1.Use of granulocyte-macropharge colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in azathioprine-induced leukopenic renal transplant recipients.
Dong Chan JIN ; Young Suk YOON ; Suk Young KIM ; Eui Jin CHOI ; Byung Kee BANG
Korean Journal of Nephrology 1993;12(4):674-676
No abstract available.
Colony-Stimulating Factors*
;
Transplantation*
2.Clinical application of granulouyte colony-stimulating factor and granlocyte, Macrophage colomy-stimulating factor.
Korean Journal of Medicine 1999;57(4):442-448
No abstract available.
Colony-Stimulating Factors*
;
Macrophages*
3.Colony Stimulating Factor 3 Mutations and Myeloid Malignancies.
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2016;38(1):103-107
Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) plays a major role in the proliferation, differentiation, and activation of neutrophil cell line hematopoietic cells. G-CSF exert the function depending on its binding to colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R), a homo-dimer receptor located on the surface of effector cells. Some recent studies have demonstrated that CSF3R mutations play a significant role in many diseases. Some of the hematopoietic diseases, especially myeloid malignancies (e.g. chronic neutrophilic leukemia) are related to the presence of various CSF3R mutations, which leads to abnormal G-CSF signal pathways. Also, the downstream kinases can be the treatment targets for these diseases. This review summarizes CSF3R mutations, mechanisms of mutations, and their contributions to the myeloid malignancies, with an attempt to further reveal the pathogenesis of myeloid malignancies, inform the diagnosis and clinical treatment of the myeloid malignancies, and provide clues for the research and development of new molecular target drugs.
Colony-Stimulating Factors
;
Hematologic Neoplasms
;
Humans
;
Mutation
;
Myeloid Cells
;
Receptors, Colony-Stimulating Factor
;
Signal Transduction
4.The Effect of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor and Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor on the Preimplantation Development and Implantation in Mouse Embryos.
Chung Hoon KIM ; Eun Ju PARK ; Jong Yoon HWANG ; Seok Ho HONG ; Sung Hoon KIM ; Hee Dong CHAE ; Byung Moon KANG
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002;45(1):126-132
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on preimplantation development and implantation in mouse embryos. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight-cell stage mouse embryos were cultured for 96 hours with G-CSF or GM-CSF at concentrations of 10 pg/ml, 100 pg/ml, 1 ng/ml and 10 ng/ml. Embryos not treated with G-CSF or GM-CSF were served as control. The percentages of embryos which developed to expanded, hatched blastocyst stage and in vitro implantation at 96 hours were determined. Results were analyzed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. RESULTS: The percentages of fully expanded blastocysts in all G-CSF and GM-CSF treatment groups were not significantly different from the control. The percentages of hatched blastocysts were significantly higher in 100 pg/ml and 10 ng/ml of G-CSF treatment group compared to the control (p<0.05, p<0.05, respectively). The percentages of hatched blastocysts were significantly lower in 1 ng/ml of GM-CSF treatment group compared to the control, 10 pg/ml, and 100 pg/ml of GM-CSF treatment group (p<0.05, p<0.05, p<0.05, respectively), and the percentages of hatched blastocysts were also significantly lower in 10 ng/ml of GM-CSF treatment group compared to the control and 100 pg/ml of GM-CSF treatment group (p<0.05, p<0.05, respectively). The percentages of implanted blastocysts in vitro were significantly higher following incubation with all concentrations of G-CSF compared to the control and, especially in 100 pg/ml and 10 ng/ml of G-CSF treatment groups compared to the control and other treatment groups. The percentages of implanted blastocysts in vitro were significantly higher in 10 pg/ml of GM-CSF treatment group than the control and 100 pg/ml of GM-CSF treatment groups (p<0.05, p<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: G-CSF and GM-CSF might influence on embryonic development and implantation in mouse embryos.
Animals
;
Blastocyst
;
Colony-Stimulating Factors*
;
Embryonic Development
;
Embryonic Structures*
;
Female
;
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
;
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor*
;
Granulocytes*
;
Mice*
;
Pregnancy
5.Application of Apoptogenic Pretreatment to Enhance Anti-tumor Immunity of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF)-secreting CT26 Tumor Cells.
Do Youn JUN ; Elizabeth M JAFFEE ; Young Ho KIM
Immune Network 2005;5(2):110-116
BACKGROUND: As an attempt to develop a strategy to improve the protective immune response to GM-CSF-secreting CT26 (GM-CSF/CT26) tumor vaccine, we have investigated whether the apoptogenic treatment of GM-CSF/CT26 prior to vaccination enhances the induction of anti-tumor immune response in mouse model. METHODS: A carcinogen- induced mouse colorectal tumor, CT26 was transfected with GM-CSF gene using a retroviral vector to generate GM-CSF-secreting CT26 (CT26/GM-CSF). The CT26/GM-CSF was treated with gamma-irradiation or mitomycin C to induce apoptosis and vaccinated into BALB/c mice. After 7 days, the mice were injected with a lethal dose of challenge live CT26 cells to examine the protective effect of tumor vaccination in vivo. RESULTS: Although both apoptotic and necrotic CT26/GM-CSF vaccines were able to enhance anti-tumor immune response, apoptotic CT26/GM-CSF induced by pretreatment with gamma-irradiation (50,000 rads) was the most potent in generating the anti-tumor immunity, and thus 100% of mice vaccinated with the apoptotic cells remained tumor free for more than 60 days after tumor challenge. CONCLUSION: Apoptogenic pretreatment of GM-CSF-secreting CT26 tumor vaccine by gamma-irradiation (50,000 rads) resulted in a significant enhancement in inducing the protective anti-tumor immunity. A rapid induction of apoptosis of CT26/GM-CSF tumor vaccine at the vaccine site might be critical for the enhancement in anti-tumor immune response to tumor vaccine.
Animals
;
Apoptosis
;
Colony-Stimulating Factors*
;
Colorectal Neoplasms
;
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
;
Mice
;
Mitomycin
;
Vaccination
;
Vaccines
;
Zidovudine
6.Effect of GM-CSF to the M-VAC Chemotherapy Induced Leukopenia in Patients with Urothelial Cancer.
Jong Bo CHOI ; Dong Sun KIM ; Jae Heung CHO
Korean Journal of Urology 1994;35(2):151-155
Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) occupies a central position in the regulation of hematopoietic responses. GM-CSF not only signals proliferations of granulocyte-macrophage but also drives these cells into differentiation and activates mature cells of the GM-CSF sensitive lineage. Myelosuppression that is induced by M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatinum) chemotherapy brings many problems in successful treatment such as sepsis, dose reduction, delaying the schedule. Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor is introduced hopefully as a new solution for these problems. So we evaluated the efficacy and safety of GM-CSF in leukopenia induced by M-VAC chemotherapy in patients with urothelial cancer. GM-CSF was administered at 200ug subcutaneously in 10 M-VAC cycles of 6 patients on 5th and 6th day after M-VAC therapy. Sixteen cycles, by which only M-VAC chemotherapy was administered without GM-CSF. of the other 6 patients served as control group. Mean white blood cell count in peripheral blood at M-VAC 2nd day and 15th day was 5,630/mm3 and 4,240/mm3 in GM-CSF administered cycles, 6,58l/mm3and 3,613/mm3 in non GM-CSF administered cycles. There was no delayed cycle in administration of MTX and vinblastine at M-VAC 15th day in the cycles with GM-CSF. There was no significant side effects caused by GM- CSF. The result indicates that GM-CSF can be used safely and effectively against leukopenia after M-VAC chemotherapy of urothelial cancer.
Appointments and Schedules
;
Colony-Stimulating Factors
;
Doxorubicin
;
Drug Therapy*
;
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor*
;
Granulocytes
;
Humans
;
Leukocyte Count
;
Leukopenia*
;
Sepsis
;
Vinblastine
7.The Characterization of T Cell - Derived Neutrophil Survival Factor %.
