1.Construction of nursing quality evaluation indicators in perioperative period of heart transplantation
Jiehui FENG ; Han ZHU ; Yangzi WANG ; Chunhua GAO ; Xia CHEN ; Chao YU ; Ying PAN ; Aolin YOU ; Huafen WANG
Chinese Journal of Nursing 2024;59(4):425-431
Objective To construct quality evaluation indicators for perioperative nursing in heart transplantation,and to provide standard and professional quantitative bases for monitoring and management of perioperative nursing quality.Methods This study was conducted based on the frame work of the three-dimensional"structure-process-outcome"quality model,using literature review,Delphi method and analytic hierarchy to determine the content of the indicators,and the weight of each index.Results A total of 22 experts from 14 qualified heart transplantation hospitals were included,and a total of 2 rounds of consultations were conducted.The effective recovery rates of 2 rounds of expert consultation questionnaires were 100%.The authority coefficients were 0.817.The variation coefficients of each item ranged from 0.025~0.169 and 0.039~0.157.The Kendall harmony coefficients were 0.126 and 0.225(P<0.001).The final evaluation indicators for perioperative nursing quality in heart transplantation included 3 first-level indicators,12 second-lever indicators and 59 third-level indicators.Conclusion The evaluation indicators of perioperative nursing quality in heart transplantation was scientific,comprehensive and specialized,which can provide references for the evaluation of perioperative nursing quality in heart transplantation.
2.Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy between fine needle aspiration needles and end-cutting fine needle biopsy needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for solid pancreatic lesions
Yundi PAN ; Chunhua ZHOU ; Minmin ZHANG ; Taojing RAN ; Xianzheng QIN ; Kui WANG ; Yao ZHANG ; Tingting GONG ; Ling ZHANG ; Dong WANG ; Xiangyi HE ; Wei WU ; Benyan ZHANG ; Lili GAO ; Duowu ZOU
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2024;41(11):864-870
Objective:To compare the diagnostic efficacy of 22 G fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles and 22 G end-cutting fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles for solid pancreatic lesion using both cytological and histological examination.Methods:Clinical data of 116 patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) at the Digestive Endoscopy Center of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from June 2022 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty-three patients sampled with 22 G FNA needles were the FNA group, and 53 sampled with 22 G FNB needles were the FNB group. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and cytological and histological diagnostic yield of FNA needles and FNB needles for solid pancreatic lesions were compared.Results:There were no significant differences in age, gender, lesion location, lesion size, or the number of passes between the FNA group and the FNB group ( P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the diagnostic accuracy [93.7% (59/63) VS 90.6% (48/53), P=0.730], sensitivity [93.0% (53/57) VS 90.2% (46/51), P=0.732], specificity [100.0% (6/6) VS 100.0% (2/2), P=1.000], positive predictive value [100.0% (53/53) VS 100.0% (46/46), P=1.000] and negative predictive value [60.0% (6/10) VS 28.6% (2/7), P=0.335] of combined cytology and histology in distinguishing benign and malignant lesions between the two groups. In the FNA group, the diagnostic accuracy of combined cytology and histology was higher than cytology alone [93.7% (59/63) VS 81.0% (51/63), P=0.008], and was higher than histology alone without statistical significance [93.7% (59/63) VS 87.3% (55/63), P=0.125]. In the FNB group, the diagnostic accuracy of combined cytology and histology was higher than cytology alone [90.6% (48/53) VS 69.8% (37/53), P=0.001], but not than histology alone [90.6% (48/53) VS 90.6% (48/53), P=1.000]. For solid masses located in pancreatic body/tail, the diagnostic accuracy for malignancy by histology using FNB needles tended to be higher than that of FNA needles [100.0% (17/17) VS 81.3% (26/32), P=0.080]. Conclusion:Both FNA needles and FNB needles exhibit adequate diagnostic yield for solid pancreatic masses when combining cytology and histology. FNB needles may offer a higher histological diagnostic yield.
