3.Simultaneous Translabyrinthine Tumor Removal and Cochlear Implantation in Vestibular Schwannoma Patients.
Jin Won KIM ; Ji Hyuk HAN ; Jin Woong KIM ; In Seok MOON
Yonsei Medical Journal 2016;57(6):1535-1539
Refinement of surgical techniques has allowed hearing preservation after tumor resection to be prioritized. Moreover, restoration of hearing after tumor removal can be attempted in patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas or those with a schwannoma in the only-hearing ear. Cochlear implantation (CI) has emerged as a proper method of acoustic rehabilitation, provided that the cochlear nerve remains intact. Studies of electrical promontory stimulation in patients after vestibular schwannoma resection have demonstrated favorable results. We describe herein two cases of hearing rehabilitation via CI implemented at the time of vestibular schwannoma resection. Tumors were totally removed, and cochlear implant electrodes were successfully inserted in both cases. Also, post operative CI-aided hearing showed improved results.
Acoustics
;
Cochlear Implantation*
;
Cochlear Implants*
;
Cochlear Nerve
;
Ear
;
Electrodes
;
Hearing
;
Humans
;
Methods
;
Neurilemmoma
;
Neuroma, Acoustic*
;
Rehabilitation
4.Advances in minimally invasive cochlear implantation.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2015;29(19):1754-1758
Cochlear implantation has gradually been accepted as an effective treatment for many patients with severe to pround sensorineural hearing loss. The traditional cochlear implantation does not exist up to expectations in some respects. With the soft surgery technique brought forward, the idea of minimally invasive cochlear implantation is deely rooted among the people. Now many institutions are carring out a series of clinical researches and practices to improve the results of cochlear implantation surgery and reduce the complications around the world. It includes minimally invasive approach, cochleostomy and electrode insertion techniques, especially the latter two affect the preservation of residual hearing. This article is a review of the advances in minimally invasive cochlear implantation from the above three aspects.
Cochlear Implantation
;
methods
;
Cochlear Implants
;
Electrodes, Implanted
;
Hearing
;
Humans
;
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
;
methods
5.Application of intraoperative CT-assisted positioning in difficult cases of cochlear implantation.
Fan ZHANG ; Xing LU ; Wenjing ZHANG ; Lu LI ; Han XUAN ; Zhaobing QIN
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2023;37(5):329-333
Objective:To report the experience of using CT-guided cochlear implant surgery in difficult cases such as severe inner ear deformities and anatomical abnormalities, and to discuss the application value of intraoperative CT-assisted localization in difficult cases of cochlear implant surgery. Methods:Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 23 cases of difficult cochlear implant surgery cases completed by our team with the assistance of intraoperative CT, and collected their medical data, including preoperative imaging manifestations, surgical conditions, and intraoperative imaging images for evaluation. Results:During the study period, 23 difficult cases(27 ears) underwent cochlear implantation under the guidance of intraoperative CT, and 4 cases were bilaterally implanted. Including 6 cases of incomplete segmentation type Ⅰ(IP-Ⅰ), 1 case of incomplete segmentation type Ⅱ(IP-Ⅱ), 10 cases of incomplete segmentation type Ⅲ(IP-Ⅲ), 3 cases of common cavity deformity(CC) and 3 cases of cochlear ossification after meningitis. Facial nerve anatomy was abnormal in 9 cases, cerebrospinal fluid "blowout" was serious in 14 cases, electrode position was abnormal in 3 cases requiring intraoperative adjustment of electrode position, anatomical difficulties required intraoperative CT to assist in finding anatomical landmarks in 2 cases, and electrodes were not fully implanted in 3 cases. Conclusion:When faced with difficult cases with challenging and complex temporal bone anatomy, intraoperative CT can accurately evaluate the electrode position and provide intraoperative anatomical details, allowing immediate adjustment of the electrode position if necessary, providing safety guarantee for difficult cases of cochlear implant surgery and ensure accurate implantation of electrodes.
Humans
;
Cochlear Implantation/methods*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods*
;
Cochlea
;
Cochlear Implants
7.Speech Perception and Language Outcome in Congenitally Deaf Children Receiving Cochlear Implants in the First Year of Life.
Sung Wook JEONG ; Ji Won SEO ; Sung Hyun BOO ; Lee Suk KIM
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2018;61(12):644-649
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of early cochlear implantation (CI) performed in infants less than 12 months of age. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Twenty-five children who received their first CI before 12 months of age were included in this study (infant group). The speech perception and language outcomes of these children were compared with those of 14 children who received their first CI between 13 and 24 months of age (older group). All children received sequential bilateral CI with the inter-stage interval of less than 2 years. Speech perception was measured using Categories of Auditory Performance, monosyllabic word test and sentence test, and language ability was measured using Sequenced Language Scale for Infants, Preschool Receptive-Expressive Language Scale, or Receptive & Expressive Vocavulary Test, depending on the age at the time of testing. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in speech perception abilities between the infant group and the older group. The mean expressive language score of infant group was higher than that of the older group, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the receptive language score of infant group was significantly higher than that of the older group. CONCLUSION: Children who received CI before 12 months of age achieved better receptive language ability than those who received it after 12 months of age. Thus CI should be performed as early as before 12 months of age to achieve better language ability.
Child*
;
Cochlear Implantation
;
Cochlear Implants*
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Language
;
Methods
;
Speech Perception*
8.Early Linguistic Developments of Simultaneous Bilateral Cochlear Implantees.
Michelle J SUH ; Hyun Jin LEE ; Hyun Seung CHOI
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2018;61(12):650-657
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to compare receptive and expressive language development in children who have undergone simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation (SCI) and those who have undergone bimodal stimulation (unilateral CI+ hearing aid). SUBJECTS AND METHOD: In a retrospective analysis of clinical data, 15 pediatric patients who have received SCI and nine patients who have received bimodal stimulation (BM group) were enrolled. CI was performed for all patients at 24 months of age. Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) scores, Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) scores, and developmental quotients (DQ) for expressive and receptive language were compared between the groups at 12 month of follow-up. The Percentage of Consonants Correct (PCC) of children evaluated at 4 years old was also compared. RESULTS: At 12 months of follow-up, significantly greater improvements in CAP scores (Δ4.25±0.5) were noted in the SCI group compared to the BM group (Δ3.56±0.88, p=0.041). Significantly greater improvements in IT-MAIS scores were also noted in the SCI group (Δ36.17±4.09) than in the BM group (Δ30.17±2.91, p=0.004). The DQ of receptive language was higher in the SCI group than in the BM group (87.6±15.4% vs. 75.5±12.0%, p=0.023) at 12 months of follow-up. Moreover, early SCI was associated with better receptive language skills. PCC index of children at 4 years old was higher in the SCI group than in the BM group (88.5±13.2% vs. 62±15.8%, p=0.014). Earlier SCI was associated with even greater improvements. CONCLUSION: Bilateral SCI is associated with significant improvements in language development when compared with bimodal stimulation. Earlier SCI was associated with better outcomes.
Child
;
Cochlear Implantation
;
Cochlear Implants
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Hearing
;
Humans
;
Language Development
;
Linguistics*
;
Methods
;
Retrospective Studies
9.The effect of binaural bi-modal fitting on speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients with low frequency electrodes incompletely implanted.
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2015;29(11):980-983
OBJECTIVE:
To study the effect of binaural bi-modal fitting (one cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid) on speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients with low frequency electrodes incompletely implanted.
METHOD:
A total of 15 cochlear implant(CI) users who have low residual hearing (250 Hz 45-90 dBHL, 500 Hz 75 - 100 dBHL) of their non surgery ears. We closed the top three electrodes to simulate the state of low-frequency electrodes incompletely implanted by fitting software. (1) The same tester received twice speech recognition tests in incompletely implanted state, one test used single CI model and the other used binaural bi-modal fitting model. (2)The same tester received above twice speech recognition tests again, but in completely implanted state. Then we compared the results of tests.
RESULT:
The CI users used binaural bi-modal fitting have higher speech recognition score than the same users used unilateral cochlear implant model in low-frequency electrodes incompletely implanted state(P<0. 05). The gap between the scores of the tests by using two usage patterns in low frequency electrodes incompletely implanted state was more than that in completely implanted state (P<0. 05).
CONCLUSION
Binaural bi-modal fitting can help CI users to improve their speech recognition ability in low-frequency electrodes incompletely implanted state.
Cochlear Implantation
;
methods
;
Cochlear Implants
;
Electrodes, Implanted
;
Hearing
;
Hearing Aids
;
Hearing Tests
;
Humans
;
Speech
;
Speech Perception
10.Language Development in Profoundly Prelingually Deaf Children with Cochlear Implantation: Long-Term Outcomes.
Jin Hyun RYU ; Da Jung JUNG ; Hyun Ho CHO ; Jae Ho LEE ; Sang Heun LEE ; Kyu Yup LEE
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2016;59(7):502-509
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is well established that cochlear implantation provides significant benefits for prelingually profound deaf children. However, there are few studies that examined the long-term outcome of cochlear implantation beyond 10 years in prelingually deaf children. The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term benefit of cochlear implantation for children with more than 10 years of experience of using cochlear implantation, regarding auditory performance and academic status. We then determined the age effect of cochlear implantation on auditory performance for prelingually deaf children. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: The longitudinal development of auditory performance of 119 deaf children was analyzed after cochlear implantation. Among the 119 children, 58 were included for analysis. RESULTS: The children who received cochlear implanst at younger age showed significantly better auditory performance. Age at which implantation had been performed had a significant effect on the development of auditory performance before 4 years of age. Many children continued to demonstrate improvements of auditory performance upto five years of implant use. Some showed development of auditory performance upto 10 years cochlear implantation. CONCLUSION: The present result indicates that speech perception and performance for children continue to improve over time from 5 upto 10 years while using cochlear implant. The use of earlier cochlear implantation was demonstrated to provide better auditory performance. The age at which implantation was performed was one of the important factors influencing the long-term outcome of cochlear implantation.
Child*
;
Cochlear Implantation*
;
Cochlear Implants*
;
Humans
;
Language Development*
;
Methods
;
Speech Perception