No abstract available.
Aged ; Chilaiditi Syndrome/*diagnosis/radiography ; Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis/surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Humans ; Intestinal Mucosa/surgery ; Male

Adolescent ; Colon, Ascending ; pathology ; Colonic Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery ; Colonic Polyps ; pathology ; surgery ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Follow-Up Studies ; Ganglioneuroma ; pathology ; surgery ; Humans ; Male

Generally, colon lipoma is mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic. However, sometimes it may present with symptoms, such as pain, constipation, obstruction, or bleeding and may be the leading point for intussusception, particularly in large size (>20 mm). Giant colon lipoma may warrant the removal to exclude confusion with other lesions that have a malignant potential and to control symptoms. Currently, surgical resection should be considered for giant lipoma more than 20 mm in diameter due to the high risk of perforation or bleeding, especially when the lesion is broadly-based. We report here a case of spontaneous resolution acquired after endoscopic partial resection for the symptomatic giant colon lipoma with broad-base requiring surgery.
Colonic Neoplasms/*diagnosis/surgery/therapy ; Colonoscopy ; Humans ; Lipoma/*diagnosis/surgery/therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome

Post-polypectomy surveillance has become a major indication for colonoscopy as a result of increased use of screening colonoscopy in Korea. However, because the medical resource is limited, and the first screening colonoscopy produces the greatest effect on reducing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer, there is a need to increase the efficiency of postpolypectomy surveillance. In the present report, a careful analytic approach was used to address all available evidences to delineate the predictors for advanced neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy. Based on the results of review of the evidences, we elucidated the high risk findings of the index colonoscopy as follows: 1) 3 or more adenomas, 2) any adenoma larger than 10 mm, 3) any tubulovillous or villous adenoma, 4) any adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, and 5) any serrated polyps larger than 10 mm. In patients without any high-risk findings at the index colonoscopy, surveillance colonoscopy should be performed five years after index colonoscopy. In patients with one or more high risk findings, surveillance colonoscopy should be performed three years after polypectomy. However, the surveillance interval can be shortened considering the quality of the index colonoscopy, the completeness of polyp removal, the patient's general condition, and family and medical history. This practical guideline cannot totally take the place of clinical judgments made by practitioners and should be revised and supplemented in the future as new evidence becomes available.
Adenoma/*diagnosis/surgery ; Adenoma, Villous/diagnosis/surgery ; Colonic Polyps/pathology/*surgery ; *Colonoscopy ; Colorectal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/surgery ; Databases, Factual ; Humans ; Republic of Korea ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Guidelines for current postoperative colonoscopic surveillance are not specified in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with synchronous adenoma (SA). We performed this retrospective study to determine the postoperative colonoscopic surveillance interval for the CRC patients with SA. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-four CRC patients with SA (SA-group) and the same number of patients without SA (NSA-group) were selected from our database. Two groups were matched by the stage of CRC. Median colonoscopic surveillance period was 55 (12-99) months. The colonoscopic surveillance frequency and interval were similar between the two groups. RESULTS: Mean age was higher and male was more frequent in SA-group than NSA-group (p= 0.0001). The incidence of missed adenoma, advanced missed adenoma and metachronous adenoma (MA) were higher in SA-group (30.8% vs. 5.8% at 1st yr., p=0.0001; 4.4% vs. 0%, p=0.0001; 31.1% vs. 9.1% at 2nd yr., p=0.016) during the first consecutive two years of surveillance. The MA- and advanced-MA-free survival rate were lower in SA-group (24.6% vs. 6.6%, p=0.0001; 4.1% vs. 0%, p=0.02) during three years after surgery. Dysplasia of the SA (p=0.04; OR, 110.3; 95% CI, 1.13-10742.6) and presence of missed adenoma (p=0.036; OR, 43.6; 95% CI, 1.28-1490.1) were risk factors for the advanced MA on a multivariate analysis in SA-group. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative colonoscopic surveillance at first year after surgery is warranted in CRC patients with SA.
Adenoma/diagnosis/*surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma/diagnosis/*surgery ; Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis/*surgery ; *Colonoscopy ; Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis/*surgery ; Disease-Free Survival ; English Abstract ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/diagnosis/*surgery

