Objective:To investigate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic cold snare resection of small colorectal polyps and prophylactic hemostatic clip.Methods:A total of 260 patients diagnosed as having small colorectal polyps in Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital from January 2021 to March 2022 were randomly assigned to cold snare polypectomy (CSP) group (receiving CSP), CSP+hemostatic clip group (receiving CSP+prophylactic hemostatic clip), hot snare polypectomy (HSP) group, and HSP +hemostatic clip group (receiving HSP+prophylactic hemostatic clip). Each group had 65 cases. The treatment, incidence of bleeding, and other complications were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in the basic characteristics of patients or polyps among the four groups ( P>0.05). Immediate intraoperative bleeding occurred in 5 cases (7.69%), 4 cases (6.15%), 3 cases (4.62%), and 3 cases (4.62%) in the four groups respectively with no significant difference ( χ2=0.778, P=0.855), while only 1 delayed postoperative bleeding was observed in HSP group with no significant difference among the four groups ( χ2=3.012, P=0.390). The incidence of postoperative abdominal pain was the highest in the HSP group ( n=7, 10.77%) significantly different from those of the CSP group ( n=1, 1.54%) and the CSP+hemostatic clip group ( n=1, 1.54%) ( P<0.05). Polypectomy time of single polyp in CSP group was the shortest (2.18±1.07 min) , followed by HSP group (2.83±0.82 min), then CSP+hemostatic clip group (3.15±1.16 min), with HSP+hemostatic clip group (4.88±1.85 min) being the longest ( F=50.397, P<0.001). Conclusion:It is suggested to use CSP for small colorectal polyps. If there is no risk of bleeding or perforation during the operation, it is not necessary to use prophylactic hemostatic clips.