Utilization of the colostomy site for laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure was recently introduced, and several studies have shown the feasibility of the procedure, which allows the colostomy site to serve as an access port for the operation. We demonstrate a method utilizing an accessory 5 mm trocar to assist in the operation while employing a colostomy-deepened glove port.
Colostomy* ; Laparoscopy ; Methods ; Surgical Instruments

PURPOSE: Colostomy creation is an essential procedure for colorectal surgeons, but the preferred method of colostomy varies by surgeon. We compared the outcomes of trephine colostomy creation with open those for the (laparotomy) and laparoscopic methods and evaluated appropriate indications for a trephine colostomy and the advantages of the technique. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 263 patients who had undergone colostomy creation by trephine, open and laparoscopic approaches between April 2006 and March 2016. We compared the clinical features and the operative and postoperative outcomes according to the approach used for stoma creation. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-three patients (62%) underwent colostomy surgery for obstructive causes and 100 (38%) for fistulous problems. The mean operative time was significantly shorter with the trephine approach (trephine, 46.0 ± 1.9 minutes; open, 78.7 ± 3.9 minutes; laparoscopic, 63.5 ± 5.0 minutes; P < 0.001), as was the time to flatus (1.8 ± 0.1 days, 2.1 ± 0.1 days, 2.2 ± 0.3 days, P = 0.025). Postoperative complications (<30 days) were not different among the 3 approaches (trephine, 4.3%; open, 1.2%; laparoscopic, 0%; P = 0.828). In patients who underwent rectal surgery, a trephine colostomy was feasible for a diversion colostomy (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The trephine colostomy is safe and can be implemented quickly in various situations, and compared to other colostomy procedures, the patient's recovery is faster. Previous laparotomy history was not a contraindication for a trephine colostomy, and a trephine transverse colostomy is feasible for patients who have undergone previous rectal surgery.
Colostomy* ; Flatulence ; Humans ; Laparotomy ; Methods ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgeons

Objective: To examine the preliminary effect of laparoscopic extraperitoneal colostomy anterior to posterior sheath of rectus abdominis-transversus abdominis for the prevention of parastomal hernia after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Methods: This study is a prospective case series study. From June 2021 to June 2022, patients with low rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection combined with extraperitoneal colostomy anterior to posterior sheath of rectus abdominis-transversus abdominis at the First Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital were enrolled. The clinical data and postoperative CT images of patients were collected to analyze the incidence of surgical complication and parastomal hernia. Results: Totally 6 cases of patient were enrolled, including 3 males and 3 females, aging 72.5 (19.5) years (M(IQR)) (range: 55 to 79 years). The operation time was 250 (48) minutes (range: 190 to 275 minutes), the stoma operation time was 27.5 (10.7) minutes (range: 21 to 37 minutes), the bleeding volume was 30 (35) ml (range: 15 to 80 ml). All patients were cured and discharged without surgery-related complications. The follow-up time was 136 (105) days (range: 98 to 279 days). After physical examination and abdominal CT follow-up, no parastomal hernia occurred in the 6 patients up to this article. Conclusions: A method of laparoscopic extraperitoneal colostomy anterior to posterior sheath of rectus abdominis-transversus abdominis is established. Permanent stoma can be completed with this method safely. It may have a preventive effect on the occurrence of parastomal hernia, which is worthy of further study.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Colostomy/methods* ; Rectus Abdominis ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Incisional Hernia/surgery* ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Hernia, Ventral/surgery* ; Surgical Mesh/adverse effects*

Ectopic stomal varices are an unusual cause of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The term "ectopic stomal varices" means abnormally dilated veins that have developed in the stomal mucosa. We describe the 2D reformatted and 3D volume rendered images by MDCT in a patient with an episode of acute bleeding from the colonic stoma. This case indicates that the 2D reformatted and 3D volume rendered images are useful to detect this rare complication of portal hypertension, and they help to tailor adequate treatment for the patients with bleeding from stomal varices.
Varicose Veins/*complications/*radiography/therapy ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods ; Recurrence ; Male ; Ligation ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Humans ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*etiology/*radiography/therapy ; *Colostomy ; Aged

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect of GORE-TEX Dual Mesh fixing into peritoneum in sigmoid-colostomy on the prevention of peristomal hernia.

METHODSSixty patients undergone sigmoid-colostomy from Jan. 2003 to Jan. 2005 in the first affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Patients received papillary sigmoid-colostomy through rectus abdominis and peritoneum in control group and GORE-TEX Dual Mesh fixing into peritoneum during sigmoid-colostomy in observation group. Complications and recurrence rate were recorded in follow-up period.

RESULTSPeristomal hernia occurred in eight patients (8/30) in control group (26.7%), while no hernia happened in observation group (0/30).

CONCLUSIONGORE-TEX Dual Mesh fixing into peritoneum in sigmoid-colostomy can prevent peristomal hernia.

Adult ; Aged ; Biocompatible Materials ; Colon, Sigmoid ; surgery ; Colostomy ; instrumentation ; methods ; Female ; Hernia ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peritoneum ; surgery ; Polytetrafluoroethylene ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Surgical Mesh

OBJECTIVETo investigate the value of protective stoma in intersphincteric resection (ISR) for ultra-low rectal cancer.

METHODSClinical data of 56 ultra-low rectal cancer patients without involvement of external anal sphincter treated during January 1999 to July 2009 with trans-anal ISR plus trans-abdominal total mesorectum excision and coloanal anastomosis were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received protective ostomy: ostomy group (16 cases) and ostomy-free group (40 cases). The postoperative complications as well as anal functional restoration were compared between the two groups.

RESULTSSixteen cases (32.1%) of the 56 patients received protective stoma. The complication rate of anastomosis and anus complication rate in the ostomy-free group were significantly higher than those in ostomy group [35.0% (14/40) and 40.0% (16/40) vs. 1/16 and 1/16; P < 0.05]. In the ostomy-free group, one patient developed anastomotic dehiscence and tumor recurrence, the patients was given permanent colostomy, and the other three patients with lesions in the anastomosis and anus received ostomy and secondary surgical treatment, with a reoperation rate of 10.0% (4/40). The anal function of patients in the two groups were both decreased after the operation. The rate of patients got Kirwan grade I anal sphincter function in the 3rd, 6th and 12th month after protective stoma operation was 11/16, 13/15 and 11/13 in the ostomy group, respectively; and those were 30.0%, 37.5% and 45.0% in the ostomy-free group, respectively. Anal function was significantly better in the ostomy group than that in the ostomy-free group during the same postoperative period (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONProtective stoma can avoid anastomotic leakage following ISR for ultra-low rectal cancer, and alleviate the suffering of anal incontinence in the early postoperative period, and is conducive to the restoration of anal function.

Adult ; Aged ; Anal Canal ; surgery ; Anastomotic Leak ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Colostomy ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVETo compare two different procedures of colostomy in the laparoscopic- assisted abdominoperineal resection(LAPR), and to reduce the related complications of colostomy.

METHODSSixty- three cases with anorectal cancer undergone LAPR from June 2001 to December 2005 were registered and followed up. Circular stapler anastomosis with sigmoid colon and abdominal skin were applied on 61 cases of the colostomy, and 2 cases were hand sutured. All patients were assigned to group A and B. Thirty- seven cases received the procedure of colostomy through the rectus abdominis peritoneally in group A,other 26 cases through extraperitoneal tunnel and the rectus abdominis in group B.

RESULTSDescending colon, sigmoid colon and rectum were dissected using laparoscopic instruments in 63 cases. No conversion to open procedure and no operative death occurred in two groups of patients. There was no significant difference between two groups in mean operation time, but significant differences were found in the time of return of bowl function[A group (2.4 +/- 1.1)d vs B group (1.9 +/- 0.8)d,P < 0.05], duration of postoperative hospital stay [A group (19.9 +/- 7.8)d vs B group (14.5 +/- 3.9)d,P < 0.01] and stoma related complications(A group 29.4% vs B group 4.0%,P < 0.05). Postoperative hospital stay were shorter, and less colostomy related complications were found in group B.

CONCLUSIONColostomy through extraperitoneal tunnel and the rectus abdominis is a better procedure in LAPR, which can reduce the related complications of colostomy and shorten postoperative hospital stay.

Abdominal Cavity ; surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anal Canal ; surgery ; Colostomy ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Peritoneum ; surgery ; Rectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo explore the application of three-stitch preventive transverse colostomy in anterior resection of low rectal cancer.

