No abstract available.
Cisapride* ; Gastric Emptying* ; Humans

No abstract available.
Cisapride* ; Gastric Emptying* ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic*

A 41-year-old male patient presented with idiopathic persistent hiccups. The hiccups did not respond to pharmacologic treatments including cisapride, omeprazole, and baclofen. Phrenic nerve block was also ineffective. However, the persistent hiccups were successfully treated with short-term positive pressure ventilation using a short-acting muscle relaxant.
Adult ; Baclofen ; Cisapride ; Hiccup ; Humans ; Male ; Muscles ; Omeprazole ; Phrenic Nerve ; Positive-Pressure Respiration

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the effects of cisapride tartrate on gastrointestinal symptoms and gastric emptying times in diabetic patients with dysmotility like dyspeptic symptoms. METHODS: Cisapride was administered before each meal in 61 patients for 4 weeks. The intensity of gastrointestinal symptoms before and after cisapride administration was scored from 0 to 4, in the order of increasing severity of symptoms. In addition, a gastric emptying test was performed. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the total intensity score of symptoms was observed during the first two weeks, from 8.5+/-2.1 to 4.0+/-3.0 (p < 0.05), and a further reduction was noted during the next two weeks, to 2.8+/-2.8 (p < 0.05). Good to excellent improvement was obtained in 70.4% of the patients, but the improvement in symptoms was not related to age, duration of diabetes, glucose, Hb A1c, neuropathy, or retinopathy. Treatment with cisapride induced a significant regression of symptoms and a significant improvement of delayed gastric emptying from 104.0+/-31.7 minutes to 79.5+/-17.1 (p < 0.05). However, there was a lack of association between the changes in gastric emptying times and improvements in symptoms(r(2)=0.00186). Only 3 patients complained of loose stool, nausea, or dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: Cisapride was effective in improving dysmotility like dyspeptic symptoms in diabetic patients without serious side effects.
Cisapride* ; Dizziness ; Dyspepsia ; Gastric Emptying ; Glucose ; Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated ; Humans ; Meals ; Nausea

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: This study was performed prospectively to evaluate the short - term effect of cisapride tartrate on the frequency and the degree of symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia and functional constipation. METHODS: One-hundred thirty-two patients with a mean age of 44.7 years in men and 43.1 years in women, who presented with symptoms of both functional dyspepsia and functional constipation were recruited, and the frequency and the degree of symptoms corresponding to functional dyspepsia and functional constipation were assessed by an interview in 10 hospitals respectively. In an open, multicenter trial, 132 patients received 10 mg of cisapride tartrate three times a day (TID) for 8 weeks. Patients wrote a defecation diary for 8 weeks and checked symptom scores, which represented the degree of symptoms of dyspepsia and constipation, at the 4th and 8th week. RESULTS: The frequently reported symptoms of functional dyspepsia were epigastric fullness (2.34+/-0.80), bloating (2.05+/-0.82), early satiety (1.67+/-0.99), anorexia (1.04+/-0.95) and nausea (0.94+/-0.93). The mean defecation frequency per week was 3.07+/-2.35 and patients showed subjective symptom scores as follows; 97.0+/-25.26 % in the rate of sense of incomplete evacuation, 1.85+/-0.73 in the hardness of stool and 1.62+/-0.57 in difficulty to pass stool. After adminstration of cisapride tartrate in the case of functional dyspepsia, 66.1% of patients at the 4th week and 81.5 % of patients at the 8th week showed good or excellent improvements. In the case of functional constipation, 82.7% of patients also showed good or excellent improvements. Overall improvements of symptoms in both functional dyspepsia and functional constipation were 78.2% at the 8th week. CONCLUSION: Cisapride tartrate reduced the frequency and the degree of symptoms in functional dyspepsia and functional constipation without significant adverse effects. Functional dyspepsia and functional constipation without significant adverse effects.
Anorexia ; Cisapride* ; Constipation* ; Defecation ; Dyspepsia* ; Female ; Hardness ; Humans ; Male ; Nausea ; Prospective Studies

Pharmacologic treatment of the detrusor hypocontractility(hyporeflexia) remains controversial issues. Clean intermittent self catheterization(CIC) alone, or combination with bethanechol chloride has been generally accepted as treatment modality. Until presently, bethanechol chloride is the only pharmacologic agent commonly used for bladder emptying without significant complication. However, the effectiveness of bethanechol seem to be episodic. The present study compared the contractile response of various pharmacologic agents including bethanechol chloride, ATP, PG E1, E2, F2-alpha on the smooth muscle strips of male rabbit bladder. In addition, effect of the gastrointestinal motility agents such as cisapride and metoclopramide on the contraction of rabbit bladder were assessed. Each bladder was divided into bladder body and bladder base for comparison of pharmacologic effects. FS at basal tension elicited a frequency dependent contraction which was greater in bladder body strips than in bladder base strips. The contractile responses to bethanechol, ATP, PG E1, E2 and PG F2-alpha were greater in bladder body than in bladder base.In the bladder body,magnitude of the contractile responses by ATP and PG F2-alpha were approximately 1/3 of those by bethanechol or FS.PG F2-alpha was consistently more potent to produce contraction than PG E1, E2. ATP induced contraction only consisted of initial phasic rise of tension. The contraction induced by PG developed slower than those caused by bethanechol. Cisapride(10uM) induced weak contractile responses comparable to those by PG E1 Metoclopramide had no contractile effects in this studies. Conclusively, differences exist in the response of the bladder body and base to FS and various pharmacologic agents. ATP, PG E2 and PG F2-alpha exhibited some notable contractile responses to the bladder body that were approximately 1/3 of those by bethanechol. Gastrointestinal motility agents were not shown to be effective in the mediation of contraction of rabbit bladder.
Adenosine Triphosphate ; Bethanechol ; Cisapride ; Gastrointestinal Motility ; Humans ; Male ; Metoclopramide ; Muscle, Smooth* ; Negotiating ; Urinary Bladder*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) electrolyte lavage solution is now commonly used for peroral colonic preparation. However, the need to ingest a large volume reduces patient acceptance and may limit compliance, thereby resulting in improper preparation. This study was designed to assess whether adding of magnesium oxide or cisapride to PEG solution decreased the volume of PEG solution required without compromising the quality of the preparation. METHODS: One hundred thirty seven patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were randomly chosen to receive one of three preparations (Group A: 4 L PEG; Group B: 2 L PEG plus cisapride 20 mg; Group C: 2 L PEG plus magnesium oxide 2 g). Endoscopist was blinded as to the method of preparation and scored the degree of colonic preparation (1 to 4). RESULTS: Mean scores of preparation in group A, B, and C were 2.85, 2.69, and 2.20, respectively (p=0.001). There were significant differences of the degree of preparation between group A and group C, between group B and group C, but not between group A and group B. CONCLUSIONS: Two liters of PEG plus cisapride induced equally effective colonic preparation compared to four liter PEG solution. This results show that the addition of cisapride to PEG solution can reduce volume of PEG solution during colonoscopy preparation.
Cisapride* ; Colon ; Colonoscopy* ; Compliance ; Humans ; Magnesium Oxide ; Outpatients ; Polyethylene Glycols ; Therapeutic Irrigation*

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: The therapeutic requirements of patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) are similar to those with erosive esophagitis. The pharmacological action mechanism of prokinetics is quite different; domperidone is a peripheral dopamine D2-antagonist and cisapride is a HT4-agonist. This study was performed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of these two different prokinetics in patients with NERD. METHODS: 178 patients, with heartburn and/or regurgitation, without reflux esophagitis were enrolled and divided into 2 groups by randomization code. In this prospective multicenter trial, 178 patients (93 patients in cisapride group, 85 patients in domperidone group) received 10 mg of cisapride three times a day or 10 mg of domperidone three time a day for 2 or 4 weeks. Symptom assessment was performed in each patients before treatments, 2 and 4 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Of the 133 patients available for final analysis, 65 were allocated to the cisapride group and 68 to the domperidone group. After 2 weeks treatment, heartburn was reduced in 81.1% of cisapride group, 56.7% of domperidone group (p < 0.05) and regurgitation was reduced in 89.7% of cisapride group, 77.7% of domperidone group. After 4 weeks treatment, heartburn was reduced in 94.3% of cisapride group, 88.7% of domperidone group and this difference was not significant. The proportion of adverse events in cisapride group was 9.4% and was 5.5% in domperidone group. CONCLUSIONS: Cisapride tartrate was more effective in relieving heartburn in NERD patients than domperidone maleate after 2 week treatment. However, this superior effect dose not persist longer than 2 weeks.
Cisapride* ; Domperidone* ; Dopamine ; Esophagitis ; Esophagitis, Peptic ; Heartburn ; Humans ; Prospective Studies ; Random Allocation ; Symptom Assessment

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Prokinetics are commonly used for the treatment of functional dyspesia, but their methods of action are different. First, we compared the efficacy and safety of the dopamine receptor antagonists, which were domperidone maleate and levosulpiride, in a 2 week treatment in functional dyspepsia, then investigated the efficacy and safety of cisapride tartrate in a 2 week treatment in those who were resistant to domperidone maleate or levosulpiride. METHODS: One hundred Forty-nine patients, who were diagnosed with functional dyspepsia, were selected. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups, domperidone maleate (75) and levosupiride (74). Daily they took 30mg of domperidone maleate (DOM) or 75mg of levosulpiride (LEV) for 2 weeks. Then the subjects who didn't respond to these treatments took 30mg of cisapride tartrate for the following 2 weeks. RESULTS: At week 0, the total symptom scores of the DOM group and LEV group were 8.01+/-2.57 and 8.14+/-2.65 respectively, which were not statistically different. At week 2, the total symptom scores of the DOM and LEV groups were significantly reduced to 4.28+/-3.30 and 4.85+/-3.53(p=0.0001). The efficacy rates of the DOM and LEV groups at week 2 were 50.8% vs. 44.1%. The rate of adverse events in the LEV groups was much higher than in the DOM group(17.7% vs. 8.0%). In addition the rate of change from normal to abnomal in prolactin level was markedly higher in the LEV than that of the DOM group(80.0% vs. 8.3%). After 2 weeks of treatment with cisapride tartrate, the total symptom score was significantly reduced to 3.77+/-2.49(p=0.0001), and the efficacy rate was 75.0%. The satisfaction of the resistant subjects in efficacy of cisapride compared with the previous treatment was 73.3%. The rate of adverse events of cisapride tartrate was 5.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Considering efficacy and safety of domperidone maleate and levosulpiride, domperidone maleate was the safer drug for the treatment of functional dyspepsia, and cisapride tartrate can be a useful drug in those patients who are resistant to dopamine antagonists like domperidone maleate and levosulpiride.
2,5-Dimethoxy-4-Methylamphetamine ; Cisapride* ; Domperidone ; Dopamine Antagonists* ; Dopamine* ; Dyspepsia* ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Humans ; Prolactin

BACKROUND/AIMS: It has been thought that in many of those who complain of "epigastric soreness," their symptom is actually "heartburn" secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study was undertaken to determine the incidence of GERD in patients who complain of epigastric soreness and to evaluate the effect of cisapride tartrate on their symptoms. METHODS: A total 107 patients who visited tertiary referral hospitals and complained of epigastric soreness were enrolled. We evaluated their symptoms and performed esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD). In 53 of the 107 patients who showed a normal EGD, gastroesophageal reflux studies (24 hour ambulatory pH monitoring, Bernstein test, modified Bernstein test) were performed. RESULTS: Of the 107 patients, 36 had organic gastroduodenal diseases, 18 had reflux esophagitis, and 53 showed a normal EGD finding. Of these 53 patients, the gastroesophageal reflux studies were normal in 23 patients and abnormal in 30. Forty eight (44.9%) of 107 patients showed reflux-associated epigastric soreness. There was no difference in demographic characteristics among reflux-associated, gastroduodenal, and functional epigastric soreness groups. Among clinical characteristics of the 3 groups, the only difference found was the time of the symptoms during a day. In the reflux-associated epigastric soreness group, the symptoms were more severe during daytime. After cisapride tartrate administration for 4 weeks, symptom scores of reflux-associated and functional epigastric soreness groups improved from 9.2+/-3.9 and 10.4+/-3.9 to 4.0+/-3.8 and 3.8+/-2.2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found a great number of patients having GERD among those complaining of "epigastric soreness." Cisapride tartrate was effective in relieving epigastric soreness in reflux-associated and functional epigastric soreness groups.
Cisapride* ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Esophagitis, Peptic ; Gastroesophageal Reflux* ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Incidence* ; Tertiary Care Centers