1.Use of Protective Gloves in Nail Salons in Manhattan, New York City.
Corey BASCH ; Christina YARBOROUGH ; Stephanie TRUSTY ; Charles BASCH
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2016;49(4):249-251
OBJECTIVES: Nail salon owners in New York City (NYC) are required to provide their workers with gloves and it is their responsibility to maintain healthy, safe working spaces for their employees. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency with which nail salon workers wear protective gloves. METHODS: A Freedom of Information Law request was submitted to New York Department of State's Division of Licensing Services for a full list of nail salons in Manhattan, NYC. A sample population of 800 nail salons was identified and a simple random sample (without replacement) of 30% (n=240) was selected using a random number generator. Researchers visited each nail salon from October to December of 2015, posing as a potential customer to determine if nail salon workers were wearing gloves. RESULTS: Among the 169 salons in which one or more workers was observed providing services, a total of 562 workers were observed. For 149 salons, in which one or more worker was observed providing services, none of the workers were wearing gloves. In contrast, in six of the salons observed, in which one or more workers was providing services, all of the workers (1 in 2 sites, 2 in 1 site, 3 in 2 sites, and 4 in 1 site) were wearing gloves. Almost three-quarters of the total number of workers observed (n=415, 73.8%) were not wearing gloves. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that, despite recent media attention and legislation, the majority of nail salon workers we observed were not wearing protective gloves when providing services.
Freedom
;
Gloves, Protective*
;
Jurisprudence
;
Licensure
2.Zika Virus on YouTube: An Analysis of English-language Video Content by Source.
Corey H BASCH ; Isaac Chun Hai FUNG ; Rodney N HAMMOND ; Elizabeth B BLANKENSHIP ; Zion Tsz Ho TSE ; King Wa FU ; Patrick IP ; Charles E BASCH
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2017;50(2):133-140
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the source, length, number of views, and content of the most widely viewed Zika virus (ZIKV)-related YouTube videos. We hypothesized that ZIKV-related videos uploaded by different sources contained different content. METHODS: The 100 most viewed English ZIKV-related videos were manually coded and analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Among the 100 videos, there were 43 consumer-generated videos, 38 Internet-based news videos, 15 TV-based news videos, and 4 professional videos. Internet news sources captured over two-thirds of the total of 8 894 505 views. Compared with consumer-generated videos, Internet-based news videos were more likely to mention the impact of ZIKV on babies (odds ratio [OR], 6.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64 to 23.76), the number of cases in Latin America (OR, 5.63; 95% CI, 1.47 to 21.52); and ZIKV in Africa (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.04 to 6.31). Compared with consumer-generated videos, TV-based news videos were more likely to express anxiety or fear of catching ZIKV (OR, 6.67; 95% CI, 1.36 to 32.70); to highlight fear of ZIKV among members of the public (OR, 7.45; 95% CI, 1.20 to 46.16); and to discuss avoiding pregnancy (OR, 3.88; 95% CI, 1.13 to 13.25). CONCLUSIONS: Public health agencies should establish a larger presence on YouTube to reach more people with evidence-based information about ZIKV.
Africa
;
Anxiety
;
Health Communication
;
Internet
;
Latin America
;
Pregnancy
;
Public Health
;
Social Media
;
Zika Virus*
3.Lyme Disease and YouTubeTM: A Cross-Sectional Study of Video Contents.
Corey H BASCH ; Lindsay A MULLICAN ; Kwanza D BOONE ; Jingjing YIN ; Alyssa BERDNIK ; Marina E EREMEEVA ; Isaac Chun Hai FUNG
Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives 2017;8(4):289-292
OBJECTIVES: Lyme disease is the most common tick-borne disease. People seek health information on Lyme disease from YouTube™ videos. In this study, we investigated if the contents of Lyme disease-related YouTube™ videos varied by their sources. METHODS: Most viewed English YouTube™ videos (n = 100) were identified and manually coded for contents and sources. RESULTS: Within the sample, 40 videos were consumer-generated, 31 were internet-based news, 16 were professional, and 13 were TV news. Compared with consumer-generated videos, TV news videos were more likely to mention celebrities (odds ratio [OR], 10.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13–52.58), prevention of Lyme disease through wearing protective clothing (OR, 5.63; 95% CI, 1.23–25.76), and spraying insecticides (OR, 7.71; 95% CI, 1.52–39.05). CONCLUSION: A majority of the most popular Lyme disease-related YouTube™ videos were not created by public health professionals. Responsible reporting and creative video-making facilitate Lyme disease education. Partnership with YouTube™ celebrities to co-develop educational videos may be a future direction.
Cross-Sectional Studies*
;
Education
;
Health Communication
;
Insecticides
;
Lyme Disease*
;
Protective Clothing
;
Public Health
;
Social Media
;
Tick-Borne Diseases