Cyclosporine ; pharmacokinetics ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Treatment Outcome

Anemia, Aplastic/drug therapy* ; Benzoates/therapeutic use* ; Cyclosporine/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Hydrazines/therapeutic use* ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; Pyrazoles/therapeutic use*

Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains unsatisfactory. It is possible that immunosuppressive therapy might be effective for a certain subset of patients with MDS. In this review 105 patients with MDS who were treated with cyclosporin A (CsA) including 90 RA, 5 RARS, 10 RAEB, were analyzed. The dose of CsA was 2 - 12 mg/(kg x d) for at least three months. Hematological improvement was observed in 64 patients (61%), and complete remission was observed in 14 patients (13.3%). These results indicated that CsA immunosuppressive therapy may be useful for IPSS low, intermediate-1 and intermediate-2 MDS patients.
Cyclosporine ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes ; drug therapy ; immunology

No abstract available.
Colitis, Ulcerative/*drug therapy ; Cyclosporine/*therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/*therapeutic use ; Infliximab/*therapeutic use ; Male ; Salvage Therapy/*methods

OBJECTIVETo systematically evaluate the clinical effects of cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus, which are calcineurin inhibitors, on lupus nephritis.

METHODIn this study, the clinical trials on treatment of lupus nephritis with cyclosporine A and tacrolimus published until May 2010 were searched at www.guideline.gov, www.nice.org.uk, mdm.ca/cpgsnew/cpgs/index.asp, www.show.scot.nhs.uk, www.nzgg.org.nz, www.eguid elines.co.uk, www.gin.net, Cochrane library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Wanfang database, Chinese Journal full-text Database, Chongqing Weipu Database by using the methods of Cochrane systematic review. At the same time the information from related journals, professional data and network were hand-searched. The homogeneous evaluation was performed by meta-analysis.Statistical analysis of clinical data was performed by using RevMan 4.2 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.

RESULTA total of 214 reports were found, while only 7 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, 4 of them were on the treatment with CsA (treatment group) and cyclosporine (CTX) group (control group), and 3 of them were the on treatment with FK506 (treatment group) and CTX group (control group). There were 148 reports in the treatment of CsA and CTX group, while 185 reports in the treatment of FK506 and CTX group. Both CsA and tacrolimus group could decrease daily urinary protein. Tacrolimus group was good at reducing daily urinary protein as compared with CTX group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z = 2.8, P = 0.005), but there was no significant difference between CsA and CTX groups (Z = 1.08, P = 0.28). Tacrolimus group was good at complete remission as compared with CTX group (Z = 3.64, P = 0.0003), partial remission was similar in both groups (Z = 0.53, P = 0.6), and tacrolimus group was good at total remission (Z = 2.2, P = 0.03). There was no significant difference between CsA and CTX group in side effect within a short period, while FK506 had less side-effect than CTX group.

CONCLUSIONCompared with the treatment with CTX, tacrolimus was good at reducing daily urinary protein. CsA and CTX were similar in reducing daily urinary protein in the treatment of lupus nephritis. Tacrolimus resulted in better total remission than CTX and had less side effect. CsA and CTX groups were similar in side effect. On the whole, calcineurin inhibitor could significantly decrease daily urinary protein, and tacrolimus was better in treatment and had less side-effect than CTX. However, large scale, multicenter, well-designed clinical trials should be adopted to further confirm the conclusions.

Calcineurin Inhibitors ; Cyclosporine ; therapeutic use ; Enzyme Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Lupus Nephritis ; drug therapy ; Tacrolimus ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo analyze the outcome of childhood aplastic anemia received allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST).

METHODSThe clinical data of 125 consecutive children with aplastic anemia (AA) in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTSAccording to the clinical manifestations, the 125 AA children were divided into two groups: SAA (n = 79) and NSAA (n = 46). There was no significant difference between the two groups in sex, age and follow-up duration (P > 0.05). The median follow-up was 25 (6 - 89) months. 103 cases received IST and 22 received allogenic HSCT. In SAA group, the response rate was better in patients received allogenic HSCT (n = 21) than in those received IST (n = 58) (85.7% vs 53.4%, P < 0.01). SAA patients received IST were further divided into two groups: 47 received antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine-A (CsA) combined therapy, 11 received CsA alone. There was no significant difference in total response rates (55.3% vs 45.5%, P = 0.555) and cure rates (42.6% vs 27.3%, P = 0.499) between the two groups. In NSAA group, 45 patients received IST and 1 received allogenic HSCT. In the IST treated NSAA patients, there was also no statistic significance in cure rates (36.4% vs 32.4%, P = 0.806) and total effective rates (63.6% vs 64.7%, P = 0.949) between ATG and CsA combined therapy (n = 11) and CsA alone therapy (n = 34).

CONCLUSIONThe outcome of children with AA received allogenic HSCT was obviously better than those received IST. IST is still the choice for patients without suitable donors for HSCT.

Anemia, Aplastic ; therapy ; Antilymphocyte Serum ; therapeutic use ; Child ; Cyclosporine ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To observe the occurrence of immune dysfunction in children with aplastic anemia (AA) and the factors that may lead to immune dysfunction, analyze the relationship between the expression of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and immune dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 34 children with AA treated in our hospital from December 2016 to September 2018 were selected. All the children received immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for 6 months. According to whether the children had immune dysfunction after 6 months of treatment, they were divided into occurrence group and non occurrence group. General information and laboratory indices were compared between the two groups, and serum G-CSF level was tested, the relationship between serum G-CSF level and immune dysfunction in AA children after treatment with IST was observed and analyzed. RESULTS: After treatment with IST for 6 months, 12 cases developed immune dysfunction (35.29%). Serum interferon (IFN)-γ level of the occurrence group was higher but G-CSF level was lower than those of the non occurrence group (P<0.05), while the difference of other baseline data was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that overexpression of serum IFN-γ and low expression of G-CSF were both the influencing factors of immune dysfunction in AA children after IST treatment (OR>1, P<0.05). ROC curve was drawn, and the result showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of serum G-CSF level predicted the risk of immune dysfunction after IST was 0.843>0.80, when the index cut-off value was set at 6.614 pg/ml, the predictive value was ideal. CONCLUSION AA children have a higher risk of immune dysfunction after IST, which may be related to the low expression of serum G-CSF. The detection of serum G-CSF expression can be considered to predict the risk of immune dysfunction in AA children after IST, so as to guide early clinical intervention.
Anemia, Aplastic ; Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use* ; Child ; Cyclosporine/therapeutic use* ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; Humans ; Immunity ; Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use*

Humans ; Cyclosporine/therapeutic use* ; Anemia, Aplastic/drug therapy* ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use* ; Benzoates/therapeutic use*

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Anticoagulants ; therapeutic use ; Cyclophosphamide ; therapeutic use ; Cyclosporine ; therapeutic use ; Fish Oils ; therapeutic use ; Glomerulonephritis, IGA ; therapy ; Glucocorticoids ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Mycophenolic Acid ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use

Objective: To reassess the predictors for response at 6 months in patients with severe or very severe aplastic anemia (SAA/VSAA) who failed to respond to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) at 3 months. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 173 patients with SAA/VSAA from 2017 to 2018 who received IST and were classified as nonresponders at 3 months. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate factors that could predict the response at 6 months. Results: Univariate analysis showed that the 3-month hemoglobin (HGB) level (P=0.017) , platelet (PLT) level (P=0.005) , absolute reticulocyte count (ARC) (P<0.001) , trough cyclosporine concentration (CsA-C0) (P=0.042) , soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) level (P=0.003) , improved value of reticulocyte count (ARC(△)) (P<0.001) , and improved value of soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR(△)) level (P<0.001) were related to the 6-month response. The results of the multivariate analysis showed that the PLT level (P=0.020) and ARC(△) (P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors for response at 6 months. If the ARC(△) was less than 6.9×10(9)/L, the 6-month hematological response rate was low, regardless of the patient's PLT count. Survival analysis showed that both the 3-year overall survival (OS) [ (80.1±3.9) % vs (97.6±2.6) %, P=0.002] and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) [ (31.4±4.5) % vs (86.5±5.3) %, P<0.001] of the nonresponders at 6 months were significantly lower than those of the response group. Conclusion: Residual hematopoietic indicators at 3 months after IST are prognostic parameters. The improved value of the reticulocyte count could reflect whether the bone marrow hematopoiesis is recovering and the degree of recovery. A second treatment could be performed sooner for patients with a very low ARC(△).
Anemia, Aplastic/drug therapy* ; Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use* ; Cyclosporine/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Immunosuppression Therapy ; Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use* ; Prognosis ; Receptors, Transferrin/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome