Pathologic fracture in osteosarcoma has traditionally been associated with a poor prognosis and is an immediate indication for amputation of the affected extremity. This concept has been questioned and remains an area of debate, especially because advances in osteosarcoma treatment have today resulted in better survival and limb salvage rates.

It is the objectives of this paper to analyze the survival and limb salvage rate of osteosarcoma patients presenting with pathologic fractures and compare these with the population of osteosarcoma patients without pathologic fractures.

Over a 15-year period (1993-2008), these were 84 patients presenting with non-metastatic high-grade classic osteosarcoma of the extremities (Enneking Stage IIB) who received complete treatment from the University of the Philippines-Musculoskeletal Tumor (UP-MuST) Unit and who had a follow up of at least 2 years. Ten of these 84 patients had pathologic fractures prior to surgery. Their overall survival was 50%, similar to the 50.38% overall survival of the entire group of 84 osteosarcoma patients. Limb salvage rate was 60%, similar to the 59% rate of patients without pathologic fractures.

This study shows that contrary to traditional teaching, overall survival for this subset of osteosarcoma patients with pathologic fractures is acceptable at 50% and is equal to that of the entire group of osteosarcoma patients. At the same time, successful limb salvage surgery is possible despite the presence of a pathologic fracture, especially in patients with good response to chemotherapy.

Human ; Animal ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Young Adult ; Adolescent ; Child ; Humans ; Limb Salvage ; Fractures, Spontaneous ; Follow-up Studies ; Philippines ; Osteosarcoma ; Amputation ; Salvage Therapy ; Extremities ; Prognosis ; Bone Neoplasms

PURPOSERecording vital signs is important in the hospital setting and the quality of this documentation influences clinical decision making. The Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) uses vital signs to categorise the severity of a patient's physiological derangement and illustrates the clinical impact of vital signs in detecting patient deterioration and making management decisions. This descriptive study measured the quality of vital sign recordings in an acute care trauma setting, and used the MEWS to determine the impact the documentation quality had on the detection of physiological derangements and thus, clinical decision making.

METHODSVital signs recorded by the nursing staff of all trauma patients in the acute care trauma wards at a regional hospital in South Africa were collected from January 2013 to February 2013. Investigator-measured values taken within 2 hours of the routine observations and baseline patient information were also recorded. A MEWS for each patient was calculated from the routine and investigator-measured observations. Basic descriptive statistics were performed using EXCEL.

RESULTSThe details of 181 newly admitted patients were collected. Completion of recordings was 81% for heart rate, 88% for respiratory rate, 98% for blood pressure, 92% for temperature and 41% for GCS. The recorded heart rate was positively correlated with the investigator's measurement (Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.76); while the respiratory rate did not correlate (Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.02). In 59% of patients the recorded respiratory rate (RR) was exactly 20 breaths per minute and 27% had a recorded RR of exactly 15. Seven percent of patients had aberrant Glasgow Coma Scale readings above the maximum value of 15. The average MEWS was 2 for both the recorded (MEWS(R)) and investigator (MEWS(I)) vitals, with the range of MEWS(R) 0-7 and MEWS(I) 0-9. Analysis showed 59% of the MEWS(R) underestimated the physiological derangement (scores were lower than the MEWS(I)); 80% of patients had a MEWS(R) requiring 4 hourly checks which was only completed in 2%; 86% of patients had a MEWS(R) of less than three (i.e. not necessitating escalation of care), but 33% of these showed a MEWS(I) greater than three (i.e. actually necessitating escalation of care).

CONCLUSIONDocumentation of vital signs aids management decisions, indicating the physiological derangement of a patient and dictating treatment. This study showed that there was a poor quality of vital sign recording in this acute care trauma setting, which led to underestimation of patients' physiological derangement and an inability to detect deteriorating patients. The MEWS could be a powerful tool to empower nurses to become involved in the diagnosis and detection of deteriorating patients, as well as providing a framework to communicate the severity of derangement between health workers. However, it requires a number of strategies to improve the quality of vital sign recording, including continuing education, increasing the numbers of competent staff and administrative changes in vital sign charts.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with combined anterior instability and superior labrum from anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, and to analyze the effect of concomitant SLAP repair on surgical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability between January 2004 and March 2013. A total of 120 patients were available for at least 1-year follow-up. Forty-four patients with reparable concomitant detached SLAP lesions (group I) underwent combined SLAP and anterior stabilization, and 76 patients without SLAP lesions (group II) underwent anterior stabilization alone. Patient characteristics, preoperative and postoperative pain scores, Rowe scores, and shoulder ranges of motion were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patients in group I had higher incidences of high-energy trauma (p = 0.03), worse preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) (p = 0.02), and Rowe scores (p = 0.04). The postoperative pain VAS and Rowe scores improved equally in both groups without significant differences. Limitation in postoperative range of motion was similar between the groups (all p-value > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior instability with SLAP lesion may not be related to frequent episodes of dislocation but rather to a high-energy trauma. SLAP fixation with anterior stabilization procedures did not lead to poor functional outcomes if appropriate surgical techniques were followed.
Dislocations ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Incidence ; Pain, Postoperative ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies ; Shoulder Dislocation ; Shoulder*

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with combined anterior instability and superior labrum from anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, and to analyze the effect of concomitant SLAP repair on surgical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability between January 2004 and March 2013. A total of 120 patients were available for at least 1-year follow-up. Forty-four patients with reparable concomitant detached SLAP lesions (group I) underwent combined SLAP and anterior stabilization, and 76 patients without SLAP lesions (group II) underwent anterior stabilization alone. Patient characteristics, preoperative and postoperative pain scores, Rowe scores, and shoulder ranges of motion were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patients in group I had higher incidences of high-energy trauma (p = 0.03), worse preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) (p = 0.02), and Rowe scores (p = 0.04). The postoperative pain VAS and Rowe scores improved equally in both groups without significant differences. Limitation in postoperative range of motion was similar between the groups (all p-value > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior instability with SLAP lesion may not be related to frequent episodes of dislocation but rather to a high-energy trauma. SLAP fixation with anterior stabilization procedures did not lead to poor functional outcomes if appropriate surgical techniques were followed.
Dislocations ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Incidence ; Pain, Postoperative ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies ; Shoulder Dislocation ; Shoulder*

BACKGROUNDRecent studies have suggested that the presence of a pathological fracture does not impact on oncologic outcomes and the feasibility of limb salvage surgery (LSS) in appropriately selected patients when combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These have largely been single institutional studies with limited numbers. The Eastern Asian Musculoskeletal Oncology Group reviewed the data from three large volume Asian orthopedic oncology centers to determine whether the presence of a pathologic fracture affected outcomes in osteosarcoma patients.

METHODSA retrospective review of the data was conducted. Ninety-five cases of nonmetastatic extremity osteosarcoma with a pathological fracture and 887 cases without fracture treated during the same period were compared.

RESULTSIn the fracture group, the LSS rate was 62.1%, and the rate of amputation was 37.9%. In the nonfracture group, the LSS rate was 74.7%, and the amputation was 25.3%. In patients with a pathologic fracture, the rate of local recurrence for LSS and amputation groups was 8.5% and 2.8%, respectively. In this group, the 5-year survival in the LSS group was 66% as against. 46.8% in the amputation group.

CONCLUSIONSOur study suggests that surgically treated patients with pathologic fractures in osteosarcoma have adequate local control and do not have a poorer outcome compared to patients without a fracture. Though osteosarcoma with a pathologic fracture is not a contraindication for limb salvage, appropriate case selection is important when deciding local control options to ensure adequate oncologic clearance.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Bone Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Extremities ; pathology ; surgery ; Female ; Fractures, Spontaneous ; etiology ; surgery ; Humans ; Limb Salvage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; complications ; surgery ; Osteosarcoma ; complications ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult