1.In vitro studies of IgY against fusion VacA-HpaA protein of Helicobacter pylori
Cuilian YE ; Zhibang YANG ; Ji ZHANG ; Jin HUANG
Chinese Journal of Immunology 1985;0(02):-
Objective:Researching physical-chemic and biologic speciality of VacA-HpaA IgY,which provide a solid experimental basis for the preparation of vaccine against H.pylori infection.Methods:The purified antigen of fusion protein VacA-HpaA was used to immunize hens and the VacA-HpaA IgY was extracted from the yolk by water dilution methods.(1)After the VacA-HpaA IgY was purified by deposition technique with ammonium sulfate,the purity of IgY was analyzed by SDS-PAGE,and protein content of IgY was analyzed by Bradford method.(2)The indirect ELISA was used to detect its heat-stability,acid-stability and pepsin-stability.(3)The specificity of VacA-HpaA IgY to the antigens was identified by Western blot.(4)MTT was applied to assay the neutralization of VacA-HpaA IgY to The cytotoxity of H.pylori.(5)The neutralization of IgY to AGS cells was observed with scanning electron microscopy(SEM).Results:(1)The purity of VacA-HpaA IgY was about 60%,and the protein content of IgY was 22g/L;(2)The IgY showed a good heat-stability,a favorable acid-stability,and a well ability of anti-pepsin digest;(3)Western blot exhibited the protein bands with molecular weight of 27 000 and 30 000.The titer of VacA-HpaA IgY to VacA and HpaA were 1∶3 200 and 1∶6 400;(4)A dose and time dependent correlation of the IgY to counteract the cytotoxic activity of VacA;(5)VacA-HpaA IgY could interrupt the adhesive attraction of H.pylori.Conclusion:The VacA-HpaA IgY has good stabilities and well biologic speciality,which imply that the IgY could be used to prepare treatmental antibody against H.pylori infection.
2.Effectiveness, safety and cost of urinary follicle stimulating hormone in controlled ovarian stimulation in China: multi-center retrospective cohort study of 102 061 in vitro fertilization cycles
Yimin ZHU ; Yue GAO ; Donghong NAI ; Linli HU ; Lei JIN ; Ying ZHONG ; Ze WU ; Guimin HAO ; Qiongfang WU ; Yichun GUAN ; Hong JIANG ; Cuilian ZHANG ; Minli LIU ; Xiaohong WANG ; Xiaoming TENG ; Jinliang DUAN ; Liran LI ; Yue ZHANG ; Hong YE
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2022;57(7):510-518
Objective:To explore the effectiveness, safety and cost between urinary follicle stimulating hormone (uFSH) and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in China.Methods:Data were collected from 16 reproductive centers in China covering oocytes collection time from May 1, 2015 to June 30, 2018. Eligible patients were over 18 years old, adopting COS with uFSH (uFSH group) or rFSH (rFSH group) as start gonadotropins (Gn), and using in vitro fertilization (IVF) and (or) intracytoplasmic sperm injection for fertilisation, excluding frozen embryo recovery cycle. Generalised estimating equation was used to address the violation of independency assumption between cycles due to multiple IVF cycles for one person and clustering nature of cycles carried out within one center. Controlling variables included age, body mass index, anti-Müllerian hormone level, cause of infertility, ovulation protocol, type of fertilisation, number of embryos transferred, number of days of Gn use.Results:Totally 102 061 cycles met eligibility criteria and were included in the analyses. In terms of effectiveness, after controlling relevant unbalanced baseline characteristics, compared with rFSH group, the high oocyte retrieval (>15 oocytes was considered high retrieval) rate of uFSH group significantly decreased in gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol ( OR=0.642, P<0.01) and in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol ( OR=0.556, P=0.001), but the clinical pregnancy rate per transfer cycle and the live birth rate per transfer cycle significantly increased ( OR=1.179, OR=1.169, both P<0.01) in both agonist and antagonist protocols. For safety, multiple analysis result demonstrated that in the agonist protocol, compared with rFSH group, the incidence of moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome of uFSH group significantly decreased ( OR=0.644, P=0.002). The differences in ectopic pregnancy rate and multiple pregnancy rate between the uFSH and rFSH groups were not significant ( P=0.890, P=0.470) in all patients. In terms of cost, compared with rFSH group, the uFSH group had lower total Gn costs for each patient ( P<0.01). Conclusion:For patients who underwent COS, uFSH has better safety, and economic profiles over rFSH in China.