Cochlear Implantation ; adverse effects ; methods ; rehabilitation ; Hearing Tests ; Humans

Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants/adverse effects* ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery* ; Humans ; Tinnitus/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome

Electrode array misplacement is a rare complication of cochlear implant. This article reports an 11-year-old boy who was mistakenly implanted the cochlear electrode array into the superior semicircular canal during the initial cochlear implant. After the diagnosis was confirmed, he underwent a second cochlear implant and the electrode array were successfully implanted into the cochlea. This article conducted a systematic review of the literature on electrode array misplacement, and the causes of electrode array misplacement were analyzed from different implantation position.
Male ; Humans ; Child ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Reoperation ; Cochlea ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants/adverse effects* ; Semicircular Canals/surgery*

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the indications and surgery time of cochlear implantation in patients with otitis media with effusion (OME).

METHODSCochlear implantation was performed in 26 patients with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss and OME. Non-Surgical Treatment was conducted for OME before the following implantation. According to the standards of the indications and surgery time, surgery was carried out. During the process of surgery operation, related lesions of OME were completely removed and proper drainage was then constructed. After the surgery, the patients were regularly followed up, and the effective of cochlear implantation was evaluated.

RESULTSUnilateral ear of 26 patients was successfully operated. Among them, 5 cases were left ears and the remaining was right ears. All implant devices worked normally after 1 month. Had been followed up from 13 months to 4.3 years, 19 patients with OME were healed and the remaining was turning better. No evidence showed phenomenon of the eardrum perforation and acute attack of OME.

CONCLUSIONSOnce the indications of cochlear implantation in patients with OME are guaranteed, the surgery should be conducted as early as possible. The complications of cochlear implantation in patients with OME can be effectively avoided through proper treatment in different stages.

Child, Preschool ; Cochlear Implantation ; adverse effects ; Contraindications ; Humans ; Otitis Media with Effusion ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome

Child ; Cochlear Implantation ; adverse effects ; Hematoma, Epidural, Cranial ; etiology ; Humans ; Male

Cochlear Implantation ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Meningitis ; etiology ; Postoperative Complications

Child, Preschool ; Cochlear Implantation ; adverse effects ; Foreign-Body Reaction ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; diagnosis

To analyze the functional change of horizontal semicircular canals after cochlear implantation.Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study.Their vestibular function was evaluated by using the caloric test and video head impulse test before and one week,one month after CI surgery,respectively.The unilateral weakness(UW),slow phase velocity(SPV)in caloric test and gain in video head impulse test(vHIT-G)were observed.Caloric test was abnormal when UW>25% or SPV mean<6°/s,while vHIT was abnormal when vHIT-G<0.8.The SPV of the implanted ear were[(10.36±8.01)°/s;(14.77±14.24)°/s]pre-operatively,[(6.45±7.52)°/s;(5.14±4.67)°/s]1 week post-operatively and[(6.05±3.86)°/s;(6.27±4.17)°/s]1 month post-operatively.Statistically significant difference(<0.05)was found between pre-and post-operative period.The vHIT-G of the implanted ear were(0.73±0.33)pre-operatively,(0.65±0.32)1 week post-operatively and(0.71±0.36)1 month post-operatively.There was no statistically significant difference of vHIT-G between preand post-operative period((pre-operative/1 week post-operative)=0.084,(pre-operative/1 month post-operative)=0.679).Four patients presented with vertigo and one of them manifested slight unsteadiness post-operatively.All symptoms resolved within 7 days.These symptoms had no correlate with age,gender,implantedear and results of vestibular test.Cochlear implantation can affect the horizontal semicircular canal function,and the video head impulse test and caloric test should be used in a complementary fashion.
Caloric Tests ; Cochlear Implantation ; adverse effects ; methods ; Head Impulse Test ; Humans ; Semicircular Canals ; physiopathology ; Vertigo

OBJECTIVETo approach the incidence rate, symptoms, etiologies, correlating reasons, consequences and treatments of local responses caused by implant after cochlear implantation and to provide reference for the future works.

METHODSFrom 1995 to 2007 there were 997 cases adopted cochlear implantation in Peding Union Medical College Hospital. Ten cases experienced local responses were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTSThe incidence of local response was 1.003%. There were 6 males and 4 females. The ages were between 13 months to 8 years old. The average age was 34 months. The devices mainly were made by Cochlear and Med-EL companies. The mainly symptoms and signs were local swellings, complaint of pruritus after ear, decrease of sound legibility and so on. Onset frequencies of this disease was 1 to 8 times. The bacterium cultured of displacing liquids was negative. But the IgE was detected in 2 cases. Results showed the patients were midrange status of hypersensitivity. Positive conservative treatments must be done including antibiotics, antihistamines, necessarily using immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONSBesides local infection of bacteria, the allergy caused by silicone of implant coupled be a reason. Although the diagnose of this disease was difficult, but the screening of source of hypersensitivity was necessary before operation. It was recurrent attacks and maybe liable by kindred patients. Onset age was more below 4 years old. The patch test should be done again when the symptoms were occurrence after operation. If severe secondary infection was occurred and the states could not be well controlled the devices in the body must be explanted immediately. When the conditions were stable reimplantation could be experienced by non-sensibilisinogen devices.

Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cochlear Implantation ; adverse effects ; Cochlear Implants ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; etiology ; Infant ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUNDThe popularization and promotion of gene diagnosis technology makes it possible to detect deafness genes for children with congenital hearing impairment, and the proportion of gap junction protein beta 2 (GJB2) gene mutations in cochlear implant patients is 26.5%. We did follow-up evaluation on auditory rehabilitation effect for all 31 deaf children with GJB2 gene mutation after cochlear implantation to provide a reference for such patients.

METHODSApplication of "the genetic deafness gene chip detection kit" and "gene complete sequence analysis" were applied to conduct detection on common genetic deafness gene mutation hotspots of the hearing impaired children with cochlear implantation. To conduct auditory rehabilitation effect evaluation on all 31 cases of patients with GJB2 genetic deafness after 3, 6 and 12 months of the operation respectively. The single factor repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to analysis whether there were significant difference among the results of initial consonant of a Chinese syllable recognition at 3 different stages after the operation, the results of vowel of a Chinese syllable recognition at 3 different stages after the operation, and the results of two-syllable recognition at 3 different stages after the operation.

RESULTSThe 235delC is the high-incidence mutational site in 31 cases of patients with GJB2 genetic deafness, and the total detection rate is up to 90.3% (28/31). There were significant differences in the initial consonant and the vowel of a Chinese syllable recognition rate, and the two-syllable recognition rates at 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONCochlear implantation is a safe and effective measure for auditory reconstruction, enabling patients with GJB2 hereditary severe sensorineural deafness to achieve auditory speech recognition effectively.

Child, Preschool ; Cochlear Implantation ; adverse effects ; Connexins ; genetics ; Deafness ; genetics ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mutation ; Treatment Outcome