1.Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Neurological Patients With an Injectable Elastomer Prosthesis: Preliminary Results.
Julien RENARD ; Marco CITERI ; Lucia ZANOLLO ; Chiara GUERRER ; Luigi RIZZATO ; Luca FREDIANI ; Christophe ISELIN ; Michele SPINELLI
International Neurourology Journal 2017;21(1):75-79
Many treatment options for stress urinary incontinence are difficult to apply to neurological patients. Urolastic is a new agent that is primarily indicated for women with mild stress urinary incontinence or men after prostate surgery. In this report, we present a series of 5 cases describing the first use of Urolastic to treat neurological patients. All patients were evaluated with a voiding diary and the use of auxiliary devices as the main indicators of continence. The median operative time was 30.8 minutes, and no complications were observed. Of the 5 patients, 4 reported improved incontinence: 2 switched from diapers to small pads, while the other 2 patients were able to discontinue urinary condom use. The only instance of treatment failure occurred in a patient with a low-compliance bladder. The advantages of this procedure appear to include a soft-cuff effect, reversibility, and minimal invasiveness. However, a future randomized study would be necessary to validate this treatment option.
Condoms
;
Elastomers*
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Operative Time
;
Prostate
;
Prostheses and Implants*
;
Treatment Failure
;
Urinary Bladder
;
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic
;
Urinary Incontinence*
;
Urinary Incontinence, Stress
2.Working Towards Accreditation by the International Standards Organization 15189 Standard: How to Validate an In-house Developed Method an Example of Lead Determination in Whole Blood by Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.
Carine GARCIA HEJL ; Jose Manuel RAMIREZ ; Philippe VEST ; Denis CHIANEA ; Christophe RENARD
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2014;34(5):367-371
Laboratories working towards accreditation by the International Standards Organization (ISO) 15189 standard are required to demonstrate the validity of their analytical methods. The different guidelines set by various accreditation organizations make it difficult to provide objective evidence that an in-house method is fit for the intended purpose. Besides, the required performance characteristics tests and acceptance criteria are not always detailed. The laboratory must choose the most suitable validation protocol and set the acceptance criteria. Therefore, we propose a validation protocol to evaluate the performance of an in-house method. As an example, we validated the process for the detection and quantification of lead in whole blood by electrothermal absorption spectrometry. The fundamental parameters tested were, selectivity, calibration model, precision, accuracy (and uncertainty of measurement), contamination, stability of the sample, reference interval, and analytical interference. We have developed a protocol that has been applied successfully to quantify lead in whole blood by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS). In particular, our method is selective, linear, accurate, and precise, making it suitable for use in routine diagnostics.
Accreditation
;
Humans
;
Laboratories/standards
;
Lead/*blood/standards
;
Reference Standards
;
*Spectrophotometry, Atomic/standards
;
*Validation Studies as Topic