BACKGROUNDWhile combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are commonly used to treat polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), comparative data regarding metabolic effects of different progestogens on this patient population are missing. This study aimed to compare the different effects of drospirenone (DRP)-containing COCs with cyproterone acetate (CPA)-containing COCs, combined with metformin and lifestyle modifications in women with PCOS and metabolic disorders.

METHODSNinety-nine women with PCOS and a metabolic disorder between January 2011 and January 2013 were enrolled into this prospective randomized clinical trial. Participants were randomized into two groups such as DRP-containing COCs, and CPA-containing COCs. Participants took COCs cyclically for 6 months, combined with metformin administration (1.5 g/d) and lifestyle modifications (diet and exercise). Clinical measures and biochemical and hormone profiles were compared. Comparisons for continuous variables were evaluated with paired and unpaired Student's t-tests. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used when the data were not normally distributed. Analysis of covariance was used to control for age, body mass index (BMI), and baseline data of each analyzed parameter when compared between the two groups.

RESULTSA total of 68 patients have completed the study. The combination regimen of COCs, metformin, and lifestyle modifications in these patients resulted in a significant decrease in BMI, acne, and hirsutism scores when compared to baseline levels in both groups (P < 0.05). Blood pressure (BP) was significantly different in the CPA group when compared to baseline (75.14 ± 6.77 mmHg vs. 80.70 ± 5.60 mmHg, P < 0.01), and after 6 months of treatment, only the change in systolic BP was significantly different between the two groups (4.00 [-6.00, 13.00] mmHg vs. -3.50 [-13.00, 9.00] mmHg, P = 0.009). Fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance decreased significantly in the DRP group (5.40 ± 0.41 mmol/L vs. 5.21 ± 0.32 mmol/L, P = 0.041; 13.90 [10.50, 18.40] μU/ml vs. 10.75 [8.60, 13.50] μU/ml, P = 0.020; 3.74 [2.85, 4.23] vs. 2.55 [1.92, 3.40], P = 0.008) but did not differ between the two groups. While individual lipid profiles increased in both groups, no statistically significant difference was observed.

CONCLUSIONSDRP-containing COCs combined with metformin and lifestyle modifications could better control BP and correct carbohydrate metabolism in women with PCOS and metabolic disorders compared with CPA-containing COCs.

TRIAL REGISTRATIONChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-TRC-11001143; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=8395.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Androstenes ; administration & dosage ; Carbohydrate Metabolism ; Contraceptives, Oral ; administration & dosage ; Cyproterone Acetate ; administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Insulin Resistance ; Life Style ; Lipids ; blood ; Metformin ; administration & dosage ; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome ; blood ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; Prospective Studies

Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal ; administration & dosage ; Abortion, Induced ; methods ; Androgen Antagonists ; administration & dosage ; Contraceptives, Oral ; administration & dosage ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; methods ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; Hormone Replacement Therapy ; methods ; Hormones ; administration & dosage ; Humans ; Mifepristone ; administration & dosage ; Norpregnenes ; administration & dosage ; Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between condom use and oral contraceptive consumption and the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Perth clinics. A total of 348 women responded to the structured questionnaire. Information sought included demographic and lifestyle characteristics such as the use of condom for contraception, consumption of oral contraceptive, and duration of oral contraceptive usage. Crude and adjusted odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using unconditional logistic regression models and reported as estimates of the relative risk. RESULTS: The prevalence of CIN was found to be 15.8%. The duration of oral contraceptive consumption among women with abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear result indicating CIN was significantly shorter than those without abnormal Pap smear result (mean+/-SD, 5.6+/-5.2 years vs. 8.2+/-7.6 years; p=0.002). Comparing to < or =3 years usage, prolonged consumption of oral contraceptive for > or =10 years reduced the risk of CIN (p=0.012). However, use of condom for contraception might not be associated with a reduced risk of CIN after accounting for the effects of confounding factors (adjusted OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.05 to 5.11; p=0.577). CONCLUSION: Use of oral contraceptives, but not condoms, for contraception appeared to be inversely associated with CIN. Prolonged use of oral contraceptive demonstrated its benefits of reducing the risk of CIN.
Adult ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia/epidemiology/*prevention & control ; Condoms/*utilization ; Contraception Behavior/*statistics & numerical data ; Contraceptives, Oral/*administration & dosage ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Prevalence ; Risk Assessment/methods ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Western Australia/epidemiology