1.Analysis on Cistanche tubulosa that parasites on different Tamarixs by RAPD.
Changlin WANG ; Yuhai GUO ; Pengfei TU ; Qiaosheng GUO ; Shu'an WANG ; Chuanqing SUN
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica 2009;34(3):264-268
OBJECTIVETo study genetic difference of Cistanche tubulosa that parasites on different Tamarixs and give a reference to select host of C. tubulosa.
METHODSixteen selected primers by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers were used to analyze genetic distance of C. tubulosa that parasites on eight different hosts.
RESULTSixty-six point seven percent of the total bands were polymorphic, that proved the genetic diversity level in different C. tubulosa types was relatively high, especially the two that parasites on Tamarix hispida and T. chinensis. Cultural areas had more remarkable influence on genetic distance of Cistanche tubulosa than the hosts, and introduction was helpful to maintain the more genetic diversity in different C. tubulosa types. Genetic difference in different C. tubulosa types was far less than that between different species in Cistanche.
CONCLUSIONC. tubulosa types which parasite on different Tamarixs have high genetic diversity.
Cistanche ; genetics ; physiology ; DNA, Plant ; analysis ; Genetic Variation ; Host-Parasite Interactions ; genetics ; Phylogeny ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique ; Tamaricaceae ; classification ; genetics ; physiology
2.CHINET 2012 surveillance of antibiotic resistance in Klebsiella spp .in China
Jing GUAN ; Chao ZHUO ; Danhong SU ; Yuxing NI ; Jingyong SUN ; Fu WANG ; Demei ZHU ; Fupin HU ; Yingchun XU ; Xiaojiang ZHANG ; Yunsong YU ; Qing YANG ; Zhongju CHEN ; Ziyong SUN ; Zhaoxia ZHANG ; Ping JI ; Bin SHAN ; Yan DU ; Hong ZHANG ; Jing KONG ; Yuanhong XU ; Jilu SHEN ; Chuanqing WANG ; Aimin WANG ; Zhidong HU ; Quan LI ; Lianhua WEI ; Ling WU ; Yunjian HU ; Xiaoman AI
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2014;(5):398-404
Objective To investigate the antimicrobial resistance of clinical strains of K lebsiella spp .isolated from 15 hospitals in China CHINET during 2012 .Methods Kirby-Bauer method and automatic microbiology analysis system were employed to study the antimicrobial resistance . WHONET 5 .6 software was applied for data analysis according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2012 breakpoints .Results A total of 9 621 clinical K lebsiella isolates were analyzed ,including 8 772 strains of K . pneumoniae and 804 strains of K . oxytoca . About 54 .9% (5 285/9 621) of the K lebsiella strains were isolated from sputum ,and 16 .3% (1 564/9 621) were isolated from pediatric patients .Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that about 8 .9% ,10 .8% and 12 .9% of the strains were resistant to imipenem ,meropenem and ertapenem ,respectively .About 14 .1% and 17 .0% of the strains were resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam , respectively . Carbapenem-resistant K lebsiella strains were identified from all the 15 hospitals ,including 945 strains of K .pneumoniae and 45 strains of K .oxytoca ,which were resistant to either imipenem ,meropenem or ertapenem .Conclusions The Klebsiella isolates collected from 15 hospitals in China during 2012 are relatively sensitive to carbapenems ,cefoperazone-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam .The prevalence of carbapenem-resistant strains is still increasing in China ,about 10 .3% in 2012 ,and relatively higher in Eastern China .More efforts should be made to control the superbug .
3.CHINET 2012 surveillance of antibiotic resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in China
Hui ZHANG ; Xiaojiang ZHANG ; Yingchun XU ; Zhidong HU ; Jin LI ; Ziyong SUN ; Cui JIAN ; Fu WANG ; Demei ZHU ; Chao ZHUO ; Danhong SU ; Yunzhuo CHU ; Yunsong YU ; Jie LIN ; Yuanhong XU ; Jilu SHEN ; Yuxing NI ; Jingyong SUN ; Zhaoxia ZHANG ; Ping JI ; Lianhua WEI ; Ling WU ; Chuanqing WANG ; Jianchang XUE ; Hong ZHANG ; Wanhua LI ; Yunjian HU ; Xiaoman AI ; Bin SHAN ; Yan DU
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2014;(5):392-397
Objective To investigate the antimicrobial resistance in the A cinetobacter baumannii strains in different parts of China during 2012 .Methods A total of 8 739 clinical isolates of Acinetobacter were collected from 13 general hospitals and two children’s hospitals ,of which most were A . baumannii (89 .6% , 7 827/8 739 ) . Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out by means of Kirby-Bauer method according to the unified protocol . The susceptibility testing data were analyzed by WHONET 5 .6 software according to CLSI 2013 breakpoints .Results Majority (85 .4% ) of the Acinetobacter strains were isolated from inpatients .The remaining 14 .6% were from outpatients and emergency room patients .Of the 7 827 strains of A .baumannii , 10 .9% ,35 .2% ,35 .7% and 43 .4% were resistant to tigecycline ,minocycline ,cefoperazone-sulbactam and amikacin , respectively .The percentage of A .baumannii resistant to imipenem and meropenem was 63 .5% and 68 .2% ,respectively . The antimicrobial resistant pattern varied in different hospitals . The resistance of A . baumannii varied between different clinical departments .A number of pandrug resistant (PDR) (20 .0% ,1 567/7 827) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) (45 .0% , 3 521/7 827 ) A . baumannii were identified . Conclusions A . baumannii is the most popular pathogenic bacteria among Acinetobacter .The antibiotic resistance of A .baumannii is still increasing .Cefoperazone-sulbactam and minocycline has good in vitro antibacterial activity against A .baumannii .The antibiotic resistance of A .baumannii varies greatly with hospital and department .
4.CHINET 2012 surveillance of antibiotic resistance in Enterobacter spp .in China
Zhongju CHEN ; Ziyong SUN ; Zhidong HU ; Jin LI ; Lianhua WEI ; Ling WU ; Yingchun XU ; Xiaojiang ZHANG ; Yuanhong XU ; Jilu SHEN ; Chuanqing WANG ; Aimin WANG ; Yuxing NI ; Jingyong SUN ; Zhaoxia ZHANG ; Ping JI ; Fu WANG ; Demei ZHU ; Fupin HU ; Yunzhuo CHU ; Chao ZHUO ; Danhong SU ; Yunsong YU ; Jie LIN ; Hong ZHANG ; Jing KONG ; Yunjian HU ; Xiaoman AI ; Bin SHAN ; Yan DU
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2014;(5):387-391
Objective To investigate the distribution and antibiotic resistance of clinical Enterobacter isolates .Methods A total of 3 031 clinical strains of Enterobacter were collected from 15 hospitals from January 1 through December 31 , 2012 . Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with Kirby-Bauer or minimum inhibitory concentration method .The results were analyzed according to CLSI 2012 breakpoints .Results Enterobacter cloacae and Enterobacter aerogenes accounted for 73 .0% (2 212/3 031) and 23 .9% (725/3 031) of all the Enterobacter strains .The isolates of other Enterobacter species accounted for 3 .1% (94/3 031 ) . The main source of the isolates was respiratory tract specimen , accounting for 53 .2% (1 612/3 031) .Most (> 89% ) of the Enterobacter strains were resistant to cefazolin and cefoxitin . Generally ,54 .4% ,47 .5% and 34 .3% of the strains were resistant to cefuroxime ,cefotaxime and cefazidime ,respectively . About 6 .6% to 26 .3% of the strains were resistant to amikacin ,gentamicin ,piperacillin-tazobactam ,cefepime ,cefoperazone-sulbactam ,ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole .Imipenem ,meropenem and ertapenem showed the highest activity , to which only 3 .5% ,3 .7% and 10 .3% of the strains were resistant ,respectively .About 8 .9% (269/3 031) of the strains were resistant to at least imipenem ,meropenem or ertapenem .Four Enterobacter strains were extensive-drug resistant (XDR) .Conclusions The prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Enterobacter isolates decreased slightly in 2012 compared to the data in 2011 ,but the situation is still very serious .We should continue to take effective measures to control the resistant strains .
5.CHINET surveillance of distribution and susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates in 2012
Fupin HU ; Demei ZHU ; Fu WANG ; Yunsong YU ; Jie LIN ; Yunjian HU ; Xiaoman AI ; Zhidong HU ; Jin LI ; Yuanhong XU ; Jilu SHEN ; Hong ZHANG ; Jing KONG ; Zhaoxia ZHANG ; Ping JI ; Chuanqing WANG ; Aimin WANG ; Yuxing NI ; Jingyong SUN ; Ziyong SUN ; Zhongju CHEN ; Chao ZHUO ; Danhong SU ; Yingchun XU ; Xiaojiang ZHANG ; Lianhua WEI ; Ling WU ; Bin SHAN ; Yan DU ; Baiyi CHEN ; Yunzhuo CHU
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2014;(5):382-386
Objective To investigate the distribution and susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates in 2012 from CHINET surveillance .Methods Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out according to a unified protocol using Kirby-Bauer method or automated Systems .Results were analyzed according to the breakpoints of CLSI 2012 M100-S22 .Results A total of 1 499 CRE isolates were collected from January to December 2012 ,of which K lebsiella spp .,Enterobacter spp .and E .coli accounted for 63 .5% ,15 .1% and 13 .7% ,respectively .Of the 1 499 isolates , 48 .2% and 29 .3% were from respiratory tract and ICU , respectively . The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that the resistance rate of CRE isolates to most antimicrobial agents was 70 .0%-100% except amikacin (46 .9% ) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (49 .8% ) .CRE isolates from adults were more resistant to ciprofloxacin ,aminoglycosides and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole than those from children .Conclusions The antibiotic resistance of CRE isolates is very high . The spread of CRE strains in a specific region such as ICU and neurosurgery ward poses a serious threat to clinical practice and implies the importance of strengthening infection control .
6.CHINET 2014 surveillance of bacterial resistance in China
Fupin HU ; Demei ZHU ; Fu WANG ; Xiaofei JIANG ; Yingchun XU ; Xiaojiang ZHANG ; Zhaoxia ZHANG ; Ping JI ; Yi XIE ; Mei KANG ; Chuanqing WANG ; Aimin WANG ; Yuanhong XU ; Jilu SHEN ; Ziyong SUN ; Zhongju CHEN ; Jingyong SUN ; Sufei TIAN ; Jin LI ; Hong ZHANG ; Jing KONG ; Yunjian HU ; Xiaoman AI ; Chao ZHUO ; Danhong SU
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2015;(5):401-410
Objective To investigate the susceptibility and resistance of clinical isolates from hospitals in several regions of China .Methods Fifteen general hospitals and two children′s hospitals were involved in this program . Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out according to a unified protocol using Kirby‐Bauer method or automated systems .Results were analyzed according to CLSI 2014 breakpoints .Results A total of 78 955 clinical isolates were collected from January to December 2014 ,of which gram negative organisms and gram positive cocci accounted for 72 .6% and 27 .4% ,respectively . Methicillin‐resistant strains in S .aureus(MRSA)and coagulase negative Staphylococcus(MRCNS)accounted for an average of 44 .6% and 83 .0 % ,respectively .The resistance rates of methicillin‐resistant strains to β‐lactams and other antimicrobial agents were much higher than those of methicillin‐susceptible strains .However ,92 .0% of MRSA strains were still susceptible to trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole ,while 85 .6% of MRCNS strains were susceptible to rifampin .No staphylococcal strains were found resistant to vancomycin ,teicoplanin or linezolid .In Enterococcus spp .,the resistance rates of E .f aecalis strains to most tested drugs (except chloramphenicol) were much lower than those of E . f aecium .Some strains of both species were resistant to vancomycin .Vancomycin resistant strains of E . f aecalis and E . f aecium were mainly V anA ,V anB or V anM type based on their phenotype or genotype .Regarding non‐meningitis S .pneumoniae strains ,the prevalence of penicillin‐susceptible S .pneumoniae strains isolated from both adults and children were higher than those isolated in 2013 ,but the prevalence of penicillin‐intermediate S . pneumoniae or penicillin‐resistant S . pneumoniae strains decreased . The prevalence of ESBLs producingstrainswas55.8% in E.coliand29.9% in Klebsiellaspp.(K.pneumoniaeand K.oxytoca)and24.0% in Proteus mirabilis isolates on average . ESBLs‐producing Enterobacteriaceae strains were more resistant than non‐ESBLs‐producing strains in terms of antibiotic resistance rates . The strains of Enterobacteriaceae were still highly susceptible to carbapenems .Overall less than 10 % of these strains were resistant to carbapenems . About 62 .4% and 66 .7% of Acinetobacter spp .(A .baumannii accounts for 93 .0 % ) strains were resistant to imipenem and meropenem ,respectively . Compared with the data of year 2013 ,extensively‐drug resistant strains in K . pneumoniae and A .baumannii increased . Conclusions The antibiotic resistance of clinical bacterial isolates is growing .The disseminated multi‐drug or pan‐drug resistant strains in a special region poses a serious threat to clinical practice and implies the importance of strengthening infection control .
7.CHINET 2011 surveillance of antibiotic resistance in Stenotrophomonas malto-philia in China
Xiaoman AI ; Yunjian HU ; Yunsong YU ; Qing YANG ; Yuxing NI ; Jingyong SUN ; Yingchun XU ; Xiaojiang ZHANG ; Ziyong SUN ; Zhongju CHEN ; Fu WANG ; Demei ZHU ; Fupin HU ; Chao ZHUO ; Danhong SU ; Yuanhong XU ; Jilu SHEN ; Bin SHAN ; Yan DU ; Lianhua WEI ; Ling WU ; Zhaoxia ZHANG ; Ping JI ; Chuanqing WANG ; Aimin WANG ; Bei JIA ; Wenxiang HUANG ; Hong ZHANG ; Jing KONG
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2014;(2):94-99
Objective To investigate the resistance of clinical Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates from 15 hospitals in several regions of China during 2011.Methods Fifteen repre-sentative general hospitals were involved in this program. Bacterial susceptibility testing was carried out by means of a unified protocol using Kirby-Bauer method and MIC determi-nation.Results were analyzed according to CLSI 2011 break-points.Results Majority (93.3%) of the 1 889 clinical strains of S.maltophilia were isolated from inpatients.On-ly 6.7% of the isolates were from outpatients.About 62.9% of these S .maltophilia strains were isolated from old patients whose age was 60 years or older.Only 8.2% of the strains were from the patients younger than 18 years old.Sputum and re-spiratory tract secretion were the most common specimen source,accounting for 82.6%.Another 4.2% isolates were from blood,abdominal fluid and other sterile body fluids.The percentage of the S .maltophilia strain resistant to trimethoprim-sul-famethoxazole,levofloxacin and minocycline was 16.6%,10.0% and 1.8%,respectively.The strains resistant to cefopera-zone-sulbactam accounted for 19.0%.About 37.1% of the strains isolated from blood or sterile body fluids were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole,significantly higher than the strains from urine or wound specimens (P < 0.01).Conclusions S.maltophilia strains are mainly isolated from inpatients.The most common source is sputum and other respiratory speci-mens.Most of the patients with S.maltophilia isolate are 60 years of age or older.The S.maltophilia strains are constitu-tively resistant to several antibacterial agents,but showed relatively lower resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole,levo-floxacin and minocycline.Cefoperazone-sulbactam is still active against these strains.The antimicrobial therapy targeting S. maltophilia infections should be selected cautiously according to the results of antimicrobial resistance surveillance.
8.Resistance profile ofSalmonella isolates in hospital across China:results from CHINET Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program, 2005-2014
Yunmin XU ; Yan DU ; Bin SHAN ; Chuanqing WANG ; Jianchang XUE ; Hong ZHANG ; Chun WANG ; Yingchun XU ; Xiaojiang ZHANG ; Ziyong SUN ; Cui JIAN ; Fu WANG ; Demei ZHU ; Qing YANG ; Yuxing NI ; Jingyong SUN ; Zhidong HU ; Jin LI ; Chao ZHUO ; Danhong SU ; Zhaoxia ZHANG ; Ping JI ; Yunsong YU ; Jie LIN ; Lianhua WEI ; Ling WU ; Yuanhong XU ; Jilu SHEN ; Yunjian HU ; Xiaoman AI ; Yunzhuo CHU ; Yi XIE ; Mei KANG ; Yanqiu HAN ; Sufang GUO ; Bei JIA ; Wenxiang HUANG
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2016;16(3):294-301
Objective To investigate the distribution and changing resistance proifle ofSalmonella isolates in hospitals across China during the period from January 2005 to December 2014.Methods Seventeen general hospitals and two children’s hospitals were involved in this program. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out by means of a unified protocol using Kirby-Bauer method or MIC determination. The results were analyzed according to CLSI 2014 breakpoints.Results The proportion ofSalmonella isolates increased with time from 0.2% in 2005 to 0.7% in 2014. A total of 3 478Salmonella strains were collected from 19 hospitals. The proportion ofSalmonella typhimurium andSalmonella enteritidis was 27.4% and 24.4%, respectively. During the 10-year period, theSalmonella strains showed highest resistance rate to ampicillin (33.3%-64.8%), but low resistance to cefoperazone-sulbactam (0-5.3%) and ciprofloxacin (2.4%-14.3%).S. typhimurium showed higher resistance rate thanS. typhi,S. paratyphi andS. enteritidis. About 76.8% and 50.5% ofS. typhimurium were resistant to ampicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The average prevalence of multi-drug resistantSalmonellawas 3.9% in the ten-year period, the highest (7.5%) was in 2005, the lowest (1.5%) in 2013.Conclusions During the period from 2004 to 2015, majority of theSalmonella isolates in hospitals across China wasS. typhimurium andS. enteritidis. Ampicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are no longer appropriate for empirical treatment ofS. typhimurium infection due to high resistance rate.Salmonella isolates are relatively more susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins and quinolones. Ongoing monitoring is necessary to identify multi-drug resistant strains ofSalmonella.
9.Changing resistance proifle ofProteus, Serratia, Citrobacter, Morganella andProvidencia isolates in hospitals across China:data from CHINET Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program 2005-2014
Jin LI ; Zhidong HU ; Fu WANG ; Demei ZHU ; Fupin HU ; Ziyong SUN ; Zhongju CHEN ; Yi XIE ; Mei KANG ; Yingchun XU ; Xiaojiang ZHANG ; Zhaoxia ZHANG ; Ping JI ; Chuanqing WANG ; Aimin WANG ; Yuxing NI ; Jingyong SUN ; Yunsong YU ; Jie LIN ; Yunzhuo CHU ; Sufei TIAN ; Yuanhong XU ; Jilu SHEN ; Bin SHAN ; Yan DU ; Chao ZHUO ; Danhong SU ; Hong ZHANG ; Jing KONG ; Lianhua WEI ; Ling WU ; Yunjian HU ; Xiaoman AI ; Yanqiu HAN ; Sufang GUO ; Qing YANG ; Bei JIA ; Wenxing HUANG
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2016;16(3):284-293
Objective To understand the changing resistance proifle ofProteus,Serratia,Citrobacter,Morganella andProvidencia in hospitals across China according to the data from CHINET Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program 2005-2014.Methods Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by using Kirby-Bauer method or automatic minimum inhibitory concentration determination according to a uniifed protocol.Results A total of 21 663 clinical isolates were collected from January 2005 to December 2014. The proportion ofProteus andSerratia isolates increased with time from 1.41% in 2005 to 2.09% in 2014, and from 0.99% in 2005 to 1.28% in 2014 among all the isolates. No change was found for the proportion ofCitrobacter,Morganella, orProvidencia. Less than 10% of theProteus isolates were resistant to cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefoxitin, amikacin and tigecycline. Less than 10% of theSerratia isolates were resistant to cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, amikacin and tigecycline. Less than 20% of theCitrobacter isolates were resistant to cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, amikacin and tigecycline. Less than 10% of theMorganella isolates were resistant to cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, amikacin and tigecycline. Less than 20% of theProvidencia isolates were resistant to cefoperazone-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, cefoxitin and tigecycline.Conclusions The antibiotic resistance ofProteus,Serratia, Citrobacter,Morganella andProvidencia isolates in hospitals across China is growing during the period from 2005 to 2014. Strengthening infection control and rational antibiotic use are effective to slow the growth of drug resistance.
10.Antibiotic resistance profile of Enterobacter in hospitals across China:data from CHINET Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program from 2005 through 2014
Lei TIAN ; Zhongju CHEN ; Ziyong SUN ; Yingchun XU ; Xiaojiang ZHANG ; Yuxing NI ; Jingyong SUN ; Fu WANG ; Demei ZHU ; Yuanhong XU ; Jilu SHEN ; Hong ZHANG ; Jing KONG ; Qing YANG ; Lianhua WEI ; Ling WU ; Zhidong HU ; Jin LI ; Chuanqing WANG ; Aimin WANG ; Chao ZHUO ; Danhong SU ; Yi XIE ; Mei KANG ; Bin SHAN ; Yan DU ; Zhaoxia ZHANG ; Ping JI ; Yunjian HU ; Xiaoman AI ; Yunzhuo CHU ; Sufei TIAN ; Bei JIA ; Wenxiang HUANG ; Yunsong YU ; Jie LIN ; Yanqiu HAN ; Sufang GUO
Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2016;16(3):275-283
Objective To investigate the distribution and antibiotic resistance proifle of clinicalEnterobacter isolates using the data from CHINET during the period from 2005 through 2014.Methods A total of 20 558 clinical strains ofEnterobacter spp. were collected from 2005 to 2014 in CHINET Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with Kirby-Bauer or minimum inhibitory concentration method. The results were analyzed according to CLSI 2014 breakpoints.ResultsEnterobacter cloacae andEnterobacter aerogenes accounted for 71.1% (14 617/20558) and 20.1% (4 129/20 558) of all theEnterobacterisolates, respectively. The proportion ofEnterobacter spp. increased with time from 3.5% in 2005 to 4.3% in 2014. The main source of the isolates was respiratory tract, accounting for 55.2% (11 358/20 558). More than 90% of theEnterobacterisolates were resistant to cefazolin and cefoxitin, but less than 30% of the strains were resistant to cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoperazone-sulbactam, amikacin, gentamicin, ciprolfoxacin, meropenem, imipenem and ertapenem. TheEnterobacterisolates showed a trend of declining resistance to most antibiotics except ertapenem and meropenem. The resistance proifle ofEnterobacterisolates varied with departments where they were isolated. The strains from ICU and Department of Surgery were relatively more resistant to antibiotics. The prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains was decreasing, but the prevalence of carbapenem-resistantEnterobacter (CRE, resistant to any of imipenem, meropenem or ertapenem) was increasing. The MDR and CRE strains were primarily isolated from ICU and Department of Surgery. At least 30% of the MDREnterobacter strains were resistant to any of the antimicrobial agents tested except meropenem, imipenem and ertapenem and at least 35% of the CRE strains were resistant to any of the antimicrobial agents tested except amikacin and ciprolfoxacin.Conclusions TheEnterobacter isolates in CHINET Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program showed decreasing resistance to most of the antimicrobial agents tested since 2011, but the prevalence of CRE strains increased progressively. Effective measures should be carried out to prevent the spread of CRE strains in hospitals.