Lipomas are common benign tumors of mature adipose tissue, enclosed by thin fibrous capsules. They can occur on any part of the body; however, peritoneal lipoma is extremely rare. We encountered a case of a 75-year-old man presenting with intermittent abdominal pain, who had undergone right hemicolectomy due to colon cancer. Abdominal computerized tomography showed a well-defined heterogenous fatty mass measuring 4.5x3.5 cm in size, suggesting fat necrosis located in the abdominal wall. Laparotomy showed a very large soft mass of peritoneum. Pathologically, the tumor was diagnosed as lipoma containing fat necrosis located in parietal peritoneum not fixed to any organs, but with small bowel adhesion. Due to its rare etiologic origin and obscure cause of development, we report on a case of lipoma of parietal peritoneum causing abdominal pain.
*Abdominal Pain ; Aged ; Colonic Neoplasms/surgery ; Humans ; Lipoma/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Male ; Peritoneum/*pathology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) for colorectal tumors is a crucial issue. However, such recurrence is usually detected within one year and cured with additional endoscopic treatment, which makes EPMR acceptable. Herein, we report a rare case of repeatedly recurrent colon cancer involving the appendiceal orifice after EPMR, which was not cured with additional endoscopic treatments. A 67-year-old man was referred to us for endoscopic treatment of a 25 mm cecal tumor spreading to the appendiceal orifice in May 2002. The tumor was resected with EPMR, showing well differentiated intramucosal adenocarcinoma with a positive lateral cut margin of tubular adenoma. Endoscopic surveillance was conducted and the first local recurrence was detected in August 2006. Although we resected it endoscopically, the second local recurrence was found in September 2007 and we removed it with endoscopic resection again. However, the third local recurrence was detected in March 2008. Although endoscopic resection was performed also for the third recurrence, curative resection was not achieved. In February 2009, laparoscopic assisted colectomy was performed and histopathological examination showed well differentiated adenocarcinoma with deep submucosal invasion. This case is important in considering indication for endoscopic resection in colorectal tumors involving the appendiceal orifice.
Adenocarcinoma/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Aged ; Appendiceal Neoplasms/complications ; Colectomy ; Colonic Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Humans ; Intestinal Mucosa/pathology ; Male ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Recurrence

Although colorectal granular cell tumors (GCTs) are rare, their incidental finding has increased as the use of diagnostic colonoscopy has become more common. Here we describe the case of a 41-yr-old man with a GCT in the descending colon that was detected after a screening colonoscopy. Endoscopic examination revealed a yellowish submucosal tumor, 13x12 mm in diameter, in the descending colon. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by histological examination revealed that the tumor was composed of plump histiocyte-like cells with an abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm and small round nuclei. The tumor cells expressed S-100 protein and stained with periodic acid-Schiff, but were negative for desmin and cytokeratin. The resected tumor was diagnosed as a GCT. Colonoscopists should consider the possibility of GCT in the differential diagnosis of yellowish submucosal tumors of the colon. In such patients, EMR seems to be a feasible and safe approach for diagnosis and treatment.
Adult ; *Colon, Descending/pathology ; Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis/*pathology/surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Granular Cell Tumor/diagnosis/*pathology/surgery ; Humans ; Male ; S100 Proteins/metabolism

Multiple primary malignancy was reported firstly by Billroth in 1889. Recently, multiple primary malignancies are considered to increase due to improved survival rate of cancer patients, advanced diagnostic tools, and increased use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In Korea, several cases of triple primary malignancies were reported. However, four primary malignancies in gastro-intestinal tract was rarely reported. Recently, we experienced a 70 year-old male who was diagnosed with metachronous four primary malignancies in rectum, ascending colon, stomach, and ampulla of Vater. We report this rare case of metachronous four primary malignancies with a review of literature.
Adenocarcinoma/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/diagnosis/surgery ; Aged ; Ampulla of Vater/*pathology ; Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis/surgery ; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasms, Second Primary/*diagnosis/pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis/surgery ; Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

PURPOSE: Although there is a consensus about the need for surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic resection, the interval remains controversial for large sessile colorectal polyps. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome and the adequate surveillance colonoscopy interval required for sessile and flat colorectal polyps larger than 20 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 204 patients with large sessile and flat polyps who received endoscopic treatment from May 2005 to November 2011 in a tertiary referral center were included. RESULTS: The mean age was 65.1 years and 62.7% of the patients were male. The mean follow-up duration was 44.2 months and the median tumor size was 25 mm. One hundred and ten patients (53.9%) received a short interval surveillance colonoscopy (median interval of 6.3 months with range of 1-11 months) and 94 patients (46.1%) received a long interval surveillance colonoscopy (median interval of 13.6 months with range of 12-66 months). There were 14 patients (6.9%) who had local recurrence at the surveillance colonoscopy. Using multivariate regression analysis, a polyp size greater than 40 mm was shown to be independent risk factor for local recurrence. However, piecemeal resection and surveillance colonoscopy interval did not significantly influence local recurrence. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment of large sessile colorectal polyps shows a favorable long-term outcome. Further prospective study is mandatory to define an adequate interval of surveillance colonoscopy.
Adult ; Aged ; Colonic Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Colonic Polyps/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; *Colonoscopy ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/*diagnosis ; Prospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Watchful Waiting/*methods