Objective: To investigate the inhibitory effect on Burkholderia pseudomallei (B. pseudomallei) strain HNBP001 of a bacillomycin D-like cyclic lipopeptide compound named bacillomycin DC isolated from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens HAB-2. Methods: The antibacterial effect of bacillomycin DC on B. pseudomallei was determined using the disk diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentrations were evaluated by microdilution assay. In addition, transmission electron microscopy was performed and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay was carried out to determine the expression of MexB, OprD2, and qnrS genes. Results: Bacillomycin DC produced an inhibition zone against B. pseudomallei with minimum inhibitory concentration values of 12.5 μg/mL 24 h after treatment and 50 μg/mL at 48 and 72 h. Transmission electron microscopy showed that bacillomycin DC resulted in roughening cell surface and cell membrane damage. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis showed low expression of MexB, OprD2 and qnrS genes. Conclusions: Bacillomycin DC inhibits the growth of B. pseudomallei and can be a new candidate for antimicrobial agents of B. pseudomallei. Rajaofera Mamy 1 Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education and School of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Kang Xun 2 Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education and School of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Jin Peng-Fei 3 Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Tropical Plant Diseases and Pests (Hainan University), Ministry of Education, Haikou 570228, Hainan Chen Xin 4 Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education and School of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Li Chen-Chu 5 Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education and School of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Yin Li 6 Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education and School of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Liu Lin 7 Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education and School of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Sun Qing-Hui 8 Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education and School of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Zhang Nan 9 Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education and School of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Chen Chui-Zhe 10 Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education and School of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan He Na 11 Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education and School of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Xia Qian-Feng 12 Key Laboratory of Tropical Translational Medicine of Ministry of Education and School of Tropical Medicine and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Miao Wei-Guo 13 Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control of Tropical Plant Diseases and Pests (Hainan University), Ministry of Education, Haikou 570228, Hainan Kung CT, Lee CH, Li CJ, Lu HI, Ko SF, Liu JW. Development of ceftazidime resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei in a patient experiencing melioidosis with mediastinal lymphadenitis. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2010; 39(12): 945-947. Mohamad NI, Harun A, Hasan H, Deris Z. In-vitro activity of doxycycline and β-lactam combinations against different strains of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Indian J Microbiol 2018; 58(2): 244-247. Limmathurotsakul D, Wongratanacheewin S, Teerawattanasook N, Wongsuvan G, Chaisuksant S, Chetchotisakd P, et al. Increasing incidence of human melioidosis in Northeast Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010; 82(6): 1113-1117. Bond TEH, Sorenson AE, Schaeffer PM. Functional characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei, biotin protein ligase: A toolkit for anti-melioidosis drug development. Microbiol Res 2017; 199: 40-48. Alatoom A, Elsayed H, Lawlor K, AbdelWareth L, El-Lababidi R, Cardona L, et al. Comparison of antimicrobial activity between ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam against multidrug-resistant isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int J Infect Dis 2017; 62: 39-43. Limmathurotsakul D, Golding N, Dance DA, Messina JP, Pigott BM, Moyes CL, et al. Predicted global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and burden of melioidosis. Nat Microbiol 2016; 1(1): 15008. Dutta S, Haq S, Hasan MR, Haq JA. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of clinical isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Bangladesh. BMC Research Notes 2017; 10(1): 299. Platt R. Adverse effects of third-generation cephalosporins. J Antimicrob Chemother 1982; 10(Suppl C): 135-140. Ahmad N, Hashim R, Mohd Noor A. The in vitro antibiotic susceptibility of malaysian isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Int J Microbiol 2013; 2013: 121845. Sarovich DS, Price EP, Von Schulze AT, Cook JM, Mayo M, Watson LM, et al. Characterization of ceftazidime resistance mechanisms in clinical isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei from Australia. PLoS One 2012; 7(2): e30789. Jenney AWJ, Lum G, Fisher DA, Currie BJ. Antibiotic susceptibility of Burkholderia pseudomallei from tropical northern Australia and implications for therapy of melioidosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2001; 17(2): 109-113. Thibault FM, Hernandez E, Vidal DR, Girardet M, Cavallo JD. Antibiotic susceptibility of 65 isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei to 35 antimicrobial agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 54(6): 1134-1138. Wuthiekanun V, Amornchai P, Saiprom N, Chantratita N, Chierakul W, Koh GC, et al. Survey of antimicrobial resistance in clinical Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates over two decades in Northeast Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55(11): 5388-5391. Behera B, Babu TP, Kamalesh A, Reddy G. Ceftazidime resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei: First report from India. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2012; 5(4): 329-330. Blower RJ, Barksdale SM, van Hoek ML. Snake cathelicidin NA-CATH and smaller helical antimicrobial peptides are effective against Burkholderia thailandensis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015; 9(7): e0003862. Dean SN, Bishop BM, Van HML. Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm to alpha-helical peptides: D-enantiomer of LL-37. Front Microbiol 2011; 2: 128. Kampshoff F, Willcox MDP, Dutta D. A pilot study of the synergy between two antimicrobial peptides and two common antibiotics. Antibiotics (Basel) 2019; 8(2): E60. Dawson RM, Liu CQ. Properties and applications of antimicrobial peptides in biodefense against biological warfare threat agents. Crit Rev Microbiol 2008; 34(2): 89-107. Jin P, Wang H, Liu W, Fan Y, Miao W. A new cyclic lipopeptide isolated from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens HAB-2 and safety evaluation. Pestic Biochem Physiol 2018; 147: 40-45. Boottanun P, Potisap C, Hurdle JG, Sermswan RW. Secondary metabolites from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens isolated from soil can kill Burkholderia pseudomallei. Amb Express 2017; 7(1):16. Kang X, Fu Z, Rajaofera MJN, Li C, Zhang N, Liu L, et al. Whole-genome sequence of Burkholderia pseudomallei strain HNBP001, isolated from a melioidosis patient in Hainan, China. Microbiol Resour Announc 2019; 8(36): e00471-19. Liu L, Sun QH, Pei H, Chen CZ, Xiu H, Zhang N, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of Burkholderia pseudomallei collected in Hainan, China. Chin J Zoono 2019; 35(06): 514-517+524. Gay K, Robicsek A, Strahilevitz J, Park CH, Jacoby G, Barrett TJ, et al. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in non-Typhi serotypes of Salmonella enterica. Clini Infect Dis 2006; 43(3): 297-304. Fu QY, Chen CY, Wu J, Wu Q, Qin X, Qian SY, et al. Establishment and evaluation of real-time PCR for rapid and quantitative detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Third Mil Med Univ 2015; 17: 1734-1738. Serra C, Bouharkat B, Tir Touil-Meddah A, Guénin S, Mullié C. MexXY multidrug efflux system is more frequently overexpressed in ciprofloxacin resistant french clinical isolates compared to hospital environment ones. Front Microbiol 2019; 10: 366. Cai S, Chen Y, Song D, Kong J, Wu Y, Lu H. Study on the resistance mechanism via outer membrane protein OprD2 and metal ß-lactamase expression in the cell wall of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Exp Ther Med 2016; 12(5): 2869-2872. Kamjumphol W, Chareonsudjai P, Chareonsudjai S. Antibacterial activity of chitosan against Burkholderia pseudomallei. Microbiologyopen 2018; 7(1). Doi: 10.1002/mbo3.534 Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-AAC) method. Methods 2001; 25(4): 402-408. Baindara P, Mandal SM, Chawla N, Singh PK, Pinnaka AK, Korpole S. Characterization of two antimicrobial peptides produced by a halotolerant Bacillus subtilis strain SK.DU.4 isolated from a rhizosphere soil sample. AMB Express 2013; 3(1): 2. Chalhoub H, Sáenz Y, Nichols WW, Tulkens PM, Van Bambeke F. Loss of activity of ceftazidime-avibactam due to Mex-AB-OprM efflux and overproduction of AmpC cephalosporinase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, isolated from patients suffering from cystic fibrosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2018; 52(5): 697-701. Verchère A, Picard M, Broutin I. Functional investigation of the MexA-MexB-OprM efflux pump of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biophysic J 2013; 104(2): 286a. Van Duin D, Lok JJ, Earley M, Cober E, Richter SS, Perez F. Colistin versus ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 66(2): 163-171. Schweizer HP. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei: Implications for treatment of melioidosis. Future Microbiol 2012; 7(12): 1389-1399. Quinn JP, Darzins A, Miyashiro D, Ripp S, Miller RV. Imipenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO: Mapping of the OprD2 gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35(4): 753-755. Dong F, Xu XW, Song WQ, Lü P, Yang YH, Shen XZ. Analysis of resistant genes of beta-lactam antibiotics from Pseudomonas aeruginosa in pediatric patients. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2008; 88(42): 3012-3015. Shen J, Pan Y, Fang Y. Role of the outer membrane protein OprD2 in carbapenem-resistance mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS One 2015; 10(10): e0139995. Georges B, Conil JM, Dubouix A, Archambaud M, Bonnet E, Saivin S, et al. Risk of emergence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance to ß-lactam antibiotics in intensive care units. Crit Care Med 2006; 34(6): 1636-1641. Literak I, Dolejska M, Janoszowska D, Hrusakova J, Meissner W, Rzyska H, et al. Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria, including strains with genes encoding the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and QnrS, in waterbirds on the Baltic Sea Coast of Poland. Appl Environ Microb 2010; 76(24): 8126-8134. Wang J, Zhang X, Sun G, Wang Q, Lu L, Feng X, et al. Utility of multiple-locus variant-repeat analysis method for the outbreak of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Clin Lab 2014; 60(7): 1217-1223. El-Badawy MF, Alrobaian MM, Shohayeb MM, Abdelwahab SF. Investigation of six plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes among clinical isolates of pseudomonas: A genotypic study in Saudi Arabia. Infect Drug Resist 2019; 12: 915-923. Martín-Gutiérrez G, Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Pascual Á, Rodríguez-Beltrán J, Blázquez J. Plasmidic qnr genes confer clinical resistance to ciprofloxacin under urinary tract physiological conditions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61(4): e02615-e02616. Paiva MC, Reis MP, Costa PS, Dias MF, Bleicher L, Scholte LLS, et al. Identification of new bacteria harboring qnrS and aac(6')-Ib/cr and mutations possibly involved in fluoroquinolone resistance in raw sewage and activated sludge samples from a full-scale WWTP. Water Res 2017; 110: 27-37.

Objective: For patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) complicated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), both anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy should be applied, but the use of anticoagulation therapy is still poor in these patients in China. The purpose of this study was to explore the status and adherence of antithrombotic therapy in AF patients with ACS and the impact on 1 year clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients with AF hospitalized for ACS were retrospectively included from 6 tertiary hospitals in China between July 2015 and December 2020. According to the use of anticoagulant drugs at discharge, patients were divided into two groups: anticoagulant treatment group and non-anticoagulant treatment group. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the main factors influencing the use of anticoagulant drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation complicated with ACS. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 bleeding events were also collected at 1 year after discharge. After propensity score matching, Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate the effect of anticoagulant treatment and non-anticoagulant treatment on 1-year prognosis. The patients were divided into different groups according to whether anticoagulation was performed at discharge and follow-up, and the sensitivity of the results was analyzed. Results: A total of 664 patients were enrolled, and 273 (41.1%) were treated with anticoagulant therapy, of whom 84 (30.8%) received triple antithrombotic therapy, 91 (33.3%) received double antithrombotic therapy (single antiplatelet combined with anticoagulant), and 98 (35.9%) received single anticoagulant therapy. Three hundred and ninety-one (58.9%) patients were treated with antiplatelet therapy, including 253 (64.7%) with dual antiplatelet therapy and 138 (35.3%) with single antiplatelet therapy. After 1∶1 propensity score matching between the anticoagulant group and the non-anticoagulant group, a total of 218 pairs were matched. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that history of diabetes, HAS-BLED score≥3, and percutaneous coronary intervention were predictors of the absence of anticoagulant therapy, while history of ischemic stroke and persistent atrial fibrillation were predictors of anticoagulant therapy. At 1-year follow-up, 218 patients (79.9%) in the anticoagulant group continued to receive anticoagulant therapy, and 333 patients (85.2%) in the antiplatelet group continued to receive antiplatelet therapy. At 1-year follow-up, 36 MACEs events (13.2%) occurred in the anticoagulant group, and 81 MACEs events (20.7%) in the non-anticoagulant group. HR values and confidence intervals were calculated by Cox proportional risk model. Patients in the non-anticoagulant group faced a higher risk of MACEs (HR=1.802, 95%CI 1.112-2.921, P=0.017), and the risk of bleeding events was similar between the two group (HR=0.825,95%CI 0.397-1.715, P=0.607). Conclusions: History of diabetes, HAS-BLED score≥3, and percutaneous coronary intervention are independent factors for the absence of anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF complicated with ACS. The incidence of MACEs, death and myocardial infarction is lower in the anticoagulant group, and the incidence of bleeding events is similar between the two groups. The risk of bleeding and ischemia/thrombosis should be dynamically assessed during follow-up and antithrombotic regiments should be adjusted accordingly.
Humans ; Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy* ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects* ; Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Anticoagulants ; Myocardial Infarction/complications* ; Hemorrhage ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Ischemic Stroke/drug therapy* ; Stroke