1.Comparative genomic analysis of gene variations of two Chinese Yersinia pestis isolates from vaccine strain EV76.
Yuan Hai YOU ; Peng WANG ; Yan Hua WANG ; Mao Jun ZHANG ; Zhi Zhong SONG ; Rong HAI ; Dong Zheng YU ; Hai Bin WANG ; Xing Qi DONG ; Jian Zhong ZHANG
Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 2012;25(4):440-448
OBJECTIVETo investigate genomic variations of two Chinese Yersinia pestis isolates that were isolated from different plague foci obtained from vaccine strain EV76 from the Yunnan province of China.
METHODSA microarray containing 12 000 probes covering the entire genome of seven Yersinia pestis and two Yersinia pseudotuberculosis strains, was used. PCR assays were performed to confirm microarray results.
RESULTSThe gene variations detected included the absence of five genes related to the synthesis of betaine in both EV76 and another sequenced attenuated strain, KIM D27. Several genes related to phage-related membrane proteins were found to be absent in the Antiqua biovar Yunnan strain, 485, which was isolated from a rodent plague foci.
CONCLUSIONThese findings provide initial insight into the distinct strains isolated from natural foci, within their genomic context, including Yunnan Y. pestis strains. This information will be used therefore to establish subsequent comparisons of these sequences with published complete genomes of other strains.
China ; Comparative Genomic Hybridization ; methods ; Genome, Bacterial ; genetics ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Yersinia pestis ; genetics
3.Current limitations and difficulties in application of microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis.
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2011;28(1):47-51
Subchromosomal abnormalities can be positioned by the detection of copy number variation (CNV) using microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). aCGH has become a powerful tool in understanding the association between gene and genetic etiology in both research and clinical laboratories. Meanwhile as a new technique, controversies inevitably arose in its clinical application. As for the phenotype of CNV, little has been disclosed. For the clinicians, the difficulty in explanation of the CNV to the patients is obvious, which makes many doctors refuse to use aCGH for clinical diagnosis. Customized arrays have been exploited to decrease the uncertainty and efforts to search for a balance between overloaded information and insufficient information have been made. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current limitations and difficulties in application of aCGH in prenatal diagnosis and its application prospect from the point of a clinician.
Comparative Genomic Hybridization
;
methods
;
DNA Copy Number Variations
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
;
methods
;
Pregnancy
;
Prenatal Diagnosis
;
methods
4.Prenatal diagnosis of a fetus in a family with mandibulofacial dysostosis.
Yan-hui LIU ; Shao-quan SHI ; Yan-liang ZHANG ; Yong DAI ; Xuan SHANG ; Ya-min WU ; Chao-qiang LI ; Li-fen LI
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2010;27(4):437-440
OBJECTIVETo measure the feasibility of application of comparative genomic hybridization technique in the prenatal diagnosis of fetus with mandibulofacial dysostosis.
METHODSA pregnant woman having a fetus with mandibulofacial dysostosis diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound test was selected. The amniotic fluid and blood of the pregnant and blood of her husband were collected and conventional cytogenetic analysis was performed. The whole genome was scanned by array comparative genomic hybridization assay (array-CGH). Reverse transcription fluorescence quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis was used to verify the result of array-CGH.
RESULTSNo abnormality was found in conventional cytogenetic analysis while a duplicated region in 1p36.33 was detected by array-CGH assay. The region spans 722 kb and contains two genes, VWA1 and PYGO2, which play roles in the development of cartilage. The result of array-CGH was confirmed by the RT-qPCR assay. The diagnosis of mandibulofacial dysostosis was confirmed after birth.
CONCLUSIONAuthor diagnosed a fetus with mandibulofacial dysostosis by array-CGH assay and found two candidate genes related to the development of craniofacial bone: VWA1 and PYGO2.
Adult ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Comparative Genomic Hybridization ; methods ; Female ; Fetus ; pathology ; Humans ; Karyotyping ; methods ; Mandibulofacial Dysostosis ; genetics ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; methods
5.Chromosome copy analysis by single-cell comparative genomic hybridization technique based on primer extension preamplification and degenerate oligonucleotide primed-PCR.
Ke TAN ; Yu-fen DI ; De-hua CHENG ; Fang XU ; Guang-xiu LU ; Yue-qiu TAN
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2010;27(4):387-392
OBJECTIVETo establish a single-cell whole genome amplification (WGA) technique, in combination with comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), for analyzing chromosomal copy number changes, and to explore its clinical application in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).
METHODSTwelve single-cell samples with known karyotypes, including 5 chorionic villus samples, 4 human embryonic stem cell (hESC) samples and 3 peripheral lymphocyte samples, and 4 single blastomere samples carrying chromosomal abnormalities detected by PGD, were collected for whole genome amplification by combining primer extension preamplification (PEP) with degenerate oligonucleotide primed-PCR (DOP-PCR) amplification. The amplified products labeled by red fluorescence were mixed with control DNA labeled by green fluorescence, and then the mixture was analyzed by CGH. As a comparison, 10 single cell samples were amplified by DOP-PCR only and then CGH analysis was performed.
RESULTSThe amplification using PEP-DOP-PCR was more stable than traditional DOP-PCR. The products of PEP-DOP-PCR range from 100 bp to 1000 bp, with the mean size being about 400 bp. The CGH results were consistent with analyses by other methods. However, only 6 out of 10 single cell samples were successfully amplified by DOP-PCR, and CGH analysis showed a high background and 2 samples showed inconsistent results from other methods.
CONCLUSIONPEP-DOP-PCR can effectively amplify the whole genome DNA of single cell. Combined with CGH, this WGA method can successfully detect single-cell chromosomal copy number changes, while DOP-PCR was easy to fail to amplify and amplify inhomogeneously, and CGH analysis using this PCR product usually showed high background. These results suggest that PEP-DOP-CGH is a promising method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Comparative Genomic Hybridization ; methods ; DNA Primers ; Genetic Testing ; methods ; Humans ; Karyotyping ; methods ; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques ; methods ; Nucleic Acid Hybridization ; methods ; Oligonucleotides ; chemistry ; Preimplantation Diagnosis ; methods
6.Application of array comparative genomic hybridization analysis for fetuses with growth anomalies.
Lin WANG ; Xiaobin WANG ; Na CAI ; Bin HE ; Qiuhua WU ; Wei LI ; Liping ZHANG ; Xiaoping MA ; Rong QIANG
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2017;34(5):691-694
OBJECTIVETo explore the genetic etiology for fetuses featuring intrauterine growth anomalies using array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).
METHODSForty-nine fetuses were enrolled in this study. Genomic DNA of the abortive tissues was analyzed with aCGH.
RESULTSFourteen (28.6%) samples were found with chromosomal aberrations, which included 8 chromosomal aneuploidies and 6 micro-aberrations (4 with known clinical pathogenecity and 2 with unknown clinical significance).
CONCLUSIONNumerical and structural chromosomal aberrations underlie a significant proportion of fetal growth anomalies. aCGH has provided an effective method for delineating their genetic cause.
Adult ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Comparative Genomic Hybridization ; methods ; Congenital Abnormalities ; genetics ; DNA Copy Number Variations ; Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; methods
7.Progress of cytogenetic detection in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Qing-Bing ZHOU ; Xiao-Mei HU ; -Feng LIU ; Rou MA
Journal of Experimental Hematology 2011;19(6):1536-1540
In recent years, significant progresses have been got in study on pathogenesis, treatment and prognosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), especially on use of new technology, that has great importance for cytogenetics of MDS. Recently, the progress of cytogenetic detection in MDS is very remarkable. Based on the metaphase cytogenetics (MC) method, prognostic significance of cytogenetics in MDS was clarified gradually. For example, people have known the prognostic significance of 12 p-, 11 q-, +21, t(11(q23)), although these genetic abnormalities are rare in the MDS. In addition, chromosome mutation emerged in the process of MDS may indicate the poor prognosis. On the other hand, with the use of SNP-A and aCGH in the study of genetics, MDS cytogenetic abnormality detection rate has been further improved and can reach to 78%. At the same time, some of MDS patients with the "normal karyotype" detected by MC have new hidden aberrations through the SNP or CGH detection, and these patients have a poorer prognosis. In this review, the advances of study on cytogenetic detection for MDS based on MC and SNP-A or aCGH methods are summarized.
Comparative Genomic Hybridization
;
methods
;
Cytogenetics
;
methods
;
Humans
;
Karyotype
;
Karyotyping
;
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
;
diagnosis
;
genetics
;
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
;
Prognosis
9.Combined spectral karyotyping and microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for the diagnosis of a case with ring chromosome 15.
Min PAN ; Kwong Wai CHOY ; Can LIAO ; Tze Kin LAU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2012;29(5):562-565
OBJECTIVETo assess the value of spectral karyotyping (SKY) combined with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) for the diagnosis of complex ring chromosome aberration.
METHODSFor an 8-year-old boy featuring growth retardation, G-banding analysis has indicated a 46,XY,r(15)? karyotype, which was delineated by SKY in combination with array-CGH.
RESULTSThe ring chromosome has originated from chromosome 15 according to SKY analysis. Position of the breakpoint (15q26.3) and a 594 kb deletion were revealed by array-CGH.
CONCLUSIONMolecular cytogenetic technologies are efficient tools for clarifying complex chromosomal abnormality, which has provided a powerful tool for conventional cytogenetic analysis.
Child ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15 ; Comparative Genomic Hybridization ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Mosaicism ; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis ; Ring Chromosomes ; Spectral Karyotyping
10.Prenatal diagnosis of two fetuses with de novo small supernumerary markers by single nucleotide polymorphism array based comparative genomic hybridization.
Xiu-qing JI ; Li LI ; Ying LIN ; Ding-yuan MA ; An LIU ; Jing-jing ZHANG ; Jian CHENG ; Jing ZHOU ; Ping HU ; Zheng-feng XU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2012;29(5):510-514
OBJECTIVETo explore the origins of small de novo mosaic supernumerary marker chromosomes (mars) in two fetuses, and to assess the feasibility of single nucleotide polymorphism array-based comparative genomic hybridization (SNP-array CGH) for prenatal molecular cytogenetic diagnosis.
METHODSTwo fetuses with de novo were identified. SNP-array marker chromosomes was applied to define the location and range of marker chromosomes. The karyotype of fetus I was determined to be 47,XX,+ mar[23]/46,XX[16], and that of fetus II was 47,XX,+ mar. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was applied to verify the genomic imbalance found in fetus II. The karyotypes of parents were normal in both families.
RESULTSSNP-array CGH has indicated a 8.3 Mb duplication at 9p21.1-p21.3 in fetus I, and a 10.8 Mb duplication at 15q11.2-q13.3 in fetus II. MLPA has also confirmed a 15q terminal duplication in fetus II.
CONCLUSIONAbove cases have illustrated that SNP-array CGH is a rapid, powerful and sensitive technique which may be used for identify the origins of marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.
Adult ; Comparative Genomic Hybridization ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis