1.Bowel Preparation, the First Step for a Good Quality Colonoscopy.
Intestinal Research 2014;12(1):1-2
No abstract available.
Colonoscopy*
3.Rectal Retroflexion during Colonoscopy: A Bridge over Troubled Water.
Clinical Endoscopy 2014;47(1):3-4
No abstract available.
Colonoscopy*
4.What Is the Mean Procedure Time to Optimize Colonoscopy?.
Clinical Endoscopy 2016;49(6):500-501
No abstract available.
Colonoscopy*
5.How Should We Manage Iatrogenic Perforation Caused by Colonoscopy?.
Clinical Endoscopy 2016;49(3):214-215
No abstract available.
Colonoscopy*
6.Difficult Polypectomy.
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 2003;19(6):399-405
No abstract available.
Colonoscopy
7.What Matters in Colonoscopy?.
Annals of Coloproctology 2013;29(6):223-223
No abstract available.
Colonoscopy*
8.What is the Usefulness and Problem of Magnifying Colonoscopy?.
Chang Young LIM ; Il Han SONG ; Jung Won KIM ; Seung Woo NAM ; Im Whan ROE
Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2001;22(3):192-193
No abstract available.
Colonoscopy*
9.Bowel Preparation for Surveillance Colonoscopy After a Colorectal Resection: A New Perspective
Annals of Coloproctology 2019;35(3):107-108
No abstract available.
Colonoscopy
10.A Three-Year Review of the Clinical and Pathologic Profile of Patients with Colonic Polyps in a University Hospital in Metro Manila (2014-2016)
Gregory Allan C CO ; Rolando A LOPEZ
Journal of Medicine University of Santo Tomas 2018;2(1):201-213
Background :
The data on the prevalence and distribution of polyps in Asians is limited with conflicting data about the most common type.
Objective:
To obtain recent data about the histologic types of endoscopically labeled as polyps by
colonoscopy and correlate with the clinico-pathologic profile
Method:
Retrospective cross-sectional review of histopathologic and endoscopic reports of colonoscopy with biopsy of colonic polyps of patients in the
University of Santo Tomas Hospital (January 2014-
December 2016).
Results:
3910 colonoscopies were performed and
a total of 302 patients were retrieved and 500 polyps were resected. The most common indication was
hematochezia and hemorrhoids. The colonic polyps
were solitary in 36% of the cases. Majority were seen
in 50-69 years old, left sided region (78%), particularly the sigmoid (37%), and sessile (77.3%). The
most common type is tubular adenoma (45%) and
majority of the adenomatous polyps were seen in
the sigmoid. There is significant association between
age and presence of an adenomatous polyp where
≥70 years old are about 2.5 times more likely to
have adenomatous polyp and pedunculated polyps
are 2 times more likely to be adenomatous. There is
no significant association between presence of an
adenomatous polyp and polyp size and gender.
Conclusion
The type and distribution of colorectal
polyps are similar with others and vigilant approach
of the left side should be exercised. Absence of any
significant difference between size and adenomatous nature necessitate the need for early identification and removal of colorectal polyp in preventing
morbidity and mortality from cancer.
Colonoscopy
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail