OBJECTIVETo evaluate the report quality of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of oral and maxillofacial surgery in China during 2000-2009.

METHODSA comprehensive electronic search was carried out through Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and 19 kinds of journals of stomatology in China were also hand-searched. We identified RCT published between 2000 and 2009, and classified into oral and maxillofacial surgery and labeled "random" and assessed the quality of these reports using the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) statement.

RESULTS53 RCT articles were included. Reporting quality of the 53 articles was not high and the CONSORT score was 8.2 +/- 2.5.

CONCLUSIONThe reporting quality of RCT of oral and maxillofacial surgery in China is poor. The CONSORT statement should be used to standardize the reporting of RCT.

China ; Humans ; Oral Medicine ; Publishing ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; standards ; Surgery, Oral

OBJECTIVETo assess the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCT) related to dentine hypersensitivity which were published between 2000 and 2009 in nineteen Chinese stomatological journals, learn the current status and the influence factors of reporting quality of the dentine hypersensitivity RCT, and determine whether they can provide high quality evidence clinically.

METHODSA handsearching of nineteen Chinese stomatological journals to identify dentine hypersensitivity RCT which were published between 2000 and 2009 and labeled "random". Assess the reporting quality of these RCT by Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement and then analyze the influence factors of reporting quality by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTSWe identified 61 dentine hypersensitivity RCT, among which 45 belonged to journals of Chinese scientific study statistical source and 16 belonged to journals of non-statistical source. The reporting quality of dentine hypersensitivity RCT was not high at large and the CONSORT score was 8.1 +/- 2.4 on average. Multiple linear regression showed that the score of improved Jadad scale (t=4.656, P=0.000) was the main influence factor of reporting quality of dentine hypersensitivity RCT. The better the intrinsic authenticity was, the higher the reporting quality would be.

CONCLUSIONCurrently, reporting quality of Chinese dentine hypersensitivity RCT needs to be improved. In order to improve the reporting quality of dentine hypersensitivity RCT, experts in stomatology should not only improve experimental design before experiments, but also write papers in accordance with CONSORT statement.

Dentin Sensitivity ; Humans ; Publishing ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The fungal microbiota from self?retained soil and tongue coating of 18 patients with precancerous lesions of upper gastrointestinal (PLUG) were sequenced. The diversity of α, β in and the structure of the microbial community were analyzed, and the association of them was quantified by using the Spearman rank correlation method. The richness index (1.67±2.79) and the diversity index (0.25±0.10) of the fungal microbiota from tongue coating of PLUG patients were significantly lower than those from soil (4.00± 4.69; 0.99±0.18) (all P values<0.001). The relative abundance of 11 taxa from tongue coating of these PLUG patients was positively associated with that from soil (all P values<0.05).

The fungal microbiota from self?retained soil and tongue coating of 18 patients with precancerous lesions of upper gastrointestinal (PLUG) were sequenced. The diversity of α, β in and the structure of the microbial community were analyzed, and the association of them was quantified by using the Spearman rank correlation method. The richness index (1.67±2.79) and the diversity index (0.25±0.10) of the fungal microbiota from tongue coating of PLUG patients were significantly lower than those from soil (4.00± 4.69; 0.99±0.18) (all P values<0.001). The relative abundance of 11 taxa from tongue coating of these PLUG patients was positively associated with that from soil (all P values<0.05).

Objective:To evaluate the structural features, stability and postoperative effect of integrated framework, 1+ 1 framework, 2+ 1 framework, 4+ 1 framework, and Y-shaped nasal framework.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed based on the clinical data of patients underwent in Department of Plastic and Aesthetic (Burn) Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from February 2019 to November 2020. According to rhinoplasty framework, the patients were divided into integrated framework group, 1+ 1 framework group, 2+ 1 framework group, 4+ 1 framework group, and Y-shaped framework group. Based on the principle of plane photography, the stability of the nasal framework was evaluated by measuring the nasal tip projection and the nasolabial angle 1 month after surgery, and 12 months after surgery. The satisfaction of patients and the incidence of postoperative complications were collected. The difference in nasolabial angle and nasal tip projection data of postoperation 1 month and postoperative 12 months among each group were analyzed by one-way analysis vaniance or Kruskal-Waliis H test.Bonferroni test or Nemenyi test was used for pairwise comparison between groups. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:A total of 201 patients (18 males and 183 females, aged 18-46 years, average aged 26.6±5.9 years)were included in this study and followed up for 12-21 months. There were 45 patients in the integrated framework group, 45 patients in the 1+ 1 framework group, 34 patients in the 2+ 1 framework group, 35 patients in the 4+ 1 framework group, and 42 patients in the Y-shaped framework group. Four patients with Y-shaped framework had significant nasal tip supination 12 months after surgery. Among the patients with 1+ 1 framework, 1 patient showed slight columella distortion 6 months after surgery, and 3 patients showed significant nasal tip subrotation 12 months after surgery. One patient in 2+ 1 framework group developed nasal infection 92 days after surgery. No complications were found in other groups during follow-up. In terms of nasal tip projection during postoperative follow-up, the median difference of nasal tip projection between 12 months and 1 month after surgery in 2+ 1 framework group, integrated framework group, 1+ 1 framework group, and 4+ 1 framework group, and Y-shaped framework group was -0.08 cm, -0.09 cm, -0.20 cm, -0.10 cm and -0.17 cm, respectively. The difference of nasal tip projection among the five groups was statistically significant ( P<0.01). The difference between 2+ 1 framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant( P<0.05). The difference between 4+ 1 framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The difference between integrated nasal framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The difference between Y-shaped framework group and 1+ 1 framework group was statistically significant ( P<0.05). In terms of nasolabial angle during postoperative follow-up, the median difference of nasolabial angle between 12 months and 1 month after surgery in 2+ 1 framework group, integrated framework group, 1+ 1 framework group, and 4+ 1 framework group, and Y-shaped framework group was -4.20°, -3.80°, -6.50°, -4.10° and -6.35°, respectively. The difference of nasolabial angle among the five groups was statistically significant ( P<0.01). The difference between 2+ 1 framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant( P<0.05). The difference between 4+ 1 framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The difference between integrated nasal framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Patient satisfaction evaluation, 2+ 1 framework group had the highest satisfaction(34/34, 100.00%), followed by 4+ 1 framework group (34/35, 97.14%), integrated framework group(42/45, 93.33%), Y-shaped framework group(36/42, 85.71%), 1+ 1 framework group(37/45, 82.22%). Conclusion:The changes of nasolabial angle and nasal tip projection in 2+ 1 framework, integrated framework, and 4+ 1 framework were smaller than those in Y-shaped framework and 1+ 1 framework.2+ 1 framework was convenient and had good postoperative stability and high patient satisfaction.

Objective:To evaluate the structural features, stability and postoperative effect of integrated framework, 1+ 1 framework, 2+ 1 framework, 4+ 1 framework, and Y-shaped nasal framework.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed based on the clinical data of patients underwent in Department of Plastic and Aesthetic (Burn) Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from February 2019 to November 2020. According to rhinoplasty framework, the patients were divided into integrated framework group, 1+ 1 framework group, 2+ 1 framework group, 4+ 1 framework group, and Y-shaped framework group. Based on the principle of plane photography, the stability of the nasal framework was evaluated by measuring the nasal tip projection and the nasolabial angle 1 month after surgery, and 12 months after surgery. The satisfaction of patients and the incidence of postoperative complications were collected. The difference in nasolabial angle and nasal tip projection data of postoperation 1 month and postoperative 12 months among each group were analyzed by one-way analysis vaniance or Kruskal-Waliis H test.Bonferroni test or Nemenyi test was used for pairwise comparison between groups. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results:A total of 201 patients (18 males and 183 females, aged 18-46 years, average aged 26.6±5.9 years)were included in this study and followed up for 12-21 months. There were 45 patients in the integrated framework group, 45 patients in the 1+ 1 framework group, 34 patients in the 2+ 1 framework group, 35 patients in the 4+ 1 framework group, and 42 patients in the Y-shaped framework group. Four patients with Y-shaped framework had significant nasal tip supination 12 months after surgery. Among the patients with 1+ 1 framework, 1 patient showed slight columella distortion 6 months after surgery, and 3 patients showed significant nasal tip subrotation 12 months after surgery. One patient in 2+ 1 framework group developed nasal infection 92 days after surgery. No complications were found in other groups during follow-up. In terms of nasal tip projection during postoperative follow-up, the median difference of nasal tip projection between 12 months and 1 month after surgery in 2+ 1 framework group, integrated framework group, 1+ 1 framework group, and 4+ 1 framework group, and Y-shaped framework group was -0.08 cm, -0.09 cm, -0.20 cm, -0.10 cm and -0.17 cm, respectively. The difference of nasal tip projection among the five groups was statistically significant ( P<0.01). The difference between 2+ 1 framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant( P<0.05). The difference between 4+ 1 framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The difference between integrated nasal framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The difference between Y-shaped framework group and 1+ 1 framework group was statistically significant ( P<0.05). In terms of nasolabial angle during postoperative follow-up, the median difference of nasolabial angle between 12 months and 1 month after surgery in 2+ 1 framework group, integrated framework group, 1+ 1 framework group, and 4+ 1 framework group, and Y-shaped framework group was -4.20°, -3.80°, -6.50°, -4.10° and -6.35°, respectively. The difference of nasolabial angle among the five groups was statistically significant ( P<0.01). The difference between 2+ 1 framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant( P<0.05). The difference between 4+ 1 framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The difference between integrated nasal framework group and 1+ 1 framework group or Y-shaped framework group was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Patient satisfaction evaluation, 2+ 1 framework group had the highest satisfaction(34/34, 100.00%), followed by 4+ 1 framework group (34/35, 97.14%), integrated framework group(42/45, 93.33%), Y-shaped framework group(36/42, 85.71%), 1+ 1 framework group(37/45, 82.22%). Conclusion:The changes of nasolabial angle and nasal tip projection in 2+ 1 framework, integrated framework, and 4+ 1 framework were smaller than those in Y-shaped framework and 1+ 1 framework.2+ 1 framework was convenient and had good postoperative stability and high patient satisfaction.

The fungal microbiota from self-retained soil and tongue coating of 18 patients with precancerous lesions of upper gastrointestinal (PLUG) were sequenced. The diversity of α, β in and the structure of the microbial community were analyzed, and the association of them was quantified by using the Spearman rank correlation method. The richness index (1.67±2.79) and the diversity index (0.25±0.10) of the fungal microbiota from tongue coating of PLUG patients were significantly lower than those from soil (4.00±4.69; 0.99±0.18) (all P values<0.001). The relative abundance of 11 taxa from tongue coating of these PLUG patients was positively associated with that from soil (all P values<0.05).