No abstract available.
Conflict of Interest

No abstract available.
Conflict of Interest*

Authors are actual contributors on article's academic and publication procedure. The contributions on publication process include the establishment of conception and design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting or correction of article and final approval of the paper. Recently, the relationship between researchers becomes more complex because of more numbers of researchers and more co-works with various specialized research fields than before. Authorship is the deciding of roles between authors. It is very important on performing scholarly work in terms of academic and publication ethics. Inappropriate authorship encompasses gift, honorary, ghost, swapping and disguised authorship. Inappropriate authorship often lead legal problem as well as ethic problem or conflict of interest. Therefore obvious establishment of authorship is ethically and legally important to researchers.
Authorship ; Conflict of Interest ; Fertilization ; Publications

Authors are actual contributors on article's academic and publication procedure. The contributions on publication process include the establishment of conception and design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting or correction of article and final approval of the paper. Recently, the relationship between researchers becomes more complex because of more numbers of researchers and more co-works with various specialized research fields than before. Authorship is the deciding of roles between authors. It is very important on performing scholarly work in terms of academic and publication ethics. Inappropriate authorship encompasses gift, honorary, ghost, swapping and disguised authorship. Inappropriate authorship often lead legal problem as well as ethic problem or conflict of interest. Therefore obvious establishment of authorship is ethically and legally important to researchers.
Authorship ; Conflict of Interest ; Fertilization ; Publications

Conflict of interest (COI) in research represents situations that pose risks of undue influence on scientific objectivity and judgment because of secondary interests. This is complex but is inherent to biomedical research. The role of a clinician scientist can be conflicted when scientific objectivity is perceived to compete with scientific success (publications, grants), partiality to patients (clinical trials), obligations to colleagues (allowing poor scholarship to pass), research sponsors (industry), and financial gains (patents, royalties). While there are many ways which COIs can occur in research, COI mitigations remain reliable. Collaborations between investigators and industry are valuable to the development of novel therapies and undue discouragement of these relationships may inadvertently harm the advancement of healthcare. As a result, proper management of COI is fundamental and crucial to the maintenance of long-term, mutually beneficial relationships between industry and academia. The nature of COI in research and methods of mitigation are discussed from the perspective of a clinician scientist.
Biomedical Research ; Conflict of Interest ; Humans

Even among highly educated health professionals, there is inconsistency in the knowledge and perception concerning both conflict of interest (COI) itself and COI disclosure. The key issue is the credibility of the manuscript, which relies heavily on transparency of COI for the reader. The tendency to disregard the importance of COI disclosure among journal editors has been recently highlighted. For all types of COI, the primary question is how it is managed. To ensure the enforcement of the declared journal COI policies, it is crucial that not only authors, but also those who are involved in the assessment of manuscripts, be educated and informed of the updated guidelines concerning COI disclosure.
*Conflict of Interest ; Disclosure ; Editorial Policies ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Research

The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) provides recommendations to improve the editorial standards and scientific quality of biomedical journals. These recommendations range from uniform technical requirements to more complex and elusive editorial issues including ethical aspects of the scientific process. Recently, registration of clinical trials, conflicts of interest disclosure, and new criteria for authorship-emphasizing the importance of responsibility and accountability-, have been proposed. This year a new editorial initiative to foster sharing of clinical trial data has been launched. This review discusses this novel initiative with the aim of increasing awareness among readers, investigators, authors and Editors of the Editors' Network of the European Society of Cardiology.
Authorship ; Cardiology ; Conflict of Interest ; Disclosure ; Humans ; Information Dissemination* ; Research Personnel

The medical professionalism for faculty members of medical schools has some different implication from other medical professions. They have to work as educator, researcher, and manager as well as clinician. The professionalism of each duties has its own uniqueness, which sometimes causes a conflict between them. Therefore, the faculty members of medical schools have to harmonize their different tasks and duties each other, looking after the professional development through the professional life.
Conflict of Interest ; Education, Medical ; Hospitals, University ; Korea ; Schools, Medical

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine effect of incivility, resilience, and social support experienced by nursing students on burnout in clinical practice. METHODS: Subjects were 140 nursing students who agreed to participate in this study. Collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation and stepwise multiple regression with SPSS WIN 23.0 program. RESULTS: Burnout showed significantly positive correlation with incivility but significantly negative correlations with resilience and social support. Factors affecting burnout were satisfaction with major-dissatisfaction, satisfaction with major-average, social support, grade, and relationship with peers. Satisfaction with major (dissatisfaction) had the greatest effect on burnout, explaining 41% of the total variance. CONCLUSION: According to this study, dissatisfaction with major was identified as the most significant factor influencing burnout of nursing students in clinical practice. Therefore, it is important to develop and implement programs that can reduce dissatisfaction with major and increase social support and relationship with peers in order to lower burnout of nursing students. In addition, a systemic management of fourth-grade students with a high level of clinical practice is necessary to reduce the level of clinical practice. The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Conflict of Interest ; Humans ; Nursing ; Resilience, Psychological ; Students, Nursing

Humans ; Trust ; Conflict of Interest ; Judgment ; Medicine ; Biomedical Research