OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate in the treatment of hematonosis patients infected by multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria (GNB), and discuss the possible factors that affect the efficacy of colistin sulfate. METHODS: The clinical data of 85 hematologic patients infected with MDR GNB in the Soochow Hopes Hematonosis Hospital from April 2022 to November 2022 were collected and divided into clinically effective group with 71 cases and ineffective group with 14 cases according to the therapeutic efficacy of colistin sulfate. The age, gender, type of hematologic disease, status of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, infection sites, type of pathogen, timing of administration, daily dose and duration of colistin sulfate, and combination with other antibacterial agents of patients in two groups were compared. Logistic regression was used to analyze on the meaningful variables to study the influencing factors of colistin sulfate. The adverse reactions of colistin sulfate were also evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender, type of hematologic disease, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation status, infection sites and pathogen type between the effective group and the ineffective group (P>0.05). Compared with the medication time more than 7 days, meropenem used within 7 days in the clinical effective group, and timely replacement with colistin sulfate could obtain better efficacy, the difference was statistically significant (P=0.018). The duration of tigacycline before colistin sulfate did not affect the efficacy, and there was no significant difference in efficacy between the effective and ineffective groups. The therapeutic effect of colistin sulfate at daily dose of 500 000 U q8h was better than that of 500 000 U q12h, the difference was statistically significant (P=0.035). The time of colistin sulfate use in the clinically effective group was longer than that in the ineffective group, which had a statistical difference (P=0.003). Compared with the clinical ineffective group, the efficacy of combination regimens with colistin sulfate was better than that of colistin sulfate monotherapy, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.013). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the indicators with statistical differences in the two groups of patients, which suggested that the use time of colistin sulfate (B: 2.358; OR: 10.573; CI: 1.567-71.361; P=0.015) and the combination of colistin sulfate (B: 1.720; OR: 5.586; CI: 1.210-25.787; P=0.028) were influential factors in the efficacy of colistin sulfate. During the treatment, the incidence of nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity and peripheral neurotoxicity were 5.9%, 1.2% and 1.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION The use of colistin sulfate improves the clinical efficacy of MDR GNB infections in hematological patients, and the timing of colistin sulfate administration and the combination of drugs are independent factors affecting its clinical efficacy, and the safety during treatment is high.
Humans ; Colistin/adverse effects* ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Meropenem/adverse effects* ; Treatment Outcome ; Gram-Negative Bacteria ; Hematologic Diseases

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) alone or in combination with colistin (COL) against clinically isolated extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDR-PA). METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 16 clinical XDR-PA isolates was determined by broth dilution method and chessboard design when CAZ-AVI and COL were used alone or in combination, then the combined inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was calculated. Class A [Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase β-lactamase (bla_KPC), Guiana extended-spectrum β-lactamase (bla_GES)], Class B [imipenemase β-lactamase (bla_IMP), Verona-Integronmetallo β-lactamase (bla_VIM), New Delhi metallo β-lactamase (bla_NDM), German imipenemase β-lactamase (bla_GIM), Sao Paulo metallo-β-lactamase (bla_SPM)], Class C [AmpC β-lactamase (bla_AmpC)], Class D [oxacillinase β-lactamase (bla_OXA)] β-lactamase-related resistance genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction. Drug-resistant mutation frequencies of each strain were determined on a drug-containing plate. The time kill curves of three XDR-PA were plotted by colony counting method. A biofilm model was established in vitro, and the synergistic effect of CAZ-AVI and COL on biofilm inhibition was detected by methythiazolyl tetrazolium assay (MTT). RESULTS: The MICs of 16 XDR-PA for CAZ-AVI ranged from 1 mg/L to 128 mg/L, and three of the isolates showed resistance (MIC > 8 mg/L). The FICI range of CAZ-AVI combined with COL was 0.312-1.000. Four isolates were synergistic, while the other 12 isolates were additive. Three isolates resistant to CAZ-AVI contained Class B resistance genes such as bla_IMP and bla_VIM, while 13 susceptible isolates carried resistance genes belonging to Class A, C or D. The logarithm values of mutation frequencies of drug resistance in CAZ-AVI group, COL group and combination group were -4.81±0.88, -7.06±0.69 and -9.70 (-9.78, -9.53), respectively. There were significant differences among the three groups (H = 33.601, P < 0.001), and between every two groups (adjusted P < 0.05). In time kill curves, the phytoplankton load of three XDR-PA decreased more than 6 log CFU/L when these two drugs were used together, and number of PA1819 planktonic bacteria decreased more than 5.1 log CFU/L compared with monotherapy group. Viable quantity in biofilm (A₄₉₀) of normal saline group, CAZ-AVI group, COL group and CAZ-AVI-COL group were 0.665±0.068, 0.540±0.072, 0.494±0.642 and 0.317±0.080, respectively. There was significant difference between the other two groups (all P < 0.001), except for that between CAZ-AVI group and COL group (P = 0.109). CONCLUSIONS CAZ-AVI combined with COL can effectively improve the bactericidal effect of each drug alone on XDR-PA. The regimen can also reduce the production of drug-resistant bacteria and inhibit the formation of biofilm. Therefore, it is a potential treatment for XDR-PA infection.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use* ; Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use* ; Ceftazidime/therapeutic use* ; Colistin/therapeutic use* ; Drug Combinations ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics* ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy* ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; beta-Lactamases

PURPOSE: Colistin is used for the treatment of pneumonia associated with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, the best route of administration and dosage is not known. We report our experience with aerosolized colistin in twelve patients with pneumonia caused by colistin-only-susceptible (COS) A. baumannii. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients' medical records who were treated with aerosolized colistin for the treatment of pneumonia. RESULTS: Ten patients were treated only with aerosolized colistin inhalation and two patients received a 3-day course intravenous colistin, and then switched to colistin inhalation therapy. The median duration of aerosolized colistin therapy was 17 days (5-31 days). Four patients were treated only with aerosolized colistin, whereas 4 patients received concomitant glycopeptides, and 4 received concomitant levofloxacin or cefoperazone/sulbactam. At the end of the therapy, the clinical response rate and bacteriological clearance rate was 83% and 50%, respectively. Colistin-resistant strains were isolated from 3 patients after aerosolized colistin therapy; however, all of them showed favorable clinical response. The median interval between inhalation therapy and resistance was 7 days (range 5-19 days). Acute kidney injury developed in 3 patients. Two patients experienced Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea. One patient developed fever and skin rash after aerosolized colistin therapy. No patient developed neurotoxicity or bronchospasm. CONCLUSION: Colistin inhalation therapy is deemed tolerable and safe, and could be beneficial as an adjuctive therapy for the management of pneumonia due to COS A. baumannii. However, the potential development of colistin resistance cannot be overlooked.
Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects/*pathogenicity ; Administration, Inhalation ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Colistin/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pneumonia/*drug therapy ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVETo investigate the therapeutic effect and side effects of colistin in treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacillus in patients with severe burn in order to provide the basis for reasonable application of this antibiotic in clinic.

METHODSNine burn patients suffered from infections caused by MDR gram-negative bacillus admitted to our institute from August 2005 to January 2009 were involved in this study. On the premises that isolated bacteria were only sensitive to colistin or not sensitive to other antibiotics, patients were treated with intravenous drip of colistin (100 x 10(4) - 150 x 10(4) U/d), or intravenous drip combined with administration of the drug into respiratory tract by atomization or instillation (50 x 10(4) - 100 x 10(4) U/d). The bacteriologic and therapeutic effects and side effects (including neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, rise in serum levels of creatinine, urea nitrogen and cystatin C were detected and compared before and after administration) of colistin were observed.

RESULTSOut of 9 patients, 7 patients were with bloodstream and pulmonary infections, 1 patient was with bloodstream, pulmonary, and invasive wound infections, and 1 patient was with bloodstream and urinary tract infections. The pathogenic bacteria were proved to be Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas maltophilia. After the administration of colistin, bacteria clearance rate of blood reached 92.3% in 9 patients; isolation rate of MDR gram-negative bacillus of sputum was significantly decreased in 7 patients with pulmonary infection (before treatment 58.2% v.s. after treatment 14.6%, P < 0.01); a complete MDR gram-negative bacillus clearance of urine was observed in 1 patient with urinary tract infection. Colistin was clinically effective in 8 patients but ineffective in 1 patient (effective rate 88.9%). Compared with those before administration, serum levels of creatinine and urea nitrogen were decreased after administration in all patients; no significant difference in serum level of cystatin C among 8 patients was detected, except an obvious elevation in serum level of cystatin C in 1 patient after colistin therapy, and it lowered 1 month after discontinuation. No neurotoxicity or other side effect was observed during medication and 5 days after discontinuation in all patients.

CONCLUSIONSReasonable application of colistin is a good option for treating infections caused by MDR gram-negative bacillus in patients with severe burn, as no other more effective drug is found.

Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Burns ; drug therapy ; microbiology ; Colistin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; Gram-Negative Bacteria ; drug effects ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: Acinetobacter baumannii infections are difficult to treat owing to the emergence of various antibiotic resistant isolates. Because treatment options are limited for multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii infection, the discovery of new therapies, including combination therapy, is required. We evaluated the synergistic activity of colistin, doripenem, and tigecycline combinations against extensively drug-resistant (XDR) A. baumannii and MDR A. baumannii. METHODS: Time-kill assays were performed for 41 XDR and 28 MDR clinical isolates of A. baumannii by using colistin, doripenem, and tigecycline combinations. Concentrations representative of clinically achievable levels (colistin 2 microg/mL, doripenem 8 microg/mL) and achievable tissue levels (tigecycline 2 microg/mL) for each antibiotic were used in this study. RESULTS: The colistin-doripenem combination displayed the highest rate of synergy (53.6%) and bactericidal activity (75.4%) in 69 clinical isolates of A. baumannii. Among them, thedoripenem-tigecycline combination showed the lowest rate of synergy (14.5%) and bacteri-cidal activity (24.6%). The doripenem-tigecycline combination showed a higher antagonistic interaction (5.8%) compared with the colistin-tigecycline (1.4%) combination. No antagonism was observed for the colistin-doripenem combination. CONCLUSIONS: The colistin-doripenem combination is supported in vitro by the high rate of synergy and bactericidal activity and lack of antagonistic reaction in XDR and MDR A. baumannii. It seems to be necessary to perform synergy tests to determine the appropri-ate combination therapy considering the antagonistic reaction found in several isolates against the doripenem-tigecycline and colistin-tigecycline combinations. These findings should be further examined in clinical studies.
Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy/microbiology ; Acinetobacter baumannii/*drug effects/genetics/isolation & purification ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*pharmacology/therapeutic use ; Bacterial Proteins/genetics ; Carbapenems/*pharmacology/therapeutic use ; Colistin/*pharmacology/therapeutic use ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/*drug effects ; Drug Synergism ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Minocycline/*analogs & derivatives/pharmacology/therapeutic use ; Multilocus Sequence Typing ; beta-Lactamases/genetics

BACKGROUNDAerosolized amikacin (AA) is a current option for the management of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB), as it is reported that AA could increase the alveolar level of the drug without increasing systemic toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AA as an adjunctive therapy for VAP caused by MDR-GNB.

METHODSIn this single-center, double-blind study conducted in a 36-bed general Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in a tertiary hospital from June 2014 to June 2016, 52 ICU patients with confirmed MDR-GNB VAP were randomized to two groups (AA group, n = 27 and placebo group, n = 25). Amikacin (400 mg, q8h) or saline placebo (4 ml, q8h) was aerosolized for 7 days. The attending physician determined the administration of systemic antibiotics for VAP. Patients were followed up for 28 days. Bacteriological eradication, clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS), and serum creatinine were assessed on day 7 of therapy. New resistance to amikacin, cure rate of VAP, weaning rate, and mortality were assessed on day 28.

