1.Potential endophenotype for schizophrenia: neurological soft signs.
Christy Lm HUI ; Gloria Hy WONG ; Cindy Py CHIU ; May Ml LAM ; Eric Yh CHEN
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2009;38(5):408-406
INTRODUCTIONNeurological soft signs (NSS) are suggested as a candidate endophenotype for schizophrenia. This article aims to review relevant literature and discuss the role of NSS in understanding schizophrenia.
METHODSThis is an update on a review article published in 2003. Articles from 2003 onwards were specifically reviewed and discussed with relevance to the role of NSS as endophenotype for schizophrenia.
RESULTSConsistent data suggest an excess of NSS in schizophrenic patients. NSS appear to be related to schizophrenic symptoms, in particular negative symptoms and disorganisation. Information on NSS and demographic correlates is scarce, and the confounding effects between age, education and intelligence on NSS constitute an important gap in current knowledge. Longitudinal data suggest NSS as both a trait and state variable in the course of disease. NSS are not specific with regard to diagnosis, although there are claims that individual sub-components may be more specific. The weight of evidence raises question on the specificity of NSS for schizophrenia.
CONCLUSIONSThe usefulness and feasibility of NSS as a specific endophenotype target for schizophrenia is unclear. However, NSS remain an important feature and symptom correlate of schizophrenia. Future research should focus on delineating the effects of NSS from those of confounding demographic variables, and the stability of NSS over the course of illness to elucidate its role in schizophrenia.
Humans ; Mental Disorders ; Neurologic Examination ; Phenotype ; Risk Factors ; Schizophrenia ; diagnosis ; genetics ; Sensitivity and Specificity
3.Adverse Effects of 24 Hours of Sleep Deprivation on Cognition and Stress Hormones.
Eun Yeon JOO ; Cindy W YOON ; Dae Lim KOO ; Daeyoung KIM ; Seung Bong HONG
Journal of Clinical Neurology 2012;8(2):146-150
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The present study was designed to investigate whether 24 h of SD negatively affects the attention and working memory and increases the serum concentrations of stress hormones, glucose, and inflammatory markers. METHODS: The acute effects of sleep deprivation (SD) on cognition and the stress hormones were evaluated in six healthy volunteers (all men, age 23-27 years). All were good sleepers, had no history of medical or neuropsychiatric diseases, and were not taking any kind of medication. All of the volunteers were subjected to the Continuous Performance Test (CPT) for attention and working memory of cognition and blood tests both before and after 24 h of SD. Electroencephalographic monitoring was performed during the study to confirm the wakefulness of the subjects. RESULTS: SD significantly elevated the serum concentrations of stress hormones (cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine), but serum levels of glucose and inflammatory markers were not changed compared to baseline. For easier steps of the CPT the subjects performed well in giving correct responses after SD; the correct response scores decreased only at the most difficult step of the CPT. However, the subjects performed consistently poor for the error responses at all steps after SD. There was no correlation between the CPT scores and stress hormone levels. CONCLUSIONS: The 24 h of SD significantly heightened the levels of stress hormones and lowered attention and working memory. The acute SD condition seems to render the subject more susceptible to making errors.
Cognition
;
Epinephrine
;
Glucose
;
Hematologic Tests
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Memory, Short-Term
;
Sleep Deprivation
;
Wakefulness
4.Late-onset non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis: Comparison with early-onset and very late-onset myasthenia gravis
Eun Bin Cho ; Ju-Hong Min ; Sujin Lee ; Cindy W Yoon ; Jin Myoung Seok ; HyeJin Cho ; Hye Lim Lee ; Byoung Joon Kim
Neurology Asia 2017;22(2):123-131
Objective: To identify the clinical characteristics of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) according
to age at onset. Methods: We retrospectively recruited 227 non-thymomatous MG patients with adult
onset who had been followed up for more than one year. The patients were classified based on the
age of symptom onset as “early-onset MG” (EOMG,18–50 years; N=135), “late-onset MG” (LOMG,
50–64 years; N=53), and “very late-onset MG” (VLOMG, 65 years; N=39). Clinical features and
serological findings were compared between these groups. Results: LOMG patients showed more
frequent ocular MG (55%) and less frequent thymic hyperplasia (9%) compared to EOMG patients
(31% and 38%; p=0.006 and p<0.001, respectively), and no female preponderance compared to
VLOMG patients (female, 49% vs.77%; p=0.014). However, there were no significant differences
between VLOMG and EOMG patients, except for more frequent thymic hyperplasia (p<0.001) in
EOMG patients. When analyzing female patients only, less frequent secondary generalization (10%)
were additionally found in LOMG patients, compared to EOMG (47%, p= 0.008) and VLOMG (59%,
p=0.004) patients. Anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (HR, 5.48; 95% CI, 1.73–17.37; p=0.004) was
independently associated with secondary generalization in female EOMG patients.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that LOMG patients, especially female, were characterized by frequent
ocular MG and less frequent secondary generalization, distinguished from EOMG and VLOMG
patients. Further large epidemiologic studies in Korea are needed to determine the characteristics of
MG patients according to the age at onset and gender.
5.To Determine the Risk-Based Screening Interval for Diabetic Retinopathy: Development and Validation of Risk Algorithm from a Retrospective Cohort Study
Jinxiao LIAN ; Ching SO ; Sarah Morag MCGHEE ; Thuan-quoc THACH ; Cindy Lo Kuen LAM ; Colman Siu Cheung FUNG ; Alfred Siu Kei KWONG ; Jonathan Cheuk Hung CHAN
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2025;49(2):286-297
Background:
The optimal screening interval for diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains controversial. This study aimed to develop a risk algorithm to predict the individual risk of referable sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) in a mainly Chinese population and to provide evidence for risk-based screening intervals.
Methods:
The retrospective cohort data from 117,418 subjects who received systematic DR screening in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2016 were included to develop and validate the risk algorithm using a parametric survival model. The risk algorithm can be used to predict the individual risk of STDR within a specific time interval, or the time to reach a specific risk margin and thus to allocate a screening interval. The calibration performance was assessed by comparing the cumulative STDR events versus predicted risk over 2 years, and discrimination by using receiver operative characteristics (ROC) curve.
Results:
Duration of diabetes, glycosylated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, presence of chronic kidney disease, diabetes medication, and age were included in the risk algorithm. The validation of prediction performance showed that there was no significant difference between predicted and observed STDR risks in males (5.6% vs. 5.1%, P=0.724) or females (4.8% vs. 4.6%, P=0.099). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.81) for males and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.83) for females.
Conclusion
The risk algorithm has good prediction performance for referable STDR. Using a risk-based screening interval allows us to allocate screening visits disproportionally more to those at higher risk, while reducing the frequency of screening of lower risk people.
6.To Determine the Risk-Based Screening Interval for Diabetic Retinopathy: Development and Validation of Risk Algorithm from a Retrospective Cohort Study
Jinxiao LIAN ; Ching SO ; Sarah Morag MCGHEE ; Thuan-quoc THACH ; Cindy Lo Kuen LAM ; Colman Siu Cheung FUNG ; Alfred Siu Kei KWONG ; Jonathan Cheuk Hung CHAN
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2025;49(2):286-297
Background:
The optimal screening interval for diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains controversial. This study aimed to develop a risk algorithm to predict the individual risk of referable sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) in a mainly Chinese population and to provide evidence for risk-based screening intervals.
Methods:
The retrospective cohort data from 117,418 subjects who received systematic DR screening in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2016 were included to develop and validate the risk algorithm using a parametric survival model. The risk algorithm can be used to predict the individual risk of STDR within a specific time interval, or the time to reach a specific risk margin and thus to allocate a screening interval. The calibration performance was assessed by comparing the cumulative STDR events versus predicted risk over 2 years, and discrimination by using receiver operative characteristics (ROC) curve.
Results:
Duration of diabetes, glycosylated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, presence of chronic kidney disease, diabetes medication, and age were included in the risk algorithm. The validation of prediction performance showed that there was no significant difference between predicted and observed STDR risks in males (5.6% vs. 5.1%, P=0.724) or females (4.8% vs. 4.6%, P=0.099). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.81) for males and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.83) for females.
Conclusion
The risk algorithm has good prediction performance for referable STDR. Using a risk-based screening interval allows us to allocate screening visits disproportionally more to those at higher risk, while reducing the frequency of screening of lower risk people.
7.To Determine the Risk-Based Screening Interval for Diabetic Retinopathy: Development and Validation of Risk Algorithm from a Retrospective Cohort Study
Jinxiao LIAN ; Ching SO ; Sarah Morag MCGHEE ; Thuan-quoc THACH ; Cindy Lo Kuen LAM ; Colman Siu Cheung FUNG ; Alfred Siu Kei KWONG ; Jonathan Cheuk Hung CHAN
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2025;49(2):286-297
Background:
The optimal screening interval for diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains controversial. This study aimed to develop a risk algorithm to predict the individual risk of referable sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) in a mainly Chinese population and to provide evidence for risk-based screening intervals.
Methods:
The retrospective cohort data from 117,418 subjects who received systematic DR screening in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2016 were included to develop and validate the risk algorithm using a parametric survival model. The risk algorithm can be used to predict the individual risk of STDR within a specific time interval, or the time to reach a specific risk margin and thus to allocate a screening interval. The calibration performance was assessed by comparing the cumulative STDR events versus predicted risk over 2 years, and discrimination by using receiver operative characteristics (ROC) curve.
Results:
Duration of diabetes, glycosylated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, presence of chronic kidney disease, diabetes medication, and age were included in the risk algorithm. The validation of prediction performance showed that there was no significant difference between predicted and observed STDR risks in males (5.6% vs. 5.1%, P=0.724) or females (4.8% vs. 4.6%, P=0.099). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.81) for males and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.83) for females.
Conclusion
The risk algorithm has good prediction performance for referable STDR. Using a risk-based screening interval allows us to allocate screening visits disproportionally more to those at higher risk, while reducing the frequency of screening of lower risk people.
8.To Determine the Risk-Based Screening Interval for Diabetic Retinopathy: Development and Validation of Risk Algorithm from a Retrospective Cohort Study
Jinxiao LIAN ; Ching SO ; Sarah Morag MCGHEE ; Thuan-quoc THACH ; Cindy Lo Kuen LAM ; Colman Siu Cheung FUNG ; Alfred Siu Kei KWONG ; Jonathan Cheuk Hung CHAN
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2025;49(2):286-297
Background:
The optimal screening interval for diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains controversial. This study aimed to develop a risk algorithm to predict the individual risk of referable sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) in a mainly Chinese population and to provide evidence for risk-based screening intervals.
Methods:
The retrospective cohort data from 117,418 subjects who received systematic DR screening in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2016 were included to develop and validate the risk algorithm using a parametric survival model. The risk algorithm can be used to predict the individual risk of STDR within a specific time interval, or the time to reach a specific risk margin and thus to allocate a screening interval. The calibration performance was assessed by comparing the cumulative STDR events versus predicted risk over 2 years, and discrimination by using receiver operative characteristics (ROC) curve.
Results:
Duration of diabetes, glycosylated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, presence of chronic kidney disease, diabetes medication, and age were included in the risk algorithm. The validation of prediction performance showed that there was no significant difference between predicted and observed STDR risks in males (5.6% vs. 5.1%, P=0.724) or females (4.8% vs. 4.6%, P=0.099). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.81) for males and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.83) for females.
Conclusion
The risk algorithm has good prediction performance for referable STDR. Using a risk-based screening interval allows us to allocate screening visits disproportionally more to those at higher risk, while reducing the frequency of screening of lower risk people.
9.Intraperitoneal versus intranasal administration of lipopolysaccharide in causing sepsis severity in a murine model: a preliminary comparison
Yaqing JIAO ; Cindy S. W. TONG ; Lingyun ZHAO ; Yilin ZHANG ; John M. NICHOLLS ; Timothy H. RAINER
Laboratory Animal Research 2024;40(2):280-286
Community-acquired respiratory infection is the commonest cause of sepsis presenting to emergency departments. Yet current experimental animal models simulate peritoneal sepsis with intraperitoneal (I.P.) injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as the predominant route. We aimed to compare the progression of organ injury between I.P. LPS and intranasal (I.N.) LPS in order to establish a better endotoxemia murine model of respiratory sepsis. Eight weeks old male BALB/c mice received LPS-Escherichia coli doses at 0.15, 1, 10, 20, 40 and 100 mg per kg body weight (e.g. LPS-10 is a dose of 10 mg/kg body weight). Disease severity was monitored by a modified Mouse Clinical Assessment Score for Sepsis (M-CASS; range 0–21). A M-CASS score ≥ 10 or a weight reduction of ≥ 20%, was used as a criterion for euthanasia. The primary outcome was the survival rate (either no death or no need for euthanasia). The progression of disease was specified as M-CASS, body weight, blood glucose, histopathological changes to lung, liver, spleen, kidney, brain and heart tissues. Survival rate in I.P. LPS-20 mice was 0% (2/3 died; 1/3 euthanized with M-CASS > 10) at 24 h. Survival rate in all doses of I.N. LPS was 100% (20/20; 3–4 per group) at 96 h. 24 h mean M-CASS post-I.P. LPS-10 was 6.4/21 significantly higher than I.N. LPS-10 of 1.7/21 (Unpaired t test, P < 0.05). Organ injury was present at 96 h in the I.P. LPS-10 group: lung (3/3; 100%), spleen (3/3; 100%) and liver (1/3; 33%). At 24 h in the I.P. LPS-20 group, kidney injury was observed in the euthanized mouse. At 96 h in the post-I.N. LPS-20 group, only lung injury was observed in 2/3 (67%) mice (Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s, P < 0.01). At 24 h in the post-I.N. LPS-100 group all (4/4) mice had evidence of lung injury. Variable doses of I.N. LPS in mice produced lung injury but did not produce sepsis. Higher doses of I.P. LPS induced multi-organ injury but not respiratory sepsis. Lethal models of respiratory virus, e.g., influenza A, might provide alternative avenues that can be explored in future research.
10.Caesarean section scar pregnancy: a case series at a single tertiary centre.
Yi Ping Cindy PANG ; Wei Ching TAN ; Tze Tein YONG ; Poh Kim Elisa KOH ; Hak Koon TAN ; Tew Hong HO
Singapore medical journal 2012;53(10):638-642
We present a case series of four patients with Caesarean scar pregnancies (CSPs) managed at our gynaecological unit between October 2008 and May 2009. Three patients were detected while asymptomatic, and were treated with elective intragestational sac methotrexate injections. The last patient had presented following complications from a termination of pregnancy for a CSP that was misdiagnosed as intrauterine. Following treatment, this patient and another developed arteriovenous malformation, which responded to bilateral uterine artery embolisations and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist treatment.
Abortion, Induced
;
methods
;
Adult
;
Cesarean Section
;
adverse effects
;
Cicatrix
;
complications
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy, Ectopic
;
diagnosis
;
etiology
;
therapy
;
Treatment Outcome