1.PILL series. What is my ideal diabetes target?
Choon How HOW ; Ngai Kin Christopher CHANG
Singapore medical journal 2012;53(12):778-quiz p. 781
Diabetes mellitus is common in our increasingly affluent and ageing population. Although it is an old friend of practising family physicians, there is a need to be familiar with and up to date about the disease. As patients become more informed and receptive to current medical information, family physicians also need to stay current. This article highlights the evidences that have shaped our current treatment targets for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
;
blood
;
therapy
;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
;
blood
;
therapy
;
Family Practice
;
methods
;
Glycated Hemoglobin A
;
metabolism
;
Humans
;
Physicians, Family
2.Limb-shaking transient ischemic attack with distal micro-embolic signals and impaired cerebrovascular reactivity using transcranial Doppler.
Deidre Anne De SILVA ; Moi-Pin LEE ; Meng-Cheong WONG ; Hui-Meng CHANG ; Christopher L H CHEN
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2008;37(7):619-620
Carotid Artery, Internal
;
diagnostic imaging
;
Cerebrovascular Disorders
;
diagnostic imaging
;
physiopathology
;
Extremities
;
physiopathology
;
Humans
;
Ischemic Attack, Transient
;
complications
;
diagnostic imaging
;
drug therapy
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Middle Cerebral Artery
;
diagnostic imaging
;
Thromboembolism
;
diagnostic imaging
;
physiopathology
;
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial
4.Comparative Review of the Socioeconomic Burden of Lower Back Pain in the United States and Globally
Diana CHANG ; Austin LUI ; Alisa MATSOYAN ; Michael SAFAEE ; Henry ARYAN ; Christopher AMES
Neurospine 2024;21(2):487-501
Internationally, the United States (U.S.) cites the highest cost burden of low back pain (LBP). The cost continues to rise, faster than the rate of inflation and overall growth of health expenditures. We performed a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed and non– peer-reviewed literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for contemporary data on prevalence, cost, and projected future costs. Policymakers in the U.S. have long attempted to address the high-cost burden of LBP through limiting low-value services and early imaging. Despite these efforts, costs (~$40 billion; ~$2,000/patient/yr) continue to rise with increasing rates of unindicated imaging, high rates of surgery, and subsequent revision surgery without proper trial of non-pharmacologic measures and no corresponding reduction in LBP prevalence. Globally, the overall prevalence of LBP continues to rise largely secondary to a growing aging population. Cost containment methods should focus on careful and comprehensive clinical assessment of patients to better understand when more resource-intensive interventions are indicated.
5.Comparative Review of the Socioeconomic Burden of Lower Back Pain in the United States and Globally
Diana CHANG ; Austin LUI ; Alisa MATSOYAN ; Michael SAFAEE ; Henry ARYAN ; Christopher AMES
Neurospine 2024;21(2):487-501
Internationally, the United States (U.S.) cites the highest cost burden of low back pain (LBP). The cost continues to rise, faster than the rate of inflation and overall growth of health expenditures. We performed a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed and non– peer-reviewed literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for contemporary data on prevalence, cost, and projected future costs. Policymakers in the U.S. have long attempted to address the high-cost burden of LBP through limiting low-value services and early imaging. Despite these efforts, costs (~$40 billion; ~$2,000/patient/yr) continue to rise with increasing rates of unindicated imaging, high rates of surgery, and subsequent revision surgery without proper trial of non-pharmacologic measures and no corresponding reduction in LBP prevalence. Globally, the overall prevalence of LBP continues to rise largely secondary to a growing aging population. Cost containment methods should focus on careful and comprehensive clinical assessment of patients to better understand when more resource-intensive interventions are indicated.
6.Comparative Review of the Socioeconomic Burden of Lower Back Pain in the United States and Globally
Diana CHANG ; Austin LUI ; Alisa MATSOYAN ; Michael SAFAEE ; Henry ARYAN ; Christopher AMES
Neurospine 2024;21(2):487-501
Internationally, the United States (U.S.) cites the highest cost burden of low back pain (LBP). The cost continues to rise, faster than the rate of inflation and overall growth of health expenditures. We performed a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed and non– peer-reviewed literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for contemporary data on prevalence, cost, and projected future costs. Policymakers in the U.S. have long attempted to address the high-cost burden of LBP through limiting low-value services and early imaging. Despite these efforts, costs (~$40 billion; ~$2,000/patient/yr) continue to rise with increasing rates of unindicated imaging, high rates of surgery, and subsequent revision surgery without proper trial of non-pharmacologic measures and no corresponding reduction in LBP prevalence. Globally, the overall prevalence of LBP continues to rise largely secondary to a growing aging population. Cost containment methods should focus on careful and comprehensive clinical assessment of patients to better understand when more resource-intensive interventions are indicated.
7.Comparative Review of the Socioeconomic Burden of Lower Back Pain in the United States and Globally
Diana CHANG ; Austin LUI ; Alisa MATSOYAN ; Michael SAFAEE ; Henry ARYAN ; Christopher AMES
Neurospine 2024;21(2):487-501
Internationally, the United States (U.S.) cites the highest cost burden of low back pain (LBP). The cost continues to rise, faster than the rate of inflation and overall growth of health expenditures. We performed a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed and non– peer-reviewed literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for contemporary data on prevalence, cost, and projected future costs. Policymakers in the U.S. have long attempted to address the high-cost burden of LBP through limiting low-value services and early imaging. Despite these efforts, costs (~$40 billion; ~$2,000/patient/yr) continue to rise with increasing rates of unindicated imaging, high rates of surgery, and subsequent revision surgery without proper trial of non-pharmacologic measures and no corresponding reduction in LBP prevalence. Globally, the overall prevalence of LBP continues to rise largely secondary to a growing aging population. Cost containment methods should focus on careful and comprehensive clinical assessment of patients to better understand when more resource-intensive interventions are indicated.
