Circumferential resection margin(CRM) is the closest distance from the deepest of tumor invasion to the surgical margin of mesentery. It has been well known that CRM has significant impact on the prognosis and treatment of rectal cancer. However, the significance of CRM of colon cancer is just brought to the forefront recently. Current evidence showed positive rate of CRM is 10%, and the patients with positive CRM have worse survival. The factors influencing CRM include tumor stage, differentiation, vascular cancer embolus, etc. Standard surgical procedure can lower the positive rate of colon CRM, and adjuvant therapy applied to the patients with positive colon CRM can improve the survival of colon cancer patients. CRM may become a new factor guiding the treatment in colon cancer patients.
Colectomy ; methods ; Colonic Neoplasms ; surgery ; Humans ; Prognosis

Although it has become a consensus in the field of colorectal surgery to perform radical tumor treatment and functional protection under the minimally invasive concept, there exist many controversies during clinical practice, including the concept of embryonic development of abdominal organs and membrane anatomy, the principle of membrane anatomy related to right hemicolectomy, D3 resection, and identification of the inner boundary. In this paper, we analyzed recently reported literature with high-level evidence and clinical data from the author's hospital to recognize and review the membrane anatomy-based laparoscopic assisted right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer, emphasizing the importance of priority of surgical dissection planes, vascular orientation, and full understanding of the fascial space, and proposing that the surgical planes should be dissected in the parietal-prerenal fascial space, and the incision should be 1 cm from the descending and horizontal part of the duodenum. The surgery should be performed according to a standard procedure with strict quality control. To identify the resection range of D3 dissection, it is necessary to establish a clinical, imaging, and pathological evaluation model for multiple factors or to apply indocyanine green and nano-carbon lymphatic tracer intraoperatively to guide precise lymph node dissection. We expect more high-level evidence of evidence-based medicine to prove the inner boundary of laparoscopic assisted radical right colectomy and a more rigorous consensus to be established.
Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Colonic Neoplasms/pathology* ; Lymph Node Excision/methods* ; Colectomy/methods* ; Dissection

With increase in the incidence of right colon cancer, the proportion of laparoscopic right colon resection is increasing. Though the advantage of laparoscopy in minimal invasiveness has been widely accepted, its procedure still possesses certain difficulty. In this article, we shared the experience of laparoscopic right colectomy, including entering the correct Toldt's place, management of ileocolic and middle colic vessels and the problems of D3 lymph node dissection. Basic surgical techniques and several difficulties are discussed here, which may be helpful for beginners.
Colectomy ; methods ; Colonic Neoplasms ; surgery ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Lymph Node Excision ; methods

The extent of D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer, especially the medial border of central lymph node dissection remains controversial. D3 lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolon excision (CME) are two standard procedures for locally advanced right colon carcinoma. D3 lymphadenectomy determines the medial border according to the distribution of the lymph nodes. The mainstream medial border should be the left side of superior mesenteric vein (SMV) according to the definition of D3, but there are also some reports that regards the left side of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) as the medial border. In contrast, the CME procedure emphasizes the beginning of the colonic mesentery and the left side of SMA should be considered as the medial border. Combined with the anatomical basis, oncological efficacy and technical feasibility of D3 lymph node dissection, we think that it is safe and feasible to take the left side of SMA as the medial boundary of D3 lymph node dissection. This procedure not only takes into account the integrity of mesangial and regional lymph node dissection, but also dissects more distant lymph nodes at risk of metastasis. It has its anatomical basis and potential oncological advantages. However, at present, this technical concept is still in the exploratory stage in practice, and the related clinical evidence is not sufficient.
Colectomy/methods* ; Colonic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Lymph Node Excision/methods* ; Mesocolon/surgery*

D3 lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colon cancer, which have been introduced to China for more than 10 years, are two major surgical principles worldwide. However, there are still many different opinions and misunderstandings about the core principles of D3 and CME, especially the similarities and differences between them. However, few articles have been published to discuss these issues specifically. Domestic scholars' understandings about D3 lymphadenectomy and CME for right hemicolectomy are quite different. Two different concepts including "D3/CME" and "D3+CME" have become mainstream views. The former equate D3 with CME and the latter seems to regard them as totally different principles. There is no consensus on which one is more reasonable. Therefore, this article aims to discuss the similarities and differences between D3 and CME for right hemicolectomy in perspectives of the theoretical background, surgical principles, extent of surgery and oncological outcomes. We believed that D3 and CME do not belong to the same concept, and that the scope of CME surgery for right-sided colon cancer is greater than and includes the scope of D3 surgery, and that D3 and CME are not complementary.
Colectomy/methods* ; Colonic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Lymph Node Excision/methods* ; Mesocolon/surgery*

Colonic inflammatory fibroid polyp (IFP) is an uncommon benign polypoid lesion, which is composed of fibroblasts, numerous small vessels and edematous connective tissue with marked eosinophilic inflammatory cell infiltration. This condition is frequently detected in the stomach and small intestine, but uncommon in the colon. Although IFP is a benign lesion, surgical resections are performed in most colonic cases because the polyps are usually too large to resect endoscopically. Only three patients underwent endoscopic polypectomy in our literature reviews. Here, we present a case of IFP in the descending colon successful endoscopically resected using a novel technique of trapping its stalk with an endoloop, forming the stalk into an omega shape, and then dissecting the stalk with a needle knife.
Adult ; Colectomy ; Colonic Polyps/*pathology/*surgery ; Colonoscopy/*methods ; Female ; Humans ; Leiomyoma/pathology/*surgery

OBJECTIVETo compare the medial-to-lateral approach with the lateral-to-medial approach in laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy for right colon cancer.

METHODSA prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in the Fujian provincial tumor hospital between January 2007 and July 2009. Forty-eight cases with right colon cancer were randomly divided into two groups:medial-to-lateral laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy group(group M) and lateral-to-medial laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy group(group L). Primary outcome(operative time) and secondary outcomes (estimated blood loss, intra-operative complication, post-operative complication, number of lymph node retrieval, hospital stay) were compared between two groups.

RESULTSOperative time was(122.5+/-25.8) min in group M and (162.9+/-30.9) min in Group L (P=0.01). Estimated blood loss was(55.8+/-36.2) ml in group M and (104.6+/-58.2) ml in group L(P=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in intra-operative complications(4.2% vs 8.3%, P=1.00), post-operative complications (8.3% vs 16.7%, P=0.66), number of lymph node retrieval (17.4+/-3.2 vs 17.8+/-3.4, P=0.67), and hospital stay[(7.8+/-2.2) d vs (8.0+/-3.6) d, P=0.81].

CONCLUSIONThe medial-to-lateral approach reduces operative time and blood loss in laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy as compared with the lateral-to-medial approach.

Adult ; Colectomy ; methods ; Colonic Neoplasms ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo explore the differences in long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision(CME) for colon cancer.

METHODSA total of 273 patients with colon cancer who underwent CME at the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from September 2000 to December 2008 were divided into laparoscopic(LP, n=147) and open(OP, n=126) groups in a non-random manner. The oncologic and long-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTSNo significant differences were seen in the length of distal and proximal margin, and number of lymph nodes(all P>0.05). Median postoperative follow up was 50 months. Local regional recurrence rates (LP 6.1% vs. OP 7.9%) and distal metastasis rates(LP 23.8% vs. OP 16.7%) were similar between the two groups(all P>0.05). The 5-year overall survival rates (LP 69.4% vs. OP 74.0%, P=0.840) and 5-year disease-free survival rates(LP 68.5% vs. OP 70.9%, P=0.668) between the two groups were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONSLaparoscopic CME has the same oncologic clearance effects compared with open CME for colon cancer. It might become a new standardized surgery for colon cancer.

Aged ; Colectomy ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparotomy ; Male ; Mesocolon ; surgery ; Middle Aged ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo compare the clinical safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in octogenarians. Methods Studies comparing laparoscopic colorectal resection with open colorectal resection in octogenarians were identified from the Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane databases from 1990 to 2012. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed to determine studies suitable for inclusion. Meta-analysis was performed by fixed or random effects model.

RESULTSFive observational studies with a total of 685 patients (330 laparoscopic colorectal resections and 355 open colorectal resections) were identified. Laparoscopic colorectal resection was associated with a prolonged operative time (WMD=27.89, P<0.01) and a lower rate of overall complications (OR=0.58, P<0.01), wound infection (OR=0.50, P<0.05), cardiovascular complication(OR=0.53, P<0.05), quicker bowel function return (WMD=-0.83, P<0.01), and shorter length of hospital stay (WMD=-3.60, P<0.05). No differences were found with regard to anastomotic leak (OR=1.13, P>0.05), prolonged ileus (OR=0.71, P>0.05), respiratory complication (OR=0.59, P>0.05),mortality (OR=0.67, P>0.05), and reoperation (OR=0.85, P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONLaparoscopic colorectal resection is as safe as open colorectal resection, and is more favorable in terms of length of hospital stay and bowel function return in octogenarians.

Aged, 80 and over ; Anastomotic Leak ; Colectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Operative Time ; Treatment Outcome

Colectomy ; methods ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Treatment Outcome