1.Research on the application of artificial intelligence compressed sensing technology in three-dimensional proton density weighted imaging of the unilateral hip joint
Daoen ZHANG ; Xu XU ; Hanyu LI ; Sixian HU ; Ye YUAN ; Gaofeng ZHANG ; Xiaoyong ZHANG ; Chunchao XIA ; Zhenlin LI
Chinese Journal of Radiology 2024;58(12):1431-1436
Objective:To explore the impact of artificial intelligence compressed sensing technology (CS-AI) on image quality in three-dimensional proton density weighted imaging (3D PDWI) of the unilateral hip joint.Methods:High-resolution unilateral hip imaging was conducted on 67 healthy volunteers at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January to July 2023. Imaging was performed by using CS-AI 3D PDWI sequence with acceleration factors (AF) of 4, 6, 8, and 10, respectively. According to the AF, all subjects were divided into 4 groups: CS-AI 4, CS-AI 6, CS-AI 8 and CS-AI 10, with CS-AI 4 serving as a reference. Recording the scan time, the signal and noise intensity of the femoral head, muscle, and subcutaneous fat were measured by a senior radiologist and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were then calculated. Additionally, two observers provided ratings for overall image quality and artifacts in the 4 groups, and statistical analysis was performed using the Friedman rank-sum test.Results:The acquisition times for CS-AI 4, CS-AI 6, CS-AI 8, and CS-AI 10 were 5 min 49 s, 3 min 54 s, 2 min 56 s and 2 min 22 s, respectively. Compared to CS-AI 4, the scanning time for CS-AI 6, CS-AI 8, CS-AI 10 were reduced by 32.95%, 50.14%, 59.31%, respectively. The objective evaluation revealed that the SNR and CNR of the femoral head and muscle in groups CS-AI 6, CS-AI 8, and CS-AI 10 were slightly lower than those in group CS-AI 4 ( P<0.05), and the differences were statistically significant. However, no statistically significant differences were found among the 3 groups ( P>0.05). The subjective evaluation indicated that the overall image quality scores of group CS-AI 8 [3 (3,4)] did not significantly differ from those of group CS-AI 4 and CS-AI 6( P>0.05); The mean scores of group CS-AI 4 and CS-AI 6 were 4 (4, 4); Scores of group CS-AI 10 was 3(3, 3), which statistically significant differ from those of the other groups ( P<0.05). The artifacts rating for groups CS-AI 4, CS-AI 6, CS-AI 8 and CS-AI 10 were 4 (4, 4), 4 (4, 4), 3 (3, 4), and 2 (2, 3) respectively. When AF was set to 10, the images exhibited the most severe artifacts ( P<0.05). For other AF values, artifact ratings did not differ significantly ( P>0.05). Conclusion:The CS-AI 3D-PDWI sequence with acceleration factor 8 can acquire high-resolution images of the unilateral hip joint that meet clinical diagnostic requirements while reducing scanning time.