8.Comparative Review of the Socioeconomic Burden of Lower Back Pain in the United States and Globally
Diana CHANG ; Austin LUI ; Alisa MATSOYAN ; Michael SAFAEE ; Henry ARYAN ; Christopher AMES
Neurospine 2024;21(2):487-501
Internationally, the United States (U.S.) cites the highest cost burden of low back pain (LBP). The cost continues to rise, faster than the rate of inflation and overall growth of health expenditures. We performed a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed and non– peer-reviewed literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for contemporary data on prevalence, cost, and projected future costs. Policymakers in the U.S. have long attempted to address the high-cost burden of LBP through limiting low-value services and early imaging. Despite these efforts, costs (~$40 billion; ~$2,000/patient/yr) continue to rise with increasing rates of unindicated imaging, high rates of surgery, and subsequent revision surgery without proper trial of non-pharmacologic measures and no corresponding reduction in LBP prevalence. Globally, the overall prevalence of LBP continues to rise largely secondary to a growing aging population. Cost containment methods should focus on careful and comprehensive clinical assessment of patients to better understand when more resource-intensive interventions are indicated.
9.Estimating the Contribution of Acute Gastroenteritis to the Overall Prevalence of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Eric D SHAH ; Mark S RIDDLE ; Christopher CHANG ; Mark PIMENTEL
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2012;18(2):200-204
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies reveal that acute gastroenteritis can precipitate irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms leading to the concept of post-infectious IBS. However, the overall contribution of gastroenteritis to the total IBS prevalence is unknown. In this exercise we try to estimate the contribution of gastroenteritis in IBS using the published literature and a longitudinal approach. METHODS: Existing literature was reviewed to determine the incidence of IBS after gastroenteritis, the rate of remission over time, data on rates of gastroenteritis in a given population and any patterns of resistance to these effects in human populations. This produced 3 models. The first assumed all humans were susceptible to gastroenteritis and its ability to produce IBS. The second assumed (using meta-analysis data) that 90% of humans in a given outbreak would be resistant to this effect. The third model used a high gastroenteritis exposure rate as might be seen in military deployment. RESULTS: In model 1, the prevalence was unrealistically high with an eventual steady state of 43.6% of the population affected by IBS. In a very conservative approach (model 2), steady state was achieved after 10 years to an overall prevalence of 8.9%. Interestingly, based on a high 1 year exposure rate such as military deployment, the maximum prevalence (steady state) was reached before 1 year suggesting high risk. CONCLUSIONS: Although hypothetical in approach, based on conservative estimates in existing literature the contribution of gastroenteritis to the overall prevalence of IBS is substantial.
Gastroenteritis
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
;
Military Personnel
;
Prevalence
10.Recorded Lower Esophageal Pressures as a Function of Electronic Sleeve Placement and Location of Gastric Pressure Measurement in Patients With Hiatal Hernia.
Benjamin BASSERI ; Mark PIMENTEL ; Christopher CHANG ; Edy E SOFFER ; Jeffrey L CONKLIN
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2013;19(4):479-484
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In high-resolution manometry lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) is measured relative to intragastric pressure, however Gastric Marker(TM) (GM) location used to determine resting LESP is not well established with hiatal hernia (HH). We test the hypothesis that measured resting LESP varies with HH based on GM location. METHODS: Subjects with HH > or = 2 cm were included. The eSleeve(TM) was adjusted to span only the LES, excluding the crural diaphragm (CD). Resting LESP was determined by placing the GM below and above the CD (in the position yielding the highest resting LESP). Resting pressure across the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to CD and pressure in the HH relative to subdiaphragmatic intragastric pressure were also measured. RESULTS: HH > or = 2 cm was present in 98 patients (mean length 2.7 cm). LESP decreased when GM was moved from below the CD into the HH: respiratory minimum LESP 7.5 +/- 1.1 to 3.6 +/- 0.9 mmHg; P < 0.001, mean LESP 17.7 +/- 1.3 to 13.7 +/- 1.1 mmHg; P < 0.001. When the eSleeve encompassed the LES and CD, the respiratory minimum pressure was 12.2 +/- 0.9 mmHg and mean pressure was 23.9 +/- 1.0 mmHg pressure (P < 0.001 for both). Pressure in the hernia pouch was greater than intragastric pressure: respiratory minimum 3.0 +/- 0.7 mmHg and mean 9.0 +/- 0.8 mmHg (P < 0.001 for both). pH studies showed a trend toward an association between abnormal distal esophagus acid exposure and lower resting LESP. CONCLUSIONS: GM placement in the HH produces lower resting LESPs. This may provide a more physiologic representation of LESP in HH.
Catheters
;
Diaphragm
;
Esophageal Sphincter, Lower
;
Esophagus
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux
;
Hernia
;
Hernia, Hiatal*
;
Humans
;
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
;
Manometry