormality.Conclusions The effect of morinidazole plus operation was comparable with ornidazole in treating purulent or gangrenous appendicitis.The safety of morinidazole is better than ornidazole.