1.Pilot study on a rewarming rate of 0.15°C/hr versus 0.25°C/hr and outcomes in post cardiac arrest patients
Eunhye CHO ; Sung Eun LEE ; Eunjung PARK ; Hyuk Hoon KIM ; Ji Sook LEE ; Sangchun CHOI ; Young Gi MIN ; Minjung Kathy CHAE
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 2019;6(1):25-30
OBJECTIVE: Cerebral hemodynamic and metabolic changes may occur during the rewarming phase of targeted temperature management in post cardiac arrest patients. Yet, studies on different rewarming rates and patient outcomes are limited. This study aimed to investigate post cardiac arrest patients who were rewarmed with different rewarming rates after 24 hours of hypothermia and the association of these rates to the neurologic outcomes.METHODS: This study retrospectively investigated post cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management and rewarmed with rewarming rates of 0.15°C/hr and 0.25°C/hr. The association of the rewarming rate with poor neurologic outcomes (cerebral performance category score, 3 to 5) was investigated.RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were analyzed (0.15°C/hr, n=36; 0.25°C/hr, n=35). In the comparison between 0.15°C/hr and 0.25°C/hr, the poor neurologic outcome did not significantly differ (24 [66.7%] vs. 25 [71.4%], respectively; P=0.66). In the multivariate analysis, the rewarming rate of 0.15°C/hr was not associated with the 1-month neurologic outcome improvement (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 1.69; P=0.28).CONCLUSION: The rewarming rates of 0.15°C/hr and 0.25°C/hr were not associated with the neurologic outcome difference in post cardiac arrest patients.
Critical Care Outcomes
;
Heart Arrest
;
Hemodynamics
;
Humans
;
Hypothermia
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Pilot Projects
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Rewarming
2.Impact of Neurointensivist Co-management on the Clinical Outcomes of Patients Admitted to a Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit.
Jeong Am RYU ; Jeong Hoon YANG ; Chi Ryang CHUNG ; Gee Young SUH ; Seung Chyul HONG
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2017;32(6):1024-1030
Limited data are available on improved outcomes after initiation of neurointensivist co-management in neurosurgical intensive care units (NSICUs) in Korea. We evaluated the impact of a newly appointed neurointensivist on the outcomes of neurosurgical patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). This retrospective observational study involved neurosurgical patients admitted to the NSICU at Samsung Medical Center between March 2013 and May 2016. Neurointensivist co-management was initiated in October 1 2014. We compared the outcomes of neurosurgical patients before and after neurointensivist co-management. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. A total of 571 patients were admitted to the NSICU during the study period, 291 prior to the initiation of neurointensivist co-management and 280 thereafter. Intracranial hemorrhage (29.6%) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) (26.6%) were the most frequent reasons for ICU admission. TBI was the most common cause of death (39.0%). There were no significant differences in mortality rates and length of ICU stay before and after co-management. However, the rates of ICU and 30-day mortality among the TBI patients were significantly lower after compared to before initiation of neurointensivist co-management (8.5% vs. 22.9%; P = 0.014 and 11.0% vs. 27.1%; P = 0.010, respectively). Although overall outcomes were not different after neurointensivist co-management, initiation of a strategy of routine involvement of a neurointensivist significantly reduced the ICU and 30-day mortality rates of TBI patients.
Brain Injuries
;
Cause of Death
;
Critical Care Outcomes
;
Critical Care*
;
Humans
;
Intensive Care Units*
;
Intracranial Hemorrhages
;
Korea
;
Mortality
;
Neurosurgery
;
Observational Study
;
Retrospective Studies
3.Effects of Appointing a Full-Time Neurointensivist to Run a Closed-Type Neurological Intensive Care Unit
Myung Ah KO ; Jung Hwa LEE ; Joong Goo KIM ; Suyeon JEONG ; Dong Wha KANG ; Chae Man LIM ; Sang Ahm LEE ; Kwang Kuk KIM ; Sang Beom JEON
Journal of Clinical Neurology 2019;15(3):360-368
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate whether appointing a full-time neurointensivist to manage a closed-type neurological intensive care unit (NRICU) improves the quality of critical care and patient outcomes. METHODS: This study included patients admitted to the NRICU at a university hospital in Seoul, Korea. Two time periods were defined according to the presence of a neurointensivist in the preexisting open-type NRICU: the before and after periods. Hospital medical records were queried and compared between these two time periods, as were the biannual satisfaction survey results for the families of patients. RESULTS: Of the 15,210 patients in the neurology department, 2,199 were admitted to the NRICU (n=995 and 1,204 during the before and after periods, respectively; p<0.001). The length of stay was shorter during the after than during the before period in both the NRICU (3 vs. 4 days; p<0.001) and the hospital overall (12.5 vs. 14.0 days; p<0.001). Neurological consultations (2,070 vs. 3,097; p<0.001) and intrahospital transfers from general intensive care units to the NRICU (21 vs. 40; p=0.111) increased from the before to after the period. The mean satisfaction scores of the families of the patients also increased, from 78.3 to 89.7. In a Cox proportional hazards model, appointing a neurointensivist did not result in a statistically significant change in 6-month mortality (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.652–1.031; p=0.089). CONCLUSIONS: Appointing a full-time neurointensivist to manage a closed-type NRICU had beneficial effects on quality indicators and patient outcomes.
Critical Care Outcomes
;
Critical Care
;
Humans
;
Intensive Care Units
;
Korea
;
Length of Stay
;
Medical Records
;
Mortality
;
Neurology
;
Proportional Hazards Models
;
Referral and Consultation
;
Seoul
4.Correlation between Head Trauma and Outcome of Chronic Subdural Hematoma.
Dong Han KIM ; Eun Suk PARK ; Min Soo KIM ; Sung Ho PARK ; Jun Bum PARK ; Soon Chan KWON ; In Uk LYO ; Hong Bo SIM
Korean Journal of Neurotrauma 2016;12(2):94-100
OBJECTIVE: Our study examined the prognostic factors involved in the outcome of patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) who had undergone burr hole drainage procedures, and investigated the association between outcome and traumatic head injury. In addition, we explored factors related to recurrence. METHODS: This study enrolled 238 patients with CSDH who had undergone burr hole drainage. Patients with history of head injury were categorized into the head trauma group and were compared with the no head trauma group. Outcome was considered good when modified Rankin Scale scores improved from admission to discharge and the final follow-up. RESULTS: Among 238 patients, 127 (53.4%) were included in the head trauma group. One hundred thirty-three (55.9%) patients demonstrated good outcome at discharge, and 171 (71.8%) patients demonstrated good outcome at the final follow-up. None of the factors examined was significantly correlated with good outcome at discharge. However, only history of head injury (p=0.033, odds ratio 0.511, 95% confidence interval 0.277-0.946) was significantly correlated with poor outcome at long-term follow-up. Recurrence occurred in 20 (8.4%) cases in the total cohort and 11 (55%) patients in the head trauma group. CONCLUSION: History of head trauma is correlated with poor outcome at long-term follow-up in CSDH patients having undergone burr hole drainage. Therefore, CSDH patients with history of head injury are susceptible to poor outcome, warranting more careful evaluation and treatment after burr hole drainage.
Cohort Studies
;
Craniocerebral Trauma*
;
Critical Care Outcomes
;
Drainage
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Head*
;
Hematoma
;
Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic*
;
Humans
;
Odds Ratio
;
Recurrence
5.Initial absence of N20 waveforms from median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in a patient with cardiac arrest and good outcomes
Miguel E HABEYCH ; Pouria MOSHAYEDI ; Jon C RITTENBERGER ; Scott R GUNN
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 2019;6(2):177-182
A 34-year-old male was brought to the hospital with a chest gunshot wound. Pulseless upon arrival, blood pressure was absent for 10 minutes. A thoracotomy resulted in return of spontaneous circulation. On hospital day 5, with brainstem reflexes present, he was unresponsive to call or pain, exhibited generalized hyperreflexia and bilateral Babinskys. Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (mSSEPs) and brainstem auditory evoked potentials were obtained. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology recommendations for mSSEPs and brainstem auditory evoked potentials were followed. Despite absence of the N20 responses from cortical mSSEPs no withdrawal from care was agreed upon. After awaking on day 7, mSSEPs were repeated and present. The patient survived and was discharged with minor deficits. Bilateral absence of N20 responses from mSSEPs performed beyond 48 hours after resuscitation from cardiac arrest is highly associated with bad neurological outcomes. However, variation due to hypothermia, noisy signals, medications, and brain hypo-perfusion must be taken into account.
Adult
;
Blood Pressure
;
Brain
;
Brain Stem
;
Critical Care Outcomes
;
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
;
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
;
Heart Arrest
;
Humans
;
Hypothermia
;
Male
;
Median Nerve
;
Nervous System Diseases
;
Neurophysiology
;
Prognosis
;
Reflex
;
Reflex, Abnormal
;
Resuscitation
;
Thoracotomy
;
Thorax
;
Wounds, Gunshot