RESULTSThe baseline characteristics of patients in both groups were similar. At the end of the treatment, 13 of the 32 initially detected bacterial isolates were eradicated in AA group, compared to 4 of 28 in placebo group (41% vs. 14%, P= 0.024). As for patients, 11 of 27 patients treated with AA and 4 of 25 patients treated with placebo have eradication (41% vs. 16%, P= 0.049). The adjunction of AA reduced CPIS (4.2 ± 1.6 vs. 5.8 ± 2.1, P= 0.007). New drug resistance to amikacin and the change in serum creatinine were not detected in AA group. No significant differences in the clinical cure rate in survivors (48% vs. 35%, P= 0.444), weaning rate (48% vs. 32%, P= 0.236), and mortality (22% vs. 32%, P= 0.427) were detected between the two groups on day 28.

CONCLUSIONSAs an adjunctive therapy of MDR-GNB VAP, AA successfully eradicated existing MDR organisms without inducing new resistance to amikacin or change in serum creatinine. However, the improvement of mortality was not found.

Administration, Inhalation ; Aged ; Amikacin ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Colistin ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; Female ; Gram-Negative Bacteria ; drug effects ; pathogenicity ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated ; drug therapy

Despite the identification of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates that demonstrate susceptibility to only colistin, this antimicrobial agent was not available in Korea until 2006. The present study examined the outcomes of patients with multidrug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter species bloodstream infection and who were treated with or without colistin as part of their regimen. The colistin group was given colistin as part of therapy once colistin became available in 2006. The non-colistin group was derived from the patients who were treated with other antimicrobial regimens before 2006. Mortality within 30 days of the onset of bacteremia occurred for 11 of 31 patients in the colistin group and for 15 of 39 patients in the non-colistin group (35.5% vs 38.5%, respectively, P = 0.80). Renal dysfunction developed in 50.0% of the 20 evaluable patients in the colistin group, but in 28.6% of the 35 evaluable patients in the non-colistin group (P = 0.11). On multivariate analysis, only an Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II score > or = 21 was associated with mortality at 30 days. This result suggests that administering colistin, although it is the sole microbiologically appropriate agent, does not influence the 30 day mortality of patients with a MDR Acinetobacter spp. bloodstream infection.
APACHE ; Acinetobacter/*drug effects/isolation & purification ; Acinetobacter Infections/*drug therapy/mortality ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*therapeutic use ; Bacteremia/*drug therapy/mortality ; Child ; Colistin/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/*drug effects ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) is mediated by a complete loss of lipopolysaccharide production via mutations in lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD gene or lipid A modifications via mutations in the pmrA and pmrB genes. However, the exact mechanism of therapy-induced colistin resistance in A. baumannii is not well understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the genotypic and phenotypic changes that underlie pan-drug resistance mechanisms by determining differences between the alterations in extensively drug-resistant (XDR) A. baumannii (AB001 and AB002) isolates and a pan-drug resistant (PDR) counterpart (AB003) recovered from one patient before and after antibiotic treatment, respectively. RESULTS: All three clinical isolates shared an identical sequence type (ST138), belonging to the global epidemic clone, clonal complex 92, and all produced OXA-23 carbapenemase. The PDR AB003 showed two genetic differences, acquisition of armA gene and an amino acid substitution (Glu229Asp) in pmrB gene, relative to XDR isolates. No mutations were detected in the pmrA, pmrC, lpxA, lpxC, or lpxD genes in all three isolates. In matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight analysis, the three isolates commonly showed two major peaks at 1728 m/z and 1912 m/z, but peaks at 2034 m/z, 2157 m/z, 2261 m/z, and 2384 m/z were detected only in the PDR A. baumannii AB003 isolate. CONCLUSION: Our results show that changes in lipid A structure via a mutation in the pmrB gene and acquisition of armA gene might confer resistance to colistin and aminoglycosides to XDR A. baumannii strains, resulting in appearance of a PDR A. baumannii strain of ST138.
Acinetobacter Infections/*drug therapy/microbiology ; Acinetobacter baumannii/*drug effects/*genetics/isolation & purification ; Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*pharmacology/therapeutic use ; Bacterial Proteins/*genetics ; Colistin/*pharmacology/therapeutic use ; *Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field ; Genotype ; Humans ; Male ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Molecular Typing ; Mutation ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Transcription Factors ; beta-Lactamases