The complex regional pain syndromes (CRPS I and CRPS II), also known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy and causalgia, have been recognized for the past 2,500 years. Despite its long history, the diagnosis and treatment of CRPS are still challenging. These syndromes can be characterized by discrete sensory, motor, and autonomic findings, but many patients with CRPS continue to suffer for years without the diagnosis. Although much progress has been made in the understanding of CRPS, many questions still remain unanswered. CRPS is probably a disease of the central nervous system. Yet, peripheral inflammatory processes, abnormal sympathetic- afferent coupling, and adrenoreceptor pathology may also be part of the picture. A close multidisciplinary approach amongst the pain medicine consultants, psychologist, physical and occupational therapists, and neurologist is necessary to achieve the maximum treatment outcomes. If conventional treatment (e.g. pharmacotherapy) fails to show a significant response within 12 weeks, an interventional technique such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS) needs to be tried. The current concepts of CRPS could be replaced by a new mechanism-based term or group of terms in the near future leading to improved clinical guidelines. This article reviews the different aspects of CRPS including its definition, classification, epidemiology and natural history, clinical presentation, pathophysiology and management.
Causalgia ; Central Nervous System ; Classification ; Complex Regional Pain Syndromes ; Consultants ; Diagnosis* ; Epidemiology ; Humans ; Natural History ; Pathology ; Psychology ; Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy ; Spinal Cord Stimulation

Trigger finger is one of the most common causes of hand pain and disability. Persistent trigger finger after conservative treatment has been managed with surgical release of the A1 pulley. Percutaneous A1 pulley release is being increasingly performed and many authors have reported comparable outcomes with open surgical release. However, complications have been reported, including incomplete release, flexor tendon injury, and neurovascular injury due to the blind nature of the procedure. We report on a case of a 49-year-old female who presented with features of a type I complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) following percutaneous A1 pulley release. CRPS is a relatively common complication occurring after trauma and surgical procedures of the upper extremities. We experienced a case of CRPS following percutaneous A1 pulley release which was treated effectively following early diagnosis and through a multidisciplinary approach including physical therapy and medication.
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes ; Early Diagnosis ; Female ; Fingers ; Hand ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy ; Tendon Injuries ; Trigger Finger Disorder* ; Upper Extremity

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS) type I and type II are neuropathic pain conditions that are being increasingly recognized in children and adolescents. The special distinctive features of pediatric CRPS are the milder course, the better response to treatment and the higher recurrence rate than that of adults and the lower extremity is commonly affected. We report here on a case of pediatric CRPS that was derived from ankle trauma and long term splint application at the left ankle. The final diagnoses were CRPS type I in the right upper limb, CRPS type II in the left lower limb and unclassified neuropathy in the head, neck and precordium. The results of various treatments such as medication, physical therapy and nerve blocks, including lumbar sympathetic ganglion blocks, were not effective, so implantation of a spinal cord stimulator was performed. In order to control the pain in his left lower limb, one electrode tip was located at the 7th thoracic vertebral level and two electrode tips were located at the 7th and 2nd cervical vertebral levels for pain control in right upper limb, head, neck and right precordium. After the permanent insertion of the stimulator, the patient's pain was significantly resolved and his disabilities were restored without recurrence. The patient's pain worsened irregularly, which might have been caused by psychological stress. But the patient has been treated with medicine at our pain clinic and he is being followed up by a psychiatrist.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Ankle ; Causalgia ; Child ; Complex Regional Pain Syndromes ; Diagnosis ; Electrodes ; Ganglia, Sympathetic ; Head ; Humans ; Lower Extremity ; Neck ; Nerve Block ; Neuralgia ; Pain Clinics ; Psychiatry ; Recurrence ; Spinal Cord Stimulation* ; Spinal Cord* ; Splints ; Stress, Psychological ; Upper Extremity

There is no treatment either to prevent the development of complex regional pain syndromes (CRPS), or to adequately and specifically control established pain. Symptom-based analysis of pain is important for disease progress assessments and treatment outcomes. An intravenous regional block (IVRB) with local anesthetics can contribute to the management of CRPS. We observed that by the IVRB using ropivacaine, ketamine and clonidine, the patient with CRPS type I who was resistant to sympathetic ganglion block and medical treatment with gabapentin, carbamazepine and antidepressant, was relieved of neuropathic pain.
Anesthetics, Local ; Carbamazepine ; Clonidine* ; Complex Regional Pain Syndromes ; Ganglia, Sympathetic ; Humans ; Ketamine* ; Neuralgia

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical therapeutic effect of three-needle therapy combined with acupuncture on complex regional pain syndrome typeⅠ(CRPS-Ⅰ) after stroke. METHODS: A total of 96 patients with CRPS-Ⅰ after stroke were randomized into an observation group and a control group, 48 cases in each one. In the control group, based on the routine treatment, acupuncture was applied at Neiguan (PC 6), Shuigou (GV 26), Sanyinjiao (SP 6) and other supplementary acupoints, once a day, 6 times a week for 3 weeks. Based on the treatment in the control group, three-needle therapy was added at coracoid process, greater tuberosity of humerus and infraglenoid tubercle, the muscular fascia was released by fan-shaped separation technique for 3-6 times, and the treatment was given once every 2 days, 3 times a week for 3 weeks. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, hand swelling level, Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) score and Barthel index score were observed to evaluate the pain and swelling severity, motor function and living ability of patients before and after treatment. RESULTS: ① Compared before treatment, the VAS score, hand swelling level, the FMA score and the Barthel index after treatment and 40 days after treatment were improved in both of the two groups (<0.01). ② After treatment, the VAS score in the observation group was superior to the control group (<0.01), 40 days after treatment, the VAS and FMA scores in the observation group were superior to the control group (<0.01). ③ There were no significant differences after treatment and 40 days after treatment of the hand swelling level and the Barthel index between the two groups (>0.05). CONCLUSION three-needle therapy combined with acupuncture can improve the pain severity and the motor function of affected limbs in patients with CRPS-Ⅰ after stroke, and the therapeutic effect may be sustained for a long term. However, the treatment seems to be ineffectual on extremity swelling.
Acupuncture Points ; Acupuncture Therapy ; Complex Regional Pain Syndromes ; therapy ; Humans ; Needles ; Stroke ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) involves severe pain and it is difficult to identify the exact cause or pathogenesis. Therefore, there are controversies regarding legal issues related to the establishment of damage in medical malpractice lawsuits involving CRPS. This study aimed to analyze malpractice lawsuits involving CRPS, which occurred after the disputed medical treatment, to provide information on the courts' opinion and characteristics of the cases. METHODS: This study analyzed 23 lawsuit judgments involving CRPS that were sentenced from 2005 to 2015. RESULTS: A total of 12 of the 23 cases were partially ruled in favor of the plaintiff. The average amount (KRW) claimed was 470,638,385 ± 860,634,092 (21,000,000 to 4,020,000,000), and that awarded was 72,906,843 ± 53,389,367 (15,000,000 to 181,080,803). Sixteen of the 23 cases had CRPS type I. In 11 of 23 cases, the site of the pain was located in the lower limb and in 14 cases there was no presence of trauma or event prior to medical treatment. CONCLUSION: Nerve injury was the most frequent reason for taking responsibility in compensating damage in malpractice cases involving CRPS. Physicians should consider various possibilities of such complications in medical practices. It is important to identify and improve areas which need to be improved for patient safety through analyzing the lawsuit judgment cases.
Awards and Prizes ; Complex Regional Pain Syndromes ; Judgment ; Jurisprudence ; Lower Extremity ; Malpractice ; Patient Safety

Complex regional pain syndromes (CRPS) are neuropathic pain disorders of one or more extremities developing inadequately after trauma or lesions in the peripheral or central nervous system (CNS). However, CRPS may also develop spontaneously. CRPS are clinically characterized by sensory (pain, hyperalgesia, and allodynia), autonomic (disturbances of skin temperature, color change, and presence of sweating abnormalities), and motor (paresis, tremor, and dystonia) disturbances. There has been growing evidence claiming that CRPS is a systemic disease involving the CNS and peripheral nervous system. The diagnosis is mainly based on clinical symptoms and signs, so that it could be under or over diagnosed. However, careful clinical evaluation and additional tests should lead to an adequate diagnosis. The goal of treatment is to improve function, relieve pain, and achieve remission. The clinical management of CRPS involves pharmacotherapy, non pharmacological pain coping skills such as physical, psychological and interventional therapies. Timely diagnosis and validation of clinical presentation for CRPS may result in a better outcome.
Adaptation, Psychological ; Central Nervous System ; Complex Regional Pain Syndromes ; Extremities ; Hyperalgesia ; Neuralgia ; Peripheral Nervous System ; Skin Temperature ; Sweat ; Sweating ; Tremor

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictive value of the sympathetic skin response (SSR) in diagnosing complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) by comparing three diagnostic modalities-SSR, three-phasic bone scans (TPBS), and thermography. METHODS: Thirteen patients with severe limb pain were recruited. Among them, 6 were diagnosed with CRPS according to the proposed revised CRPS clinical diagnostic criteria described by the International Association for the Study of Pain. SSR was measured in either the hands or feet bilaterally and was considered abnormal when the latency was prolonged. A positive TPBS finding was defined as diffuse increased tracer uptake on the delayed image. Thermographic findings were considered positive if a temperature asymmetry greater than 1.00degrees C was detected between the extremities. RESULTS: Five of 6 CRPS patients showed prolonged latency on SSR (83% sensitivity). TPBS was positive in the 5 CRPS patients who underwent TPBS (100% sensitivity). Thermography was positive in 4 of 5 CRPS patients who underwent the procedure (80% sensitivity). The remaining 7 non-CRPS patients differed on examination. SSR latencies within normal limit were noted in 4 of 7 non-CRPS patients (57% specificity). Results were negative in 4 of 5 non-CRPS patients who underwent TPBS (80% specificity), and negative in 3 of 5 non-CRPS patients who underwent thermography (60% specificity). CONCLUSION: SSR may be helpful in detecting CRPS.
Case-Control Studies* ; Complex Regional Pain Syndromes ; Extremities ; Foot ; Galvanic Skin Response ; Hand ; Humans ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Skin* ; Thermography

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronically painful and disabling disorder. However, no data are available even on the epidemiology of CRPS in Korea. This study was undertaken to retrospectively assess the epidemiologic characteristics of CRPS in 150 consecutive patients at a tertiary chronic pain center from March 2002 to February 2006. Information was obtained regarding patients' demographics, nature of injury, and treatment modalities. Seventy-one percent of patients had CRPS type I. The mean 11-point verbal numerical rating scale score at initial examinations and at the time of study were 8.0 and 5.7, respectively. Thirty-two percent of patients showed no change or increase in pain intensity during follow-up at our pain center. The mean duration of CRPS symptoms prior to our pain center evaluation and prior to the time of study were 27 months and 50 months, respectively. These patients had seen on average 5 different physicians before being referred to our center. This study shows that the majority of CRPS patients were referred to our center after more than 2 yr of symptoms. The clinical implication of such delayed transfer and strategies to avoid this problem are discussed.
Adult ; Complex Regional Pain Syndromes/*diagnosis/*epidemiology/therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Korea ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain/epidemiology ; Pain Clinics ; Pain Measurement/methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Wounds and Injuries/complications

Spinal cord stimulation has become a widely used and efficient alternative for the management of refractory chronic pain that is unresponsive to conservative therapies. Technological improvements have been considerable and the current neuromodulation devices are both extremely sophisticated and reliable in obtaining good results for various clinical situations of chronic pain, such as failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome, ischemic and coronary artery disease. This technique is likely to possess a savings in costs compared with alternative therapy strategies despite its high initial cost. Spinal cord stimulation continues to be a valuable tool in the treatment of chronic disabling pain.
Angina Pectoris ; Chronic Pain ; Complex Regional Pain Syndromes ; Coronary Artery Disease ; Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ; Income ; Ischemia ; Spinal Cord ; Spinal Cord Stimulation