BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the bare-metal stent era, routine follow-up coronary angiography (RFU CAG) was used to ensure stent patency. With the advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs) with better safety and efficacy profiles, RFU CAG has been performed less often. There are few data on the clinical impact of RFU CAG after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients with coronary artery disease; the aim of this study was to examine this issue. METHODS: We analyzed clinical outcomes retrospectively of 259 patients who were event-free at 12-month after stent implantation and did not undergo RFU CAG (clinical follow-up group) and 364 patients who were event-free prior to RFU CAG (angiographic follow-up group). Baseline characteristics were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimated total survival and major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival did not differ between the groups (p = 0.100 and p = 0.461, respectively). The cumulative MACE rate was also not different between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 2.02). In the angiographic follow-up group, 8.8% revascularization was seen at RFU CAG. CONCLUSIONS: RFU CAG did not affect long-term clinical outcome after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients.
Aged ; *Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Bypass ; Coronary Artery Disease/radiography/*therapy ; Coronary Restenosis/etiology/radiography/surgery ; Coronary Vessels/*radiography ; Disease Progression ; Disease-Free Survival ; *Drug-Eluting Stents ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction/etiology/radiography/surgery ; Patient Selection ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects/*instrumentation ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prosthesis Design ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome