1.Safety and feasibility of repeated percutaneous transradial coronary intervention in the same route.
Bin NIE ; Yu-Jie ZHOU ; Qing YANG ; Wan-Jun CHENG ; Zhi-Jian WANG ; Jian-Long WANG
Chinese Medical Journal 2012;125(2):221-225
BACKGROUNDThe radial approach has been increasingly used as an alternative to femoral access. And more procedures using repeated transradial coronary intervention (r-TRI) are performed. However, few data about r-TRI has been obtained. Therefore, we investigated the safety and feasibility of r-TRI using the same route.
METHODSA total of 423 consecutive eligible patients undergoing r-TRI were enrolled in the r-TRI group, and 846 patients with initial TRI (i-TRI) were assigned to the i-TRI group in a 2:1 matching ratio compared to r-TRI group. The primary endpoint included the success rate of the procedure and the incidence of vascular related complications.
RESULTSThe baseline clinical characteristics in the two groups were comparable. The success rate of procedures in the r-TRI and i-TRI was similar (96.0% vs. 97.5%, P = 0.130). In subgroup analysis (coronary angiography only or angiography with pecutaneous coronary intervention), similar results were also observed. The puncture numbers and incidence of radial artery spasm in the r-TRI group were significantly higher than in the i-TRI group (P = 0.024 and P < 0.001, respectively). The other procedural outcomes in the two groups were identical. With respect to the incidence of overall vascular related complication and independent events, there were no significant differences in spite of a higher incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO) in the r-TRI group (RAO: 1.2% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.521). The patients in the i-TRI group had more comfortable feeling than patients in the r-TRI group (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONSR-TRI produces a comparable procedure success rate and incidence of vascular complication when compared to i-TRI. It should be considered as an acceptable and safe procedure.
Adult ; Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; adverse effects ; methods ; Coronary Angiography ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged
2.A novel angiographic technique, StentBoost, in comparison with intravascular ultrasound to assess stent expansion.
Fei-fei YANG ; Li-wei ZHANG ; Dang-sheng HUANG ; Dong SHEN ; Hong-yan SUN ; Chun-hong ZHANG ; Yu-mei WANG ; Xu-wen ZHANG ; Jing BAI ; Yong-jiang MA
Chinese Medical Journal 2011;124(6):939-942
BACKGROUNDStentBoost (SB) is a novel angiographic technique which can enhance stent visualization and improve detection of inadequate stent expansion. Studies of SB that compare it with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), which is the current gold standard for detection of stent underexpansion, remain inadequate. This study aimed to test the correlation of IVUS and SB, and to evaluate the effect of SB guiding the stent postdilatation.
METHODSFrom March 2009 to June 2010, 52 patients were analyzed using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), IVUS, and SB. They included 37 patients (54 stents) with postdilatation and 15 patients (21 stents) without postdilatation. Correlations of stent diameter between the three modalities were determined.
RESULTSThe minimum diameter, maximum diameter and average diameter of postdilatation obtained by QCA, IVUS, SB were significantly larger than that of poststenting, and the ratio (maximum stent diameter (MaxLD)-minimum stent diameter (MinLD))/MaxLD of postdilatation was smaller. Correlations of MinLD were the highest between IVUS and SB (r = 0.979, P < 0.0001) when compared with QCA and SB (r = 0.973, P < 0.0001), and QCA and IVUS (r = 0.964, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONSSB has superior correlations for stent expansion measured by IVUS when compared with QCA. In addition, there is an important advantage for SB in guiding the stent postdilatation.
Aged ; Coronary Angiography ; methods ; Coronary Disease ; therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Stents ; adverse effects ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; methods
3.Brachial approach for coronary angiography and intervention: totally obsolete, or a feasible alternative when radial access is not possible?
Hwa Wooi GAN ; Hon Kan YIP ; Chiung Jen WU
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2010;39(5):368-373
INTRODUCTIONThis study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of brachial arterial puncture for coronary procedures when radial access is not possible. Radial arterial approach is the usual option for coronary procedures in our hospital. Whenever radial access is not possible, the brachial approach is preferred instead of the femoral approach. As many clinicians considered percutaneous brachial coronary angiography as an obsolete and hazardous procedure, we carried out this study to compare the outcomes of the brachial approach to the femoral approach in our centre.
MATERIALS AND METHODSWe retrospectively evaluated all cases of brachial artery puncture and femoral artery puncture in our centre from 1 January 2007 to 31 March 2009 through a prospectively collected database and looked for all complications which occurred in both groups.
RESULTSThe femoral group had a slightly higher incidence of major complications--3 out of 121 cases (2.5%) in the femoral group and 1 out of 180 cases (0.6%) in the brachial group, even though this was not statistically significant (P = 0.15). There was also no difference between these 2 groups for minor complications: 8 patients (4.4%) in the brachial group and 6 patients (5%) in the femoral group developed haematoma that did not require any blood transfusion or surgery. There was no incidence of brachial artery thrombosis and no puncture-related neurological deficit documented in the brachial group.
CONCLUSIONBrachial artery puncture and catheterisation may be a viable, safe and efficient alternative to the transfemoral approach in a centre that is experienced with the arm approach, when radial access is not possible.
Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; adverse effects ; methods ; Brachial Artery ; Cardiac Catheterization ; adverse effects ; methods ; Coronary Angiography ; methods ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Femoral Artery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies
4.Efficacy of intravascular ultrasound versus coronary angiographic guided drug-eluting stent implantation in the treatment of left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
Xiao Hang YUAN ; Xin HU ; Yan FANG ; Meng Ting JIANG ; Yan HAN ; Huan Huan FENG ; Lei GAO
Chinese Journal of Cardiology 2023;51(1):66-72
Objective: To compare the efficacy of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and coronary angiography guided drug eluting stent (DES) implantation for the treatment of left main coronary artery (LMCA) lesions. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies, which compared IVUS with coronary angiography guided DES implantation for the treatment of LMCA lesions published before August 2021 were searched in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Baseline data, interventional procedures and endpoint events of each study were collected. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), and the secondary endpoints were all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool were used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Results: Nine studies were included, including 3 RCT and 6 observational studies, with a total of 5 527 cases of LMCA. All the 6 observational studies had NOS scores≥6, and the 3 RCT had a low risk of overall bias. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with coronary angiography guided group, MACE rate (OR=0.55, 95%CI 0.47-0.66, P<0.001), all-cause death (OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.43-0.74, P<0.001), cardiac death (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.30-0.61, P<0.001), MI (OR=0.64, 95%CI 0.52-0.79, P<0.001), TLR (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.28-0.86, P=0.013) and TVR (OR=0.77, 95%CI 0.60-0.98, P=0.037) were all significantly lower in the IVUS guided group. Conclusions: Compared with angiography guided, IVUS guided PCI with DES implantation in LMCA lesions could significantly reduce the risk of MACE, death, MI, TLR and TVR. IVUS is thus superior to coronary angiography for guiding PCI treatment among patients with LMCA.
Humans
;
Coronary Artery Disease/complications*
;
Coronary Angiography
;
Drug-Eluting Stents/adverse effects*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods*
;
Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods*
;
Risk Factors
;
Myocardial Infarction/etiology*
5.Coronary bifurcation angle from 3-D predicts clinical outcomes after stenting bifurcation lesions.
Shao-Liang CHEN ; Teguh SANTOSO ; Jun-Jie ZHANG ; Fei YE ; Ya-Wei XU ; Qiang FU ; Jing KAN ; Chitprapai PAIBOON ; Yong ZHOU ; Shi-Qing DING ; Tak W KWAN
Chinese Medical Journal 2012;125(12):2083-2088
BACKGROUNDThe predictive value of bifurcation angle (BA) for worse events after stenting bifurcation lesions remains to be unknown. The present study was to investigate the dynamic change of BA and clinical relevance for patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated by drug-eluting stent (DES).
METHODSBA was calculated by 3-D quantitative coronary analysis from 347 patients in DKCRUSH-II study. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12-month, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary end points were the rate of binary restenosis and stent thrombosis at 12-month.
RESULTSStenting was associated with the reduction of distal BA. The cut-off value of distal BA for predicting MACE was 60°. Distal BA in < 60° group had less reduction after stenting ((-1.96 ± 13.58)° vs. (-12.12 ± 23.58)°, P < 0.001); two-stent technique was associated with significant reduction of distal BA (Δ(-4.05 ± 14.20)°), compared to single stent group (Δ + 1.55 ± 11.73, P = 0.003); the target lesion revascularization (TLR), TVR and MACE rate was higher in one-stent group (16.5%, 19.0% and 21.5%), compared to two-stent group (3.8%, P = 0.002; 7.5%, P = 0.016; and 9.8%, P = 0.024), respectively. Among patients in ≥ 60° group, there were no significant differences in distal BA, stent thrombosis (ST), MI, MACE, death, TLR, TVR between one- and two-stent groups; after stenting procedure, there was only slight change of distal BA in left anterior descending (LAD)-left circumflex (LCX) subgroup (from (88.54 ± 21.33)° at baseline to (82.44 ± 31.72)° post-stenting), compared to either LAD-diagonal branch (Di), or LCX-obtuse marginal branch (OM), or RCA distal (RCAd) (all P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONTwo-stent technique was associated with significant reduction of distal BA. DK crush stenting had reduced rate of MACE in patients in < 60° group, compared to one-stent technique.
Adult ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; adverse effects ; methods ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease ; diagnostic imaging ; therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Young Adult
6.Comparison of immediate and followup results between transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in true bifurcational lesions.
Yue-jin YANG ; Bo XU ; Ji-lin CHEN ; Sheng KANG ; Shu-bin QIAO ; Xue-wen QIN ; Min YAO ; Jue CHEN ; Yong-jian WU ; Hai-bo LIU ; Jin-qing YUAN ; Shi-jie YOU ; Jian-jun LI ; Jun DAI ; Run-lin GAO
Chinese Medical Journal 2007;120(7):539-544
BACKGROUNDA comparison of efficacy and safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in bifurcations has not been done. This study evaluated feasibility of transradial PCI (TRI) and compared the immediate and followup results with transfemoral PCI (TFI) in bifurcations.
METHODSOne hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients with bifurcations were treated with PCI in our hospital from April 2004 to October 2005. Of these, there were 60 patients (88 lesions) in TRI group and 74 patients (101 lesions) in TFI group. Bifurcations type was classified according to the Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud Classification.
RESULTSTRI group had smaller stent diameter ((3.06 +/- 0.37) mm vs (3.18 +/- 0.35) mm, P = 0.023) and postprocedural in-stent minimum lumen diameter ((2.62 +/- 0.37) mm vs (2.74 +/- 0.41) mm, P = 0.029) than TFI, but there were not significant differences in in-stent subacute thrombosis rate (0% vs 1.0%, P = 0.349), target lesion revascularization (TLR) (0% vs 1.0%, P = 0.349) following procedure and thrombosis (2.3% vs 1.0%, P = 0.482), in-stent restenosis (12.5% vs 10.9%, P = 0.731), in-segment restenosis (17.0% vs 14.9%, P = 0.681), TLR (10.2% vs 13.9%, P = 0.446) and TLR-free cumulative survival rate (89.8% vs 86.1%, P = 0.787) at seven months followup. No death was reported in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONTransradial intervention is feasible and appears to be as effective and safe as transfemoral PCI in treatment of true bifurcational lesions.
Adult ; Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; adverse effects ; methods ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Disease ; therapy ; Drug Delivery Systems ; Female ; Femoral Artery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radial Artery
7.Estimation of coronary artery stenosis by low-dose adenosine stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a quantitative study.
Xiao ZHOU ; Guang ZHI ; Yong XU ; Jing WANG ; Guo-Hui YAN
Chinese Medical Journal 2012;125(10):1795-1798
BACKGROUNDCoronary microcirculation reserve is an important field in the research of coronary artery disease, but it is difficult to identify clinically. Currently it is widely accepted that myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is a safe, inexpensive method and has comparatively high image resolution. The present study used quantitative low-dose adenosine stress real-time (RT)-MCE to estimate myocardial perfusion and the coronary stenosis.
METHODSForty-nine left ventricular (LV) segments from 14 unselected patients were divided into three groups according to the coronary angiography or CT angiography results: group 1 (n = 20, 41%) without significant stenosis (< 70%), group 2 (n = 12, 24%) with successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and group 3 (n = 17, 35%) with significant stenosis (> 70%). RT-MCE was performed in these patients with low-dose adenosine stress and continuous infusion of Sonovue. The replenishing curves were drawn according to the contrast density measured at the end-diastolic frame of every cardiac circle by ACQ software.
RESULTSForty-nine LV segments with satisfactory image quality were picked for quantitative contrast echo analysis. The replenishing curves were analyzed at baseline and after stress. Perfusion of group 3 did not decrease significantly at baseline, and showed no improvement during adenosine stress and was significantly different from groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05). The A·β and β increased more significantly in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.05). In a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, A·β under adenosine stress < 1.74 dB/s had a sensitivity and specificity of 71% for diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis, reduced adenosine-induced rise (percentage of A·β < 81%) had a sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 79% for the diagnosis of low-reserve, and β < 54% had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 79%.
CONCLUSIONSRest perfusion of severely stenosed arteries may be normal, but adenosine stress can detect the impaired perfusion reserve. Low-dose adenosine stress RT-MCE provides good accuracy for the evaluation of coronary perfusion reserve and hence coronary stenosis.
Adenosine ; adverse effects ; Adult ; Contrast Media ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Disease ; chemically induced ; pathology ; Coronary Stenosis ; chemically induced ; pathology ; Echocardiography ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged
8.Long-term follow-up of crush versus no crush technique for coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
Zhan GAO ; Yue-Jin YANG ; Bo XU ; Ji-Lin CHEN ; Shu-Bin QIAO ; Jian-Jun LI ; Xue-Wen QIN ; Min YAO ; Yong-Jian WU ; Jin-Qing YUAN ; Jue CHEN ; Hai-Bo LIU ; Jun DAI ; Run-Lin GAO
Chinese Medical Journal 2009;122(6):627-631
BACKGROUNDLesions at coronary bifurcations always are a big challenge for interventionists even with the advent of drug eluting stents (DES). Even as more clinical trials are published, operators still can not confirm that one strategy is more efficient than another. Selection of patients and short term follow-up contribute to the difficulty in comparing strategies.
METHODSFrom April 2004 to April 2008, 505 consecutive Chinese patients underwent DES implantation for true bifurcation lesions; including 258 using crush strategy (213 male, (56.7 +/- 10.8) years old) and 247 using no crush strategy (206 male, (58.1 +/- 10.1) years old) were analyzed.
RESULTSThe follow-up period ranged from 237 to 1223 days, average (537 +/- 340) days for the crush group and (538 +/- 351) days for the no crush group. There was no significant difference of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate between the two groups (10.1% vs 12.1%; P = 0.481), nor in cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or in the target vessel revascularization (TVR) (0.4% vs 1.6%; P = 0.207, 2.7% vs 2.8; P = 1.000 and 7.0% vs 7.7%; P = 0.865). The stent thrombosis rate was similar in the two groups (1.6% vs 2.0%; P = 0.409), late and very late stent thrombosis in both groups were very low (0.4% vs 0.4%; P = 1.000). Seven-month angiographic follow-up showed no significant difference of the restenosis rate between the two groups (11.0% vs 13.5%; P = 0.786). During the follow-up, cardiac death, nonfatal MI, TVR and ST free survival rate showed no significant difference between the two groups. The only variant identified as a predictor of MACE was percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the first two years, which accounted for 47% of patients of all cases in four years.
CONCLUSIONCrush technique showed similar long-term clinical effect compared with other two DES techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions, the surgeons' skills are very important for reducing clinical events.
Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; adverse effects ; methods ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease ; mortality ; pathology ; therapy ; Coronary Vessels ; pathology ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome
9.The use of Low Molecular Weight Heparin to Predict Clinical Outcome in Patients with Unstable Angina That Had Undergone Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Young Joon HONG ; Myung Ho JEONG ; Seung Hyun LEE ; Ok Young PARK ; Ju Han KIM ; Weon KIM ; Jay Young RHEW ; Young Keun AHN ; Jeong Gwan CHO ; Jong Chun PARK ; Soon Pal SUH ; Byoung Hee AHN ; Sang Hyung KIM ; Jung Chaee KANG
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2003;18(3):167-173
BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic therapy with heparin reduces the rate of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Low-molecular-weight heparin, given subcutaneously twice daily, has a more predictable anticoagulant effect than standard unfractionated heparin. Moreover, it is easier to administer and does not require monitoring. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 180 patients with unstable angina who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1999 and 2001 at Chonnam National University Hospital and had received either 120 U/kg of dalteparin (Fragmin (R) ), administered subcutaneously twice daily (Group I; n=90, 61.8 +/- 8.9 years, male 67.8%), or had received continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin (Group II; n=90, 62.6 +/- 9.7 years, male 70.0%). During hospitalization and at 6 month after PCI, major adverse cardiac events such as acute myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, death, and restenosis were examined. RESULTS: During hospitalization, the incidence of acute myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and death were not different between the two groups. At follow-up coronary angiography 6 months after PCI, the incidence of restenosis was lower in group I than in group II (Group I; 26/90, 28.8% vs. Group II; 32/90, 35.6%, p=0.041) and the incidence of target vessel revascularization was lower in group I than in group II (Group I; 21/90, 23.3% vs. Group II; 27/90, 30.0%, p=0.039). No difference was found in the rates of major and minor hemorrhages, ischemic strokes or thrombocytopenia between two groups. By multivariate analysis, the factors related to restenosis were lesion length, postprocedural minimal luminal diameter, CRP on admission, diabetes mellitus, the type of heparin, and stent use. CONCLUSION: Dalteparin, a low molecular weight heparin, is superior to standard unfractionated heparin in terms of reducing the restenosis rate and target vessel revascularization without increasing bleeding complications.
Angina, Unstable/radiography/*therapy
;
*Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary/methods
;
Anticoagulants/*administration & dosage/adverse effects
;
Comparative Study
;
Coronary Angiography
;
Coronary Restenosis/prevention & control
;
Female
;
Human
;
Infusions, Intravenous
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Postoperative Care
;
Prospective Studies
;
Tedelparin/*administration & dosage/adverse effects
;
Treatment Outcome
10.Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stent implantation in patients with chronic total coronary artery occlusions.
Ya-Ling HAN ; Jian ZHANG ; Yi LI ; Shou-Li WANG ; Quan-Min JING ; Xian-Hua YI ; Ying-Yan MA ; Bo LUAN ; Geng WANG ; Bin WANG
Chinese Medical Journal 2009;122(6):643-647
BACKGROUNDThere are limited data on the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) for treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTO). The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of DES implantation for CTO compared with bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation.
METHODSBetween June 1995 and December 2006, a total of 1184 patients with successful recanalization of at least one de novo CTO lesion were consecutively registered, including 660 (55.7%) who underwent DES and 524 (44.3%) who underwent BMS implantation. All patients were followed up for up to 5 years for occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Long-term survival rates were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTSBaseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups except that patients in the DES group received longer dual antiplatelet therapy ((7.4 +/- 2.5) months vs (1.7 +/- 0.8) months, P < 0.001). Average follow-up periods were (4.7 +/- 0.89) and (3.2 +/- 1.3) years for the BMS and DES groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival rates between the two groups (90.3% for DES group vs 89.6% for BMS group, Log-rank P = 0.38), but the 5-year target vessel revascularization (TVR)-free survival rate in the DES group was significantly higher than that in the BMS group (81.6% vs 73.5%, Log-rank P < 0.001). The cumulative MACE-free survival in the DES group was also significantly higher than that in the BMS group (80.6% vs 71.5%, Log-rank P < 0.001). The rates of re-admission caused by cardiovascular disease (27.0% vs 37.8%, P < 0.001) and the need for bypass surgery were significantly lower in the DES group (1.5% vs 3.4%, P < 0.05). By multivariable analysis, DES implantation could significantly lower the long-term MACE risk of PCI for CTO patients (HR: 0.492; 95% CI 0.396 - 0.656, P < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% and elderly (> or = 65 years) were identified as independent predictors of long-term MACE during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONThis study demonstrates the long-term (up to 5 years) efficacy of DES for treatment of CTO, which is superior to BMS implantation in reducing the rates of TVR and MACE, as well as the need of re-admission and bypass surgery.
Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; methods ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Occlusion ; therapy ; Drug-Eluting Stents ; adverse effects ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Stents ; adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome