1.Quality Analysis of Lithium Carbonate Tablets and Lithium Carbonate Sustained-release Tablets
Ruibo JIA ; Chunhui HAN ; Xingzhe ZHANG ; Chunjun SHAO ; Jianhua HE ; Guilian XU ; Lin LU
China Pharmacist 2016;19(5):1015-1018
Objective:To evaluate the quality status of lithium carbonate tablets and lithium carbonate sustained-release tablets. Methods:The samples were examined in accordance with the statutory standard,and the exploratory studies were carried out. The results were statistically analyzed. Results:In accordance with the statutory standard,among 120 batches of samples, only one was unqualified in dissolution,and the others were qualified. The qualified rate was 99. 2% . Conclusion:The quality of the most products meets the current standard and the quality evaluation standard needs to be improved.
2.Comparison of Protein Content Determination Respectively by Folin-Ciocalteu Method and Coomassie Bril-liant Blue Binding Method for Mannatide Oral Solution
Jianhua HE ; Lin LU ; Chunjun SHAO ; Guilian XU
China Pharmacist 2017;20(10):1861-1863
Objective:To establish the protein content determination method respectively by Folin-Ciocalteu method and Coomass-ie brilliant blue binding method for mannatide oral solution and compare the results. Methods:The limit of detection, linearity, accu-racy, repeatability, recovery and content of Folin-Ciocalteu method and Coomassie brilliant blue binding method were investigated. Re-sults:As for Folin-Ciocalteu method, the limit of detection was 0. 2 μg, the range of linearity was 0-112. 0 μg(r=0. 9990), the av-erage recovery was 105. 2%(RSD=1. 9%), the RSD of accuracy was less than 1%, and the content result of three batches of samples was 47. 45, 58. 34 and 40. 99 μg·ml-1, respectively. As for Coomassie brilliant blue binding method, the limit of detection was 0. 8 μg, the range of linearity was 0-99. 6 μg(r=0. 9980), the average recovery was 102. 0%(RSD=2. 7%), the RSD of accuracy was less than 1%, and the protein content of samples was not detected out by the method. Conclusion:Folin-Ciocalteu method can be used to determine the protein content in mannatide oral solution reliably and efficiently.
3.Comparison of Protein Content Determination Respectively by Folin-Ciocalteu Method and Coomassie Bril-liant Blue Binding Method for Mannatide Oral Solution
Jianhua HE ; Lin LU ; Chunjun SHAO ; Guilian XU
China Pharmacist 2017;20(10):1861-1863
Objective:To establish the protein content determination method respectively by Folin-Ciocalteu method and Coomass-ie brilliant blue binding method for mannatide oral solution and compare the results. Methods:The limit of detection, linearity, accu-racy, repeatability, recovery and content of Folin-Ciocalteu method and Coomassie brilliant blue binding method were investigated. Re-sults:As for Folin-Ciocalteu method, the limit of detection was 0. 2 μg, the range of linearity was 0-112. 0 μg(r=0. 9990), the av-erage recovery was 105. 2%(RSD=1. 9%), the RSD of accuracy was less than 1%, and the content result of three batches of samples was 47. 45, 58. 34 and 40. 99 μg·ml-1, respectively. As for Coomassie brilliant blue binding method, the limit of detection was 0. 8 μg, the range of linearity was 0-99. 6 μg(r=0. 9980), the average recovery was 102. 0%(RSD=2. 7%), the RSD of accuracy was less than 1%, and the protein content of samples was not detected out by the method. Conclusion:Folin-Ciocalteu method can be used to determine the protein content in mannatide oral solution reliably and efficiently.