PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of contrast display exposure on neuronal directional and spatial frequency tuning. Neuronal responses were recorded from ninety-four neurons in cortical areas 17 and 18 in two adult cats. METHODS: A multi-channel microelectrode was implanted in cortical areas 17 and 18 of two paralyzed and anaesthetized cats. Various drifting sinusoidal grating contrast displays were presented to one of the cats' eyes in the visual field. Contour plots based on the neuronal responses to the drifting sinusoidal grating displays using various contrasts (i.e., 0.4, 0.7, and 1.0) and velocities (i.e., 4.6, 13.9, 23.1, 32.3, 41.5, 50.8, and 60.0 deg/sec) were plotted as a function of the spatial frequency and the direction associated with each velocity and contrast used. RESULTS: Five parameters were extracted from these contour plots: 1) optimum response, 2) preferred direction, 3) optimum spatial frequency, 4) directional tuning width, and 5) spatial frequency bandwidth. To determine the optimal velocity, each parameter was plotted against each of the specific display contrasts used, and a 'best fit' line was established. Response amplitudes were dependent on the type of contrast utilized; however, the spatial frequency and directional tuning properties were stable for the cortical neurons assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the presentation of different contrasts on neuronal directional and spatial frequency tuning are consistent with behavioral results when medium and high contrast displays are used.
Animals ; Cats ; Contrast Sensitivity/*physiology ; Electrophysiological Phenomena ; Orientation/physiology ; Photic Stimulation/methods ; Sen ; Space Perception/physiology ; Visual Cortex/cytology/*physiology

BACKGROUNDContrast sensitivity (CS) testing can detect differences in functional vision and is highly correlated with visual performance. This study was designed to investigate the association between CS and the grading score using the lens opacities classification system (LOCS) III as well as the association between CS and visual acuity (VA) in nuclear or cortical age-related cataract (ARC) patients.

METHODSA total of 270 eyes with ARC and 30 control eyes were divided into nuclear opacity (NO), nuclear color (NC), cortical cataract (C) based on LOCS III. The CS values measured at all spatial frequencies under photopic and glare conditions that resulted in contrast sensitivity function (CSF) were evaluated, and LogMAR VA was tested with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. The correlation between CSF and LOCS III grading scores, and between CSF and LogMAR VA were analyzed.

RESULTSCompared to the controls, CSF of the nuclear or cortical ARC significantly declined. There are significant correlation between CSF and LogMAR VA, and between CSF and LOCS III grading scores. Compared to the VA, a stronger correlation existed between CSF and LOCS III grading score than that of LogMAR VA and LOCS III grading score. CS at some spatial frequencies is significantly influenced with LOCS III grading score.

CONCLUSIONSCSF significantly declined with the increasing ARC grading scores. Comparing to VA, CSF reflected the severity of cataract more comprehensively. CS at low spatial frequency is significantly influenced by ARC. Therefore, CS is more precise than VA in assessing the visual function of ARC patients.

Aged ; Cataract ; classification ; physiopathology ; Contrast Sensitivity ; physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Visual Acuity

BACKGROUNDIn recent years, computers have been intensively used at home. In contrast to paper-based books and documents, computer screen is self-illuminated with larger screen-background luminance difference, which greatly induces visual discomfort. To compensate for that, one effective solution is to offer an additional background luminance. In this study, we investigated whether and to what extent additional background lighting is needed in looking at a computer display comfortably.

METHODSIn this study, 60 healthy children aged from 9 to 12 years and 58 adults aged from 21 to 39 years participated in the experiments. They were asked to choose their most preferred background luminance intensities at three screen luminance levels. The data were analyzed by Matlab (R2012b) and SPSS 20.0.

RESULTSBoth children and adult participants selected a non-dark background as their comfortable lighting condition when watching a computer display (children: t (59) = 22.0, P < 0.01, adults: t (57) = 15.5, P < 0.01). Comparatively, children preferred brighter background in general ( F (1,116) = 7.0, P < 0.01). More importantly, participants' preferred background luminance levels were linearly correlated with screen luminance intensities (children: slope = 0.97, R(2) = 0.98; adults: slope = 0.38, R(2) = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONThese results indicate that varying background luminance to maintain screen-background luminance ratio is beneficial to human visual comfort.

Adult ; Child ; Computers ; Contrast Sensitivity ; physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Lighting ; Male ; Myopia ; prevention & control ; Young Adult

In the literatures on the human vision physiology and physics, there were reports about space resolution limit of 1' visual angle, frequency resolution limit of 5 nm and time resolution limit of 0.1" of human vision. However, there has been no report about the contrast resolution limit of human vision,especially the report of measuring method and result about the contrast resolution limit of human vision based on the modern digital image processing. Here we report a modern method for measuring the contrast resolution limit of human vision based on computer digital image processing technology, and we present the measured results and their mathematical models. The function relationships of contrast resolution limit varying with background gray in a photopic or a scotopic sights were illuminated respectively. It can be expected that such investigations with regard to human vision will establish the physiological foundation of the theories and techniques in hiding bodies and hiding figures (stealth), in anti-hiding bodies and anti-hiding figures, in the night vision system independent of infrared, as well as in their relative industries.
Algorithms ; Contrast Sensitivity ; physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; methods ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Vision, Ocular ; physiology ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo investigate the relationship between the characteristics of spatial vision deficit and the degree of amblyopia in monocular amblyopes, and to analyze its mechanism with the theory of Magnocellular and Parvocellular pathways.

METHODSOne hundred and eleven patients with monocular amblyopes aged 7-34 were included in this study. Distance best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR units and contrast sensitivity function test were performed on both eyes in all patients with ETDRS digital visual chart and functional test system OPTECR 6500. The spatial vision of amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes was evaluated by the AULCSF, Smax, Frmax and cutSF derived from the curve of contrast sensitivity function.

RESULTSThe degree of amblyopia was significantly correlated with the difference of AULCSF between the amblyopic and non-amblyopia eyes (r=-0.83, P<0.01). BCVA of amblyopic eyes was significantly correlated with AULCSF, CutSF, Smax, Frmax(r=-0.68, -0.80, -0.73, -0.56, respectively; P<0.01). In amblyopic eyes, significant difference in BCVA, AULCSF, Smax, Frmax and CutSF was seen among different amblyopic groups (P<0.01), which was defined by the degree of amblyopia. In non-amblyopic eyes,no significant difference in BCVA, AULCSF, Smax, Frmax and CutSF was noted among different amblyopic groups (P>0.05). In mild amblyopes, no significant difference in AULCSF and Frmax was found between the amblyopic eyes and non-amblyopic eyes (P>0.05), while Smax and CutSF were significantly different. However, in moderate and severe amblyopes, significant differences in BCVA, AULCSF, Smax, Frmax and CutSF was seen between the amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes (P<0.01). In amblyopic eyes, significant difference in contrast sensitivity was noted in all kinds of spatial frequencies among different amblyopic groups (P<0.01), and in non-amblyopic eyes, significant differences in contrast sensitivity was not seen in all kinds of spatial frequencies among different amblyopic groups.

CONCLUSIONSThe AULCSF, CutSF, Smax and Frmax are accorded with visual acuity for evaluation of the spatial vision of amblyopia. As the severity of amblyopia increases, the overall function of spatial vision in amblyopic eyes gradually decreases, the resolution ability of high spatial frequency is gradually weaken, the peak of contrast detection function gradually descends, and the optimal spatial frequency for contrast detection offsets toward low level of spatial frequency. Mild monocular amblyopia produces spatial contrast sensitivity loss in high spatial vision, suggesting there may be decreased sensitivity of the Parvocellular pathway, and no significant anomalous processing of Magnocellular Pathway. Whereas, in moderate and severe amblyopes, a generalized loss of sensitivity is observed at each spatial frequency. This result shows that both Magnocellular and Parvocellular pathways are damaged in different degrees, especially in Parvocellular pathway.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Amblyopia ; physiopathology ; Child ; Contrast Sensitivity ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Vision, Ocular ; physiology ; Visual Acuity ; Young Adult

To observe corrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy accompanied by fundus changes.
 Methods: Ninety-eight patients with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy and 50 healthy pregnant women underwent eye examination, including corrected visual acuity and fundus examination, and CS. Differences in corrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity between the 2 groups were analyzed with two independent samples t-test analysis, while correlation between vision and contrast sensitivity in patients was evaluated by using spearman correlation test. Difference in CS was compared between the early and advanced stage of fundus diseases.
 Results: Corrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in patient with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy were lower than that in the control group (P<0.01). Corrected visual acuity in patients was associated with contrast sensitivity at variously spatial frequencies (P<0.01), showing the most correlation in contrast sensitivity at 6 of spatial frequency (r=0.87). Compared with the early stage, the CS in the advanced patients with fundus diseases was decreased (P<0.01).
 Conclusion: The visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in patient with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy are reduced. The CS (6.0 c/d) has the largest correlation with corrected visual acuity. Comparing with the visual acuity, contrast sensitivity can be more comprehensive in evaluation of retinal function damage in patients with hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy.
Adult ; Contrast Sensitivity ; physiology ; Female ; Fundus Oculi ; Humans ; Hypertension ; complications ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications ; Retinal Diseases ; complications ; etiology ; Vision Disorders ; etiology ; physiopathology ; Visual Acuity ; physiology

OBJECTIVE: To study the application value of contrast vision in identifying the malingering decreased vision in the practice of clinical forensic medicine. METHODS: Thirty-one young and middle aged volunteers were selected and divided randomly into group 1 (16 persons with 32 eyes) and group 2 (15 persons with 30 eyes). The optotype contrast was 100%, 25%, 10% and 5%, respectively. The contrast vision of group 1 was tested. The contrast vision of group 2 was tested as follows: (1) the volunteers cooperated without inspector's interference; (2) the volunteers cooperated under inspector's interference; (3) the volunteers disguised decreased vision without inspector's interference; (4) the volunteers disguised decreased vision under inspector's interference. The data was then analyzed by statistics. RESULTS: There was a close correlation between contrast vision and contrast. As the contrast decreased, the vision acuity also decreased. The contrast vision curve of former two methods showed a good reproducibility while the contrast vision curve of latter two methods had a bad reproducibility. CONCLUSION The repetition of contrast curve with or without inspector's interference can be used to discriminate malingering vision. The acquired contrast curves can be provided to the court as direct evidence and can help enhance the verification conclusion.
Adult ; Contrast Sensitivity/physiology* ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Malingering/psychology* ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Vision Tests/statistics & numerical data* ; Vision, Binocular ; Vision, Low/psychology* ; Visual Acuity ; Young Adult

PURPOSE: Our objective was to estimate the maximum color contrast sensitivity (MCCS) thresholds in individuals with chiasma opticum damage. METHODS: The pilot study tested 41 people with pituitary adenoma (PA) and 100 age- and gender-matched controls. Patients were divided into two groups according to PA size, PA ≤1 cm or PA >1 cm. A new MCCS test program was used for color discrimination. RESULTS: The mean total error score (TES) of MCCS was 1.8 in the PA ≤1 cm group (standard deviation [SD], 0.38), 3.5 in the PA >1 cm group (SD, 0.96), and 1.4 in the control group (SD, 0.31; p < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between tumor size and MCCS result (r = 0.648, p < 0.01). In the group that had PA-producing hormones, the TES was 2.5 (SD, 1.09), compared to 4.2 value in the non-functioning PA group of patients that did not have clinically significant hormone excess (SD, 3.16; p < 0.01). In patients with normal visual acuity (VA) or visual field MCCS, the TES was 3.3 (SD, 1.8), while that in patients with VA <0.00 was 4.6 (SD, 2.9). CONCLUSIONS: Results of the MCCS test TES were 1.9 times better in patients with PA ≤1 cm compared to patients with PA >1 cm (p < 0.01). In PA patients with normal VA, the TES was 2.35 times worse than that of healthy persons (p < 0.01).
Adenoma/*complications/diagnosis ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Color Perception/physiology ; Color Perception Tests/*methods ; Contrast Sensitivity/*physiology ; *Early Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Optic Chiasm ; Pilot Projects ; Pituitary Neoplasms/*complications/diagnosis ; Time Factors ; Vision Disorders/*diagnosis/etiology/physiopathology ; Visual Fields ; Young Adult