METHODFrom May 2015 to March 2016, 70 consecutive low rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection and preventive transverse colostomy in our department were recruited in this prospective study. According to the random number table method, 70 patients were divided into three-stitch transverse colostomy group(observation group, n=35) and traditional transverse colostomy group(control group, n=35). Procedure of three-stitch preventive transverse colostomy was as follows: firstly, at the upper 1/3 incision 0.5-1.0 cm distance from the skin, 7# silk was used to suture from outside to inside, then the needle belt line went through the transverse edge of the mesangial avascular zone. At the lower 1/3 incision 0.5-1.0 cm distance from the skin, 7# silk was used to suture from inside to outside, then silk went through the transverse edge of the mesangial avascular zone again and was ligatured. Finally, in the upper and lower ends of the stoma, 7# silk was used to suture and fix transverse seromuscular layer and the skin. The operation time and morbidity of postoperative complications associated with colostomy were compared between two groups.

RESULTSThere were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups(all P>0.05). The operative time of observation group was shorter than that of control group [(3.2±1.3) min vs. (15.5±3.4) min, P<0.05]. Incidences of colostomy skin-mucous separation, dermatitis, stoma rebound were significantly lower in observation group [5.7%(2/35) vs. 34.3%(12/35), P=0.007; 8.6%(3/35) vs. 31.4%(11/35), P=0.036; 0 vs. 17.1%(6/35), P=0.025, respectively], while incidences of parastomal hernia and stoma prolapse in two groups were similar (both P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONCompared with traditional transverse colostomy method, the three-stitch preventive transverse colostomy has more operating advantages and can reduce postoperative complications associated with colostomy.

Colostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Humans ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Surgical Stomas ; adverse effects ; Suture Techniques ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; Sutures ; Treatment Outcome

Patients presenting for emergency abdominal procedures often have medical issues that cause both general anaesthesia and central neuraxial blockade to pose significant risks. Regional anaesthetic techniques are often used adjunctively for abdominal procedures under general anaesthesia, but there is limited published data on procedures done under peripheral nerve or plexus blocks. We herein report the case of a patient with recent pulmonary embolism and supraventricular tachycardia who required colostomy refashioning. Ultrasonography-guided regional anaesthesia was administered using a combination of ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric, rectus sheath and transversus abdominis plane blocks. This was supplemented with propofol and dexmedetomidine sedation as well as intermittent fentanyl and ketamine boluses to cover for visceral stimulation. We discuss the anatomical rationale for the choice of blocks and compare the anaesthetic conduct with similar cases that were previously reported.
Abdominal Wall ; surgery ; Aged ; Anesthesia, Conduction ; methods ; Anesthesia, General ; adverse effects ; Colostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Conscious Sedation ; methods ; Dexmedetomidine ; administration & dosage ; Fentanyl ; administration & dosage ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Ketamine ; administration & dosage ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Nerve Block ; methods ; Pain, Postoperative ; Postoperative Period ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; Pulmonary Embolism ; complications ; Reoperation ; methods ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular ; complications ; Ultrasonography, Interventional

OBJECTIVEThe study aimed to review the treatment and prognosis of acute obstruction of colorectal cancers and to compare different treatment strategies of those cancers, and to evaluate the risk factors affecting perioperative complications.

METHODSClinical data of 184 patients with acute obstruction of colorectal cancer undergone operation were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTSA total of 184 patients with acute obstruction of colorectal cancer was collected in this study, including 58 patients with proximal and 126 patients of distal colorectal cancers. Perioperative death occurred in 2/58 patients (3.4%) with distal colorectal cancer and 6/126 cases (4.8%) of distal colorectal cancer (P > 0.05). The overall perioperative complications in the two groups were not significantly different (P = 0.794). Among the 58 patients with proximal colorectal cancer, one patient underwent colostomy, but among the 126 patients with distal colorectal cancer, 41 patients underwent colostomy, showing a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.002). ASA scores (grade 3 - 4), elderly age (≥ 70 years) and colon perforation peritonitis were independent prognostic factors associated with perioperative mortality and morbidity. Patients in the self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (25.4 ± 8.3) d than that in the emergency surgery group (32.8 ± 16.4) d, (P = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONSEndoscopic stent implantation provides an acceptable modality of palliation for acute proximal large bowel obstruction caused by malignancies. In acute colorectal cancer obstruction, SEMS can provide a minimally invasive management compared with surgical intervention.

Acute Disease ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; complications ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Colostomy ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Intestinal Obstruction ; etiology ; therapy ; Intestinal Perforation ; etiology ; Intraoperative Complications ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Palliative Care ; methods ; Peritonitis ; etiology ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Young Adult