Administration, Topical ; Aged ; Child ; Cyclopropanes ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Female ; Haptens ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Vitiligo ; chemically induced

Objective The T-Spot.TB is an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) which is increasingly used in dermatology as a screen for latent TB before initiation of biologics and for confirming diagnosis of tuberculids. This study aims to explore its concordance with tuberculin skin tests (TST) and eventual diagnosis of latent TB. Study design This is a retrospective review of all patients in NSC who had a TB T-spot test done between 2008 and 2010. We looked at the dermatological diagnosis, results of T-Spot.TB and TST, chest radiograph findings, tuberculosis status and treatment of TB. Result 51 TB T spot tests were ordered in National Skin Centre between 1 January 2008 and 9 June 2010. 31 tests were for patients with psoriasis with the intention of initiating biologics; 5 were for patients with suspected tuberculids and tuberculosis verrucosa cutis; 3 were done as part of work-up for possible erythema nodosum; 3 tests were part of screening for latent TB in hospital staff and 9 tests were performed for other reasons. There were a total of 13 patients eventually diagnosed with latent or active TB infection. All of whom had a positive T-Spot.TB result except for 1 patient with an indeterminate result. On the other hand, out of these 13 patients, only 5 showed a positive TST, 2 had negative TST and 4 patients did not have a TST done. There were a total of 14 positive T-Spot.TB results for which 12 eventually received antituberculous therapy. All patients with erythema induratum had a positive test result. Six patients’ T-Spot.TB tests were borderline, indeterminate or could not be interpreted due to insufficient lymphocyte yield. Conclusion Our study shows the utility of T-Spot. TB test in various conditions seen in dermatology clinics in a local setting. We suggest that the T-spot test can supplant the tuberculin skin test in screening latent TB for psoriasis patients for whom biologics are intended and in erythema induratum. The high incidence of borderline and indeterminate results should not be ignored. This should be taken into account when interpreting the IGRA especially if patients are on immunosuppressive therapy.

Introduction: Lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP) is a rare acquired autoimmune disease characterised by the evolution of subepidermal blisters on normal and lichen planus affected skin. Case summary: We describe a case of lichen planus pemphigoides in a 54-year-old Chinese woman. The patient presented initially with scaly psoriasiform plaques and was diagnosed to have guttate psoriasis. She was treated with narrowband ultraviolet (NBUVB) therapy twice weekly. Within a month of starting phototherapy, she experienced a flare up of her skin lesions with a generalised eruption of violaceous papules, tense bullae over the lower limbs as well as Wickham’s striae over the buccal mucosa. Histology of the violaceous papule over abdomen revealed interface dermatitis, while the specimen from a blister showed subepidermal bulla with linear deposition of IgG and C3 along the basement membrane zone. A diagnosis of LPP was made on clinicopathological grounds. The patient subsequently responded well to oral prednisolone at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day. Conclusion: This is the first case report of NBUVB alone unmasking LPP. In the presentation, we will describe the pathological mechanism of NBUVB in the development of LPP and the key features distinguishing LPP from bullous lichen planus (BLP), psoriasis and bullous pemphigoid (BP).

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults. However, factors including efficacy, tolerability, ease of use, and cost burden may affect ustekinumab utilization. Noncompliance may, in turn, affect treatment response. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ustekinumab utilization in the real-world setting in Asia-Pacific countries. METHODS: In this phase 4 observational study conducted in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Korea, and Taiwan, adults with plaque psoriasis receiving ustekinumab were followed for up to 52 weeks. Study endpoints were the proportion of all patients using ustekinumab according to label-recommended intervals and the proportion of Korean patients who achieved a psoriasis area severity index 75 response at week 16. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 169 patients received ustekinumab (Korea, n=102; other countries, n=67). Just over half (56.2%) of patients used ustekinumab with the label-recommended interval from baseline to week 40; the proportion was higher in Korea (73.5%) than in other countries (29.9%), probably because ustekinumab was provided without charge for Korean patients up to week 40. Noncompliance increased after week 40 in Korea and from week 28 in other Asia-Pacific countries, with cost cited as the most common reason. At week 16, 56.9% of Korean patients achieved a Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75 response. Safety results were in line with those seen in previous studies. CONCLUSION: More than half of all patients in Asia-Pacific countries used ustekinumab as per the label-recommended dose interval, but reimbursement variations between countries may have confounded overall results.
Adult ; Compliance ; Humans ; Indonesia ; Korea ; Malaysia ; Observational Study ; Psoriasis* ; Singapore ; Taiwan ; Ustekinumab

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults. However, factors including efficacy, tolerability, ease of use, and cost burden may affect ustekinumab utilization. Noncompliance may, in turn, affect treatment response. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ustekinumab utilization in the real-world setting in Asia-Pacific countries. METHODS: In this phase 4 observational study conducted in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Korea, and Taiwan, adults with plaque psoriasis receiving ustekinumab were followed for up to 52 weeks. Study endpoints were the proportion of all patients using ustekinumab according to label-recommended intervals and the proportion of Korean patients who achieved a psoriasis area severity index 75 response at week 16. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 169 patients received ustekinumab (Korea, n=102; other countries, n=67). Just over half (56.2%) of patients used ustekinumab with the label-recommended interval from baseline to week 40; the proportion was higher in Korea (73.5%) than in other countries (29.9%), probably because ustekinumab was provided without charge for Korean patients up to week 40. Noncompliance increased after week 40 in Korea and from week 28 in other Asia-Pacific countries, with cost cited as the most common reason. At week 16, 56.9% of Korean patients achieved a Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75 response. Safety results were in line with those seen in previous studies. CONCLUSION: More than half of all patients in Asia-Pacific countries used ustekinumab as per the label-recommended dose interval, but reimbursement variations between countries may have confounded overall results.
Adult ; Compliance ; Humans ; Indonesia ; Korea ; Malaysia ; Observational Study ; Psoriasis* ; Singapore ; Taiwan ; Ustekinumab

INTRODUCTION: Ustekinumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the p40 subunit of both interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, and it is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of patients receiving ustekinumab for psoriasis. METHODS: This retrospective study included all adults with chronic plaque psoriasis who were prescribed ustekinumab in a tertiary dermatologic centre between December 2009 and December 2015. Efficacy end points included a proportion of patients achieving at least 50% and 75% improvement from baseline psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) and body surface area (BSA) at Weeks 4 and 16. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were prescribed ustekinumab; 69% of these were Chinese, followed by 15% Indians and 9% Malays. 31 patients had documented PASI scores and 55 patients had documented BSA improvements. In patients with recorded PASI scores, 29 (93.5%) of 31 patients achieved PASI 50, and 21 (67.7%) of 31 achieved PASI 75 at week 16. In patients with recorded BSA, 43 (78.2%) of 55 had at least 50% BSA improvement, and 31 (56.4%) of 55 achieved 75% BSA improvement at 16 weeks. Regarding safety, no patient experienced tuberculosis reactivation. A total of 11 (11%) of 99 patients had latent tuberculosis infection and were treated with prophylactic isoniazid. No patient experienced serious adverse events. No cardiovascular events, cutaneous malignancies or deaths were reported over six years. CONCLUSION Ustekinumab is safe and efficacious in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in a multiethnic Asian population.
Adult ; Humans ; Ustekinumab/therapeutic use* ; Singapore ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Severity of Illness Index ; Double-Blind Method ; Psoriasis/drug therapy*