3.Research on the Application of TOPSIS Combined with RSR Comprehensive Evaluation Method in the Construction of CHS-DRG Operational Performance System
Xinbing LÜ ; Liping MENG ; Chunhua PAN ; Haimei XIE ; Xifeng SHEN ; Xiaokun GENG ; Yingfeng WU
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(9):23-28
Objective:To explore the role of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)combined with Rank Sum Ration(RSR)comprehensive evaluation method in establishing the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups(CHS-DRG)operational performance system under the CHS-DRG payment system.Methods:SPSSPRO statistical analysis software was used,and TOPSIS method was used to regularly evaluate and rank the CHS-DRG disease groups in the hospital based on five indicators:Case Mix Index(CMI),total weight,average cost per weight,average length of stay per weight,and group profit and loss.RSR method was used to classify the TOPSIS disease group ranking results,establish performance reward standards for different grades of disease groups,and summarize and restore the reward results for each patient in the disease group to each clinical department,ultimately forming a department performance reward plan.The changes in key operational indicators related to medical insurance patients in hospitals were observed to verify the effectiveness of implementing performance reward programs.Results:After the application of TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method in the construction of CHS-DRG operational performance system,the number of hospital medical insurance patients were increased,CMI value were stabilized,average cost per visit were decreased,average length of stay were shortened,and DRG disease group surplus were increased.Conclusion:The TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method has played a good role in the construction of the CHS-DRG operational performance system.As a method of hospital economic operation evaluation,it is practical and innovative.
4.Research on the Application of TOPSIS Combined with RSR Comprehensive Evaluation Method in the Construction of CHS-DRG Operational Performance System
Xinbing LÜ ; Liping MENG ; Chunhua PAN ; Haimei XIE ; Xifeng SHEN ; Xiaokun GENG ; Yingfeng WU
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(9):23-28
Objective:To explore the role of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)combined with Rank Sum Ration(RSR)comprehensive evaluation method in establishing the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups(CHS-DRG)operational performance system under the CHS-DRG payment system.Methods:SPSSPRO statistical analysis software was used,and TOPSIS method was used to regularly evaluate and rank the CHS-DRG disease groups in the hospital based on five indicators:Case Mix Index(CMI),total weight,average cost per weight,average length of stay per weight,and group profit and loss.RSR method was used to classify the TOPSIS disease group ranking results,establish performance reward standards for different grades of disease groups,and summarize and restore the reward results for each patient in the disease group to each clinical department,ultimately forming a department performance reward plan.The changes in key operational indicators related to medical insurance patients in hospitals were observed to verify the effectiveness of implementing performance reward programs.Results:After the application of TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method in the construction of CHS-DRG operational performance system,the number of hospital medical insurance patients were increased,CMI value were stabilized,average cost per visit were decreased,average length of stay were shortened,and DRG disease group surplus were increased.Conclusion:The TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method has played a good role in the construction of the CHS-DRG operational performance system.As a method of hospital economic operation evaluation,it is practical and innovative.
5.Research on the Application of TOPSIS Combined with RSR Comprehensive Evaluation Method in the Construction of CHS-DRG Operational Performance System
Xinbing LÜ ; Liping MENG ; Chunhua PAN ; Haimei XIE ; Xifeng SHEN ; Xiaokun GENG ; Yingfeng WU
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(9):23-28
Objective:To explore the role of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)combined with Rank Sum Ration(RSR)comprehensive evaluation method in establishing the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups(CHS-DRG)operational performance system under the CHS-DRG payment system.Methods:SPSSPRO statistical analysis software was used,and TOPSIS method was used to regularly evaluate and rank the CHS-DRG disease groups in the hospital based on five indicators:Case Mix Index(CMI),total weight,average cost per weight,average length of stay per weight,and group profit and loss.RSR method was used to classify the TOPSIS disease group ranking results,establish performance reward standards for different grades of disease groups,and summarize and restore the reward results for each patient in the disease group to each clinical department,ultimately forming a department performance reward plan.The changes in key operational indicators related to medical insurance patients in hospitals were observed to verify the effectiveness of implementing performance reward programs.Results:After the application of TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method in the construction of CHS-DRG operational performance system,the number of hospital medical insurance patients were increased,CMI value were stabilized,average cost per visit were decreased,average length of stay were shortened,and DRG disease group surplus were increased.Conclusion:The TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method has played a good role in the construction of the CHS-DRG operational performance system.As a method of hospital economic operation evaluation,it is practical and innovative.