Korean Journal of Immunology 1997;19(3):363-374
It has been reported that the stimulated T lymphocytes might secret a neutrophil survival factor. Thus the goal of study was to determine which molecules are the neutrophil survival factors secreted from the phytohaemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated T lymphocytes. Human peripheral blood T lymphocytes and neutrophils were isolated by Ficoll-paque density sedimentation from heparinized blood of healthy adult donors. The purity of T lymphocytes and neutrophils were more than 90% and 95%, respectively. The maximal effective condition for the neutrophil viability-sustaining activity was 1 ug/ml af PHA in 12 hours incubation with T lymphocytes. The effect of PHA-stimulated T lymphocyte conditioned medium (TCM) on the neutrophils were used for the comparison with PHA-nonstimulated TCM or enriched medium alone. Neutrophil viability-sustaining activity with PHA-stimulated TCM for 24 hours incubation was significantly higher than other groups (85+/-11 vs 43+/-5 vs 916%; p<0.01). In the analysis of the primary data, the good candidates for the neutrophil viability-sustaining factor were granulocyte/monocyte colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-8 (IL-8). They were used in the bioassay and antibody neutralization of cytokine activity. ...continue...
Adult
;
Biological Assay
;
Colony-Stimulating Factors
;
Culture Media, Conditioned
;
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
;
Heparin
;
Humans
;
Interleukin-8
;
Lymphocytes
;
Neutrophils*
;
T-Lymphocytes
;
Tissue Donors
8.The Effect of GM-CSF Supplementation in Culture Medium in the Human IVF Programs.
Won Il PARK ; Hyuck Chan KWON ; Dong Hoon KIM ; Hee Kyoo KANG ; Myo Kyung KIM ; Hoi Chang LEE ; Ji Hak JUNG ; Myong Seop LEE ; Ho Joon LEE
Korean Journal of Fertility and Sterility 2001;28(2):161-168
OBJECTIVE: Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factors known to be secreted in murine and human reproductive tract. The development of human, bovine and murine embryos could be promoted by addition of GM-CSF in culture medium. However, the pregnancy and implantation rate of embryos cultured in GM-CSF have not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of GM-CSF in embryo development, pregnancy and implantation rate. METHODS: A total of 191 IVF cycles were divided into control and GM-CSF supplement group (control =96, GM-CSF=95). The embryos were cultured for three day with or without 2 ng/ml of recombinant human GM-CSF. The quality of embryo, developmental velocity, pregnancy and implantation rates were compared. RESULTS: There was no difference in age, number of gonadotropin ampules used, number of oocytes and fertilization. The number of ICSI cycle was higher in GM-CSF group. In GM-CSF group, G-1 grade embryos were the highest in proportion (56.4%), while G-2 grade embryos were highest (44.3%) in control group. The developmental velocity of embryos were not different between GM-CSF and control group. The pregnancy and implantation rates were significantly higher in GM-CSF group than control (47.4% vs. 33.3%, 17.0% vs. 11.1% respectively). CONCLUSION: By adding GM-CSF in culture medium, the quality of embryo, pregnancy and implantation rate could be improved.
Colony-Stimulating Factors
;
Embryonic Development
;
Embryonic Structures
;
Female
;
Fertilization
;
Gonadotropins
;
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor*
;
Humans*
;
Oocytes
;
Pregnancy
;
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
9.Mobilization Kinetics of CD34+ Cells during Continuous Intravenous Administration of G-CSF in Normal Donors.
Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion 1999;10(2):165-172
BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood progenitor cells collected from normal donors after granulocyte- colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment are increasingly used for allogeneic transplantation. Previously, we investigated the mobilization kinetics of CD34+/Thy-1dim progenitor cells during subcutaneous administration of G-CSF in normal donors (Transfusion 1997;37:406-10). Although it is considered to be a relatively safe procedure, there are still uncertainties about the most efficient method of progenitor cell mobilization. Due to the short elimination half-life of G-CSF of about 3-4 hours we considered the subcutaneous administration of G-CSF once or twice daily might be suboptimal. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the mobilization kinetics of CD34+ cells during continuous intravenous (IV) administration of G-CSF in normal donors. METHODS: Fifteen healthy donors were enrolled in this study. The median age was 38 years (range, 20-56). G-CSF (Filgrastim, 10 microgram/kg/day) was administered for 4 consecutive days through continuous IV infusion. Then, we collected PBPC on the day following the 4th dose of G-CSF using a blood cell separator. For measurement of complete blood counts and CD34+ cell levels, peripheral blood sampling was performed immediately before the administration of G-CSF (steady-state) and after 4, 8, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours of continuous IV administration of G-CSF. RESLUTS: After continuous IV administration of G-CSF, the WBC counts increased up to day 5 and reached approximately 8.4-fold above the steady-state level. Changes in the granulocyte count were similar to those in WBC counts. The number of lymphocytes increased up to day 4 (2.7-fold above the steady-state level), but no further increase occurred on day 5. Although there were considerable variations among the healthy donors, the statistical peaks of CD34+ cell levels were consistently observed on day 3 or day 4. Up to the fourth day of G-CSF treatment, the circulating CD34+ cells expanded by 25-fold. The percentage and absolute number of CD34+ cells significantly increased on day 3 (0.55 +/- 0.09%, 51.12 +/- 24.83x103/mL) and day 4 (0.47 +/- 0.09%, 46.66 +/- 24.93x103/mL), compared with steady-state values (0.06 +/- 0.09%, 2.03 +/- 5.69x103/mL). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that continuous IV administration of G-CSF apparently results in more rapid mobilization of CD34+ cells at least 24-48 hours compared with daily subcutaneous administration of G-CSF in normal donors.
Administration, Intravenous*
;
Blood Cell Count
;
Blood Cells
;
Colony-Stimulating Factors
;
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor*
;
Granulocytes
;
Half-Life
;
Humans
;
Kinetics*
;
Lymphocytes
;
Stem Cells
;
Tissue Donors*
;
Transplantation, Homologous
10.Inhibition of Fungi-Induced Nasal Polyp Epithelial Cells Activation by Corticosteroids.
Journal of Rhinology 2006;13(1):32-36
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Airway epithelial cells contribute to the pathogenesis of air disease by their interaction with inhalant pathogenic extracts. Airborne fungi interact with nasal epithelial cell and enhance the production of inflammatory cytokines. Glucocorticosteroids (GCs) have been used therapeutically for nasal polyps and allergic disease with potent anti-inflammatory effects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the inhibitory effect of GCs on fungi induced nasal epithelial cell activation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The epithelial cells of nasal polyps were obtained from patients and stimulated with Alternaria. To evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of GCs, Alternaria was pretreated with GCs (triamcinolone, dexamethasone, and budesonide) and cultured with epithelial cells. Interleukin-8 (IL-8) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were measured to determine the activation of epithelial cells. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for protease-activated receptors (PARs) mRNA expression in nasal epithelial cells were performed. RESULTS: Alternaria enhanced the production of IL-8 and GM-CSF from nasal epithelial cells. GCs inhibited the activation of nasal epithelial cells, but the PAR2 and PAR3 mRNA expression were not suppressed by GCs. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that GCs inhibit the production of chemical mediators by Alternaria, but anti-inflammatory effect of GCs are not associated with PARs.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones*
;
Alternaria
;
Colony-Stimulating Factors
;
Cytokines
;
Dexamethasone
;
Epithelial Cells*
;
Fungi
;
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
;
Humans
;
Interleukin-8
;
Nasal Polyps*
;
Receptors, Proteinase-Activated
;
RNA, Messenger