1.Central Venous Stenosis Caused by Traction of the Innominate Vein due to a Tuberculosis-Destroyed Lung.
Eun Ju SONG ; Dae Hyun BAEK ; Young Hwan HWANG ; So Young LEE ; Young Kwon CHO ; Su Ah SUNG
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2011;26(4):460-462
We report a case of central venous stenosis due to a structural deformity caused by a tuberculosis-destroyed lung in a 65-year-old woman. The patient presented with left facial edema. She had a history of pulmonary tuberculosis, and the chest X-ray revealed a collapsed left lung. Angiography showed leftward deviation of the innominate vein leading to kinking and stenosis of the internal jugular vein. Stent insertion improved her facial edema.
Aged
;
Brachiocephalic Veins/*pathology/radiography
;
*Central Venous Pressure
;
Constriction, Pathologic/*etiology/pathology/therapy
;
Edema/therapy
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Jugular Veins/pathology/radiography
;
Stents
;
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/*complications/pathology/radiography
;
Vascular Diseases/*etiology/pathology/therapy
2.Successful management of colonic perforation with a covered metal stent.
Sang Woo KIM ; Wook Hyun LEE ; Jin Soo KIM ; Ha Nee LEE ; Soo Jung KIM ; Seok Jong LEE
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2013;28(6):715-717
Self-expandable stents are widely available for the treatment of perforation of the gastrointestinal tract. Because of the risk of migration, there has been no report of the use of self-expandable stents for the treatment of perforation of the colon or rectum. This is a report of successful treatment of iatrogenic colonic perforation during balloon dilatation of anastomotic stricture with a fully covered stent. Fully covered, self-expandable metallic stents can be considered useful tools for management of this condition.
Aged, 80 and over
;
Colon/*injuries/pathology/radiography
;
Colonic Diseases/diagnosis/*therapy
;
Constriction, Pathologic
;
Dilatation/*adverse effects
;
Humans
;
*Iatrogenic Disease
;
Intestinal Obstruction/diagnosis/*therapy
;
Intestinal Perforation/diagnosis/etiology/*therapy
;
Male
;
*Metals
;
Prosthesis Design
;
Sigmoidoscopy
;
*Stents
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Wound Healing
3.Treatment of complications after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Bin ZHANG ; Ke ZHAO ; Quanlong LIU ; Shuhui YIN ; Yujuan ZHAO ; Guangzuan ZHUO ; Yingying FENG ; Jun ZHU ; Jianhua DING
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(4):432-438
OBJECTIVETo summarize the perioperative and postoperative complications follow laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LapISR) in the treatment of low rectal cancer and their management.
METHODSAn observational study was conducted in 73 consecutive patients who underwent LapISR for low rectal cancer between June 2011 and February 2016 in our hospital. The clinicopathological parameters, perioperative and postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative and postoperative complications were defined as any complication occurring within or more than 3 months after the primary operation, respectively.
RESULTSForty-nine(67.1%) cases were male and 24(32.9%) were female with a median age of 61(25 to 79) years. The median distance from distal tumor margin to anal verge was 4.0(1.0 to 5.5) cm. The median operative time was 195 (120 to 360) min, median intra operative blood loss was 100 (20 to 300) ml, median number of harvested lymph nodes was 14(3 to 31) per case. All the patients underwent preventive terminal ileum loop stoma. No conversion or hospital mortality was presented. The R0 resection rate was 98.6% with totally negative distal resection margin. A total of 34 complication episodes were recorded in 21(28.8%) patients during perioperative period, and among which 20.6%(7/34) was grade III(-IIII( according to Dindo system. Anastomosis-associated morbidity (16.4%,12/73) was the most common after LapISR, including mucosa ischemia in 9 cases(12.3%), stricture in 7 cases (9.6%, 4 cases secondary to mucosa necrosis receiving anal dilation), grade A fistula in 3 cases (4.1%) receiving conservative treatment and necrosis in 1 case (1.4%) receiving permanent stoma. After a median follow up of 21(3 to 60) months, postoperative complications were recorded in 12 patients (16.4%) with 16 episodes, including anastomotic stenosis (8.2%), rectum segmental stricture (5.5%), ileus (2.7%), partial anastomotic dehiscence (1.4%), anastomotic fistula (1.4%), rectovaginal fistula (1.4%) and mucosal prolapse (1.4%). These patients received corresponding treatments, such as endoscopic transanal resection, anal dilation, enema, purgative, permanent stoma, etc. according to the lesions. Six patients (8.2%) required re-operation intervention due to postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONAnastomosis-associated morbidity is the most common after LapISR in the treatment of low rectal cancer in perioperative and postoperative periods, which must be strictly managed with suitable methods.
Adult ; Aged ; Anal Canal ; surgery ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; adverse effects ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; statistics & numerical data ; Colectomy ; adverse effects ; Constriction, Pathologic ; etiology ; therapy ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Ileostomy ; adverse effects ; Intestinal Mucosa ; pathology ; Ischemia ; etiology ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; Lymph Node Excision ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Margins of Excision ; Middle Aged ; Necrosis ; etiology ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery ; Rectovaginal Fistula ; etiology ; therapy ; Surgical Stomas ; Treatment Outcome
4.Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of perioperative complications of bariatric and metabolic surgery.
Haifu WU ; Ming ZHONG ; Di ZHOU ; Chenye SHI ; Heng JIAO ; Wei WU ; Xinxia CHANG ; Jing CANG ; Hua BIAN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(4):393-397
Surgical operation in treating obesity and type 2 diabetes is popularizing rapidly in China. Correct prevention and recognition of perioperation-related operative complications is the premise of ensuring surgical safety. Familiar complications of the operation include deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary artery embolism, anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic fistula and marginal ulcer. The prevention of deep venous thrombosis is better than treatment. The concrete measures contain physical prophylaxis (graduated compression stocking and intermittent pneumatic compression leg sleeves) and drug prophylaxis (unfractionated heparin and low molecular heparin), and the treatment is mainly thrombolysis or operative thrombectomy. The treatment of pulmonary artery embolism includes remittance of pulmonary arterial hypertension, anticoagulation, thrombolysis, operative thrombectomy, interventional therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Hemorrhage is a rarely occurred but relatively serious complication after bariatric surgery. The primary cause of anastomotic bleeding after laparoscopic gastric bypass is incomplete hemostasis or weak laparoscopic repair. The common bleeding site in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is gastric stump and close to partes pylorica, and the bleeding may be induced by malformation and weak repair technique. Patients with hemodynamic instability caused by active bleeding or excessive bleeding should timely received surgical treatment. Anastomotic fistula in gastric bypass can be divided into gastrointestinal anastomotic fistula and jejunum-jejunum anastomotic fistula. The treatment of postoperative anastomotic fistula should vary with each individual, and conservative treatment or operative treatment should be adopted. Anastomotic stenosis is mainly related to the operative techniques. Stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy often occurs in gastric angle, and the treatment methods include balloon dilatation and stent implantation, and surgical treatment should be performed when necessary. Marginal ulcer after gastric bypass is a kind of peptic ulcer occurring close to small intestine mucosa in the junction point of stomach and jejunum. Ulcer will also occur in the vestige stomach after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and the occurrence site locates mostly in the gastric antrum incisal margin. Preoperative anti-HP (helicobacter pylorus) therapy and postoperative continuous administration of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for six months is the main means to prevent and treat marginal ulcer. For patients on whom conservative treatment is invalid, endoscopic repair or surgical repair should be considered. Different surgical procedures will generate different related operative complications. Fully understanding and effectively dealing with the complications of various surgical procedures through multidisciplinary cooperation is a guarantee for successful operation.
Anastomosis, Surgical
;
adverse effects
;
Anticoagulants
;
therapeutic use
;
Bariatric Surgery
;
adverse effects
;
Catheterization
;
China
;
Conservative Treatment
;
Constriction, Pathologic
;
etiology
;
therapy
;
Digestive System Fistula
;
etiology
;
therapy
;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
;
methods
;
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
;
Gastrectomy
;
adverse effects
;
Gastric Bypass
;
adverse effects
;
Gastric Mucosa
;
pathology
;
Gastric Stump
;
physiopathology
;
surgery
;
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
;
etiology
;
prevention & control
;
surgery
;
Hemostasis, Surgical
;
adverse effects
;
methods
;
Hemostatic Techniques
;
Heparin
;
therapeutic use
;
Humans
;
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices
;
Intestine, Small
;
pathology
;
Laparoscopy
;
adverse effects
;
Margins of Excision
;
Peptic Ulcer
;
etiology
;
therapy
;
Postoperative Complications
;
diagnosis
;
prevention & control
;
therapy
;
Pulmonary Embolism
;
etiology
;
therapy
;
Stents
;
Stockings, Compression
;
Thrombectomy
;
Thrombolytic Therapy
;
Venous Thrombosis
;
etiology
;
prevention & control
;
therapy