1.Pandemic-related health literacy: a systematic review of literature in COVID-19, SARS and MERS pandemics.
Jun Jie Benjamin SENG ; Cheng Teng YEAM ; Caleb Weihao HUANG ; Ngiap Chuan TAN ; Lian Leng LOW
Singapore medical journal 2025;66(5):244-255
INTRODUCTION:
Health literacy plays an essential role in one's ability to acquire and understand critical medical information in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infodemic and in other pandemics. We aimed to summarise the assessment, levels and determinants of pandemic-related health literacy and its associated clinical outcomes.
METHODS:
A systematic review was performed in Medline ® , Embase ® , PsycINFO ® , CINAHL ® and four major preprint servers. Observational and interventional studies that evaluated health literacy related to the novel COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) were included. Items used in health literacy instruments were grouped under the themes of knowledge, attitudes and practices. Determinants of health literacy were grouped into five domains: sociodemographic, medical, psychological/psychiatric, health systems-related and others.
RESULTS:
Of the 2,065 articles screened, 70 articles were included. Of these, 21, 17 and 32 studies evaluated health literacy related to COVID-19, SARS and MERS, respectively. The rates of low pandemic health literacy ranged from 4.3% to 57.9% among medical-related populations and from 4.0% to 82.5% among nonmedical populations. Knowledge about the symptoms and transmission of infection, worry about infection, and practices related to mask usage and hand hygiene were most frequently evaluated. Sociodemographic determinants of health literacy were most frequently studied, among which higher education level, older age and female gender were found to be associated with better health literacy. No studies evaluated the outcomes associated with health literacy.
CONCLUSION
The level of pandemic-related health literacy is suboptimal. Healthcare administrators need to be aware of health literacy determinants when formulating policies in pandemics.
Humans
;
Health Literacy
;
COVID-19/epidemiology*
;
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology*
;
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
;
Pandemics
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology*
;
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
;
Female
;
Male
2.An update on the epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19).
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2020;41(2):139-144
Through literature review and group discussion, Special Expert Group for Control of the Epidemic of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association formulated an update on the epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP). The initial source of the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) was the Huanan seafood market in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, with pangolins as a potential animal host. Currently the main source of infection is NCP patients, and asymptomatic carriers may also be infectious. The virus is believed transmitted mostly via droplets or contact. People are all generally susceptible to the virus. The average incubation period was 5.2 days, and the basic reproductive number R(0) was 2.2 at the onset of the outbreak. Most NCP patients were clinically mild cases. The case fatality rate was 2.38%, and elderly men with underlying diseases were at a higher risk of death. Strategies for prevention and control of NCP include improving epidemic surveillance, quarantining the source of infection, speeding up the diagnosis of suspected cases, optimizing the management of close contacts, tightening prevention and control of cluster outbreaks and hospital infection, preventing possible rebound of the epidemic after people return to work from the Chinese Spring Festival holiday, and strengthening community prevention and control.
Aged
;
Animals
;
Asymptomatic Diseases/epidemiology*
;
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
China/epidemiology*
;
Contact Tracing
;
Coronavirus
;
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology*
;
Humans
;
Infectious Disease Incubation Period
;
Male
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology*
;
Public Health Surveillance/methods*
;
Quarantine
;
SARS-CoV-2
3.The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China.
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2020;41(2):145-151
Objective: An outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China has spread quickly nationwide. Here, we report results of a descriptive, exploratory analysis of all cases diagnosed as of February 11, 2020. Methods: All COVID-19 cases reported through February 11, 2020 were extracted from China's Infectious Disease Information System. Analyses included: 1) summary of patient characteristics; 2) examination of age distributions and sex ratios; 3) calculation of case fatality and mortality rates; 4) geo-temporal analysis of viral spread; 5) epidemiological curve construction; and 6) subgroup analysis. Results: A total of 72 314 patient records-44 672 (61.8%) confirmed cases, 16 186 (22.4%) suspected cases, 10567 (14.6%) clinical diagnosed cases (Hubei only), and 889 asymptomatic cases (1.2%)-contributed data for the analysis. Among confirmed cases, most were aged 30-79 years (86.6%), diagnosed in Hubei (74.7%), and considered mild/mild pneumonia (80.9%). A total of 1 023 deaths occurred among confirmed cases for an overall case-fatality rate of 2.3%. The COVID-19 spread outward from Hubei sometime after December 2019 and by February 11, 2020, 1 386 counties across all 31 provinces were affected. The epidemic curve of onset of symptoms peaked in January 23-26, then began to decline leading up to February 11. A total of 1 716 health workers have become infected and 5 have died (0.3%). Conclusions: The COVID-19 epidemic has spread very quickly. It only took 30 days to expand from Hubei to the rest of Mainland China. With many people returning from a long holiday, China needs to prepare for the possible rebound of the epidemic.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Asymptomatic Diseases/epidemiology*
;
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
China/epidemiology*
;
Coronavirus
;
Coronavirus Infections/mortality*
;
Disease Outbreaks
;
Humans
;
Middle Aged
;
Mortality/trends*
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral/mortality*
;
SARS-CoV-2
7.Gastrointestinal involvement of COVID-19 and potential faecal transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
Min SONG ; Zong-Lin LI ; Ye-Jiang ZHOU ; Gang TIAN ; Ting YE ; Zhang-Rui ZENG ; Jian DENG ; Hong WAN ; Qing LI ; Jin-Bo LIU
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B 2020;21(9):749-751
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was found initially in Wuhan, China in early December 2019. The pandemic has spread to 216 countries and regions, infecting more than 23310 000 people and causing over 800 000 deaths globally by Aug. 24, 2020, according to World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/ novel-coronavirus-2019). Fever, cough, and dyspnea are the three common symptoms of the condition, whereas the conventional transmission route for SARS-CoV-2 is through droplets entering the respiratory tract. To date, infection control measures for COVID-19 have been focusing on the involvement of the respiratory system. However, ignoring potential faecal transmission and the gastrointestinal involvement of SARS-CoV-2 may result in mistakes in attempts to control the pandemic.