6.Research on the Application of TOPSIS Combined with RSR Comprehensive Evaluation Method in the Construction of CHS-DRG Operational Performance System
Xinbing LÜ ; Liping MENG ; Chunhua PAN ; Haimei XIE ; Xifeng SHEN ; Xiaokun GENG ; Yingfeng WU
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(9):23-28
Objective:To explore the role of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)combined with Rank Sum Ration(RSR)comprehensive evaluation method in establishing the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups(CHS-DRG)operational performance system under the CHS-DRG payment system.Methods:SPSSPRO statistical analysis software was used,and TOPSIS method was used to regularly evaluate and rank the CHS-DRG disease groups in the hospital based on five indicators:Case Mix Index(CMI),total weight,average cost per weight,average length of stay per weight,and group profit and loss.RSR method was used to classify the TOPSIS disease group ranking results,establish performance reward standards for different grades of disease groups,and summarize and restore the reward results for each patient in the disease group to each clinical department,ultimately forming a department performance reward plan.The changes in key operational indicators related to medical insurance patients in hospitals were observed to verify the effectiveness of implementing performance reward programs.Results:After the application of TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method in the construction of CHS-DRG operational performance system,the number of hospital medical insurance patients were increased,CMI value were stabilized,average cost per visit were decreased,average length of stay were shortened,and DRG disease group surplus were increased.Conclusion:The TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method has played a good role in the construction of the CHS-DRG operational performance system.As a method of hospital economic operation evaluation,it is practical and innovative.
7.Research on the Application of TOPSIS Combined with RSR Comprehensive Evaluation Method in the Construction of CHS-DRG Operational Performance System
Xinbing LÜ ; Liping MENG ; Chunhua PAN ; Haimei XIE ; Xifeng SHEN ; Xiaokun GENG ; Yingfeng WU
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(9):23-28
Objective:To explore the role of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)combined with Rank Sum Ration(RSR)comprehensive evaluation method in establishing the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups(CHS-DRG)operational performance system under the CHS-DRG payment system.Methods:SPSSPRO statistical analysis software was used,and TOPSIS method was used to regularly evaluate and rank the CHS-DRG disease groups in the hospital based on five indicators:Case Mix Index(CMI),total weight,average cost per weight,average length of stay per weight,and group profit and loss.RSR method was used to classify the TOPSIS disease group ranking results,establish performance reward standards for different grades of disease groups,and summarize and restore the reward results for each patient in the disease group to each clinical department,ultimately forming a department performance reward plan.The changes in key operational indicators related to medical insurance patients in hospitals were observed to verify the effectiveness of implementing performance reward programs.Results:After the application of TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method in the construction of CHS-DRG operational performance system,the number of hospital medical insurance patients were increased,CMI value were stabilized,average cost per visit were decreased,average length of stay were shortened,and DRG disease group surplus were increased.Conclusion:The TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method has played a good role in the construction of the CHS-DRG operational performance system.As a method of hospital economic operation evaluation,it is practical and innovative.
8.Research on the Application of TOPSIS Combined with RSR Comprehensive Evaluation Method in the Construction of CHS-DRG Operational Performance System
Xinbing LÜ ; Liping MENG ; Chunhua PAN ; Haimei XIE ; Xifeng SHEN ; Xiaokun GENG ; Yingfeng WU
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(9):23-28
Objective:To explore the role of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)combined with Rank Sum Ration(RSR)comprehensive evaluation method in establishing the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups(CHS-DRG)operational performance system under the CHS-DRG payment system.Methods:SPSSPRO statistical analysis software was used,and TOPSIS method was used to regularly evaluate and rank the CHS-DRG disease groups in the hospital based on five indicators:Case Mix Index(CMI),total weight,average cost per weight,average length of stay per weight,and group profit and loss.RSR method was used to classify the TOPSIS disease group ranking results,establish performance reward standards for different grades of disease groups,and summarize and restore the reward results for each patient in the disease group to each clinical department,ultimately forming a department performance reward plan.The changes in key operational indicators related to medical insurance patients in hospitals were observed to verify the effectiveness of implementing performance reward programs.Results:After the application of TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method in the construction of CHS-DRG operational performance system,the number of hospital medical insurance patients were increased,CMI value were stabilized,average cost per visit were decreased,average length of stay were shortened,and DRG disease group surplus were increased.Conclusion:The TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method has played a good role in the construction of the CHS-DRG operational performance system.As a method of hospital economic operation evaluation,it is practical and innovative.
9.Research on the Application of TOPSIS Combined with RSR Comprehensive Evaluation Method in the Construction of CHS-DRG Operational Performance System
Xinbing LÜ ; Liping MENG ; Chunhua PAN ; Haimei XIE ; Xifeng SHEN ; Xiaokun GENG ; Yingfeng WU
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(9):23-28
Objective:To explore the role of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)combined with Rank Sum Ration(RSR)comprehensive evaluation method in establishing the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups(CHS-DRG)operational performance system under the CHS-DRG payment system.Methods:SPSSPRO statistical analysis software was used,and TOPSIS method was used to regularly evaluate and rank the CHS-DRG disease groups in the hospital based on five indicators:Case Mix Index(CMI),total weight,average cost per weight,average length of stay per weight,and group profit and loss.RSR method was used to classify the TOPSIS disease group ranking results,establish performance reward standards for different grades of disease groups,and summarize and restore the reward results for each patient in the disease group to each clinical department,ultimately forming a department performance reward plan.The changes in key operational indicators related to medical insurance patients in hospitals were observed to verify the effectiveness of implementing performance reward programs.Results:After the application of TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method in the construction of CHS-DRG operational performance system,the number of hospital medical insurance patients were increased,CMI value were stabilized,average cost per visit were decreased,average length of stay were shortened,and DRG disease group surplus were increased.Conclusion:The TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method has played a good role in the construction of the CHS-DRG operational performance system.As a method of hospital economic operation evaluation,it is practical and innovative.
10.Research on the Application of TOPSIS Combined with RSR Comprehensive Evaluation Method in the Construction of CHS-DRG Operational Performance System
Xinbing LÜ ; Liping MENG ; Chunhua PAN ; Haimei XIE ; Xifeng SHEN ; Xiaokun GENG ; Yingfeng WU
Chinese Health Economics 2024;43(9):23-28
Objective:To explore the role of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)combined with Rank Sum Ration(RSR)comprehensive evaluation method in establishing the China Healthcare Security Diagnosis Related Groups(CHS-DRG)operational performance system under the CHS-DRG payment system.Methods:SPSSPRO statistical analysis software was used,and TOPSIS method was used to regularly evaluate and rank the CHS-DRG disease groups in the hospital based on five indicators:Case Mix Index(CMI),total weight,average cost per weight,average length of stay per weight,and group profit and loss.RSR method was used to classify the TOPSIS disease group ranking results,establish performance reward standards for different grades of disease groups,and summarize and restore the reward results for each patient in the disease group to each clinical department,ultimately forming a department performance reward plan.The changes in key operational indicators related to medical insurance patients in hospitals were observed to verify the effectiveness of implementing performance reward programs.Results:After the application of TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method in the construction of CHS-DRG operational performance system,the number of hospital medical insurance patients were increased,CMI value were stabilized,average cost per visit were decreased,average length of stay were shortened,and DRG disease group surplus were increased.Conclusion:The TOPSIS combined with RSR comprehensive evaluation method has played a good role in the construction of the CHS-DRG operational performance system.As a method of hospital economic operation evaluation,it is practical and innovative.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail