Objective To study the effect of lienal polypeptide injection on immune function in patients with chronic kidney disease(stage CKD5,uremia).Methods 42 patients with maintenance hemodialysis and 42 patients with peritoneal dialysis in stage CKD5 phase were selected as the research subjects.According to the digital table,they were randomly divided into observation group and control group,32 cases in each group.All patients were treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis,the observation group was treated with lienal polypeptide injection,while the con-trol group was treated without lienal polypeptide injection.The immune function index(CD3+,CD4+,CD8+,CD4+/CD8+) were compared between the two groups after treatment for 15 d.Results In the observation group,the immune index after 15 days treatment were CD3+(58.26 ±7.90)%,CD4+(34.46 ±6.45)%,CD8+(25.33 ±4.47)%,CD4+/CD8+(81.36 ±0.21).In the control group,the immune index after 15 days treatment were CD3+(55.64 ±5.32)%,CD4+(31.79 ±7.15)%,CD8+(27.52 ±4.68)%,CD4+/CD8+(1.16 ±0.18).CD3+,CD4+,CD4+/CD8+ levels of the obser-vation group were significantly higher than those of the control group(t =2.820,t =1.610,t =7.060,all P <0.05). The level of CD8+ was significantly lower than that of the control group(t =0.004,P <0.05).Conclusion Lienal polypeptide can effectively improve the immune function of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD5 stage).

OBJECTIVETo compare the perioperative safety and efficacy between hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery(HALS) and conventional open sigmoidectomy.

METHODSA total of 291 patients with sigmoid colon cancer who underwent surgery in our hospital from January 2010 to June 2013 were seperated into (HALS) group (n=200) and conventional open surgery (COS) group (n=91) with a non-randomized method. The perioperative safety and efficacy of two groups and perioperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTSThese two groups were comparable in operative time, lymph node harvest, and postoperative complications. However, HALS group had less intraoperative bleeding [(57.9±28.3) ml vs. (82.5±47.6) ml, P=0.000], shorter time to flatus [(3.0±1.4) d vs. (3.3±0.9) d, P=0.000], and shorter hospital stay [(7.3±4.2) d vs. (8.9±4.4) d, P=0.004]. There werer no significant differences in overall survival time and disease-free survival time between the two groups during 6 months to 3 years follow-up.

CONCLUSIONSHALS results in similar outcomes of conventional open surgery for sigmoidectomy with the advantage of minimal invasiveness.

Colectomy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Lymph Nodes ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Sigmoid Neoplasms ; Treatment Outcome