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification*
;
COVID-19
;
China/epidemiology*
;
Coronavirus Infections/virology*
;
Environmental Microbiology
;
Feces/virology*
;
Gastrointestinal Diseases/virology*
;
Humans
;
Models, Biological
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral/virology*
;
RNA, Viral/genetics*
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Virus Shedding
8.Progress in the study on COVID
Jiajun ZHOU ; Yongwu YU ; Ling ZHANG
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2020;45(10):1241-1246
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is now a major public health problem worldwide. Infectivity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is extremely strong. The one major target of the virus is the lung, which leads to the deaths of respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. The kidney is also one of the main organs attacked by viruses, which directly damage the renal tubules through angiotensin converting enzyme-2 and cause cytokine storm, resulting in kidney damage and increasing the risk of death in the patients. Early investigation of risk factors for kidney injury, detection of kidney injury indicators, timely supporting treatment and renal replacement therapy for the existence of kidney injury patients are useful for reducing the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients.
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology*
;
Humans
;
Kidney
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology*
;
SARS-CoV-2
9.Research progress in nervous system damage caused by SARS
Peng HUANG ; Li TANG ; Yi REN ; Liqun LIU
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2020;45(10):1247-1254
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a major outbreak in the world. SARS-CoV-2 infection can not only involve in the respiratory system, but also cause severe nervous system damage. Studies have shown that SRAS-CoV-2 can invade the nervous system through hematogenous and transneuronal pathways, and may cause nervous system damage in patients with COVID-19 by inhibiting cellular immunity, hypoxemia, inflammation, inducing neuronal degeneration and apoptosis, and angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) mechanism. It can lead to intracranial infection, toxic encephalopathy, acute cerebrovascular disease, muscle damage, peripheral nervous system injury, acute myelitis, demyelination disease or other nervous system diseases.
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology*
;
Humans
;
Pandemics
;
Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A
;
Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology*
;
Research
;
SARS-CoV-2
10.Mental health status and its influencing factors among general population and medical personnel in Guangdong Province during COVID-19 pandemic.
Zhengrong LIU ; Xudong ZHANG ; Zhihan LÜ ; Jie LIANG ; Yudi DENG ; Linfei FENG
Journal of Southern Medical University 2020;40(10):1530-1538
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the mental health status and its influencing factors among general population and healthcare professionals in Guangdong Province during COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS:
A online questionnaire-based survey was conducted from March 11st to March 15th, 2020.The questionnaire consisted of 4 parts to survey the participants'basic information, understanding of COVID-19 outbreak-associated information, cognition of COVID-19 pandemic and status of anxiety and depression.A total of 1433 valid responses were collected, including 706 from the general population and 727 from healthcare professionals.Cronbach's α coefficient and exploratory factor analysis were used for reliability and validity assessment.Chi-square, Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for univariate analysis and ordinal or nominal logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis of the data.
RESULTS:
There was no significant difference between the general population and the healthcare professionals in terms of anxiety, depression and cognition of COVID-19 outbreak after adjustment for demographic variables, but the levels of anxiety and depression of these participants were both higher than those before the pandemic.In the participants from the general population, multivariate logistic regressions showed an OR for anxiety of 1.93(1.18, 3.17) among those who spent 1-2 h a day in reading COVID-19-related news, while those who spent over 3 h had an OR value for anxiety of 1.88(1.14, 3.11);the unmarried individuals had a depression OR of 2.19(1.51, 3.18). Inaccurate cognition of COVID-19 outbreak was positive correlated with the occurrence of anxiety and depression.Unmarried individuals and those with higher educational levels had better cognition of COVID-19 outbreak.Among the healthcare professionals, multivariate logistic regressions suggested that insufficient rest time and worries about contracting the virus contributed to the occurrence of anxiety and depression.Among the nursing staff, the OR of obvious depression was 2.99(1.45, 6.18).Compared to healthcare professionals not working in designated hospital for COVID-19, those who work in the designated hospitals had ORs for obvious and severe depression of 0.48(0.25, 0.93) and 0.39(0.17, 0.89), respectively.Concerns over contracting the virus increased the possibility of incorrect cognition of COVID-19.
CONCLUSIONS
Psychological interventions are essential for both the general population and healthcare professionals, especially for unmarried individuals in the general population and the nursing staff.An excessive exposure to COVID-19-related information may have detrimental effects on the mental health.For healthcare professionals, sufficient rest needs to be ensured, and education programs on COVID-19 should be implemented among both residents and healthcare professionals to improve their mental health.
Anxiety/epidemiology*
;
Betacoronavirus
;
COVID-19
;
China/epidemiology*
;
Coronavirus Infections
;
Health Status
;
Humans
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
SARS-CoV-2

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail