BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of Lobaplatin and Cisplatin in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. METHODS: The databases of Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Wanfang, CNKI and VIP were retrieved so as to search the studies about the randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) that compared the Lobaplatin and Cisplatin for malignant pleural effusion. The main outcome indicators include objective response rate, complete response, partial response, nephrotoxicity, chest pain, gastrointestinal reaction, myelosuppression, fever response and hepatotoxicity. Relative risk was used as the effect size, which was expressed as 95% confidence interval. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 12 RCTs and 720 MPE patients were included. The results showed that the ORR (RR=1.27, 95%CI: 1.15-1.40, P<0.001), CR (RR=1.39, 95%CI: 1.09-1.78, P=0.007), PR (RR=1.21, 95%CI: 1.02-1.42, P=0.026) in LBP thoracic perfusion chemotherapy were significantly higher than those in DDP thoracic perfusion chemotherapy. The incidence of nephrotoxicity (RR=0.31, 95%CI: 0.13-0.71, P=0.005) and gastrointestinal reactions (RR=0.44, 95%CI: 0.31-0.62, P<0.001) in the LBP group were significantly lower than those in DDP group. CONCLUSIONS Compared with DDP pleural perfusion chemotherapy, the ORR, CR and PR of LBP pleural perfusion chemotherapy for MPE are significantly better than DDP, and its nephrotoxicity and gastrointestinal reactions are remarkably lower than DDP.
Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cyclobutanes ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Pleural Effusion, Malignant ; drug therapy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

OBJECTIVETo investigate the feasibility and efficacy of rituximab combined with high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

METHODSTwenty-eight patients with aggressive B-cell NHL (22 newly diagnosed, 6 relapsed) were enrolled in this study. The high-dose chemotherapy included CHOP regimen (CTX + ADM + VCR + PDN) for the newly diagnosed patients and DICE (DEX + IFO + DDP + VP-16) or EPOCH (VP-16 + PDN + VCR + CTX + ADM) for the relapsed patients. Each patient received infusion of rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m(2) for four times, on D1 before and on D7 of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization, and on D1 before and D8 after stem cell reinfusion.

RESULTSComplete remission was achieved in all patients after high dose chemotherapy and ASCT. At a median follow-up of 37 months, the estimated overall 4-year survival and progression-free survival rate for all patients were 75.0% and 70.3%, respectively, while both were 72.7% for the previously untreated patients. The therapy was generally well tolerated with few side-effects attributable to rituximab.

CONCLUSIONThese results suggest that adding rituximab to high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is feasible and may be beneficial for patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Cyclophosphamide ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Dexamethasone ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Disease-Free Survival ; Doxorubicin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Etoposide ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Fever ; chemically induced ; etiology ; Humans ; Ifosfamide ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse ; therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation ; Prednisolone ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Prednisone ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Prospective Studies ; Remission Induction ; Rituximab ; Survival Rate ; Vincristine ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Vomiting ; chemically induced ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVECisplatin (DDP) plus vinorelbine (NVB) constitute the first-line regimen (NP regimen) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Oxaliplatin (OXA) is another effective drug in treatment of NSCLC with mild toxicities to gastrointestinal tract, kidney and bone marrow. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency and safety between NVB plus OXA (NO) regimen and NP regimen for advanced NSCLC.

METHODSWe searched CBM CNKI, VIP, Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, ASCO etc. conference proceedings and internet information. Randomized controlled trials of NO versus NP for advanced NSCLC were included; we evaluated the quality of the included studies and analyzed data by Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0 software.

RESULTSFourteen randomized trials involving 1 270 patients were included. There were no statistical differences between NO and NP in overall response rate, disease control rate, 1-year survival rate, anemia and thrombocytopenia. Gastrointestinal toxicity, leucopenia, alopecia and kidney toxicity were more serious in NP (P < 0.05), but neuritis was more serious in NO, with significant difference (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONThe clinical efficacy of NO and NP for advanced NSCLC was similar, but the side effects were different. The toxicity of NO has the tendency to be more tolerable.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Treatment Outcome ; Vinblastine ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo evaluate Amifostin's effect on protecting kidney from cisplatinum (DDP) injury and its adverse reactions and safety.

METHODS193 Patients were divided into two groups randomly: 102 in group A (treatment group) and 91 in group B (control group). Indexes such as blood routine, blood calcium, liver function, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), cretinine (C), and urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG)/C and micro-albumin (MAB/C) were monitored at different intervals before or after treatment.

RESULTSIn the two courses of treatment in both groups, the deviation (D) values of MAB/C before treatment and on D2 in group A were lower than those in grop B (P < 0.05), so were those before treatment and on D4, D6, D10 and D14 (P < 0.01). The D-values of NAG/C before treatment and on D4, D6, D10 and D14 in the first course of group A were obviously lower than those on the corresponding days in group B (P < 0.01), so were those before treatment and on D2, D4, D6, D10 and D14 in the second course (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONThe reduction of MAB/C and NAG/C by Amifostin in group A demonstrates that: Amifostin is able to effectively protect the renal function, regardless of the type of tumor. In contrast with group B, Amifostin in group A shows no protection for tumor in lung cancer and ovarian cancer. The main side effects of Amifostin are mild hypotension, nausea, vomiting and hypocalcemia in some patients.

Adult ; Aged ; Amifostine ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Kidney Diseases ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Middle Aged ; Protective Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVEA multi-center randomized phase III clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy, clinical benefit response (CBR) and toxicity profile of germcitabine (GEM) or GEM plus cisplatin (CDDP) for locally advanced (LAPC) or metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC).

METHODSFrom July 2000 to May 2001, 42 untreated patients with LAPC or MPC were collected and randomized into two groups: Arm A-GEM 20 patients and Arm B-GEM + CDDP 22 patients. Eligibility criteria were: cytologically and pathologically proven pancreatic carcinoma, Karnosky performance status (KPS) 60 - 80, age 18 - 75 yrs, adequate hematological, renal and liver function, measurable disease, and controllable pain. For Arm A patients, weekly dose of GEM 1 000 mg/m(2)/w for 7 times followed by a week rest. Then weekly GEM at the same dose for 3 times every 4 weeks. Arm B patients were given weekly dose of GEM 1 000 mg/m(2)/w for 3 times every 4 weeks combined with CDDP 60 mg/m(2) on D15 for 3 cycles.

RESULTSThirty-four patients were available for objective response (Arm A 16 and Arm B 18) and 36 (Arm A 16 and Arm B 20) for CBR evaluation. In Arm A and Arm B, PR 1 (6.3%) and 2 (11%), MR 4 (25%) and 3 (16.7%), SD 7 (43.8%) and 8 (44.4%), PD 4 (25%) and 5 (27.8%), PR + MR 31.3% and 27.8%, PR + MR + SD 75% and 72.2% were observed. Positive CBR was 14/16 (87.5%) in Arm A and 14/20 (70.0%) in Arm B. The negative results was 2/16 (12.5%) in Arm A and 6/20 (30.0%) in Arm B. The median time of disease progression was not yet available at present. The 3-month survival rate of both Arm A and B was 100%, the 6-month survival rates of Arm A and B were 81.3% and 61.6% and the 12-month survival rates of Arm A and B was 31.3% and 11.1%, with median survivals of 273 and 217 days. The incidence of hematological and non-hematological toxicity of Arm A was lower than that of Arm B without statistical significance. The toxicity ranging from being mild to moderate was manageable.

CONCLUSIONGEM or GEM plus CDDP is able to lead to a moderate objective response rate, also significantly improve the quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, prolonging the survival time with tolerable toxicity.

Adult ; Aged ; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; CA-19-9 Antigen ; analysis ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Deoxycytidine ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatic Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo assess the efficacy of vinorelbine (NVB)-based regimens in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

METHODSClinical data of 48 patients diagnosed and treated for mTNBC between 2004 and 2012 at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were pretreated with anthracyclines and at least one taxane in neo-adjuvant, adjuvant or chemotherapy for mTNBC and patients should be having at least one measurable metastatic lesion. Totally, 48 patients were included in this study, of which 21 cases received first-line chemotherapy and 27 cases received second-line chemotherapy. Based on the regimen they received, 22 patients were treated with NVB plus platinum (NP), and 26 patients with NVB plus capecitabine (NX).

RESULTSAfter 70 months follow-up, in the total group of patients, the objective response rate was 20.8%, clinical benefit rate was 43.8%, median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months and median overall survival (OS) was 15.5 months. In addition, the ORR was significantly better in the NP arm versus NX arm (33.8% vs.7.7%, P=0.029) as well as PFS was statistically improved in the NP arm than NX arm (5.3 m vs. 3.0 m, P=0.023). Similar trend was observed in the OS, although the difference was not statistically significant (27.7 m vs. 14.8 m, P=0.077). In all, the most frequently reported adverse events were G1/2 gastrointestinal toxicity (68.8%) and neutropenia (62.5%) . No significant difference was observed between the NP arm and NX arm (P>0.05). The percentage of patients who delayed chemotherapy administration in the NP arm and NX arm was 9.1% (n=2), and 3.8% (n=1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONSNVB-based combination chemotherapy demonstrates moderate efficacy in mTNBC patients pretreated with anthracyclines and one taxane with manageable toxicity. NP regimen shows potential superiority over NX regimen, and should be further verified in randomized phase III clinical trial in larger cohort.

Anthracyclines ; therapeutic use ; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; therapeutic use ; Bridged-Ring Compounds ; therapeutic use ; Capecitabine ; administration & dosage ; Cisplatin ; administration & dosage ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; Retrospective Studies ; Taxoids ; therapeutic use ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Vinblastine ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEPF regimen is the standard chemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancers including nasopharyngeal cancer. Recently PF has been found to enhance the tumor control by addition of Taxotere. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TPF neoadjuvant regimen (taxotere, cisplatin (DDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)) followed by radical radiotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODSBetween December 2006 and May 2008, 41 patients with newly diagnosed UICC stage III or IV advanced nasopharyngeal cancer were enrolled. There were 29 male and 12 female patients, with a median age of 47 years (range, 29-60 years), and ECOG performance status < or = 2. The initial dose was taxotere 40 mg/m(2) d1, DDP 40 mg/m(2) d1, and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) d1-5. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for two cycles. Each dose of taxotere and DDP was increased by 5 mg/m(2) and 5-FU by 50 mg/m(2), respectively. The dose was escalated after six patients completed two cycles at the initial dose and DLT was assessed. Radiotherapy was started from the 5th week, with 68-72 Gy/34-36 fractions delivered to the nasopharynx and 60-66 Gy/30-33 fractions to the node-positive area.

RESULTSForty patients (79 cycles) were evaluated for toxicity and efficacy of the therapy. No DLT occurred at the dose levels 1-4. At dose level 5, three of six patients experienced DLT including grade III/IV neutropenia lasting more than 1 week. Two of them also had grade III mucositis, leading to the interruption of radiotherapy for more than 1 week. Three more new patients were retreated with the same dose (at dose level 6) under the G-CSF support, and no DLT occurred. Dose escalation continued to level 7, and DLT was found in all of the four patients, including three grade IV neutropenia, one of them had fever and pneumonitis; three grade III diarrhea; and one grade III mucositis lasting 10 days. Dose escalation was stopped and three more new patients were treated again at dose level 5 and no DLT was found. Other severe toxicities included grade III anemia (1 patients), grade III vomiting (4 patients), and grade III weight loss (9 patients). No severe hepatic and renal toxicities were found.

CONCLUSIONTPF neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a safe and effective regimen in the treatment of advanced NPC, with recommended doses of taxotere 60 mg/m(2) d1, DDP 60 mg/m(2) d1, and 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) d1-5.

Adult ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Fluorouracil ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Maximum Tolerated Dose ; Middle Aged ; Mucositis ; chemically induced ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; Radiotherapy, High-Energy ; adverse effects ; Taxoids ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

The inv(16)(p13q22) is found in de novo AML and is closely associated with the FAB subtype M4eo. The inv(16) is rarely reported in therapy-related AML (t-AML) patients. Herein, we report a case of t-AML with inv(16) after combination chemotherapy using antimitotic agent and alkylating agent (cis-platin-paclitaxel) for ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma.
Antimitotic Agents/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16/*genetics ; Cisplatin/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; *Inversion, Chromosome ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/*chemically induced/pathology ; Middle Aged ; Taxoids/adverse effects/therapeutic use

Pulmonary toxicity is one of the most serious adverse effects associated with a quick course of vincristine, bleomycin, and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC-VBP). The aim of this study was to evaluate pulmonary toxicity related to a quick course NAC-VBP. A total of consecutive 61 patients, who underwent at most 3 cycles of NAC-VBP every 10 days in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB-IIB cervical cancer from 1995 to 2007, were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 61 study subjects, 7 (11.5%) were identified to have pulmonary toxicity and 2 (3.3%) died of pulmonary fibrosis progression despite aggressive treatment and the use of a multidisciplinary approach. No factor predisposing pulmonary toxicity was identified. Initial symptoms were non-specific, but bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia and interstitial pneumonitis were characteristic findings by high-resolution computed tomography of the chest. The benefit of steroid therapy was uncertain and was associated with steroid-induced diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy in two patients. Fatal pulmonary toxicity is a major concern of a quick course NAC-VBP. In conclusion, these patients require special monitoring for bleomycin-induced pulmonary toxicity.
Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Bleomycin/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Cisplatin/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Diseases/*chemically induced/pathology ; Middle Aged ; *Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Pulmonary Fibrosis/chemically induced/mortality/pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/complications/*drug therapy ; Vincristine/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of palonosetron for prevention of vomiting induced by high dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

METHODSOne-hundred and twenty-eight patients received tropisetron 5 mg plus dexamethasone 10 mg at the first cycle or palonosetron 0.25 mg plus dexamethasone 10 mg, respectively, each administered 30 min before the initiation of high dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy. To observe the remission rate of acute emetic episodes and delayed emetic episodes, adverse effects and daily food-intake in the patients after the chemotherapy.

RESULTSThe complete response (CR) rates for acute vomiting were not significantly different between the tropisetron and palonosetron cycles (75.8% vs. 79.7%, P>0.05). The complete control rate of delayed vomiting in the palonosetron cycle was significantly higher than that in the tropisetron cycle (70.3% vs. 50.8%, P<0.01). The food-intake decrease rate of palonosetron cycle was 18.8%, significantly lower than the 53.1% of the tropisetron cycle (P<0.05). The toxicity in the two cycles was similar and no grade 3-4 toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONSPalonosetron is superior to tropisetron with a lower remission rate of delayed emesis induced by high dose cisplatin-based chemotherapy and with tolerable toxicity. Moreover, the apparent emesis control of palonosetron treatment seems to provide an adequate food-intake in these patients.

Aged ; Antiemetics ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Cisplatin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Eating ; drug effects ; Female ; Humans ; Indoles ; therapeutic use ; Isoquinolines ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Quinuclidines ; therapeutic use ; Vomiting ; chemically induced ; prevention & control