1.Beliefs and Attitudes toward Physician-assisted Suicide among Korean Adults
In Cheol HWANG ; Jung Hun KANG ; Won-chul KIM ; Jeanno PARK ; Hyun Sook KIM ; DaeKyun KIM ; Kyung Hee LEE
Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care 2022;25(4):198-203
Purpose:
To grasp public opinion accurately, we conducted an opinion poll on beliefs and attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide (PAS).
Methods:
A randomized telephone survey ensuring a representative sample was conducted, 1,007 participants aged 18 years or older (response rate, 9.5%).
Results:
The main results are as follows: i) 61.1% of participants thought that the current social support system for terminally ill patients and their families is insufficient; ii) 60% of participants did not recognize the term “hospice and palliative care”; iii) 81.7% of participants would not like to receive life-sustaining treatment if there is no possibility of recovery; iv) 58.4% of participants would like to receive hospice and palliative care if they are diagnosed with a terminal illness; v) the priorities for dignified dying were preparing a support system to reduce the burden of care (28.6%), economic support including reduction of medical expenses (26.7%), expansion of hospice and palliative care services (25.4%), and legalization of PAS (13.6%); and vi) 58.3% of participants agreed that the expansion of hospice and palliative care should precede the legalization of PAS.
Conclusion
Koreans currently want other efforts, including expansion of hospice and palliative care services, instead of the legalization of PAS.
2.Consensus guidelines for the definition of the end stage of disease and last days of life and criteria for medical judgment
Sang Min LEE ; Su Jung KIM ; Youn Seon CHOI ; Dae Seog HEO ; Sujin BAIK ; Bo Moon CHOI ; Daekyun KIM ; Jae Young MOON ; So Young PARK ; Yoon Jung CHANG ; In Cheol HWANG ; Jung Hye KWON ; Sun Hyun KIM ; Yu Jung KIM ; Jeanno PARK ; Ho Jung AHN ; Hyun Woo LEE ; Ivo KWON ; Do Kyong KIM ; Ock Joo KIM ; Sang Ho YOO ; Yoo Seock CHEONG ; Younsuck KOH
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2018;61(8):509-521
In Korea, the Hospice, Palliative Care, and Life-sustaining Treatment Decision-making Act was enacted in February 2016 in order to ensure that the patient's self-determination in end-of-life care processes is respected. To enhance physicians' understanding of this act and to provide proper criteria for medical judgment in variety of clinical settings, consensus guidelines were published in November 2016. In this article, the characteristics of these guidelines and related issues regarding the definitions of ‘the end stage of disease’ and ‘last days of life’ and the criteria for medical judgment are presented and summarized. According to the guidelines, the term ‘end stage of disease’ refers to a state in which there is no possibility of a fundamental recovery and the symptoms are expected to worsen within months. The terms ‘the last days of life’ and ‘the final days of life’ refer to a state in which, despite treatment, the patient's condition is worsening and death is impending, with no possibility of recovery. The attending physician and another relevant specialist should both judge a patient's medical condition as either ‘end stage of disease’ for hospice/palliative care or ‘the last days of life’ for dying patient care according to the law. Caregivers should provide appropriate medical information to eligible patients for palliative or ‘end stage of disease’ care through advance care planning. Therefore, it is critically necessary that caregivers understand the legitimate process of hospice/palliative and dying patient care based on the patient's wishes and best interests. Physicians should apply these consensus guidelines to eligible patients considering their clinical course and the patients' wishes.
Advance Care Planning
;
Caregivers
;
Consensus
;
Hospices
;
Humans
;
Judgment
;
Jurisprudence
;
Korea
;
Palliative Care
;
Patient Care
;
Specialization
3.Consensus guidelines for the definition of the end stage of disease and last days of life and criteria for medical judgment
Sang Min LEE ; Su Jung KIM ; Youn Seon CHOI ; Dae Seog HEO ; Sujin BAIK ; Bo Moon CHOI ; Daekyun KIM ; Jae Young MOON ; So Young PARK ; Yoon Jung CHANG ; In Cheol HWANG ; Jung Hye KWON ; Sun Hyun KIM ; Yu Jung KIM ; Jeanno PARK ; Ho Jung AHN ; Hyun Woo LEE ; Ivo KWON ; Do Kyong KIM ; Ock Joo KIM ; Sang Ho YOO ; Yoo Seock CHEONG ; Younsuck KOH
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2018;61(8):509-521
In Korea, the Hospice, Palliative Care, and Life-sustaining Treatment Decision-making Act was enacted in February 2016 in order to ensure that the patient's self-determination in end-of-life care processes is respected. To enhance physicians' understanding of this act and to provide proper criteria for medical judgment in variety of clinical settings, consensus guidelines were published in November 2016. In this article, the characteristics of these guidelines and related issues regarding the definitions of ‘the end stage of disease’ and ‘last days of life’ and the criteria for medical judgment are presented and summarized. According to the guidelines, the term ‘end stage of disease’ refers to a state in which there is no possibility of a fundamental recovery and the symptoms are expected to worsen within months. The terms ‘the last days of life’ and ‘the final days of life’ refer to a state in which, despite treatment, the patient's condition is worsening and death is impending, with no possibility of recovery. The attending physician and another relevant specialist should both judge a patient's medical condition as either ‘end stage of disease’ for hospice/palliative care or ‘the last days of life’ for dying patient care according to the law. Caregivers should provide appropriate medical information to eligible patients for palliative or ‘end stage of disease’ care through advance care planning. Therefore, it is critically necessary that caregivers understand the legitimate process of hospice/palliative and dying patient care based on the patient's wishes and best interests. Physicians should apply these consensus guidelines to eligible patients considering their clinical course and the patients' wishes.